Abstract
Conclusions/Future Work
Fuel Cell Chemistry
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Andy Herring , Lauren Greenlee and Christine Ngan at NIST for supplying the catalysts, the National Science Foundation for funding (grant DMR-0820518). The anion exchange membrane (AEM) fuel cell has the potential to
become an important energy conversion technology. Unlike proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells, AEMs do not use noble metal catalysts, allowing them to potentially become low-cost alternatives to PEMs.
The purpose of this research is twofold:
• To increase the methanol oxidation current produced by the bimetallic catalyst used by AEM fuel cells
• To reduce the catalyst ability to split water
To accomplish this, carbon black was added during various steps in catalyst processing.
Cyclic Voltammetry
-‐5.0 15.0 35.0 55.0 75.0 95.0 115.0 135.0 155.0 175.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:on -‐5.0 5.0 15.0 25.0 35.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 75.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:on -‐5.0 15.0 35.0 55.0 75.0 95.0 115.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:on -‐5.0 5.0 15.0 25.0 35.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 75.0 85.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:on -‐5.0 5.0 15.0 25.0 35.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 75.0 85.0 95.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:on -‐5.0 5.0 15.0 25.0 35.0 45.0 55.0 65.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:on -‐5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 -‐550.0 -‐350.0 -‐150.0 50.0 250.0 450.0 650.0 Cu rr en t D en si ty (m A/ cm 2) Voltage (mV vs. SHE) Background Oxida:onEach sample was tested using cyclic voltammetry in a three-electrode setup (seen in figures below) to determine catalytic activity.
Experimental Methodology
The first two graphs represent catalyst samples with no carbon black.
The following graphs (beginning at the right) represent catalyst with two types of carbon black added during various stages of catalyst processing.
From these data, it can be concluded that carbon black: • Increases catalytic activity for both water and methanol • Does not consistently increase catalyst selectivity for methanol
oxidation, save for exceptional cases In the future, work should be done to:
• Test for reaction products, such as CO2, CO, H2, and O2 to further
determine selectivity
• Evaluate the potential of the catalyst/carbon black combination as a way to cheaply produce hydrogen gas for energy storage applications
• Develop and test functionalized carbon black to increase the selectivity of the catalyst between methanol oxidation and water splitting
Reference electrode
Working Electrode Counter Electrode