"ENOUGH AND TO SPARE"
by
Dr. Chester M. Alter
Chancellor Emeritus, University of Denver
An Address
Given at Commencement Exercises Colorado State University
Fort Collins, Colorado
11 Enough and to Spare11
An address given at the Commencement Exercises at Colorado State University
Fort Collins, Colorado August 25, 1967
by
Dr. Chester M. Alter
Chancellor Emeritus, University of Denver
President Morgan, Trustees, Faculty, Members of the Graduating Class and Friends:
It is a pleasure to participate in these commencement
exercises largely because for fourteen years I have been a constant
witness and admirer of this university. The dynamic leadership
provided by President Morgan and his associates over an unusually
long period of time (you must realize that he has survived his position
longer than any of the current college and university presidents in
Colorado) has been a source of inspiration to all of us who have been
his colleagues. The growth and expanding service of Colorado State
University should be a source of pride to every citizen of
It was forty-four years ago that I left a farm in Indiana to
quote "go to college. 11 I so well recall one of our neighbors -- I
thought him a very wise man -- said to me just prior to my leaving
on what I anticipated would be an exciting and hopefully worthwhile
undertaking, "Chester, I don't know why you are going to college.
We have enough college graduates already and some to spare. 11
But I didn't follow his implied advice and four years later,
now forty years ago, I attended my first college commencement and
became one of the ll6, 701 that year who received an academic degree.
This year there will be nearly three quarters of a million degrees
granted by over two thousand American colleges and universities,
and you are a part of this much larger group.
During these forty years I estimate that I have personally
be worse in the mind of my erstwhile neighbor who thought there
were already enough college graduates and some to spare, I have
personally signed either as a dean or as chancellor over thirty
thousand diplomas. I hope he is not listening from his present
vantage point. But he can finally rest in peace as far as I am
con-cerned because now I have retired and will never confer another
degree or sign another diploma.
But one interesting thing about college degrees and diplomas:
They are granted in large numbers but never rescinded. They are
received by the widest possible variety of people who go to the four
corners of the earth and participate in all kinds of living and work.
They develop a wide divergency of ideas and philosophies, but did
you ever hear of a degree being returned. When you hear the
Presi-dent this afternoon say something the equivalent of "By virtue of
degree of Colorado State University, "he will be performing an
irrevocable act. I had the experience once of a disgruntled and very
vocal alumnus writing back his extreme dissatisfaction with his Alma
Mater, saying that he no longer wanted to be considered an alumnus and
he wanted his name removed from the list of graduates. I responded
that I had reviewed the laws of the state, the charter and by-laws of
the University, and found that, although I had the authority of
confer-ring degrees I had not been granted the authority to rescind them,
much, as in his case, I should like to accommodate his desire.
So today you and I, by our participation in this academic
ceremony, are becoming a permanent part of this university and as
such a part of a great and growing enterprise which we call higher
education or at least institutionalized higher education. Permit me,
if you will, to isolate some of the threads which make up the fabric
In my office at the University of Denver hung an ancient
Chinese ceremonial brocade tapestry, a gift of one of our Trustees
to the University, and an object of great beauty. It is woven of
threads of silk and paper, fibers of varied lengths and colors.
By his skillful work the unknown creator of this tapestry created
something of great use, something of great beauty, something of
great permanence. The long fibers of this fabric gave it strength
and have held together this creation down through the decades and
centuries. The nature of the fiber, silk and paper, determined its
texture, its warmth, its flexibility. The weaver's choice of colors
of the threads produced within the fabric a design, a pattern for the
whole piece.
If one carefully examines this ancient oriental brocade, he
one time it was cut into smaller squares and rectangles and these
units later sewn back together though not in their original order so
that the overall design has been changed. One notices that the
original colors have undergone internal chemical reaction with a
resultant mellowing of some of their original brightness. Some of
these changes have taken place slowly, unnoticed by any single
generation of its long line of owners or admirers. But one can see
also evidences of sudden change through accident, neglect, or
catas-trophe. A hole, a tear, a burn, perhaps the result of a thoughtless
or a careless act, or anger, or strife or war. But one sees as well
the result of someone' s earnest effort to repair and to correct these
faults, to restore the tapestry• s damaged strands.
But I, who have had the daily privilege of looking across my
desk at this piece of art, am aware principally that it is here, and
that it is good that it is here. Because it was created and because
its creation was to good purpose, because it was made of strong
threads, each endowed with qualities which have endured, because
down through the centuries someone has always cared enough for it
to preserve it and to pass it on, it is with us today. We can say that
it has achieved permanence.
So too it is with the process of learning, and so too it is
with institutions of learning and with our educational system. In
every civilized land and nation, where institutions of learning were
among the first establishments created, we find them now, rivaled
only by places of worship as the oldest institutions in every community.
Founded with great purpose and for good cause, created with built-in
strength of structure, held together with the long fibers of learning
fads, changing curricula, traditions, and methods, endowed with
significant design and pattern, our colleges and universities
remain--serving, growing, respected, supported-- in the world, as in
Colo-rado, among the oldest institutions in existence. They are likely
to remain forever so.
To be sure, if we look at our system of higher education as
it was created in America and as it exists today, we see, just as we
can see in the oriental fabric on my office wall, evidence of change.
We can see faults and flaws. We can see the results of slowly
changing educational philosophies. We can see evidence that some
elements have been cut out, laid aside, and then replaced. We can
see in the fabric we call our American educational system the results
of war and the threats of war, of ideological fashions and fads. We
pressures, of dogmas, of power thrusts. We can see the imprints
and scars of statism, of regionism, of nationalism, of commercialism,
of racism, of extreme denominationalism. It is not hard to see in
one place the burns of McCarthyism, and in another the threat of
communism. In the pattern of higher education we can now see there
has been a change from individualism to organizationalism, from
liberalism to vocationalism and perhaps, now, a trend back again.
But in spite of, or perhaps in part because of, these changes,
these attacks, these perils, our colleges and universities are here
today, filled with young men and young women in unprecedented numbers
seeking something they believe to be of value. We may not really
know what that something is and we certainly are not all agreed on
what it should be, but we call it education.
been woven into the fabric we call American higher education, those
threads that have established the pattern and have contributed to its
permanence. Let us try to differentiate between those long fibers
which have given strength and continue to give strength to the fabric
itself, and those short fibers which, woven into the surface and more
visible, are less permanent in time. Lending color and warmth and
often acceptability at any given time, it is these short and decorative
fibers which also give rise to most of the comments of higher
educa-tion' s current critics. If we do not distinguish between these threads,
we may spoil the whole cloth when we intend only to mod1fy its appearance.
First, there is the thread of learning.
If the mind of man had not given him the capacity and the
desire to learn, we would have no need for our highly developed
of childhood and youth is the time best suited for major devotion to
learning. Our physical bodies, given proper and sufficient
nourish-ment, develop into maturity with little guidance except by the forces
of nature. But our minds, our intellects, cannot be left to natural
forces if we expect maximum growth, development, and maturity.
Learning must be stimulated and guided either by ourselves or by
others. The creation of an environment where this process of
learn-ing can effectively take place is one of the objectives of our colleges
and universities. This is why they are called institutions of learning.
This is a long thread in the fabric. It has given strength to this
enterprise.
Here is another long thread, the thread of freedom of thought.
Although many of our institutions of higher learning were founded,
social and economic conflicts were prevalent, when political,
reli-gious and philosophical differences were pitted against each other,
when the founders as individuals must have held strong and divergent
opinions in regard to the then current areas of thought, it is
interest-ing that they built into the fabric of educational institutions a maximum
of freedom to learn, freedom to search, freedom to think, freedom
for individuals to live and grow toward maturity.
Another long thread of strength which has consistently been
a part of the fabric of higher education may be called the thread of
devo-tion. The founders of colleges and universities were devoted to the
cause of education. Their successors have equally devoted themselves
with time, energy, resources, and thought to the welfare and service
of their institution. With equal devotion, teachers, administrators,
and learning through their unstinted service. The public, devoted
to this enterprise, has steadily and increasingly added strength to
the fabric. The devotion of thousands of students and alumni has
been a source of satisfaction to those who would examine the texture
of American higher education.
Devotion to a good cause has a way of lifting individuals from
the level of the ordinary to the realm of the extraordinary. Higher
education in America has been one of the good causes with which
extraordinary men and women have identified themselves and to
which they have devoted their interest and their labor. So it is
that a long and strong thread of devotion has contributed to the
permanence of our fabric of higher education.
Now let us look at some of the shorter surface threads which
perhaps are subject to more rapid change but which in any period
single institution give to the fabric its characteristic pattern, its
warmth, and vitality, it serviceableness and its appeal.
As we look forward to the century ahead we must think in
terms of some of these fibers which we might label faculties,
facili-ties, curricula, nature of student body, and financial support. There
will be changes in all of these major operational areas. It will
require good judgment, as inevitable changes are made in these
designs, to be sure that the results will not impair the permanency
of the structure, will not convert a fine fabric into a piece of shoddy.
Mistakes will be made, and corrections and repairs will be required
in these operational areas.
This is a time when the super abundance of problems and
challenges faces our total educational system. Certainly we can say
15
We must give continued attention to maintaining the quality
of our faculty. In the period ahead when the competition for
out-standing teachers and scholars will surely increase, it would be
easy for any institution to fall behind. Nothing would more quickly
produce mediocrity or shoddiness in an institution of higher learning
than to permit a degeneration in faculty.
Our good friend, Dr. Louis Benezet, former President of
Colorado College, said recently that a high school senior looking for
a college could not really be expected to evaluate the relative quality
of the faculties of a group of colleges. He can be expected to
evaluate the quality of their buildings and facilities. Perhaps one
of the current fads and passing emphases of current American higher
education has been the amount of money spent on buildings. At any
program in history. But this pattern in education is not much
different from that being exhibited in our private lives, or in business
and industry.
The organization of courses of study into the various curricula
offered by a university establishes the pattern of formal education
for that institution. With the growing range of knowledge available,
combined with the ·increasing demands of the many vocations and
professions, the planning of curricula has become increasingly
difficult. Invention of new courses that should be offered seems to
be a favorite activity of teachers, while the prevention of the
prolifera-tion of courses threatens to become the chief job of academic deans.
The demand for training in specific vocational skills has been an
added burden assumed in recent years by educational institutions.
With an increase in factory classrooms and provisions for so-called
reversal of this trend in our colleges and universities. Every
univer-sity must be acutely aware that it cannot afford to try to do everything
that every other institution does. It must not expand its offerings
beyond the scope of that which it can do well. On the other hand,
there are certain basic and fundamental disciplines which we must
not neglect nor fail to make an important part of the educational
experience of every university graduate. I am thankful for the
attention being given to this problem by the faculties of many of our
colleges and universities.
Another strand of the fabric which must be carefully examined
is that of the changing character of the student body. At a time when
the proportion of college age population entering our nation• s colleges
and universities is rapidly increasing, it is easy to understand that
education-- variations in economic status, in objectives, in
interests, in motivations, and in intellectual capacity. All of these
factors will make an impact upon the nature of the student body in
various kinds of institutions.
The thoughtful design of the kind of student body a college or
university wants is a current challenge to our thinking. Perhaps we
have passed the time when every institution can afford to be all things to all people. But the University must select its students on solid
and justifiable grounds.
Now there are a hundred, a thousand, other threads of higher education that could be and are on occasion picked up, looked at,
evaluated, or criticized. Let's mention a few: education's proper
role in meeting the nation's manpower needs; the role of the university
19
education1 s proper role in national defense; the relative values of
method and content in the education of teachers; the status of the
foreign languages; the place of religion in higher education; the role
of research; the purpose of student organizations; the problem of
the married student; the place of manners and morals in our colleges;
the proper role of athletics in institutions of higher learning; federal
aid to education, and the growing use of the campus as a place of
social action, reform, and revolt. There are many more.
I have tried to identify in the fabric of higher education three
necessary long threads of permanence: the thread of learning, the
thread of freedom, the thread of devotion. I have examined four
of the fibers of more current importance to the pattern of higher
education: faculty, facilities, curricula, and the nature of the student
body. But these are words enough and to spare about higher education
the challenge is how we as individuals and as a part of our great
society are going to bring the fruits of our investment of time and
resources in education to bear on the even greater challenges of
mankind in the future. And here, too, may each of you 1967 Univer
-sity graduates find enough and to spare.