• No results found

Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1918-19

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1918-19"

Copied!
14
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

)

,

)

.AN41!YSIS OF

ATER

S.AJJIPLES

FOR

THE CAMPAIGN

1918-19

1

LOVELL FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGM COMPANY

Copies to: /

General Chemist v Traveling Chemist Chief Engineer

Aast. Chief Engineer Asst. Gen'l

Supt.

Super intendant Laboratory

(2)

ANALYBIS OF ,JLTBR ;:;i ,J,U>LE:S FUR TlW C,Jilll:>AIG - 1918-1919. 1w2 V ·'tH L __ J'~.C:T .El. Y

1 Bl, GEF:1/1 JDSTEfil.1 SU,J.n.:H C '/l:2Al'iY

---

---Sil::.ce.

Iron

CalciUl!l Magnesium Sodium Chlorine 3u1plmrie 11c.iC.. S10 2 Fe 0,1

Mg

Ho. Gl '04 2.00 .14 7.'17 1.10 Cal"bOnic Acirl

co

3

10,4fj

57.75

Organic t;; Vol at ilo J,L.tter

( by di£f'ere:uce) TO'.M.L S01I:PS

~ - Average Sample for the caJ.rrpaign.

s

OlliW.,,; -*~'ifOts}.:

Oity !iiain. direct from city sup.11ly t;;..nk. oa.mplo ta1c0n frorr: tz.~p L"l office building.

City 'a.ter was not used in any factory

o-po1•1:itions with the exception of on.ta time only w.b.on it \i/.;J.s used as a.11 emerc;ency ~'Upply to tLe boilers.

llYlOTl-J..l-::TlCAL OOi.llilN.tu 101-H;;i .AS S.Axg§,

~J:t_i::: no.x: 10.0.Qoo

Silica. Si02 2.00

Sodium Chloride NaCl 1.a1

Sodium St,lph.a te

na

2

So4

21.so

J!.l<:i.gi:tosiwn Su.l:phate MgSo

4 llo9::i

Calcium Su.lph.at,e 0a.S0

4 2,74

Co.ldum Ca.rbonate CaC03 l"l.18 Pe.rrous Carbonate FeC0

3

.g~

5'1.75 Orec.nic & Volatile .:Y!atter

{ by difference )

..

~

TOTAL SOLIDS

(3)

.ANALYSIS Oh' W.ti.TER S.aMPLES FOR THE C.AMP.aIGN 1918-1919

LOVELL FACTORY

THE GR.E.AT WESTERN SUGlili COMPANY

SHOSHONE

RIVER

warn

.al.'1.tl.LYS IS HYPOTHETIC....L 00.Mli.INJ.TIUNS

as

SaLTS

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric .Acid Carbonic .Acid

Org~nic & Volatile

S10 2 Fe Ca Mg Na Cl S04 003

Matter (by difference) TmAL SOLIDS Parts per 100,000 2.02 .17 7.80 2.28 7.95 1.10 26.38 10.45 58.15

4.87

63.02

S.i,.MPL"E;

-

.average sample for the Can[>aign. §.Q:UBCE· - Shoshone River (Factory Intake)

Main source of supply for all factory operetions.

.Parts per 100,000

Silica SiO 2 2o02

Sodium Chloride NaCl 1.81

Sodium Sulphate Ifa2S04 22.36

lTa.gm, s ium Su.lpha te 11gS04 11.29

Calciwn Su.lpba.te CaS04 3.19

Calcium Carbonate CaCo3 17.13

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03 ,35

.58.15 Organic & Volatile Matter

{by cHfference~

T-ar..AL SOLIDS

41§7

63.02

LOVELL SHOSHONE RIVER W.aT.ER

(4)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR THE Cii.M.'PAIGN 1918-1919

LOVELL FACTORY

THE GR:c..ii'.l: \7EST.i!ldN SUG.uR COMP.ANY

l!'IW:.ERED II.ATER (BR.INKING \'ATER)

.ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL OOlIBINATIONS AS SALTS

Barts per 100,000 Silica Si02 2.43 Iron Fe .37 Calcium Ca 7.81 Magnesium :Mg 2o30 Sodium Na a.21 Chlorine 01 1.11 &'ulphuric Acid

so

4 26.52 Carbonic Acid

co

10.~7 3 59072

Organic & Vela tile 1vratter

(by differenceO 3.58

TOT.AL SOLIDS .§.3.30

SAMPLE:- Average sample for the campaign. SOURCE;- Shoshone river water filtered through

sand filter, hailed and cooled.

*N2.,t.e; ~iltered water was not used in factory operations. Used for drinking pur-poses and cooling pump bearings.

~rts per

100,000

Silica Si0

2 2.43

Sodium Chloride NaCl lo83

Sodium Sulphate Na

2

so

4 23.13

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 11.38

Calcium Sulpl)B.te CaS0

4 2.55

Calcium ?arbonate

ea.co

3 17.63

ferrous Carbonate

JleCo

3 ,.77

59. 72 Organic & Volatile Matter

(by differenceO 3168

TOTAL SOLIDS

(5)

LEGPIPE WAT.ER FROM CONDENSER OF .PAN "A'' {\'/Hl'.l!E) AliTALYS IS Silica Sio2 Iron Fe Calcium Ca IV:agnesiwn ]ffg Sodium Na Chlorine 01 Sulphuric .Acid. S04 Carbonic Acid 003

Organic & Vo lat i:J. e lf.ia tter

(by differeroe) TOTii.L SOLIDS Parts per 100,000 1,48 .27 7.06 7,88 1.12 27,69 8.,45 56,20

SAMPLE;- Average sample for the campaign.

HYPOTHETIC.AL COMBIN.t:.TIOHS S Si:..LTS

!'arts ner 100,000

Silica Si0

2 1,48

Sodium Chloride NaCl l,85

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04 22.08

Magnesium Sulphate l\1IgS0 4 11.14

Calcium Sulphate CaS04 5,48

Calcium Carbonate CaC0

3 13.61

Ferrous Carbonate 1'1

eC03 1QQ

56,20 Organic & Volatile Matter

(by difference) 3272

Till.AL SOLIDS 59.92

SOURCE;- Shoshone River 1-/ater from the main water supply tank. Condensed vapors from \/hi te Pan Liquors.

LEG.PIPE 11.A.TE.R FROM CONDENSER OF .l?il.N 11A11 ( ,1,HITE)

(6)

ANALYSIS OF VI.ATER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919

L O

V E

L

L F.ACTORY

THE GREAT vESTERN

s ~

COMP.ANY

.J,EGPil?E WATER FROM TEE COlIDENSE.R OE' PAN ''B" (REMELT j

ANALYSIS

~rts

per

100,000

2.28 .29 6.34

HYJ?OTliETICAL Co.iYJ.BINATIO:i.~S -1i.S SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Silica Iron Calcium 11agnesiwn Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid Si02 Fe Ca Mg Na Cl

Organic & Volatile Matter

{ by difference ) TOTAL SOLIDS 2.07 s.23 25.60 8,83 54.62

10.04

64.66

SM.1l?LE; - Avert::.,ge sample for the campaign.

SOU"iWE;- Shoshone river water from the n:ain water aupply tanli:. Condensed vapors

from Remelt Pan liquorso

Silica SiO

2 2.28

Sodium Chloride NaCl 1.62

Sodium Sulphate Na

2

so

4 23.44

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 10.25

Calc:irun Bu.lpahte Caso

4 2.22

Calcium Carbonate CaCo

3 l4o21

llerrous Carbonate Ii'eC03 960

54.62

Organic & Voaltile Matter

( by difference ) l0,04

TOT.,J. SOLIDS 64.66

LOVELL

(7)

1.NALYSIS OF J.£,.TER SAMPLES FOR THE C.iJi[E>AIGN L918-1919

LOVELL FACTORY

THE GREAT dE8TEIDJ SUGAR COTulJ?.il.:N--Y

LEGPIPE YlATER FROM THE EVAPORATOR CONDENSER

l'rMYSIS HYPOTHETICAL C01rillH TIONS AS SALTS

;(arts

per

100.000 Parts per 100,000

Silica Si02 2,90 Iron Fe .20 calci'wn Ca 7,92 Magnesi'u.m Mg 2,26 Sodium Na 8,08 Chlorine Cl l,03 Sulphui•ic Ac id

so

4 26,48 Carbonic Acid C03 l.Q..,._77 59,64 Organic & Volatile .Matter

(by difference) 2.93

T02AL SOLIDS 62,57

SAMPLE;-

Average

sample for the carqpaign. SOURCE:- Shoshone river water from the main

water supply tank. Condensed vapors from liquors of fifth effect of the Evaporators.

Silica Si02 2-90

Sodium Chloride NaCl l.70

Sodiur.a Su.lpha.te Na

2so4 22,88

Magnesium Sulphate MgS0

4 ll.19

Calcium Sulphate Caso4 2o95

Calcium Carbonate Caoo3 17,61

Ferrous Carbonate FeC0

3

siJ.

59.64 Organic & Volatile Matter

lby difference) 2193

TOJ:lAL SOL(DS

LOVELL

(8)

ANALYSIS OF \'!.ll.TER SAMPLES JlOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919

L O V 1 L l!'a0'.110RY TEE~ GREAT \fES'.1.':KRN SUGA .. 'R. COWJ.P.ill'ifY

BA1.1:TERY SUPPLY WATER (SINGLE SYSTEM} ANALYSIS

Farts per 1001000

3ol3

HY.PO'..l:tlETICAL COMBUT.ATIONS AS SJ..LTS

Parts per

Jaa,aaa

Silica Si02 Silica . Si0

2 3o13

Iron Fe .13 Sodium Chloride NaCl 1.65

Calcium Ca Sodium Sulphate Na2So4 22073

:fi'Jagnesium Mg 2.25 Magnesium

su;i,imte

MgS0

4 11.14 Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Su)phurio Acid

so

4 Carbonic Acid 003

Organic & Volatile Matter

( by difference} TOT.AL SOLIDS 1.00 26.67 10,20 59.12

2o87

61.99

SAMPLE:- Average sample for the ca}4)a if,n.

Calcium Sulphate Calciwn Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate

Organic & Volatile (by difference)

TCJEAL SOLIDS

SOURCE:- Water from the Evaporator Condenser Legpipe, overflow from the press wash tank, and

the overflow from the legpipe seal tank.

CaS04 3.42 Ca.CO 16.78 3 FeC03 ,27 59012 If.1atter 21187 61.99 LOVELL

(9)

Al'l'.A.LYSIS OF WATER. S.i..MPLES .!WR THE 0.AMPiLIGN J.9J.8-l.9l.9 L O V ~ L L F . .1.CTORY

THE G.RE.A'l' ifiESTERN SUGAR CO:M.Pll.NY

WATER USED FOR I/ASHING HOT PRESSES

A..-rifALYSIS HYPOTHET I C.A,L- CO.MB IN.AT IONS AS SALTS

Parts pex: 1001000 farts per 1001000

Silica Si0

2 .56 Silica Si02 .56

Iron Fe .16 Sodium Chloride MaOl .16

Calcium Ca .29 Sodium Sulphate Na2

so

4 2.13

Magnesium Mg 008 Sodium Carbonate Na

2

co

3

.o5

Sodium Na .77 :Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 .28

Chlorine Cl .10 Calcium Carbonate OaC03 ~72

Sulphuric Acid S04 1.44 Ferrous Carbonate ~'FeC0

3 ~

4.23

Carbonic Acid 003 ~

.

4.23 Organic & Volatile Matter {by difference)

Organic & Volatile Matter

(by difference)

J.,46

TOTAL SOLIDS 5.69 TQIJ:...L .:luLIDS

S.AMPLE;...- Average s~le for the campaign.

SOURCE:- Drips from all reheaters, first effect of the

evaporators, and high-green and high-wash

blow-up tanks. Overflow from the boiler feed water

tank. Also possible to aend drips from second

and third effects of the evaporators and

gran-ulator traps.

LOVELL

(10)

ANALYSIS OF \'!ATER S.11...M.PIES l!'OR 'J:HE CAMPAlGN 1918-1919

LOVELL FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COil'IP.1UTY

WATER FROM. BOILE.tl FEED T.AUK

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBilw.TIONS AS SALTS

.Parts per 100,000 Parts per 100,000

Silica SiO

2 .62 Silica Si02

Iron Fe .19 Sodium Chloride NaCl

Calcium Ca .47 Sodium Sulphate Na

2

so

4

1:Iagne s i um Mg oll Sodium Carbonate Na

2

co

3

Sodium Na 1.35 Magnesium Carbonate ll/ig003

Chlorine Cl ol9 Calcium Carbonate

eaco

3

Sulphuric Cid

so

4 l.77 Ferrous Carbonate l!'eC03

Carbonic Acid 003 lg67

6037 Org~nic & Volatile Matter Organic & Volatile Matter

(by difference)

(by difference)

TCY.r.t:..L SOLIDS 7o97 TCJ.l:AL SOLIDS

SAMPLE;- Average sample for tre campaign.

SOURCE;- Drips from the second, third, fourth and fifth effects of ti1e evaporators, main st6am line trap, and drips f:oom tm granulator trap. .Possible

to send drips from the second and third evaporator effects and from the main steam line and granulator

traps to the press wash tanko LOVELL

WaTE.R .B'ROM BOILER .&'E8D TAlilK

.62 .31 2.62 .88 .38 1.17

....L!22

6.37 1960

(11)

.ANAL'YSIS u:&' WATER SilIPLES FOR THE C.AMPAIGii 1918-1919.

L O V E L L FACTORY THA GREAT 1,'ESTE..'lli SUGiffi CON'u?.ANY

COUDENSED 'I.ATER FROM EVAPORATOR DRifS

Al{ALYSIS HYPOTHETIC-' L COMBINATIONS AS S.ALTS

Silica Iron · Calciu.rn Magna s ium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid Fe Ca Na Cl

Organic & Volatile Matter

(by difference) TOTAL SOLIDS Parts per 1001000 .51 006 .19 .04 084 .24 ,51 7,84

SAMPLE;- Average sample for the cam1)aig11. SOURCE;- Condensed water from the drips of the

first, second, third, fourth and fifth effects of the Evaporators.

l:>arts J'.Jer 100,000

Silica Si0

2 .51

Sodium Chloride NaCl .40

Sodiu.rn Sulphate :t:ra2

so

4 .75

Sodium Carbonate Na2

co

3 1.01

lYJ.a.gnesirun Carbonate MgC0

3 .14

Ca lciu.rn Carbonate Ca003 .47

Ferrous Carbonate FeC0

3

-tM.

3.40 Organic & Volatile Matter

(by difference)

.iali

7,84

LOVELL

(12)

.ANALYSIS OF WAT.ER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1918-1919. L o V E L

L

FACTORY

THE GREAT f.ESTERN SUGAR COMP.ti.NY

HYPOTB:ETICAL

CQM§IN#l;IONS ~

SJu.TS

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric .Acid Carbonia Acid Fe Ca Na Cl

Organic & Volatile Ma.tter (by difference} TO'.I!AL SOLIDS

Pi:Jis

per

100,00Q

.oe

.44 .04 l.62

.o5

l.13

SAMPLE;-

Average sample for the campaign.

SOURCE;- Condensed water from the coils of

Ja.n

"A" (White). .Pwn,ped direct to boilers.

farts

per 100,000

Silica S10

2 .52

Sodium Chloride Na.Cl

.oe

Sodium Sulphate Na

2

so

4 l.67

Sodium Carbonate Na.

2

c

o

3 2.19

Magnesium Carbo~ate Mg003 .14

Calcium Carbonate CaC03 1.10

Ferrous Carbonate FeC0

3

--ll

5.87

Organic & Volatile Matter

( by difference)

TWAL SOLIDS 7.51

LOVELL

(13)

.A.NALY3IS Oll' WATER SAMPLES FOR THE Cll!IIPAIGN 1918-1919

L O V E L L. FACTORY TEE GREAT YESTERN SUG.AR C01l.1Plu"ff

COIIDENSED WATER FROM COILS OF PAN °Btt (R.1!ili1ELT)

ANALYSIS HYPCYfHETICAL 00lt1'.BINATIONS AS Sill.TS

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodimn Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid SiO 2 :B'e Ca Mg Na Cl

Organic & Volatile hiatter

(by difference) TOT.AL SOLIDS .Parts per 1001000 071 020 084 oll 1.73 015 11.85

S4M,PLE;- Average sample for the ~ig.n.

SOUR.CE:- Condensed water from the coils of Pan "B" (Remelt). Pumped direct to boilers. Also

possible to send condensed waters from the

general drips, which includes the condensed

water from all pan storage tai:ik coils and

second and third carbon~tion tan1c coils.

Parts ner 100,000

Silica Si02 .71

Sodium Chloride Na.Cl 025

Sodium Sulphate Na

2

so

4 l.61

Sodium Carbonate Na2

co

3 2.53

1~gnesiwn Carbonate MgC03 038

Calcium Carbonate CaC03 2ol0

Ferrous Carbonate FeCO _ &

3 7.99

Organic & Volatile Matter

(by differenlf!e) 3.86

TOT.il SOLlDo llo85

LOVELL

(14)

.ANALYSIS Ob' /A'i'ER SJ..MPLES FOR THE C1i.1'IPAIGN 1918-1919 L O V E L L .&1

.tl.C'J.'ORY

Tllli Gli8AT /EBTililli SUG,.,.R CO filiY

t~ .. T4R IN BOILERS

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000

Part§

per 100,000

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Cal Cium Ca :Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl l:i'ulpburic .Acid

so

4 Carbonic Acid 003

Organic & Volatile Matter (by difference) TOT.AL SOLIDS 2.52 026 3o26 .28 27.30 1.95 41.77 13a73 91.07 ~7.24 118.31

SATuIP.ili; - .Average sam1)le for the canpa ign.

SO .r CB;- later from the boiler feed tank, condensed water from t11e gener'¼l drip and condensed water from a~l pan coils.

Sili~ Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2

co

3 11a.gnesium Carbonate MgC03

calcium Carbonate CaOO 3 Ferrous Carbona.te FeC03

Organic & Volatile l\iatter (by di:t'ferenceO

~Ol'AL 601,IDS

LOVELL Note: - No Soda Ash added to t11e boilers during cam_paigno

2.52 3.21 -61.77 13.92 097 a.14

.5i

91.07 27124 118.31

References

Related documents

The results presented in Table 4-2, indicates a negative significant relationship between board size and firm performance, which then supports the theories by Hilb (2004) and

Metod: Rekrytering av informanter gjordes i samverkan med folktandvården i Region Jönköpings län och institutionen för Gerontologi på HHJ. Triggern testades i egna bostaden av

I senaste läroplan för grundskola, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet, Lgr11, finns en tydlighet om att samarbetet och utbytet av kun- skaper mellan lärare i de olika skolformerna

Varkaris and Neuhofer (2017, p.4) highlights that the potential traveller uses social media in various stages of a trip including, before, during and after physical travel has

Med Fronter som hjälpmedel har man ännu en möjlighet att kunna exempelvis individualisera undervisningen lättare, men om inte eleven har viljan eller motivationen, spelar

I hope that this systematic review will worth improving learning experiences for children with autism spectrum disorder by making teachers more aware of their roles and

H1 Variety in retailing is positively associated with the number of people employed in a local retail market H2 Variety in retailing has positive influence on the number of shops

Avoid and reduce waste Reuse waste Recycle waste Recover energy Treat waste Dispose waste Least preferable Waste management... Intro