What Motivates Students?
A Study of Students’ Attitudes and Motivation regarding English Language
Learning in Swedish Upper Secondary School
COURSE: English for Subject Teachers 91-120, 15 credits WRITER: Merna Toma
EXAMINER: Jenny Malmqvist SUPERVISOR: Anette Svensson TERM: SPRING 2020
What Motivates Students? A Study of Students’ Attitudes and Motivation regarding English
Language Learning in Swedish Upper Secondary School
Merna Toma
Abstract
This mixed method study aims to investigate motivation and attitudes towards English foreign
language learning among Swedish upper secondary school students at vocational and
preparatory programs. A quantitative questionnaire has been distributed and qualitative
interviews have been conducted concerning students’ attitudes, integrative and instrumental
motivation regarding English foreign language learning. Sociocultural theory has been applied
to analyze the data. The findings reveal that what motivates the participants to learn English is
their desires for future studies, employment, travels and global communication. The
questionnaire shows that there is no difference between students’ integrative and instrumental
motivation, while the interview findings reveal that the students are more instrumentally than
integratively motivated. In conclusion, the findings from both studies show that there is no
difference in integrative and instrumental motivation among students at the vocational and
preparatory programs. Furthermore, the results reveal that students’ motivation and attitudes
regarding English are affected by their goals, desires and their surroundings.
Keywords: English Foreign Language Learning, Motivation, Attitudes, Integrative
Motivation, Instrumental Motivation
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION ... 1
1.1AIM AND RESEARCH QUESTIONS ... 1
2. BACKGROUND ... 2
2.1SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION,SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING AND FOREIGN LANGUAGE LEARNING ... 2
2.2MOTIVATION AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING ... 3
2.3PREVIOUS RESEARCH ... 4
3. METHOD ... 5
3.1MIXED METHOD APPROACH ... 5
3.2THE PARTICIPANTS ... 7 4. THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK ... 9 4.1SOCIOCULTURAL THEORY ... 9 5. RESULTS ... 11 5.1QUESTIONNAIRE RESULTS ... 11 5.2INTERVIEW RESULTS ... 14
6. ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION ... 18
7. CONCLUSION ... 20 8. REFERENCES ... 22 9. APPENDICES ... 24 9.1QUESTIONNAIRE QUESTIONS ... 24 9.2INTERVIEW QUESTIONS ... 26 9.3PETRA ... 27 9.4PATRICIA ... 30 9.5PERNILLA ... 33 9.6PONTUS ... 35 9.7VICTOR ... 38 9.8VERONICA ... 41 9.9VERA ... 44 9.10VINCENT ... 46
1. Introduction
There are several reasons for wanting to learn a second language. These may be for educational
or business purposes, such as passing an exam or improving employment potential, or for
personal purposes, such as cultural enrichment or the wish to be a valued member of the target
language community. Nevertheless, whether learning for educational or personal reasons,
learners’ motivation and attitudes towards the second language are crucial for achieving
proficiency in the target language. Dörnyei (2001) argues that “without sufficient motivation,
however, even the brightest learners are unlikely to persist long enough to attain any really
useful language” (p. 5). Also, Gardner and Lambert (1959) claim that
an individual acquiring a second language adopts certain behavior patterns which are characteristic of another cultural group and […] his attitudes towards that group will at least partly determine his success in learning the new language. (p. 267)
Learners’ achievement in language learning is therefore dependent upon their motivation to
learn a second language as well as their attitudes towards the target language community.
Gardner and Lambert (1959, p. 267) distinguish between integrative and instrumental
motivation. Integrative motivation is when language learners desire to learn a second language
for social and personal purposes or because of a favorable interest in the language community,
whereas instrumental motivation is for the practical value of linguistic achievement.
In the Swedish upper secondary school, teachers use a wide range of teaching methods and
strategies to motivate and engage students in English language learning activities. However, a
study conducted by Svensson (2015, p. 131) reveals that the expectations are lower in a class
on a practice-based program compared with a class on a theory-based program. This
program-based difference is from the teachers’ perspectives and behaviors as well as in the students’
behaviors (Svensson, 2015, p. 131). Seemingly, teachers’ and students’ perceptions of and
expectations of students at theory-based programs and practical-based programs differ.
1.1 Aim and research questions
The aim of this study is to investigate motivation and attitudes towards English foreign
language learning among upper secondary school students at vocational and preparatory
programs in order to contribute with knowledge about what motivates students to learn English.
The following questions will be examined:
1. What motivates upper secondary school students to learn English?
2. What kind of differences are there in terms of integrative and instrumental motivation
among students from the vocational and preparatory programs?
3. How do students’ motivation and attitudes affect their English language learning?
The first part of this research paper presents research concerning motivation and attitudes in
foreign language learning to contextualize this study with other research. Subsequently, a mixed
method approach consisting of a questionnaire and interviews will be presented together with
the sociocultural theory. Furthermore, the results containing participant answers, an analysis
and a discussion of these and a conclusion of the study will be presented.
2. Background
First, a brief distinction between the definitions second language acquisition, second language
learning and foreign language learning is made to clarify the chosen term for this project.
Second, to provide a theoretical background and to contextualize this study, theories and
previous research concerning motivation and attitudes regarding English language learning will
be presented.
2.1 Second Language Acquisition, Second Language Learning and Foreign Language
Learning
The first language one learns is called one’s first language (L1). The second language one learns
is an additional acquired language (L2). The third, fifth or tenth acquired language are likewise
referred to as one’s second language (Saville-Troike, 2006, p. 2). Furthermore, Yule (2006)
makes a distinction between the terms acquisition and learning:
[t]he term acquisition is used to refer to the gradual development of ability in a language by using it naturally in communicative situations with others who know the language. The term learning, however, applies to a more conscious process of accumulating knowledge of the features, such as vocabulary, of a language, typically in an institutional setting. (p. 187, original emphases)
The first language is therefore acquired without any conscious effort, whereas, the second
language is an active learning process as one is more conscious about the newly acquired words,
grammar and pronunciation.
Additionally, sometimes a distinction is made between learning in a foreign language setting
and a second language setting (Yule, 2006, p. 187). For example, Swedish students in an
English class in Sweden are learning English as a foreign language (EFL) and, if the same
students were in an English class in the UK or the USA, they would be learning English as a
second language (ESL). Therefore, since this study investigates upper secondary school
students in Sweden, English will be referred to as a foreign language and not a second language.
However, Yule (2006, p. 187) argues that in both cases, the students are simply trying to learn
another language, and since the secondary sources in this study consider both ESL and EFL,
both phenomena are relevant to this study.
2.2 Motivation and attitudes towards second language learning
Ryan and Deci (2000, p. 54) state that a motivated person is one who is moved to act and
activated or energized toward an end. Also, Masgoret and Gardner (2003, p. 128) describe a
motivated person as one who experiences reinforcement from success and disappointment from
failure, enjoys the activity, has desires and expends effort. However, Gardner (1985) states that
in second language learning “effort alone does not signify motivation. The motivated individual
expends effort toward the goal, but the individual expending effort is not necessarily motivated”
(p. 10). Furthermore, motivation in second language learning has been defined in terms of two
factors, learners’ communicative needs and their attitudes towards the second language
community (Lightbown & Spada, 2013, p. 87). Learners will perceive the communicative value
of the second language, and they will possibly be motivated to acquire proficiency in it, if they
need to speak it in extensive social situations or to accomplish professional ambitions.
Likewise, learners will desire more contact with the speaker of the language, if they have
favorable attitudes towards them (Lightbown & Spada, 2013, p. 87). In addition, Safotso and
Tompte (2018) state that leaners’ attitudes play a vital role and can influence success or failure
in language learning:
[l]earners’ attitudes generally dictate whether or not they will be able to absorb the details of a new language. In other words, achievement in a target language relies not only on the intellectual capacity, but also on the learner’s attitudes towards language learning. In learning a second language, it is thus important that students have high motivation and positive attitude towards the target language to better succeed in it. (p. 175)
Therefore, success in the target language does not solely depend on learners’ intellectual
capacity, but on learners’ motivation and attitudes towards the target language. Additionally,
one of the most influential second language motivation researcher, Gardner (1979; in Dörnyei,
2001, p. 14) claims that a second language is not only an educational phenomenon or a
curriculum topic in school, but it also represents the cultural heritage of the speaker of that
language.
Furthermore, Gardner and Lambert (1968, p. 143) invented the terms integrative motivation
and instrumental motivation. Instrumental motivation refers to language learners who want to
acquire a language to achieve certain goals, such as passing an exam, employment, or being
able to read scientific publications. Instrumental motivation in language learning is therefore
not for social purposes (Yule, 2006, p. 192). Krashen (1988, p. 3) argues that instrumental
motivation might be an influential predictor of L2 acquisition when practical value of L2
proficiency is high and the constant use essential.
Integrative motivation is when the learner is willing and interested in social interaction with
members of the other language group (Gardner & MacIntyre, 1993, p. 159). Hence, integrative
motivation is when learners desire to be valued members of the community that speak the target
language. A positive attitude and an openness towards the target language group have therefore
great impact on learners’ achievement in the new language. Lightbown and Spada (2013, p. 87)
state that integrative motivation was considered to be the stronger predictor of successful
learning for many years. Instrumental motivation, however, was found to be the better predictor
in some contexts. Thus, it has been found that both types of motivation are related to success in
L2 learning (Lightbown & Spada, 2013, p. 87). Second language can be acquired with
instrumental motivation or with integrative motivation, or with both (Liuoliené & Metiüniené,
2006, p. 94). According to Ellis (1994, p. 682) integrative motivation can work in conjunction
with, rather than in opposition to, instrumental motivation to achieve proficiency in the target
language.
2.3 Previous research
A study conducted by Gardner and Lambert (1959) revealed that students’ orientation to
learning a second language was connected to their motivation to learn the language, attitudes
towards the target language community, and proficiency in the target language. Another study
(Gardner & Lambert, 1972) showed that attitudes and motivation were related to achievement
in the second language.
Furthermore, a study of 337 students in the United States showed that there was no significant
difference between students’ integrative and instrumental motivation (Muchnick & Wolfe,
1982; in Ellis, pp. 679-680). Subsequent research by Ghazvini and Khajehpour (2011)
involving 123 students in Iran also revealed that there was no difference between students’
instrumental and integrative motivation. However, a recent study (Hong & Ganapathy, 2017)
of 12 upper secondary school students revealed that the students were more instrumentally
motivated than integratively motived in ESL learning (Hong & Ganapathy, 2017, pp. 30-32).
Previous research reveals that there is no major difference between students’ integrative and
instrumental motivation. The studies provide this project with information regarding how these
types of motivation affect learners’ achievement in the target language, but more research is
necessary. Therefore, the present study contributes with a greater understanding of individual
motivation and attitudes towards EFL learning.
3. Method
In this section, what the two methods entail and what motivates their use in the present study
will be presented together with the types of questions asked in the interviews and the
questionnaire. In addition, the participants of this study and information regarding the
distribution of the questionnaire and the conducted interviews will be discussed.
3.1 Mixed method approach
A mixed method was used for identifying students’ motivation and attitudes towards EFL
learning to strengthen and expand the findings of this study. This method approach consisted
of a questionnaire with closed-ended questions aimed at students at Swedish upper secondary
schools. The purpose of the questionnaire was mainly to gain an overview of students’
motivation and attitudes regarding EFL learning before conducting qualitative interviews with
eight students. Peltomaki and Nummela (2006; in McKim, 2015) state that studies that utilize
both a quantitative and qualitative approach gain a deeper and broader understanding of the
phenomenon than studies that do not use a mixed methods approach.
The questionnaire covered six questions and twelve statements. The types of questions and
statements asked were personal factual questions, questions about attitudes, integrative and
instrumental motivation. The purpose of these was to provide teachers and educators with an
idea of which types of motivation and attitudes Swedish students have towards EFL learning.
The questionnaire questions are to be find in the appendices. Moreover, Wilson (2013, p. 13)
argues that a questionnaire has both strengths and weaknesses that one should consider. One of
the advantages of using a questionnaire is that it is more anonymous compared to face-to-face
interviews. Also, a standardized questionnaire permits the researcher to compare responses
among several groups. One of the weaknesses, however, is that web-based questionnaires are
not as flexible as interviews where one is able to ask follow-up questions (Wilson, 2013, p. 13).
Therefore, to gain a greater understanding of students’ motivation and attitudes regarding EFL
learning and to answer the aim of this study, qualitative interviews were necessary.
The qualitative interview consisted of ten semi-structured questions about students’ motivation
and attitudes regarding EFL learning. In a semi-structured interview, the researcher has a list of
questions to ask, however, since the interview process is flexible, the interviewer does not
strictly follow the list of questions (Bryman, 2008, p. 442). Moreover, some of the questions
are not planned in advance as the interviewer picks up on things said by interviewees (Bryman,
2008, p. 442). The interview questions are to be find in the appendices.
The English language is not the students’ first language, therefore, to avoid misinterpretations
as well as not preventing the students from expressing themselves, the questionnaire and the
interview questions were in Swedish. Moreover, the questions asked in the questionnaire and
the interviews as well as students’ answers presented in the result section were translated into
English. However, the original questions and answers were added as a footnote. The empirical
data has been treated carefully and with respect, henceforth, making sure that quotations and
information are not taken out of context.
Furthermore, the collected data was thematized to emphasize patterns observed when analyzing
the interviews. The themes that were identified when treating the data were themes such as the
importance of learning the English language for future goals, the impact of the environment on
EFL learning, and the desire to become better English language learners. The data has been
processed in three steps, first, when conducting each interview, second, in the transcription
process, and third, when analyzing the data. Brinkman and Kvale (2015) state that to some
extent “researchers who transcribe their own interviews […] will have the social and emotional
aspects of the interview situation present or reawakened during transcription and will already
have started analyzing the meaning of what was said” (p. 207). The analyzing process therefore
starts once the researcher conducts the interview. Lastly, in the transcriptions, pause fillers have
been removed and spoken collocations have been written as sentences in order to facilitate
reading.
3.2 The participants
In the Swedish upper secondary school, there are eighteen regular national programs, twelve of
which are vocational, and six of which are preparatory for higher education (Swedish institute,
2019).
A total of 238 students participated in the questionnaire, 128 participants from a preparatory
program and 110 participants from a vocational program. The participants are between the ages
of 15 and 20, and the average age of the participants is 17. Moreover, the majority study the
course English 5 or English 6, while a few study English 7.
The questionnaire was distributed to students through teachers and acquaintances. English
subject teachers, working at different municipalities, were contacted through e-mail and
requested to distribute the online questionnaire to their students and ask whether they were
interested in a qualitative interview. The students who participated in the qualitative interviews
were four students from a vocational program and four students from a preparatory program.
All the participants were interviewed separately through Skype. The interviews were recorded
with the help of a smartphone and each interview lasted approximately 20-25 minutes.
According to Brinkmann and Kvale (2015, p. 174) internet and telephone interviews have a
number of advantages in qualitative inquiry, such as increased opportunities to interview people
who are geographically distant from the researcher.
Ethical considerations were taken into account when conducting the questionnaire and the
interviews. In both studies students were assured anonymity and participated voluntarily. They
were informed that the results will not be reported to teachers, but solely used for the purpose
of this study (see Appendices). Furthermore, before conducting the interviews, the students
were assured anonymity in writing, through e-mail, and in speech. The interviewees were told
to withdraw from the interview if they felt uncomfortable continuing the conversation. The
researcher asked about their consent to record the interviews and to transcribe the data, assuring
that the data will be treated with respect. They were also assured that all data will be deleted
when the study is complete. Therefore, to protect the participants’ confidentiality and
anonymity, pseudonyms will be used in this study. Moreover, to facilitate reading the
pseudonyms will consist of names starting with the letter V for vocational program participants
and P for preparatory program participants. Lastly, the risk of appropriation exists, as the
participants might give answers, they believe the interviewer desires, however there is no reason
to doubt their honesty.
Petra is a second-year student at the Social Science Program. She is currently studying the
course English 6 and has applied for the course English 7. Petra believes that learning English
is important for communicating with people globally and for future employment.
Patricia is a third-year student at the Economics Program. She has studied the courses English
5 and 6. Patricia believes that learning English is important for travels, employment and
communication.
Pernilla is a second-year student at the Social Science Program. She is currently studying
English 6 and has a desire to continue her English studies. Patricia thinks that learning English
is important due to its status as a global language.
Pontus is a one-year student at the Economics Program. He is currently studying the course
English 5. Pontus believes that learning English is important for global communication and due
to its status as a global language.
Veronica is a second-year student at the Health and Social Care Program. She is currently
studying the course English 6. Veronica believes that learning English is important for
communicating with people worldwide and for becoming a part of society.
Victor is a second-year student at the Electricity and Energy Program. His is currently studying
the course English 6. Victor thinks that learning English is important because it gives one the
opportunity to communicate and understand things in the world.
Vera is a first-year student at the Health and Social Care Program. She is currently studying the
course English 5. Vera believes that learning English is important because it enables one to
speak with others.
Vincent is a second-year student at the Business and Administration Program. He is currently
studying English 6. Vincent thinks that learning English is important because it is spoken
globally and because it is necessary for understanding the development of society.
4. Theoretical framework
4.1 Sociocultural theory
The theoretical framework chosen for this study is the sociocultural theory. The fundamental
idea of the sociocultural theory is that personal developments occur in social interaction,
therefore, to identify students’ motivation and attitudes towards EFL learning, the
implementation of the sociocultural theory is vital for understanding how their environment
influences their English language learning.
The sociocultural theory is developed by the Russian psychologist Lev S. Vygotsky.
Vygotsky’s theories have become fundamental in Western education in Europe, Australia and
North America (Gibbons, 2015, p. 13). His theories are also
increasingly influential in a wide
number of domains including second language learning and teaching (Swain, Kinnwar &
Steinman, 2015, p
. xi). In sociocultural theory the individual’s opportunities cannot be
determined or studied in isolation, since he or she is part of a history, a culture and a society,
(Vygotsky, 1980, p. 125). In other words, human development is not individualistic but rather
social.
Vygotsky (in Lantolf, 2000, p. 1) claims that humans rely on tools which permit us to change
the world including the circumstances under which we live in. To mediate and regulate our
relationships with others and with ourselves, and thus change the nature of these relationships,
we use symbolic tools or signs (Lantolf, 2000, p. 1). According to Lantolf (2000) “Vygotsky’s
theory of learning and development implies that learning is also a form of language
socialization between individuals and not merely information processing carried out solo by an
individual” (p. 33). Language socialization between individuals is therefore necessary for the
learning to take place.
Furthermore, for Vygotsky (in Donato & MacCormick, 1994, p. 456) the source of mediation
was either a system of symbols, most importantly language, a material tool such as a computer,
or the behavior of another human being in social interaction. In language learning, depending
on how the learning of the language is mediated, unfocused learning actions may be regulated
and modified (Donato &
MacCormick, 1994, p. 456). According to Donato & MacCormick
(1994)
[m]ediation is, thus, the instrument of cognitive change. This can take the form of the textbook, visual material, classroom discourse patterns, opportunities for second language
interaction, types of direct instruction, or various kinds of teacher assistance [...]. All forms of mediation are embedded in some context that makes them inherently sociocultural processes. (p. 356)
Thus, mediation is the instrument between the learner and the object, symbol or another human
being that leads to cognitive change. Lantolf (1994) states that mediation is interpreted to be
“the introduction of an auxiliary device into an activity that then links humans to the world of
objects or to the world of mental behavior” (p. 418). Hence, mediation, whether symbolic or
physical, is what connects the individual to the world, and which then leads to learning and
development.
Moreover, Vygotsky is interested in the development of thinking and language according to
Säljö (2014, p. 301). For Vygotsky the human language has a special position as a mediating
tool. Furthermore,
Vygotsky refers to language as the tool of tools. It is through communication with other people that we can express ourselves, and linguistic concepts help us organize our surroundings. Language is our partner in most of what we do. (Vygotsky; in Säljö, 2014, p. 301) (my translation1)
Henceforth, language is a mediating tool that is essential for us to communicate and deepen our
understanding about our surroundings and the world we live in. Nevertheless, since mediation
can be several things, the implementation of the concept of
mediation will provide this study
with a greater understanding of how mediation elements influence students’ motivation and
attitudes regarding EFL learning.
1 ”Vygotskij refererar till språket som redskapens redskap. Det är genom kommunikation med andra människor
som vi kan uttrycka oss, och språkliga begrepp hjälper oss att organisera vår omvärld. Språket är vår partner i det mesta vi gör” (Säljö, 2014, p. 301).
5. Results
The questionnaire and interview results will be presented in this section.
5.1 Questionnaire results
The questionnaire data will be presented in this section. The figures represent all 238 students
who participated in this study. The results are categorized in the following steps: first, table 1
and 2 present answers concerning students’ attitudes towards the English language. Second,
table 3 shows answers about students’ instrumental motivation. Third, table 4 presents answers
regarding students’ integrative motivation. In the tables, the color blue represents the
percentage of participant answers from the vocational programs (VP) and the color orange
represents the percentage of participant answers from the preparatory programs (PP).
Table 1 illustrates question answers concerning students’ attitudes towards EFL learning
Table 1 Yes Maybe No
Is it important to learn English? 89% 9% 2%
97% 1.5% 1.5%
Are you interested in continuing your English studies after this course?
44% 23% 33%
51% 26% 23%
Table 1 shows that the vast majority of VP participants, 89%, and of PP participants, 97%,
answered yes when asked whether it is important to learn English. Also, the majority of VP
students, 44%, and of PP students, 51%, answered yes when asked whether they are interested
in continuing their English studies. Table 1 reveals that there is a slight but not major difference
in attitudes regarding English among students from the vocational and preparatory programs.
Table 2 illustrates statement answers concerning students’ attitudes towards EFL learning
Table 2 Fully
agree Mainly agree Somewhat agree Do not agree The English language is very interesting 19% 44% 33% 4%
35% 41% 22% 2%
I am always looking forward to my English lessons 17% 40% 27% 16%
14% 38% 32% 16%
It is unnecessary to learn English 2% 2% 13% 83%
2% 2% 2% 94%
I think it is fun to learn English 25% 35% 33% 7%
34% 40% 20% 6%
Vocational program (VP)
Table 2 reveals that the vast majority of the participants think that the English language is very
interesting. The majority of VP participants, 44%, and of PP participants, 41%, stated mainly
agree. Also, the majority of the students always look forward to their English classes, 40% of
VP students and 38%, of PP students mainly agree. Furthermore, equivalent answers are also
given about English being unnecessary to learn, the majority of VP participants, 83%, and of
PP participants, 94%, do not agree. However, mixed answers were given when students were
asked whether they think it is fun to learn English. While VP students stated, 35% mainly agree
and 33% somewhat agree, the vast majority of PP students stated, 34% fully agree and 40%
mainly agree. Noticeably, more PP students find English language learning fun.
Table 1 and Table 2 reveal that there is no great difference among vocational and preparatory
students’ attitudes towards EFL learning.
Table 3 illustrates statement answers concerning student’ instrumental motivation
Instrumental motivation Fully agree Mainlyagree
Somewhat agree
Do not agree It is important to achieve a good grade in the English
course 40% 54% 44% 33% 13% 11% 3% 2% Learning English is important since I might need it
in the future (employment, further studies etc.) 73% 77% 21% 16% 6% 6% 0% 1% Learning English is only important to pass the
English course 5% 8% 11% 7% 33% 30% 51% 55% Learning English is important for me to speak
English abroad 68% 69% 5% 5% 26% 25% 1% 1%
Table 3 demonstrates that the importance of achieving a good grade in the English course is
considered essential for the participants. While VP participants, 44% mainly agree, and 40%
fully agree, the majority of PP participants, 54% fully agree, and 33% mainly agree. Moreover,
learning English is considered important for future studies and employment. The vast majority
of VP students, 73%, and of PP students, 77%, stated fully agree. However, there are also shared
opinions concerning the statement that learning English is only vital to pass the English course.
The majority of VP, 51%, and of PP, 55%, do not agree. Lastly, English is also considered
essential for the students to speak English abroad as the majority of VP participants, 68%, and
of PP participants, 69% fully agree.
Table 3 illustrates that there is no difference among vocational and preparatory students’
instrumental motivation. It is apparent that the majority of the participants are instrumentally
motivated.
Table 4 illustrates statement answers regarding students’ integrative motivation
Integrative motivation Fully agree Mainly agree Somewhatagree Do not agree Learning English is important for understanding
English speaking films, books, TV and games
58% 26% 12% 4%
62% 28% 7% 3%
Learning English is important for meeting new people I can speak English with online or offline
44% 33% 15% 8%
61% 23% 14% 2%
Learning English is important for meeting people from English speaking countries
47% 31% 17% 5%
66% 22% 11% 1%
Learning English is important for understanding the American/English culture
23% 38% 27% 12%
36% 31% 25% 8%
Table 4 shows that learning English is important for understanding English speaking films,
books, TV, and games. The majority of VP participants, 58%, and of PP, 62%, fully agree.
Also, the majority believe that learning English is important for meeting new people they can
speak with online and offline. While VP students, 33% mainly agree, and 44% fully agree, the
majority of PP participants, 61%, fully agree. Similarly, learning English is important for
meeting English speaking people. The majority of the participants of VP, 47%, and of PP, 66%,
fully agree. However, mixed answers are given on the importance of learning English for
understanding the American/English culture. The majority of VP participants, 38% mainly
agree, and 27% somewhat agree, while the majority of PP participants, 36% fully agree, and
31% mainly agree. Nevertheless, the answers still show that the students agree.
Table 4 reveals that there is no difference among students from vocational and preparatory
programs. It is apparent that the majority of the participants are integratively motivated.
The quantitative questionnaire results show that the students have positive attitudes regarding
EFL learning and are both instrumentally and integratively motivated. Moreover, the results do
not show a difference among students from the vocational and preparatory programs. However,
these aspects would call for further analysis in the qualitative study.
5.2 Interview results
The results of the interviews of the eight students from the vocational and preparatory programs
will be presented in this section. The interview questions are thematized in the following way:
First, students’ attitudes towards EFL learning. Second, how are students motivated to learn the
English language. Third, how do the students motivate themselves in English language learning.
Students’ attitudes towards EFL learning
The interview results demonstrate that the participants have positive attitudes towards EFL
learning. The majority believe learning English is vital for reasons such as employment, future
studies, travels and communication with people worldwide. Pontus expresses:
[I]t is an official language, so you can speak English in all countries, really anywhere, and if you are going to Spain, you don’t need to speak Spanish, it would facilitate a lot, but if you speak English it is enough2.
In addition, Victor explains that the importance of the English language is that “now in the
world, everyone speaks English, and one has several advantages of English for understanding
and learning about things happening in world
3”. Therefore, EFL learning expands students’
opportunities in life, and most importantly it enables them to communicate globally. Patricia
explains her appreciation for the English language: “when you have cousins abroad you can
communicate with them. Also, in school, we have students coming from other countries, maybe
they have questions that they want to ask, then you can answer and communicate with them, so
they feel at home
4”. Additionally, Vincent elucidates that “yes, I have. For example, when I
play online games and that, then you have to speak English if you want to play with people
2det är såhär ett officiellt språk, alltså man kan ju prata engelska i alla länder egentligen, vart som helst typ, och alltså om man
ska åka till Spanien, alltså man behöver inte kunna spanska, men det skulle underlätta väldigt mycket, men om du har engelska så räcker ju det
3nu i världen så, så pratar alla engelska, och man har mycket nytta utav engelska för att kunna lära sig och förstå saker som
händer i världen.
4 när man har kusiner utomlands när man kommunicerar med dem. Sen har vi i skolan, det kommer ju studenter från andra
länder, kanske de har fråga som de vill ställer, då kan man svara och kommunicera med dem för att de ska kunna känna sig hemma.
from other countries. Or when I have English in school, well I can speak without problem
5”.
The participants appreciate their EFL skills and the majority want to become better EFL
speakers, as they want to acquire new words and expressions, as Pontus articulates: “personally,
I usually write song lyrics sometimes, and it would be nice to know more synonyms instead of
using regular words
6”. The desire to become successful EFL learners is established throughout
the interviews and is further demonstrated in the subsequent section.
How are students motivated to learn the English language?
The questions concerning motivation reveal a disparity between participant answers concerning
English classroom activities or skills such as, speaking, writing, listening and reading (see
Appendices). While four of the participants answered speaking, three answered writing, and
one reading and listening activities. The most common motives for favoring speaking involve
the need for practicing pronunciation, different dialects, new words or simply English-speaking
skills. Petra explains:
[I] believe you always learn best from testing yourself by trying to speak. I think it’s the same with all languages, as in Spanish. When you listen to things, you understand clearly, but then when you try to speak it yourself, it stops. So, I really think that the most important thing is to speak in order to learn properly, because it is quite easy to understand things, but when you try to say it yourself, it’s not that easy, so I think speaking is the most important part.7
Speaking can be challenging and therefore necessary for language development according to
Petra. In addition, the participants’ reasoning for favoring writing is because it is challenging
and fun. Victor states:
5 ja. Det har jag. När jag till exempel spelar online spel och sånt, då måste man kunna prata engelska om man vill spela med
folk från andra länder. Eller när jag har engelska i skolan, jag kan liksom prata utan problem.
6 Alltså personligt, jag brukar ju skriva låttexter ibland och det skulle vara skönt att kunna mer synonymer istället för att använda
vanligare ord.
7 jag tror att man lär sig alltid bäst av att testa sig själv liksom att prova och prata. Så jag tror att det är samma sak med typ alla
språk, som i spanska. Det är ifall man hör saker, så förstår man ganska tydligt, men sen när man ska försöka att prata det själv då tar det stopp liksom. Så jag tror att det viktigaste egentligen är att prata för att man ska få lära sig på riktigt liksom, för det är ganska lätt att förstå saker och ting, men sen när man ska säga det själv så är det inte lika lätt, så jag tror att prata ändå är den viktigaste delen.
[B]ecause then you have to write down in your English, so you understand, you don’t get someone else’s text that you can read, but you teach yourself, I think, so when you write texts, you develop at the same time as you write8.
Hence, language development happens when practicing writing according to Victor.
Furthermore, in classroom activities, many of the participants are mostly motivated by working
individually or in groups as opposed to classroom presentations, and only a few prefer a
combination of these. Vera explains what she feels about groupwork in the following statement:
“I feel that in English many are at different levels and it can be quite difficult with groupwork
when you are in different places
9”. Also, Pernilla states: “I would say individual work because
then you have the opportunity to follow up and become better at things you want to become
good at and not comply with a group
10”. The two students, studying at different programs, find
individual working activities more motivating as they allow them to focus on improving their
individual language skills.
Moreover, the majority of the participants are motivated and inspired by their English subject
teachers, and when asked how the teacher motivates them, the students replied that it is when
the teacher challenges them, chooses interesting and relatable topics, or when the teacher “sees”
them. This is expressed by Veronica in the following sentence: “to see me as a student and
know my qualifications, and to sit with me and discuss my goals and what I want with the
course
11”. Likewise, Pontus explains:
[Y]es it can be the English teacher as well because sometimes, he shows his skills if you say so, then you are like, it is fun to see because you do not see that every day. My friends do not have the worst12 English and when the teacher speaks in different dialects and so,
8 för att då får man liksom skriva ner alltså sin engelska, alltså förstår du, man får inte någon annans text som man får läsa, utan
att man lär sig själv, tycker jag, alltså när man skriver texter, alltså man utvecklas samtidigt som man skriver.
9 jag känner att just i engelska så är många på olika nivåer och det kan vara rätt svårt att göra grupparbete när man är på olika
ställen.
10 jag skulle väl säga individuellt arbeten för då har man möjlighet och följa och bli bättre på det man själv vill bli bättre på och
inte följa en grupp.
11 att se mig som elev och liksom och vad jag har för förutsättningar, och sitta ner med mig och prata om vad jag har för mål
och vad jag vill med kursen, lite så.
then it becomes more, how do you say, it becomes more fun and you want, when it is more fun then you want to know more13.
Henceforth, teachers have great impact on students’ motivation to learn English. Moreover,
while some are inspired by teachers, friends or family members, others find inspiration within
themselves as expressed by Victor: “myself, I am motivated by myself that I want to learn more
and more because I know that I will benefit a lot from it, it will open many doors in life, if you
understand
14.
Seemingly, the students find motivation within themselves and in their environments. Lastly, it
is apparent that there is no major difference between how students from vocational and
preparatory programs are motivated in EFL learning.
How do the students motivate themselves in English language learning?
Similar answers are given by the participants from the vocational and preparatory programs
concerning individual motivation in EFL learning. These involve watching English speaking
TV, film or listening to music. Some are also interested in reading English books, while others
enjoy online games where a command of English is required. Seemingly, the students motivate
themselves by finding activities they enjoy and learn from as stated by Vincent: “when things
go slow, then I watch a movie with English subtitles because then I know that I’m still learning
something, that is that I learn how words are pronounced in different dialects, new words and
expressions. So, I try to motivate myself by doing something I like, but in English
15”.
Correspondingly, Petra says:
[I] usually listen to music or watch YouTube or a movie that has to do with English, because then you get motivated to have the ability to speak as fluently as they do and things like
13 ja det kan vara engelskläraren också, för ibland brukar han också, visa sina skills om man säger så, då blir man såhär. Alltså
det är ju roligt att se för det är inte sånt man ser varje dag typ, mina vänner har inte såhär värsta engelskan, och när läraren hämtar olika dialekter och sånt då blir det såhär mer, vad brukar man säga, att det blir roligare och man vill och när det är roligare, då vill man ju veta mer.
14 mig själv, jag motiveras utav mig själv, att liksom jag vill ju lära mig mer och mer för att liksom jag vet att jag kommer ha
nytta av det här jättemycket, det kommer öppna många dörrar i livet, alltså förstår du.
15 när det går trögt, ja men då kollar jag på en film, och då har jag engelsk text för då vet jag att jag ändå lär mig något, alltså
att jag lär hur de uttalar ord på olika dialekter, nya ord och uttryck. Alltså jag försöker motivera mig själv genom att göra något jag gillar men då på engelska.
that, so I surround myself more with English because then I become more inspired to learn it16.
Furthermore, the participants from the respective programs explain that they do not lose
motivation in EFL learning. Pernilla states: “no I only see the positive with it, I don’t see a
reason for not learning English
17”. Similarly, Veronica says:
English is among my favorite subjects, so I have never felt it has been a little bit tough, I may have thought it was if it was a disordered lesson or if the teacher has not really listened, or perhaps because it did not go well on a presentation or something, but then I have overcome it, and then it has been good in the upcoming lesson18.
This indicates that students’ environment impacts their motivation to EFL learning.
6. Analysis and discussion
The results from the questionnaire show that the majority of the participants have positive
attitudes and consider English language learning interesting and necessary. The participants are
instrumentally motivated to learn English, as the majority believe that achievement in the target
language will give them access to future studies and employments. Similarly, the data shows
that the participants are integratively motivated, since learning English is considered necessary
in order to understand English speaking films, books and people. Therefore, the questionnaire
results reveal that the participants from the respective programs are both instrumentally (see
Table 3) and integratively (see Table 4) motivated. Proficiency in EFL learning is achieved
when integrative motivation works in conjunction with instrumental motivation (Ellis, 1994, p.
682). Moreover, there is not a major difference among participants from the vocational
programs and preparatory programs. On the contrary, the findings show agreement in
motivation and attitudes regarding EFL learning. Also, the findings of this study resemble the
majority of the previous research presented earlier (Gardner & Lambert, 1959; Gardner and
16 då brukar jag lyssna på musik eller kolla på Youtube eller på film som har med engelska att göra för då blir man motiverat
till att man vill kunna prata lika flytande som dem gör och såna saker, så jag omger mig mer med engelska för då blir jag mer inspirerad av att lära det.
17 alltså nej jag ser bara det positiva med det vill jag väl kunna säga, jag ser ingen anledning till att inte lära sig engelska 18 engelska är ju bland mina favoritämnen, så jag har ju aldrig känt att det har varit lite segt, det kan jag ha tyckt att det har
varit om det har varit en stökig lektion eller om läraren kanske inte riktigt har lyssnat eller det har gått lite dåligt kanske på någon redovisning eller så, men då har jag bara kommit över det och sen så har det ändå varit bra till nästa lektion liksom.
Lambert, 1972; Ghazvini and Khajehpour; 2011; Muchnick & Wolfe, 1982; in Ellis, pp.
679-680).
The results from the qualitative interviews reveal that participants from both vocational
programs and preparatory programs have positive attitudes and are strongly motivated towards
EFL learning. Learning the English language is perceived important due to its status as a global
language and students’ desires for future employment, studies and travelling. Also, the ability
to communicate and meet people abroad motivates the participants to become better English
language learners. The answers to motivation in EFL learning are not based upon students’
desires for becoming valued members of the English or American culture, but rather due to the
opportunities it creates, which suggests that the students from the respective programs are more
instrumentally motivated. Similar findings are revealed in the study presented earlier by Hong
and Ganapathy (2017), which showed that the students were more instrumentally motivated
than integratively motived in ESL learning (Hong & Ganapathy, 2017). Positive attitudes and
motivation towards the target language are important for students to better succeed in it (Safotso
& Tompte, 2018, p. 175).
Furthermore, the data shows that various approaches and strategies motivate the participants to
learn English. The students believe that EFL learning is best achieved when practicing speaking
or writing activities. Participants favoring speaking explain that one learns when practicing new
words, pronunciations, different dialects and expressions in speech. Whereas students favoring
writing express that it is challenging and fun to write in English, since one has to express oneself
differently. The findings concerning classroom activities indicate that students from vocational
and preparatory programs enjoy challenging and interesting tasks that lead to language
development. Additionally, the majority prefer working individually or in groups as opposed
to classroom presentations. Students’ reasoning for favoring group work is that learning
happens in interaction with other people as one learns how others use words and expressions.
This resembles the sociocultural theory that personal development occurs in social interaction.
However, students favoring individual work express that one has the opportunity to focus on
individual improvement. The answers given are based upon the participants’ own perceptions
and experiences of how languages are best learned. Nevertheless, the students learn in various
ways depending on their individual needs, therefore there are no reasons to assume that there
are differences among vocational and preparatory program students. Furthermore, the findings
reveal that teachers have great impact on students’ motivation and attitudes regarding EFL
learning. The importance of seeing and acknowledging students’ needs and goals as well as the
implementation of interesting and challenging tasks is valued by the participants from
vocational and preparatory programs. Incorporating varied teaching approaches and
instructions in conjunction with seeing and acknowledging the students are therefore essential
in order for teachers to motivate and encourage students in their EFL learning.
Finally, the interviews show that the students find motivation in surrounding themselves with
the English language. While some find motivation in books, others find motivation in English
speaking films, music and games. The students express that these inspire and encourage them
to become better EFL learners as they acquire new words, expressions and dialects, which help
them further improve their EFL skills. Students consider these mediation tools stimulating
because they believe that learning happens in tasks which they find interesting and challenging.
As previously stated, a person who experiences reinforcement from success and disappointment
from failure, has desire and expends effort is a motivated person (Masgoret & Gardner, 2003,
p. 128). The answers reveal that even when the students feel unmotivated, they do not lose the
interest to learn English, instead they find activities which they enjoy and learn from.
Furthermore, the implementation of the concept mediation reveals that the participants use
symbolic, material and human beings as tools to develop their EFL skills. These mediation tools
take the form of books, visual material such as films, TV and online games, or human beings
such as friends, family members and teacher assistance (
Donato & MacCormick, 1994, p. 356)
.
Finally, the data shows that the participants at the Swedish upper secondary school learn
individually and in interaction with others. Furthermore, the result that deserves special
attention is the one revealing that there is no difference in motivation and attitudes regarding
EFL learning among students from the vocational and preparatory programs. The majority of
the participants from respective programs have positive attitudes and are highly motivated to
improve their EFL skills. The findings indicate that these attitudes might be, as previously
stated by Svensson (2015, p. 131), from the teachers’ and the students’ perspectives and
expectations of the students studying at the different programs.
7. Conclusion
The findings of this study reveal that what motivates students at the Swedish upper secondary
school is their strong desires for future studies, employment, travels and interaction with people
worldwide. The quantitative questionnaire revealed that the there is no difference between
students’ integrative and instrumental motivation. However, the findings from the qualitative
interviews were different from the questionnaire results as the interviews showed that the
students are more instrumentally motivated than integratively motivated. The qualitative
interviews were therefore essential for supplementing the questionnaire, as the interviews
provided this study with a greater understanding. One aspect that emanates from this project is
that there is not a big difference among students from the vocational and preparatory programs.
On the contrary, the results reveal mutual opinions concerning interesting and challenging
topics, a determination for improvement and an appreciation for teachers who see and
acknowledge them. Students’ attitudes and motivation to EFL learning are affected by their
goals, desires and their surroundings which include friends, teachers, classroom activities and
books. These mediation tools, whether symbolic, material, or human beings in social
interaction, connect the students to the world and affect their learning and development.
Lastly, the questionnaire and interview answers do not represent all Swedish upper secondary
school students’ attitudes and motivation regarding English: they are solely a representation of
the participants in this study. This research has contributed to the field of education through
examining various types of student motivation and attitudes regarding EFL learning in a
Swedish upper secondary context. The results will aid current and future educators to be more
effective in their teaching practices. Moreover, since the difference among students from
vocational and preparatory programs is not major, the differences may relate to teachers’
perceptions and expectations of students at the different programs. Therefore, for possible
future research, an investigation of differences between teachers’ perceptions and expectations
of students studying English at vocational and preparatory programs could be worth examining.
8. References
A. Liuolienė, & R. Metiūnienė. (2006). Second Language Learning Motivation. Coactivity:
Philology, Educology, 14(2), 93–98. https://doi.org/10.3846/coactivity.2006.24.
Brinkmann, S., Kvale, S. (2015). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research
Interviewing (3. Ed.). Sage Publications.
Brown, H. D. (2001). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (4th ed.). Englewood Cliff:
Pentice Hall.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social Research Methods (3. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Donato, R., & MacCormick, D. (1994). A Sociocultural Perspective on Language Learning
strategies: The role of mediation. The modern language journal, 78(4), 453-464.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Ellis, R. (1994). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gardner, R. (1968). Attitudes and Motivation: Their Role in Second-Language
Acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 2(3), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.2307/3585571
Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). On the Measurement of Affective Variables in Second
Language Learning. Language Learning, 43(2), 158-194.
Gardner, R.C., & Lambert, W. E. (1959). Motivational Variables in Second-Language
Acquisition. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de psychologiy, 13(4), 266
Ghazvini, S., & Khajehpour, M. (2011). Attitudes and Motivation in Learning English as Second
Language in High School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(C), 1209–
1213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.264
Hong, Y., & Ganapathy, M. (2017). To Investigate ESL Students’ Instrumental and Integrative
Motivation towards English Language Learning in a Chinese School in Penang: Case
Study. English Language Teaching, 10(9), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n9p17
Krashen, S. (1988). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. London:
Prentice Hall International (UK).
Lantolf, J. (1994). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning: Introduction to the
Special Issue. Modern Language Journal, 78(4), 418–420.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02058.x
Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). (2000). Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (Vol. 78, No.
4). Oxford University Press.
Lightbown, P. M. & Spada, N. (2013). How Languages are Learned. Oxford: Oxford University
Press.
Lundgren, U., Säljö, R., & Liberg, C. (2014). Lärande Skola Bildning. Stockholm. Natur och
Kultur.
Masgoret, A., & Gardner, R. (2003). Attitudes, Motivation, and Second Language Learning: A
Meta–Analysis of Studies Conducted by Gardner and Associates. Language Learning, 53(1),
123–163. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00212
McKim, C. (2015). The Value of Mixed Methods Research: A Mixed Methods Study. Journal of
Mixed Methods, 11(2), 202-222.
http://didier-jourdan.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/MM-and-Graduates-students.pdf
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New.
Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Safotso, G., & Tompte, N. (2018). Attitudes and Motivation of Chadian Learners of English. World
Journal of Education, 8(2), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n2p174
Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Svensson, A. (2015). “New Technologies” and “Old Values”: The Function of Various Text and
Media Forms in Literary Studies. Educare - Vetenskapliga Skrifter, (1), 117–138.
Swain, M., Kinnear, P., & Steinman, L. (2015). Sociocultural Theory in Second Language
Education: An Introduction Through Narratives (Vol. 11). Multilingual matters.
Swedish Institute. (20 December 2019). Education in Sweden. Sweden.se.
https://sweden.se/society/education-in-sweden/#.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1980). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes.
Harvard University Press.
Wilson, C. (2013). Credible Checklists and Quality Questionnaires: A User-Centered Design
Method. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. San Francisco, CA, USA. Retrieved 17 April
2020
from:http://proquestcombo.safaribooksonline.com.proxy.library.ju.se/book/quality-management/9780124103924/checklists/st0065_chp001_html?uicode=jonkop
Yule, G. (2006). The study of language (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Appendices
9.1 Questionnaire questions
Hej!Jag heter Merna och jag är lärarstudent från Jönköping University. Jag skriver mitt examensarbete om gymnasieelevers motivation till att lära sig engelska, därför söker jag gymnasieelever som vill delta i denna studie genom att svara på denna enkät. Svaren är anonyma och resultaten rapporteras inte till någon lärare, men används blott för denna studie.
1. Kön o Man o Kvinna o Vill inte ange 2. Ålder o 15 o 16 o 17 o 18 o 19 o 20 3. Jag går i ett: o Yrkesprogram o Högskoleförberedande program
4. Ange kursen du läser/läst senast (om du inte läser någon just nu): o Engelska 5
o Engelska 6 o Engelska 7
5. Tycker du att det är viktigt att lära sig engelska? o Ja
o Nej o Kanske
6. Är du intresserad av att fortsätta studera engelska efter denna kurs? Markera endast ett alternativ
o Ja o Nej o Kanske
Hur mycket håller du med i följande uttalanden? 7. Det engelska språket är riktigt intressant o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
8. Jag ser alltid fram emot mina engelska lektioner o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
9. Det är onödigt att lära sig engelska o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
10. Jag tycker det är roligt at lära mig engelska o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
11. Det är viktigt att få ett bra betyg i engelska o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
12. Att lära mig engelska är viktigt eftersom jag kan behöva det senare (för jobb, studier mm.) o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
13. Att lära mig engelska är endast viktigt för att klara engelskakursen o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
14. Att lära mig engelska är viktigt så jag kan prata engelska utomlands o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
15. Att lära mig engelska är viktigt så jag kan förstå engelsktalande filmer, böcker, TV och spel
o Instämmer helt o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
16. Att lära mig engelska är viktigt så jag kan träffa nya människor jag kan prata engelska med online eller offline
o Instämmer helt o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
17. Att lära mig engelska är viktigt så jag kan träffa folk från engelsktalande länder o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
18. Att lära mig engelska är viktigt för att förstå den amerikanska/engelska kulturen o Instämmer helt
o Instämmer till stor del o Instämmer till en liten del o Instämmer inte alls
Den andra delen av min studie består av intervjuer om motivation, skriv gärna din mejladress om du är intresserad av att vara med i en intervju
9.2 Interview questions
1. Vilket program läser du?2. Tycker du att det är viktigt att lära dig engelska? Varför? Varför inte?
3. Har du någon gång känt dig tacksam över att du kan engelska? När?/ Berätta om det.
4. Har du någon gång önskat att du kunde mer engelska? När?/ Berätta om det.
5. Vilken eller vilka av följande aktiviteter eller förmågor: tala, skriva, lyssna och läsa motiveras du mest av i klassrummet när du har engelska?
Varför?
6. Vilka arbetssätt: till exempel individuellt arbete, grupparbete, redovisning motiverar dig till att lära dig engelska?
7. Finns det något annat som motiverar dig att bli bättre i engelska? Kan du ge något exempel?
8. Finns det någon person som motiverar dig att bli bättre i engelska? Vem/vilka?
9. Vad tycker du är utmanande eller svårt när det gäller att lära sig engelska? 10. Finns det något som gör att du inte vill lära dig engelska?
Berätta/ge exempel.
11. Hur motiverar du dig själv att lära dig engelska när eller om det går trögt eller tar emot? ”Berätta gärna lite mer om det”
9.3 Petra
M: Vilket program läser du? P: Naturvetenskapsprogrammet
M: Tycker du att det är viktigt att lära dig engelska? P: Ja jamen. Jätteviktigt tycker jag att det är. M: Varför?
P: För att typ alla i hela världen, eller i stora delar av världen, kan prata engelska och det är så man kan ta sig runt. Och jag personligen älskar jag att resa så därför hjälper det mig jättemycket när jag resar. Och annars vet jag att många jobb innehåller att man ska kunna engelska, man ska kunna presentera, prata med andra och sådär saker, så jag tror att det är väldigt viktigt vart än man är och vilken situation man är i.
M: Hur hjälper det dig när du är ute och resa:
P: Jag kan prata med befolkningen, att kunna ta mig fram på olika sätt, att kunna beställa mat. Jag kan svenska engelska och lite spanska men ifall jag åker till ett land utom det så behöver man kunna engelska då liksom.