• No results found

Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1917-18

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Analysis of water samples for the campaign 1917-18"

Copied!
11
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

AN.ALIBIS OF WATER S.AWPmB FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1917-18 LOVELAND FACTORY Copi•s to .... General Ohemiat

V

Chief .Eagineer JJ a 't Chief Eltgineer Sal>•rinteadent T"ra.vel1ng Chemi.at La'bora.toey

(2)

.ANALYSIS OF W.il.ER SAMPLES FOR THE 01.Yf'..UGN 1917-lS LOVELAND FACTORY

Tim GREA~ WESTF.mT SUG.m COMP.ANY

BOILER FEED. AN.A.tYSIS

~a.rte 12et 100,000

HY.POTHETIOAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Silica IroA Oaleium Magae1ium Sodium Chlorine 8102 Fe Oa Mg. Na. Cl Sulphuric. Aoid SO 4 Carbo.aio Acid 00 3 Orga.uic & Volatile Matter (Bydifference) TOT.AL SOLIDS

.s9

002 .29 .10 ,57 t50 .16 1)92

3ol5

2.44

5.59

SAMPLE:-iA.vers.ge aample for the aam:pa.ig?l

SOURCEz-Drips from Gralmlator Coils,Steam Ohe1t1 of 2rld,3rd,4th & 5th,Evaps,all liTe steam traps thruout the factory via Flash tank aa.d City Water.

Silica S102

Sodium Chloride Ne.CL Sodium Stllphate Na2

so

4 Sodium Carbonate Na2

co

3 Magnesium Oarboaate ,Mg003 Calcium Carbonate Ca00

3 F1rroua Carbou.te FeC0

3

Orgaaio & Volatile Matter {By difference}

TOT.AL SOLIDS LOVELAND .BOILER FEED ,59 o82 .24 ,39 .35 .'12 6.59

(3)

.AN.4.LYSIS OF W.A!l.1ER SAMPLES FOR THE C.All!PilGN 1917-18

LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

.ANALYSIS. ·Part1 per 1001000 Silica S10z .91 Iron Calcium Uagneaium Sodium Ohlorille Sulphuric .Acid Carbonic .Acid Fe -Ca

Organic & Volatile

Matter (By dit:terence}

TO'l'.AL SOLIDS .02 .77 o3l 1.10 oiO .41

f:~

SOURCE:- From the big Thompson River about 8 miles west of the factory.

CITY WATER.

HU">OT.HE'l'IC.AL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS Parta per 100,000

.

S1l1fa s10 .91

Sodium Chloride

Naef

o9.9

Sodium Sulphate Na.

so

4 061

Sodium Carbonate Na-00~ loli ![agnesimn Carbonate Mg003 V 1.07 Calcium Carbonate Oa.08

3 1.92

Ferroua Carbonate Fe003 _.,t.Q!.

Orgaaio & Volatile Matter (By dif~erence}

TOTAL SOLIDS LOVEL.AND CITY WATER. 6072

1.oe

7.80

(4)

AN.ALYSIS OF WATER fMlvIPLES FOR THE 01.MPAIGN 1917-lS LOVELANDFACTORY

THE GREAT WESTE.RN SUGl:..R COMP1Jfi

PRESS WASH.

ANALYSIS HY.POTHETI01.L OOMB!Jf.A.TIONS .AS

s.:Jas

P&.:irt& ~•r 1001000 P~e ~er 1001000

Silica Si02 .'75 Silica SiO 0 'lfi

2

Iro Fe .09 Sodium Chloride l'iaOl 099

C&.loium Ca .71 So d1um Su.l.phat <> Na2S04 ofiG

liagnH1um Mg

.2&

Magnasium Sulphate MgS04 1.29

Sodium Na .57 Calcium Sulphate Ca~

6'4 olO

Chlori.ae Cl

.,o

Oalo1umm0a.rg0&&t e CaC0

3 lo'10

Sulphuric Acid

so

4

1.,e

Ferrous Oarboaate Ft00

3 .19

Ca.rbonio .!aid

co

3 1.12 5068

5,.68

Orga.uio & Volatile Organic & Volatile

Matter (~y difference}

.w.g_

&t~er (By differenc9J 6.30

ro'l.'AL SOLIDS lloe8 TOTAL SOLIDS llo88

SAMPLE:..A.verage Sample for the campaign

SOUROE:-Dripa from lst.:Evaps,Oa.rbonation Coil•

and all heatere,Condenaation from 4th & 5th. Pan Condeneers.

(5)

ANALYSIS OF W.ATER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN 1917-lS LOVELil.ND 1<".ACTORY

THE: GREAT w:ESTERN SUGAR COMP.ANY

P.AN PIG.

.ANALYSIS.

Pa.rta per 1001000

HYFOTHETICJ.L COMBINATIONS AS SALTS Pa.rta per lOOaOOO

Silica Si02 068 Iroa Fe vl8 Calcium Oa lo74 LlagD.Hium l4g .78 Sodium Na .60 Chlaril:l.e Cl .40

Su.lphurio .Laid

so

4 5oM

Oa.rllou.1o Acid

003

1.s2

ll.,.'14 0rg&u.1c & Volatile

Matter(]~ dif~er u.ce) 4256

TOTAL SOLIDS 16.30

SAMPLE: ... ATers.ge sample tor the oamp&igAo

SOURCEa- Condenaation fl-om Pa..n Coil&&

Silica Sodium Chl~ride Sodium Sulphate Mag,n.eaium Stilphs.te Calcium Sulphate Oaloium Carbonate Ferroua Oa.rbon.a.te

Orguio & Volatile Ma.tter(By differenc•) TO'EAL SOLIDS Si02 Na.Cl Na2S04 MgS04 CafS04 Oa.00 3 F 003 LOVELAND Pil PIG.

.se

066

1.os

3-.66 2.90 ,a,.22 o3'l llo'l4

(6)

l.NALYSIS OF WM!.ER SM/IP LBS :b'OR THE CAMPAIGN 1917 "'18 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR 801'..JP ANY

llll.TTERY SUPPLY PURE. ANALYSIS. Parta per 1001000 S1l1ea 510 2 .98 Ire.n Fe 007 Oalcium Ca 4:.42 Magnesium Mg 1~68 Sodium Na lc.55 O'hlorillO Ol

.so

Slilpburio .Aoi& 504 14.4.0 Carbone .A4id

co

3 3.96 27.76 Organic & Volatile

Katter(~y diftereace}

9.44

fOTAL SOLIDS 37020

~LE:- Average aam;ple for the oampaiga. SOtm.CEa- Orerflow from Presa Waah Tank

and City Wa.tero

IYPOTHETIOAL COMBINilIONS AS SALTS Pa.rte per 100,000

Silio:a Si02 .98

Sodium Chloride Na.Cl '°82

Sodium Sulphate Na.2.s~

s.eo

!IJag!l.eaium Sulphate MgS04 9o5l Oaleium Sulphate OaS04 6c,c23'

Oaloium Carbonate CaC03 i.47 Ferrous Carbo».ate FeC03 ol5 27.76

Organic & Volatile

Mat~er(By ilf~erence)

9.44-TOT.AL SOLIDS 37.20

l,()VELAm)

(7)

ANALYSIS OF Amm. SAMPLES FOR i'HE C.A:Ml?AIGN 1917-1

LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT tESTERlT SUGAR COMP ANY

RA.T'l'ERY SUPPLY IMPURE.

.ANALYSIS.

Parts per 1001000

HYPOTH.l!Y.rIC.AL CO!il3INATIONS .AS SALTS

Pa.rte per 100,000

Silica SiOz 2.46 Si11ea Si02 2 .. 46

Iron Fe o2'1 Sodium Chloride MaOl 1.e1

Caloium Oa 14048 Sodium Sulp hate Na3S04 12.66

MagliHium Mg 6.69 "14agn•sium Sulphate MgS04 32.62

Sodium Ue. 4. l Calcium Sulphate OaS0

4 30.41

Chlor1A• Cl 1.10 C~loiwn Carbonate CaC 3 l3o84

Su.lphuric Acid

so

4 66005 Ferrous Carbonate F•C03 256

Carlaonic Acid 003

&

159 94.36

94.31

Organic & Volatile Organic & Volatile

l!a.tter(By difference) 10.'4. Matt•r(By diff reno•) l0.64

Tar.AL SOLIDS 105~00 TOT.AL SOLIDS 105.00

SAMPLE:- ATerage sample for the campaign.

(8)

.ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR THE CAMPAIGN l917wl8

LOVELAND F1.CTORY

T.aE GREA!r WESTERN SUGAR COMP.IJ..TY

P.llt LEG. (Composite of all 5 Pans}

1J<UILYS1l6. HY.POT.8E'!ICAL COMBIF.ATIONS .AS SALTS

~arts per 1001000 Sil1ca. s10 2 1.5e IroA F .32 Caloium Ca 4.86 Magnuium Mg 4.77 Sodium Na l4o85 Chlorine Cl ,,90 Sulphuric ACid S0 4 53ol7

Carbonic .Acid 003 4oBQ

e5.25

Organic & Volatile

Matter(By difference 3!43

TOTAL SOLIDS !!o61

SMJPLEt- .Average sample for the campaign.. SOURCE:- Oondensatio:a. from Pans & Eva.pa,

Ditch & Well Water.

Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate Magnesium Sulphate Calcium Sulphate Calcium. Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate Organic! Volatile Matter(:By difference) TOT...U. SOLIDS mParta per Si02 Na.Cl Na2

so

4 fjg$04 CaS04 Oaoo 3 Fe00 3 LOVELAND PAN LEG. 100,000 1 .. 58 l.4S 44o0S 23o6l 6.40 7.44 .66 5.26 3.43 88.66

(9)

.il.U.YSIS OF WJ...T"ER S.AMPLES lfOR THl!i OlllAP.llGN 1917-16

L O ~ FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COJ§.AllY

EJil

LEG PIPES(COMPOSITENORTH & SOUTH)

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICJ.L COMBIN.ATIONS A,5 SALTS

Parts per 1001000

Silioa s102 2.06.

Iro• Fe 029

Oaloium Oa. l4o92

Vs.peaium Mag 5oe4

Sodium Na 4 .. 67 Ohlor1Ae 01 1.20 Sulphuric Acid S0 4 66.96 Oarboaio .Acid 003 §,58 92o6l

Orgaaio & Volatile

Ka.tt,r(By difference} 22.17

!l'OTJ.L SOLIDS 114.68

5..AMPLE: - .A.Te rage ;ample for the campaigii.

BOUROE:- Ditch water and wella,Evapora.tora

Condenaera CondenaatiOAo

Parta B•r 1001000

Silica Si02 2.0,

Sodium Chloride NaCl 1.9e

Sodium Sulphate Na2

so

4 12.02

n~eaium Sulphate Mg$04 28.93

Calcium Sulphate OaS0

4 36046

Oalc1um Carbonate

ca.co

3 10.46

Ferroua Carbonate Fe00

3 11160

92.51

Organic & Volatile

Matter(By dif~erenee} 22ol'l

TOT..U. SOLIDS 114.61

(10)

ANALYSIS OF WATER S~MPLES FOR THE C.AMPAIGN l 917-18 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

DITaH W.A.mR.

.ANALYSIS HIPOTHETICJ.L CO!vIBINATIONS .AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000

11110& SiOz 1.36

ha Fe

.e3

Oal.81\JID Ga 15.82

Kagu11um Mg 6.19

Sodium Na. 4ol5

Chloru.1 Cl lolO

hlphurio Acid

so

4 59075

Carbonic Acid

cos

'l.91

97.79 Org&a1.c

!

Vols.tile

lfa.tt1r (B~ difter1ace) 13079

!O'l!A.L SOLIDS 111.51

fWU>LEi- ATer&ge aample for the campaigno

S00RCE:- Lake LoT1l&11.d and OemetllJ'Y Lake.

Parta per 1001000

Silioa. Si02

S0ditm1 Chloride Na.Cl

Sodium Sulphate N'a2

so

4 .Ma.gneaium Sulphate Mg504 Calcium Sulphate Ca.804 Calcium Oarbonat1 OaC03 Ferroua Carbonate Fe003

Organic & Volatile Matter (.By dU·:terence)

fOTAL SOLIDS LOVELAND DITCKWA!l!ER. 1.36 1.81 12.72 30066 37081 llo?l 1.'!2 97.79 13.79 lllo5

(11)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES :B'OR THE CAMPAIGN l9l7wl8 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WES'l'ERN SU~ COMPANY

:BOILER Wilim..

AlULYSI8

Part-a per 1001000

HYPOTHETICl.L COllJB.Uu.TIOltS US &mS

Parts yer 1001000 Silica SiO .2 4086 Iron Fe o3e Calcium ,Ca ol6 Magnesium Mg ol8 Sodium Na 51086 Chlorine 01 3.00 Sulphuric Acid S04 10.94 Oa.rbonio ... ~id v 003 59.11 l&h,79 Organic & Volatile

Ma.tter(By

d1£ference} 91.95

~OT.AL SOLIDS 222.74.

SAMP!E:- Average aa."!lple for the eampaign.

SOUR<w.,. - 'Dir ct from Boil r..-o

b Silica Sodium Chloride Sodium Sul:phs.t• Sodium Carbonate Ma.gneaium Carbonate Oalo1um Carbonate Ferroua Oa.rbonate

Organic & Volatil

Matter(By dif~er•nae} 'fOTAL SOLIDS Si02 NaOl Na2

so

4

wazoo

3 MgC03

caeo

3 FeC03 4.e6 5~44 1G.1e 102.50 .62 040 .'79 130079 9lo95 222o'14

References

Related documents

and social considerations on local distribution systems ensured a local orientation. Sourcing from sustainable farms that fulfil both social and environmental criteria, compensating

I senaste läroplan för grundskola, förskoleklassen och fritidshemmet, Lgr11, finns en tydlighet om att samarbetet och utbytet av kun- skaper mellan lärare i de olika skolformerna

Den ena kommer att vara de som inte bryr sig särskilt mycket om att äga musik, de som bara vill lyssna, för dem kommer tjänster som Spotify eller Last FM eller vad det

placerade så att man har genomblick till de större delarna av huset. Huset är orienterat för att erhålla maximalt med ljusinsläpp från söder, det sprids in genom köket o

Men om man kan diskutera humor som pedagogiskt verktyg genom att inom lärarutbildningen använda lärares erfarenheter av framförallt de strategier som Dimbleby &amp; Burton

Our working definition is in accord with these central points in Blunden’s (2015) work: each perezhivanie includes what is done and suffered and also the how of action of the

(2013) studie beskriver detta tillstånd då endast en känsla av hoppets närvaro finns, vilket kan jämföras med hur personerna i Juvakkas och Kylmäs (2009) studie också beskriver det

In this preliminary work we explored the prediction of musical so- phistication subscales (i.e., emotions and active engagement) from music listening behavior.. Our results show