• No results found

Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1919-1920

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1919-1920"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

GREELEY FACTORY

THE GR"E~.T

WESTERN

SUGAR

COMPANY

Coples

to:

-General

Chemist.

Chief

Engineer.

Asst.

Chief

Engineer

.

Manager

.

S

uparintenden t.

Traw

ling

Ch mist

.

Laboratory.

(2)

ANALYSIS

OF

/

CITY

~~TER••·••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAGE l

2-

RI

VIB WATER

••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAG

E

2

LID

PIPE

W

.>i

TER FROM COND

ENSER

OF

t'RB:E

PAN •••••••••••••••••••••••

PAGE

3

Lm

PIPE

WATER FROM

CONDENSER

O

F

GROSSES

•••••••••••••••••••••••••

P.AGE

4

LID PIPE

WATER

FROM

CONDENSER

OF EV'l.POR

A

TORS:

RIVER

••••••••••••••

PAGE

5

LEG PIPE WATER FR

O

M CONDENSER

OF

EVAPORATORS: CITY

••••••••••••••• PAGE

6

/()

IMPURE BA.TTERY SOPPLY

•••••••

~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAGE

7

9

PURE

BATTERY suPPLY

••••••••••••••••••••••••••• •.• •••••••••••••••••

PAGE

8

7

WATER USED

FOR WASH

I

NG

HOT

PRF...SSES•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAGE

9

-~

WHITE

PAN COIL DRIPS•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAGE

JQ

-

' /

BOILER FEEID

••••••••••••• ~••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAGE

11

~

WATER

IN BOILERS•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••PAGE

12

(3)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPAN't

---1

G8...,s;Rl.-.llE--.i:.E

e-.

I,.1c~

---

E-.Y

- - - -

__

Factory

__

_ ---

Fe

bru

a.

r_y 20-.

Kind of Water:

CITY

WATER

Description of Sample:

Average

for the campaign.

Source of Water:

'.l

ater

t

a

ken from

the cach

e

l

a

pouci:t'e

Ri

V

er

about

fourteen miles

above

the city

of Ft.

Collins.

ANALYSIS Silica Si01 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO Parm Per 100,000

l.78

.10

1.39

.36

,35

.32

.o4

3.24

a.32

HYPOTHETICAL COM131NA TIONS

Silica Si09

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04 Sodium Carbonate Na.C03 Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

F enous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile lby difference} TOT AL SOLIDS

__

192_o__

Parm Per 100,000

l.78

,

o53

.06

.2e

1.25

..

,,

3.47

.21

7.58

.74

e.32

Genffal Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. A1St. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

PAGE

l

____ (

1~

/_/

' ~ ~

-.)_,,

(4)

G

R

E E

I,

E-Y._

_ _ _

_

Factory

Kind of Water:

RIVER

WATER

Descripti,m of Sample:

Average

for

the carrrpa ign.

Source of Water:

Inlet to factory

pumps.

Below

Eaton factory

drain

and Windsor

factory

drain but

above

Greeley

factory drain. Below city sewers of

Ft

.

Collins,

Windsor, Eaton

and

ureeley.

ANALYSIS Silica Sio. Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Part. Per 100,000

3.66

.18

18.97

8.40

15.49

3.75

76.45

18.59

145.49

13.41

158.90

PAGE 2

HYPOTHETICAL COM81NA TIONS

Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na,S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium. Chloride CaCl2

Calcium. Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

41.57

22.69

30.69

.37

145.49

13.41

158.90

~

~

~

.

.

L,A/h,,O

•· - .. · Chief Chemi,t.

(5)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

G R E

E__L__E_?'

_

_

Factory

Kind of Water:

LEG PIPE

WATER

FROM CONDENSER OF

\7

HITE PAN.

Descripti,;,n of Sample:

Average for the campaign.

Source of Water:

River

water

from Main River

Water

Taruc and

Condensation from

White

pan

Vapors.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO Puta Per 100,000

2.56

.14

15.45

8.43

15.48

3.59

73.88

15.09

134.62

15.76

150.38

HYPOTHETICAL COM8INATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03 Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

_

192.G.___

Parts Per 100,000

2.56

5.92

40.61

41073

18.59

24.92

.29

134.62

15176

150.38

r Geural Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

PAGE

3

J.

_c/:_

~

(6)

_ _ _

G...JLE__E_

_

L

_

E Y

_

Factory

Fe bxuary 2.0'j:

Kind of Water: Description of Sample: Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

LEG PIPE

W

ATER FROM CONDENSER OF GROSSES

AT

e

rage for the campaign.

River w

a

ter from

RiTer

water

Tank

a

nd Condens

a

.tion from Grosses.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parta Per 100,000

Si02

3.14

Silica Si02

Fe

.27

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca

18.21

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Mg

a.47

Sodium Carbonate Na

2C03

Na

15.28

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Cl

3.59

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

so.

76.79

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

C03

17.38

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

143.13

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

14.73

157 86

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

_

192~

Pam Per I 00,000

3.14

5.92

39099

41.92

23.10

28.50

.56

143013

14.73

157.86

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt.

Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

PAGE 4

~L~wa

(7)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

_

_

_

____.,G...._..R

~

E-E

-

.L--E-4-

~

_Factory

February_ 20,.

_

_

192_Q__

Kind of Water:

LEG PIPE

WATER

FB.OM CONDENSER

OF

EVAPORATORS: RIVER.

Description of Sample:

ATerage

for

the

campaign,

Source 01 Water:

River

Water and

Condensation from

&th Effect

Evaporator

.

Also a

possible

mixture

with

city

water.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid 504

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

Genrral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory HYPOTHETICAL COMBlNATIONS Parll Per 100,000

3.42

Silica Si02

.13

Sodium Chloride NaCl

16.51

Sodium Sulphate Na2SO,

7.50

Sodium Carbonate Na2C00

13.89

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

3.07

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

66.84

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

17.14

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

128.50

12.60

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

141.10

TOT AL SOLIDS

PAGE 5

Pull Per 100,000

3.42

5.06

36.75

.37

.12

17.53

28.35

.27

120.50

l2.6Q

141.10

(8)

Factory

February

20,

_192

_

0

_

Kind of Water:

LEG PIPE

WA

TER FROM CONDENSER OF EVAPORATORS: CITY.

DescriptiQn of Sample: Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

ATerage

for th

e

campaign.

City

wat

e

r

and Condensation from 5th Effect Vapors. Also a

possible mixture with Riv

e

r Water.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parr. Per !00,000

SiO,

2.00

Silica Si00

Fe

014

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Ca

2.35

Sodium Sulphate Na2SO,

Mg

.74

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Na

1.91

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Cl

.58

Magnesium Sulphate MgS0

4

so,

4.06

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

CO:i

4.95

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

F enous Carbonate FeC03

16.73

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

2!17

18.90

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO Genrral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

PAGE 6

Parr. Per 100,000

2.00

.96

4.72

1.09

1.80

5.87

.29

16.73

2.17

18.90

(9)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

_ _ _ _ _

___.,,G.___..,R.__.E __E_L

_

E_

Y

_

Factory

February 20,

_

192

_

o

~

Kind of Water:

IMPURE BATTERY SUPPLY

DescriptiQn of Sample:

Average

for

the campaign•

Source of Water:

Le

g

pipe

w

a

ter

River

Condenser

of Ev

a

porators

and

overflo

w

from

Pure Battery

Supply.

ANALYSIS Silica Si01 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so

.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic a11d Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO Parb Per I 00,000

2.62

.13

6.00

2.77

4.76

1.37

21.90

7.33

46.88

6.18

53.06

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na8S04

Sodium Carbonate Na,CO,. Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 Magnesium Carbonate MgCO,.

Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC08

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO,.

Organic and Volatile lby difference) TOT AL SOLIDS Parb Per 100,000

2.62

2.26

11.95

13.71

4.08

11.99

.27

46.88

G.le

53.06

Genrral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

PAGE 7

1,(/

(10)

- - - - -

-G-...R.,____..,E,_...E~ E Y

_

factory

Febr~l._

20,

Kind of Water:

PURE BATTERY SUPPLY

DescriptiQn of Sample:

ATerage

for the

campaisne

Source of Water:

r.,e

g

Pipe

w

a

.

ter from First .t!l~por

a

tor Condenser and overflow

from Press

wash

Water T

a

nk.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO. Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO Part, p., I 00,000

1.04

.oe

2.04

077

1.2a

.63

4.38

3.44

13.66

3.66

17.32

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2SO,

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile lby difference} TOT AL SOLIDS

_

192

0

_

_

Part, Per 100,000

1.04

1.04

2.69

3.21

.42

5o09

.17

13.66

3.66

17.32

Gen~ral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

PAGE 8

J.

V

~fr;;vMJ

(11)

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

---G-lLE...E--L-E-Y

-

_

Factory

February 20,

_ _

192~-Kind of Water:

WATER USED FOR

WASHING

HOT PRESSES.

Descripti<>n of Sample:

Average

for the campaign.

Source of Water:

Drips

f

rom First

Effect

,

from Raw

and ~hin

Juice

He

o.

ters,

and

from Blow Up, Bro

w

n

ra

n

and

Grosse Coils.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Sio. Iron Fe Calcium Ca Masnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid CO"

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt.

Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

Parll Per I 00,000 Parll Per 100,000

.48

Silica Si02

.48

.14

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.69

.48

Sodium Sulphate Na2SO•

.34

.17

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

.38

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

.42

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

.50

.63

Magnesium Carbonate MgCO:i

.24

1.04

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate Caso.

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

1.20

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

.29

3.74

3.74

2.38

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

2,38

6.12

TOT AL SOLIDS

6.12

PAGE 9

J~w

_

(12)

- - - -

---G--R---B--E

-

I.

E

Y

-

_

Factory

pebruary 20,

Kind of Water:

WHITE

p

,A.N

COIL DRIPS.

Description of Sample:

ATerage

for

the campaign.

Source of Water:

Condensation from Whit ~an Coils.

ANALYSIS Silica Si00 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Part, Per 100,000

.52

Silica Si02

.2a

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.34

Sodium Sulphate Na,SO,

.oa

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

.41

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

.37

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

.37

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

.98

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

F errou• Carbonate FeC03

3.35

2.33

Organic and Volatile {by difference)

5.68

TOT AL SOLIDS

PAGE 10

_

19f'

_ _

Parll Per 100,000

.52

.61

.52

.03

.24

.85

.58

3.35

2.~3

5.68

(13)

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

- - - ~

G..______...R_

E._

JLL E

Y.

__

.

Factory

_

Febru

a

ry

_

20

_

,

___

192_9_

,

Kind of Water:

BOILER FEED.

Description of Sample:

ATerage for the campaign.

Source of Water: Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid

Condensed Wator from the

s

team Uhests of 2nd,3rd, 4th and 5th Effects of

the Evaporators. ~rips from

W

hite pan Coils when Tr

a

ps are in use. Also

~ranulator Trap and Condensed

W

ater from

H

ot

W

ater He

a

t

e

r Uoils.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COM81NATIONS

Parla Per 100,000 Parla Per 100,000

SiO•

.30

Silica Si02

.30

Fe

.14

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.30

Ca

.27

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Mg

.11

Sodium Carbonate Na 2C03 Na

.12

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

.40

Cl

.48

Magnesium Sulphate MgS0 4

so.

.oo

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

.03

co

,

.57

Calcium Chloride CaCI2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

.67

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.29

1.99

1.99

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS

2.73

4.72

Organic and Volatile thy difference}

2.73

TOT AL SOLIDS

4.72

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

PAGE 11

C. / /!

1 ( /

VH>-i~

Chief Chemi,t.

(14)

_ __,

G~R_D

__

]L

L

_

EJ

Factory

F~bruary 20,

Kind of Water:

WATER

IN BOILERS.

DescriptiQn of Sample:

Aver

....

ge

for

the campaign.

SourceofWater:

Boiler

Feed

Wa

ter, Condensation

from White Pan

Coils and Uity

,'ater

.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

Gen~ral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Part, Per I 00,000

.24

Silica SiO,

.10

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.26

Sodium Sulphate Na,504

.oa

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

1.41

Magnesium Chloride MgCl

005

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

.22

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

2.36

Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

4.72

1.48

Organic and Volatile (by difference}'

6.20

TOT AL SOLIDS

PAGE 12

_

192

_

0

_

Ports Per 100,000

.24

.oe

.33

2.93

.28

.65

.21

4.72

J.~a

6.20

References

Related documents

The interaction of the myeloma cells with the ECM proteins and accessory cells (figure 3) has an established and piv- otal role in the pathogenesis of MM (Chauhan et al.,

Varkaris and Neuhofer (2017, p.4) highlights that the potential traveller uses social media in various stages of a trip including, before, during and after physical travel has

I hope that this systematic review will worth improving learning experiences for children with autism spectrum disorder by making teachers more aware of their roles and

H1 Variety in retailing is positively associated with the number of people employed in a local retail market H2 Variety in retailing has positive influence on the number of shops

Avoid and reduce waste Reuse waste Recycle waste Recover energy Treat waste Dispose waste Least preferable Waste management... Intro

Enligt KASAM kan individer som har tillgång till stöd från olika personer uppleva ökade känslor av hanterbarhet (Antonovsky, 2005). Psykosociala interventioner, såsom social

Sedan våren 2009, rullande ordförandeskap z Samarbete med fyra stadsdelsbibliotek: Rosengård, Lindängen, Bellevue

One contribution that this study will hopefully give to user experience design and future studies is that if researchers plan to develop a digital solution such as a