• No results found

Homogenization applied in rough surface hydrodynamic lubrication

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Homogenization applied in rough surface hydrodynamic lubrication"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1:8 Svenska Mekanikdagar 2007 30

Homogenization Applied in Rough Surface

Hydrodynamic Lubrication

Andreas Almqvist

1

&

Peter Wall

2

1

Division of Machine Elements Andreas.Almqvist@ltu.se 2

Department of Mathematics Lule˚a University of Technology It is clear surface roughness influence on

lubri-cation of many types of machine elements. It is, however, a delicate problem to tell how much a small change in the surface machining pro-cess will affect the performance of the lubrica-ted interface, in terms of load carrying capacity, frictional losses, etc. This work regards mode-ling of the effects caused by the surface rough-ness in hydrodynamically lubricated conjunction by means of the, linear incompressible and iso-viscous Reynolds equation; ∇ · (h3

ε(x)∇pε(x)) = Λ∇·(e1hε(x)) where pεis the pressure. For small values of ε, the function hεoscillates rapidly, im-plying a time consuming numerical solution. For sufficiently small values of ε it is even

impossib-le. In these situations the concept of homogeni-zation constitutes a valuable tool. In ref.1it has been shown that a branch within homogeniza-tion devoted to finding upper and lower boundsa is also applicable to the problem studied here. In ref.2

these ideas were utilized to perform nu-merical simulations of rough hydrodynamically lubricated contacts. Figure 4 illustrates conver-gence (left) and the preciseness of the the bounds (right). Similar to the work in ref.2

the objective of this work is to demonstrate how the ideas of homogenization may be used to efficient analyze the influence of surface roughness on hydrodyna-mic performance.

a

The ideas of finding bounds have proved to be useful in different physical applications, such as composite engineering. x (m) H y d ro d y n a m ic p re ss u re (P a ) ε = 1/22 ε = 1/23 ε = 1/24 Hom. 0.05 0.06 0.07 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 5 5.5 6 6.5×10 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7×10 7 x (m) H y d ro d y n a m ic p re ss u re (P a ) p− Hom. p+ 0.0565 0.057 0.0575 0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 5.966 5.968 5.97 5.972×10 7 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7×10 7

Figur 4: A series of pressure solutions pε solutions and the corresponding homogenized

pressure solution (left). Lower and upper bounds pressure solutions compared with the ho-mogenized solution (right).

1D. Lukkassen, A. Meidell, and P. Wall. Bounds on the effective behavior of a homogenized

reynold-type equation. Research Report, No. 3, ISSN 1400-4003, Department of Mathematics, Lule˚a University of Technology, Accepted for publication in Journal of Function Spaces and Applications, 2006.

2A. Almqvist, D. Lukkassen, A. Meidell, and P. Wall. New concepts of homogenization applied in rough

surface hydrodynamic lubrication. International Journal of Engineering Science, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 6 December 2006.

References

Related documents

To study the user performance data from 40 older adults and their partner/significant others (80 participants in total) during a four-weeks period of using Move Improve to

The effects on normal force as a function of groove depth d + for the cylindrical geometry is shown in figure 36 where the different curves represent different values of groove width

This project focuses on the possible impact of (collaborative and non-collaborative) R&D grants on technological and industrial diversification in regions, while controlling

Syftet eller förväntan med denna rapport är inte heller att kunna ”mäta” effekter kvantita- tivt, utan att med huvudsakligt fokus på output och resultat i eller från

Som rapporten visar kräver detta en kontinuerlig diskussion och analys av den innovationspolitiska helhetens utformning – ett arbete som Tillväxtanalys på olika

For this type of roughness the arithmetic-harmonic bounds pressure solutions are not equal to the homogenized one but Figure 11 reveals that the difference between the load

For the proof of the theorem for the upper bound of the minimal period of Pell’s cat map, and the lemmas leading up to it, we firstly need some results from elementary number

Joel Kr onander Ph ysically Based Rendering o f Synthetic Object s in Real En vir onment s 2015.. Department of Science and Technology