• No results found

Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1919-20

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1919-20"

Copied!
13
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

' - - - -

1;.,~ ~ - - - ~ ~ - - ~ - - - -

'-

1

_

-

_:

_

..

- - - ~/

\

..AliALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1919-20.

Copies to:

G

eneral Supt •

...-.General Chemist

Asst. Genl.

S

upt.

Asst. Chief

Engineer

Superintendent

Traveling Chemist

Laboratory-BILLINGS FACTORY

(2)

l

KIND

OF WATER

YELLO

W

STONE

.

RIVER

1

I

CITY

2

3

\ (,

~

BATTERY SUPPLY

(

i f ~

f f ~

4

?

H<J.r PRESS

WASH

5

r

OOLD

SACCHAREE PRmS WASH

6

EVAPORATOR CONDENSER TAIL PIPF.S

7

PAN

CONDENEi'ER

TAIL PIPES

8

1/

BOILER

FEED T.ANX

9

,S--

BOILER FEED (BENJRN DIREST)

10

> Y( \ /

FROll

BOILERS

(f,,

<o

11

(3)

Form 445-6m--fl.2G=-Paclo 100

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

BILLINGS

_

Factory

March 1,

_

192

_

0

_

Kind of Water:

YELLOWSTONE RIVER.

DescriptiGn of Sample:

Average

sample for the campaign. San:y;>le taken from the intake

sump

pump.

Source of Water:

Yellowstome River. Factory ini7ake about one mile south of the factory.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic aad Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst- Genl. Supt. Asst- Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parll p.., 100,000

1.78

.~28

5.40

1.77

3.'36

1.22

16.48

5.81

36.10

2.36

31.46

*Page

1

1 HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Para Per I 00,000 Silica SiO,

1.78

Sodium Chloride NaCl

2.01

Sodium Sulphate Na,S04

7.94

Sodium Carbonate Na,C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate

Mgso.

8.76

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

5.84

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

9.19

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.58

36.10

Oraanic and Volatile lby difference)

2.36

TOT AL SOLIDS

38.46

(4)

Form 44i-6m-·1'-20-Padt 100

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

Kind of Water:

B I L

_

L

_

.IJLG:__S

_

~

Factory

CITY

WATER

Descripti<>n of Sample:

Average

sample

for the

vampaign.

___

l92_Q

__

Source of Water:

Yellowatone

River. Water

previously filtered through city filtering pl.a.mt.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium

Mg

Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

,

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

Parll Per I00,000

1.30

.31

5.37

1.s2

3.31

1.22

17 .39

5.29

36.0l

1.83

37.84

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Parll Per 100.000 Silica Si02

1.30

Sodium Chloride NaCl

2.01

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

7.78

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

9.01

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

CalcilHll Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

1.00

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

s.27

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.64

36.0l

Organic and Volatile tby difference)

1.83

TOT AL SOLIDS

37.84

~/~

A

~-fl~./1')

~

~ _ v / ~

mi,t.

(5)

Form 441-6m-l'-20-Padt 100

/ I

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

H

I L L I

N

G_s_

_

_

Factory

Mar-0h

1..---

- - --

_

J

92.Q__

Kind of Water:

MA

I

N

T.Al~K

Descripti<>n of Sample:

Average

sample for the sampaigne

Source of Water:

Yellowstone River water.

Also

ppssible

to senf City

water. Ma.in

source of

supply for all factory operation.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parb Per 100,000 Parb Per 100,000

Silica SiO• Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintend,mt Traveling Chemist Laboratory

l.72

.14

4.63

l.76

4.06

1.22

17.47

4.78

35.78

2.33

38.11

Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2

so

.

Sodium Carbonate Na,C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate

Mgso.

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCI2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC08

F erroua Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile lby difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

l.72

2.01

10.10

8.71

35.78

2

.33

38.ll

Page

3

1 ~ ~ -C-h-em-u-t.

(6)

-Form 4411-6m-l'-20-Pado 100

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

_

_ _

B

_

I L L }

_E

_

G

-

S

_

Factory

March

1,

_

192~

-Kind of Water:

BATTERY

SUB.PLY

(

SHTGLE SYSTE111).

Description of Sample:

Average

sample for the campaign.

Source of Water:

All

water from tail pipes of the upper condensers of the evaporators,

and

drips from vapor pan. Possible to send water from the main tank.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine CI Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO Genffal Supt, General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Parts Per 100,000

1.56

Silica Si02

.14

Sodium Chloride NaCl

3.14

Sodium Sulphate Na,S04

1.49

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

~.77

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

.98

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

14.24

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

2.44

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate

easo.

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

F erroua Carbonate FeC03

26.76

2.56

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

29.32

TOT AL SOLIDS

Page

41

Parts Per 100,000

1.56

1.62

6.62

7.38

5.47

3.82

.29

26.76

2.56

29.32

(7)

Fora44i-6m- t-20-Pacla 100

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

B I L L I

_

N G

_§_

____

Factory

:M

.a:r.Qh

l ,

__ _

_

J92_Q__

_

_

Kind of Water:

R

O'

£

PRESS WASH

DescriptiGn of Sample:

A

verage sample for the oampaign.

Source of Water:

Condensed water from the 1st. effect Of the evapprators, battery oalorisators,

all heaters, overflow from the boiler feed tank.

Possible to bypass battery supply

to press wash and send drips from all ev

ap

orator, carbonation

and

blowup traps

and

office heatin

g

system.

ANALYSIS Silica Si01 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

Genrral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt.

Asst. Chief Engine« Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parll Per 100.000

.32

.13

.51

.24

.a8

.37

1.42

1.44

5.31

2.86

8.17

P

age

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica SiO,

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na,C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calciooi Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC08

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile {by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS Parll Per 100.006

.32

.61

1.98

.10

.76

1.27

.27

5.31

2.86

8.17

5.

----

~ _ , - , .

.£/1.C.I.C/"-

_

~

~

~

. Chemist.

(8)

Form 448-6m- l'-20-Pado IOO

WATER

ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

_

Factory

Kind of Water: DescriptiGn of Sample:

COLD SACCHARATE

PRESS

WAS

H

.A

verage sample for the oa.mpa.ign.

Source of Water:

City

Water

.

ANALYSIS Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

Gen~ral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory Parta Per I 00,000

le46

.1a

4.64

1.78

4.31

1122

14.53

7.05

35.17

2

.61

37.718

Page

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na.C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCl Magnesium Sulphate

Mgso.

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile lhy difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

6

_

192

_

0

_

Parta Per I 00,000

1.46

2.01

10.87

a.a1

.21

11.44

.37

35.17

2.61

37.78

(9)

Fomi 441t-6m- l'-20-Paclo 100

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

. _ _ _ _

B

_

I

_

L

L

I N

~

- - -

Factory

-·---

-

~~~

-

-

~

-

'

_______

_

192..Q_

~

Kind of Water:

CONDENSER TAIL

PIPE

OF EVAPORATOR.

DescriptiGn of Sample:

Average

sample for the campaign.

Source of Water:

Main

water tank, ma.in source of supply for all factory operation.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO, Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO Parts Per I 00,000

l.64

.14

5.06

1.46

3.33

1.22

14.81

5.39

33.05

2.13

35.18

---HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Silica Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate

Mgso.

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Chloride CaCI,

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

Ferrous Carbonate FeCOa

Organic and Volatile lby difference) TOT AL SOLIDS Parts Per 100,000

1.64

2.01

'1.84

7.23

5.30

8.74

.29

33.05

2.13

Genffal Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

Page 7.

-

~ -

~

~-~

~r~

J ~ ~

(10)

Fona441-6m-ll.20-Pado 100

( (

WATER

ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

BILLilfGS

_

Factory

Kind of Water:

C:01'1DENSER TAIL

PIPES OF ALL P.AHS.

DescriptiQn of Sample:

Ave

rage

sample for

the

campaign.

Source of Water:

Main water tank.

TuTa.in

source of supply for all factory operation.

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Silica Si02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine CJ Sulphuric Acid

so ..

Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO Partt Pet I 00,000

1.34

.31

4.60

1.72

3.10

1.22

14.46

5.44

32.19

1.20

33.39

Silica Si01

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

Sodium Carbonate Na.C03

Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

Calcium Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaSO*

Calcium Carbonate CaC08

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Organic and Volatile lby difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

_

192..o__

Parts Per I 00,000

1.34

2.01

7.13

8.51

4.04

8.52

.64

32.19

1.20

36.39

Genrral Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt.

Asst.

Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist

Laboratory

Pag,r 8.

~r~~

r

fl_ _Q - - - · - -

(11)

Form445-6m-l'-20-Paclo 100

I { (

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

BILLINGS

Factory

________

Ma_!'Ch ).,

______

)92

~

0

-Kind of Water:

WATER FROM BOILER FEED TANK.

Descriptign of Sample:

Average sample for the campaign.

Source of Water:

Drips from 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th bodies

the evaporators, all live steam,

all granWJ:ltor, all heating systems, 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cmdensers and blowup traps.

Possible to send drips from all heaters to boiler feed.

ANALYSIS Silica Si00 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so.

Carbonic Acid

co

.

Organic and Volatile (by difference} TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

Genffal Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Travelilll! Chemist Laboratory Parts Per I 00.000

1.12

.17

.73

034

6.69

.86

9.42

4.22

23.55

6.52

30.07

Page

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS Part, Per 100,000 Silica Si02

1.12

Sodium Chloride NaCl

1.42

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

13.93

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

3.73

Magnesium Chloride MgCI Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

1.18

Calciwn Chloride CaCl2

Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate CaC03

1.82

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.35

23.55

Organic and Volatile (by difference}

6.82

TOT AL SOLIDS

30.07

9.

-

~ - J - ,

=-~/~.j

A n ~ ~

(12)

Fora 44S-6m- ~-20-Pado 100

'

WATER

ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

B I L L I N G S

______

Factory

Kind of Water:

BOILER FEED

WATER

(RETURU DIRECT)

Descripti,m of Sample:

Average sample for the campaign.

March 1,

__

192

__

0

Source of Water:

Condensed water from all pan coils,

except

vapor pans. Pumped direct to boilers.

ANALYSIS Silica SiO• Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl

Sulphuric Acid

so,

Carbonic Acid

co.

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS COPIES TO

General Supt. General Chemist Asst. Genl. Supt. Asst. Chief Engine« Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parb Per 100,000 Part, Per 100,000

.20

Silica Si08

.20

.oa

Sodium Chloride NaCl

.40

.29

Sodium Sulphate Na1SO,

.34

.14

Sodium Carbonate Na.C03

.27

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

.24

Magnesium Sulphate MgSO,

.69

1.32

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

.18

Calcium Chloride

eac1

2

Calcium Sulphate CaSO,

.77

Calcium Carbonate CaC08

.15

Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

.17

2.72

2.72

.83

Organic and Volatile {by difference)

.83

3.55

TOT AL SOLIDS

3.55

Page 10.

~ - -

_

~_:/!.-:_)

(13)

r

I

WATER ANALYSIS

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

---'

B,:___,:I L L I

N

_

CL..§

________

Factory

Mar~~

_l,

_

192__Q_

_

Kind of Water:

FROM

BOILERS

Descripti .. n of Sample:

Average sample for

the

oampaign

0

Source of Water:

Water

from boiler feed water tank

and

from

cll>ndensed

waters

from

pan

coils

pumped

direct to boilers.

ANALYSIS Silica Si01 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid S04 Carbonic Acid C03

Organic and Volatile (by difference) TOT AL SOLIDS

COPIES TO

General Supt.

General Chemist Asst, Genl. Supt.

Asst. Chief Engineer Superintendent Traveling Chemist Laboratory

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS

Parll Per 100,000 Parll Per I 00,000

2.26

Silica SiO,

2.26

1.20

Sodium Chloride NaCl

11.69

2.37

Sodium Sulphate Na2S04

160039

.so

Sodium Carbonate Na2C03

60.77

82.90

Magnesium Chloride MgCI

7.09

Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

108.43

Magnesium Carbonate MgC03

2.77

41.21

Calcium Chloride CaCl2 Calcium Sulphate CaS04

Calcium Carbonate C:aC03

5.92

F cnous Carbonate FeCO,,

2.49

246.26

246.26

54.55

Organic and Volatile (by difference)

5t~55

300.ll

TOT AL SOLIDS

300.ll

Page ll.

_

/rr~

A ,

/l_A

_____

~

-.,, f.A---V---"'£Y--:::

-£,,V'~

r

-

~

Chief Chemist.

References

Related documents

Land use planning has been proven an effective tool in addressing the impacts of climate change and natural hazards, as well as in minimizing risk and

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to explore potential growth strategies availa- ble to family businesses operating in a niche market in Canada, in order to

På så sätt kunde datainsamlingen säkerställa att felaktig information som inte bekräftas från samtliga metoder upptäcktes samt öka förståelsen för introduktionen

By investigating the applied diversity on different levels of music characteristics (i.e., artist and genre level), we found that on a general level musically sophisticated users

Since the boundary quantum field theory in this case is defined over a p-adic number field either Q p or its unramified extension Q pn , further development of

In previous works [9,10], the following correspondence between driven two-dimensional conformal field theories and dynamical systems has been established implicitly: Evolution of

Work of Ferwerda, Schedl, and Tkalcic [12, 10] on Instagram pictures, showed that the way filters are applied to create a certain distinctive- ness that can be used to

förhållande till skolbiblioteksverksamheten. Inom några år går det kanske att urskilja en utveckling med tanke på den ändring i skollagen som infördes nyligen och där rektor