Analysis of water samples for campaign

(1)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR CAMPAIGN11918-19 LGVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

Copies to:

General Ch8Ilist. / Chief Engineer.

Ass't Chief Engineer. Superintendent.

Travelling Chemist. Laboratory.

(2)

*******

ANALYSIS OF WATER S!MFLES FOR CAMPAIGN 1918-19 LOVELAND FACTORY

'l!HE GREA.T WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

ANALYSIS

BOILER FEED

Parts

per

100,000

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS

SALTS Pal"l[i;s Pt

r

100

,ooo

Silica _Si02 Iron Fe Calci'Ulll Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid

so

₄ Carbonic Acid

co

₃

Organic & Volatile matter (by Difference) TOTAL SOLIDS

SAMPLE: ... ATe rage sample for the campaign. .66 .06 .31 .13 .66 .65 1.15 ,43 4.05 3.12 7.17

SOURCE:• Drips from Granulator coils, Steam Chests of 2nd 3rd, 4t~, & 5th Effects of Evaps, all

Silica Sodium Chloride Sod11lum Sulphe!te Magnesium Sulphate Ca.leium Sulphate Calcium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate

live steam traps thruout the factory via Fla.sh tank and city water.

S.i02 Na.Cl Na2

so

4 MgS04 CaS0₄ Ca.C03 FeC0₃ .66 1.07 074 .64 .20 .62 .12 4.05 3.12 7.17 LOVELAND BOILER FE~

(3)

***

.A.N.A.LYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR Cil!IPAIGN1918-19 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREA.T WESTm:N SUGAR COMP.ANY

PAN PIG

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts

per

100,000

Silica _Si02

.so

Iron Fe .07 Calcium Ca 1.14 Magnesium Mg 052 Sodium Na .39 Chlorine Cl

.so

Sulphuri• Acid S04 4.32 Carbonic Acid 003 .87 8.61 Organic & Volatile

Matter (BYdifference) 5,51

TOTAL SOL IDS 14.12

SAMPLE: Average sample for campaign. SOURCE:~ Condansation from Pan Coils.

Silioa

Sodium Chloride Sodium Sulphate .Magnesium Sulphate Calcium Sulphate Oaloium Carbonate Ferrous Carbonate Parts per Si0 2 NaCl Na₂so₄ MgS0₄ CaS04 Ca.00₃ Feco3 LOVELAND PAN PIG 100,000

.ao

.82 .2~ 2.57 3o00 1.05 .15 8.61 5.51 14.12

(4)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR CAMPAIGN 1918•19 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREA.T WESTERN SUGAR CO.MP.ANY

PRES§ WA.SH

ANALYSIS

HY.POTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts

per

100,000 Parts per 100,000

Silica Sl0

2 2.22 Silica S102 2.22

Iron Fe 1.34 Sodium Chloride NaCl 1.48

Calcium Ca .89 Sodium Sulphate _Ba2S04 1.27

Magnesium Mg .59 .Magnesium _{Sulphate MgS04} 2.02

Sodium Na .99 Magnesium Carbonate MgC0₃ .62

Chlorine Cl .90 Calcium C14rbo11a.te

Sulphuric .Acid S0

4 2.47 Ferrous Carbo:na.te

Carbonie Acid 003

3.21

12.61 Orgahic & Volatile matter

(by difference) 4.43

TOTAL SOLIDS ll{.04

SAMPLE:- ATerage sanple for the ca.mpaigaj

SOURCE:• Drips from 1st ETaps, Carbonation Coils and all heaters, condensation from 4th& 5th Pa.n Condensers.

Ca.co₃ FeC0 3 LOVELA.N.D PRESS WASH 2.22 2.78 12.61 4.43 17.04

(5)

ANALYSIS OF WATER S.Alfi'LES FOR CAM'"'AIGN 1918-19 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREA.T WESTERN SUGAR COMP.ANY

CITY WA.TER

ANALYSIS HYPOTBTICJL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts

;per

100,000

Silica _Si02 2.30 Silica

Iron Fe .13 Sodium Chloride

Calcium Ca lo42 Sodium Sul:pha te

Magnesium M'g .51 Magnesium Sulphate

Sodium Na .99 Calcium Sulphate

Chlorine Cl

.so

Caleium Carbonate

Sulphurio Acid

so

₃ 3.99 Ferrous Carbonate

Carbonic Acid

co

₁ 1.6&

11.78 Organic & Volatile matter

(by difference} l,64

TOTAL

so:uns

l3e42

SAMPLE:- ATerage for tla eanpaign.

SOURCE:- Big Thompson riTer about 8 miles west ot Factory.

Parts Si0₂ NaCl Na₂so₄ MgS0₄ CaS0 4 CaC03 Fece₃ LOVELAND CITY WATER ;per 100,0000 2.30 1.32 1.45 2.52 1.42 2.50 .27 11.78 1.64 13.42

(6)

ANALYSIS OF WATER Silll'LES FOR ClJ.iIPAIGN 1918-19.

LOVELAND FACTORY

BATTERY SUPPLY PURE AN,ilYSIS

Parts per 100,000

HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS Parts per 100,000, Silica _S102 4.90 Iron Fe .84 Calcium Ca 4.22 Magnesium Mg 2.33 Sodium· Na 2.97 Chlorine 01 1.00 Sulphuric Acid

so

₄ 21.19 Carbonic Acid 003 217§ 40.21 Organic & Volatile matter (by Difference) 4193

TOTAL SOLIDS 45,14

S.ilfi>Lll:• Average for the campaign.

Silica _Si02

Sodium Chloride NaCl Sodium Sulphate Na

2

so

4

Magnesium Sulphate MgS0

4

Calcium Sulphate CaS0₄ Calcium Carbonate CaC03 Ferrous Carbonate FeC6

3

SOu"RCE:- OYerflow from Press wash, City water and ractory Well water.

LOVEUND

BATTERY SUPPLY PURE.

4.90 1.65 7.16 11.53 10.13 3.10 l.74 40,21 4993 45.14

(7)

ANALYSIS Silica _Bi02 Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Jig Sodium Na Chlorine Cl Sulphuric Acid so₄ Carbonic Acid 003

Organic & Volatile matter (By difference)

TOT.AL SOLIDS

ANALYSIS OF WATER S.AMPLES FOR C!M?AIGN 1918-19 LOVEIJi.ND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR COMPANY.

BATTERY SU:P:PLY DllPURE

.la:eOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS ..iS

Pa.rte per

100,000 i.52 Silica .53 Sodium Chloride 1.59 Sodium Su)phate 4.87 l4agnesium Sulplate 12.51 M.a.gnesitllll Carbonate 1.50 Caloium Carbonate 40.74 Ferrous Carbonate 1 4e55 75.81 12.03 0,.04 Parts per Si02 Na.Cl Na2S04 MgS04 MgC03 CaC0₃ FeC03 106,000 9.52 2.47 35.62 20.0e 2.25 3.97 1. 10 75081

12.03

87.84

SAMPLE:- ATera.ge sample fc;,r the c81?1J)aig.n. SOURCE:- Pans and Evaporators condensers.

LOVELAND

BATTERY SUPPLY IM:PURE

(8)

ANALMSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR C.A.MP~IGN 1918-19. LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUGAR CCDMP.ANY

WHITE PAN CONDENSERS

ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Parts

Silica. S1Cl

2 9.94 Silica Si02

Iron Fe .49 S&ilium Chloride NaCl

Calcium Ca 5.17 Sodium Sulphate _Na.2S04

Ma.gne s i um Mg 6.83 Magnesium Sulphate MgS04

Sodium Na 4.92 Calcium Sulphate

Caso

₄

Chlorine Cl

.ao

Calcium Carbonate _CaC03

Sulphuric Acid

so

₄ 41.81 Ferrous Carbonate FeC03

Carbonie .Acid 003

3.75

73.71

Organic & Volaitle matter

(by difference) 17.11

TOTAL SOLIDS

_t•

_.

_e2

SAMPLE:- ATerags sample for the oanpaign.

SOURCE:~ Condensation from White Pans, Ditch and well water.

LOVELAND

WHITE PAN CONDENSERS

per 100,000 9.94 1.32 13.59 33.81 7.99 6.04 1.02 73.71 17.11 90.82

(9)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR CAMPAIGN 1918-19 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT VVESTEaN SUGAR CONLPANY

RAW P.A1'l CONDENSERS

.ANALYSIS HYPOTHETICAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Parts per 100.00,Q

Silica 8102 14.66 Silica. Si02 14.66

Iron Fe .34 Sodium Chloride NaCl 2.64

Calcium Ca 4.92 Sodium Sulphate Nail04 15.44

:naa.gn.

s i um Mg 5.26 :Magnesium Sulphate MgS0₄ 26.04

Sodi'UII Na 6.04 Calcium Sulphate CaS04 14.65

J.

Chlorine Cl 1.60 Calcium Carbonate _CaC03 1.52

Sulphuric Acid so₄ 41.56 Ferrous Carbonate FeC0

3 .70

Carbonic A.c id 003 1.27

75.65 75.65

Organic & Volatile matter (Bydifferencell7,59 17159

TOTAL SOLIDS 93.24 93.24

SAMPLE:- Average for the campaign.

SOURCE:T Condensation from the Raw Pans, Ditch wa)er & Well water.

LOVELAND

(10)

Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid Carbonic Acid ANALYSIS Fe Ca Mg Na Cl

Organic & Volatile matter (by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR CAMPAIGN 1918-19 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT \VESTERN SUGAR COMPANY

EVAPORATOR CONDENSERS

Parts per 100,000 11.32

HYPOTHEUCAL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts per 100.000 .32 8.05 5.33 4.91 2.10 43.41 3.05 78.49 13.47 91.96 Silica _Si02

Sodi'UlD Chloride NaCl

lia.gnesium Sulphate MgS0 4 Calcium Sulphate _Caso4 Calcium Carbonate CaC0₃ Ferrous Carbonate

Feco

₃

¼l.32 10.96 26.38 21.19 .66 78.49 13.47 91.96

SAMPLE:- ATerage for the campaign.

SOURCE:- ETaporators oendensation, D'itch Water and. Well wat9r.

LOVELAND

(11)

ANALYSIS Silica Si0₂ Iron Fe Calcium Ca Magnesium Mg Sodium Na Ohloriae Cl Sulphurio Acid

so

₄ Carbonic Asid ₀₀₃

Organic & Volatile matter {by difference)

TOTAL SOLIDS

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR ~ V:Pj,IGN 1918-19 LOVELAIID FACTORY

TEE GREAT WES'rERN SUG.AR OOMF.ilNY

DITCH WATER

hY.POTHETICALCOMlHNATIONS AS SALTS.

Parts per 100,000 Parts.q;pe

r

100

,ooo

2.70 Silica. Si02 2.70

.91 Sodium Cij.l.oride NaCl 2.14

12.22 Sodium Sulphate _Na2S04 10.52

5.13 Ma.gne s i um Sulphate M_gS04 25.39

4.24 Calcium Sulphate _Caso4 3.77

1.30 Calcium Carbonate Caco

3 27.75

30.04 Ferrous Carbonate _FeC03 1.89

J.71S!2

74.16 74.16

17.84 17184

92.00 92.00

SAMPLE:- ATerage for the Campaign.

SOURCE:- Lake LOTeland and CemeDery Lake.

LOVELAIID

DITCH WA.TER

(12)

ANALYSIS OF WATm S.Al/IPLES FOR C.A.!/[2AIGN 1918-19.

LOVELAND FACTORY

WELL WATER AJ."'q ALYS I S Parts

per

100,000 Silica Si0₂ 3.46 Iron Fe .42 8alcium Ca 13.41 Magnesium Mg 16.24 Sodim Na 21.00 Chlorine Cl 2.00

Sul:phurio Acid so~ 97.44

Carbonic Acifi 003 25144

179.,U

Organic & Vala.tile matt r

(by dii'ferenoe) 33195

TOTAL SOLIDS 213.36

SAMPLE:- One sample taklen from pump hole. SOURCE:- Nine wells north & east of Factory.

HYPOTHETIC.AL COMBINATIONS AS SALTS Parts per 100,000

Silio& Si0

2 Sodium Chloride NaCl

Sgdium Sul:pha.te _N82S04 Magnesium Sulphate MgS04 Calcium Car-bonate Ferrous Carbonate LOVELAND WELL WATER. 3.30 70.55 .87 179.41 33,95 213.36

(13)

ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR CAMPAIGN 1918-19 LOVELAND FACTORY

THE GREAT WESTERN SUG.AR COMPANY

BOILER WJ.TER .ANALYSIS

:Parts

· per

100

,ooo

5.32 .28

HY1'0TEETIQ4J, COMBINATIONS AS SALTS

Parts per 100,000 Silica Iron Calcium Magnesium Sodium Chlorine Sulphuric Acid C8.l" bonic .A.aid Fe Ca. Mg Na Cl S04 003

Organic & Volatile Matter

(by difference) TOTAL SOL IDS

SAMPLE:- Average sample for campaign. SOURCE:- Direct from Boilers.

.46 .16 73.fi6 9.60 15.02 80132 185.02 132110 317.12 Silica _Si02

Sodium Chloride Na.Cl Sodium Sulphate _Na.2S04 Sodium Carbonate _Na.2003 Magnesium Carbonate MgC03 Calcium Carbonate Ferrpus Carbonate Ca.003 FeC03 LOVELAND BOILER WATER 5.32 15.83 22.21 139.28 .55 1.15 .68 185.02 132,10 317.12