• No results found

Under The Sign of Regret

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Under The Sign of Regret"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

LUND UNIVERSITY PO Box 117 221 00 Lund +46 46-222 00 00

Under The Sign of Regret

Cesarco, Alejandro

2019

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):

Cesarco, A. (2019). Under The Sign of Regret. Malmö Faculty of Fine and Performing Arts, Lund University.

Total number of authors:

1

General rights

Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply:

Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.

• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.

• You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal

Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy

If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

(2)

Organization LUND UNIVERSITY

Document name

Date of issue

Author(s) Alejandro Cesarco Sponsoring organization Title and subtitle Under The Sign of Regret

Abstract

“Under the Sign of Regret” focuses on aesthetically mediated responses to regret. It interrogates the qualities of the feeling of regret as well as what is produced under its influence (as objects and as experiences). These two aims—considering regret as a mode and as a tool—hinge between two complementary definitions of aesthetics: on the one hand, the quality of feelings or the “distribution of the sensible”; and on the other hand the specific regime for identifying and reflecting on the arts.

My research looks at regret as an aesthetic mode and as a methodological tool. It recuperates the positive qualities of regret without overvaluing it as a great gain. This hovering between loss and gain sets up the research as a tactic against the achievement driven and production principled art-field.

The hypothesis is to consider regret as a generative force (one that seeds and propels forward), as a bittersweet drama of adjustments (between who we are and who we aspired to be, or between what we make and our shortcomings), and ultimately, as a way of questioning perspective itself (distance, visibility, point of view, and, most importantly, time).

After setting up a conceptual map of regret in the introductory chapter I turn my attention away from the psychological and sociological origins of regret towards its effects in the world, namely the effects it has as a creative force in the arts. I am arguing, on the one hand, that regret, as a sub-category of depression, is at the core of how the contemporary individual operates socially. And, on the other hand, I am making a distinction between feeling regret and using regret as a methodological drive.

Reading artistic forms and experiences through a lens of regret does not mean that the works analysed are about regret, or narrate a story of regret, but rather that they embody and thus help exemplify some of the traits, characteristics, and modes that emerge from considering regret conceptually.

I have identified two particular characteristics of producing under the sign of regret: suspended agency and ghostly haunting. Each of these characteristics are taken up in individual chapters that define and ground these modalities of production (principally through the methodologies and tropes employed in my own artistic practice as well as other selected examples), while continuing to mull over the different shades of meaning of regret as a generative force.

Key words Visual Art, Regret, Psychoanalysis, Affect Theory, Creativity, Aesthetics

Classification system and/or index terms (if any)

Supplementary bibliographical information Language English

ISSN and key title 1653-8617: 23 ISBN 978-91-7895-223-6

Recipient’s notes Number of pages Price

Security classification

I, the undersigned, being the copyright owner of the abstract of the above-mentioned dissertation, hereby grant to all reference sourcespermission to publish and disseminate the abstract of the above-mentioned dissertation.

References

Related documents

Re-examination of the actual 2 ♀♀ (ZML) revealed that they are Andrena labialis (det.. Andrena jacobi Perkins: Paxton & al. -Species synonymy- Schwarz & al. scotica while

Fuzzy Decision Making Using Max-Min Method and Minimization Of Regret Method(MMR)..

N O V ] THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, That the secretary-manager, officers, and directors of the National Reclamation }~ssociation are authorized and urged to support

Samtidigt som man redan idag skickar mindre försändelser direkt till kund skulle även denna verksamhet kunna behållas för att täcka in leveranser som

Faktumet att spelarna själva kommer till tals i stora delar av materialet från år 2002 och 2012 tyder dock på att skildringen av spel blivit något mer mångsidig och nyanserad än

We read the letter by Drs Blomstedt and Hariz titled “The Paper That Wrote Itself —A Ghost Story” 1 concerning out viewpoint article titled “Directional Leads for Deep

The third paper argues that, given that both know and regret are factive verbs as they both trigger the presupposition that the embedded proposition is true, a fundamental

He claims that the connection is - at least partly - governed by the saliency hierarchy (1977:76 ff). This hierarchy influences the speaker's perspective on the event, and