'
.
,
f l .''
- r- ·-;
Tig.,rt
Su
.
pply
Sitriatiori
For.
World
Siig·ar
Seeri
W ASHINGTO:-J", Dec. 3
(UPIJ - Administration farm -,-expe1;ts· ha\"e produced •·pro. jections" indicat;ng world
sug-ar supplies will remain in
tight balance with demand through at least 1980.
The -accuracy of that
fore-cast, which is viewed with
skepticism by some sugar
in-dustry groups, could play a
major role in determining
whether the Agriculture
De-partment is able to de\·elop
much support for its
con-troversial plan to abolish fed-eral sugar controls.
Department sources here . said a study by agency
tech-nicians indicates that under "ick>al" cooditions, world
sug-ar production by the 1979-80
season would increase 25 to 30
per ceot over the 1972-73 total
of 83.1 millioo tons. At the
same time, the study indi; cates, world sugar
consump-tion is estimated to increa...~
by the s1:1.me 25 to 30 per cent .
trom the 1972-i3 le\·el of 84.5
I
million tons. ~
! Experts said these esti- !
mates indicate that "while l
· sufficient sugar will be forth-
j
coming (to meet world needs),j
i
-
·significant buildup in stocks!
may not occur except underI
I
optimum conditions."j
Held C<m;;en-ative
I
·
One agriculture officialque-l · r i e d about the estimates
l
I
'
termed them cooservati\·e and'
~J~,~~iic;~
0o1e~~~~d
l~~~1
!~
I
· hampered by shortages of fuel
or capital for expensive new processing plants.
· 1' An industry official who
· asked not to be identified,
! however, .said it was "hard: to believe that (current high
prices) will not bring out
sub-stantially increased produc-!
,, I
~10n. i
"I just can't find any of our
. J people who think as the
de-I
·partment does that supplies ,· will remain tig!1t for a iong
"1l' time," the otiicial said.
Currently, SU!";ar prices are.
high because production has
been run.ning below demand
,
to,
me<aly,m
aadbu,ec1
·
r
_
·
~-
-~
~~~
-s
~
.
;._
~
-
~
-
'-:'.~
~
'
have been bidding up
avail-able stocks.
Agriculture Department
o!-!icial.s, believing the era o!
sugar surpluses may be pa.st, are seeking White Hou~
sup-port for a proposal under
which
a
40-year-old sugarcon-trol program would be
re-pealed after 1974.
Under a department plan,
Coogress would be asked to
al-low the old sugar act to expire
next year, throwing the U.S.
market open to Yirrually all
foreign and domestic
produc-ers on a free competitive
basis. ·
The plan, if accepted by the
White House and adopted by
Congress. would- protect the
income
ot
d-0mestic growersby .setting "target" prices and
.providing payments to farm-'
ers if open-market prices sag
below the target level