• No results found

Treatment planning in public social casework : a street-level response to policy pluralism

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Treatment planning in public social casework : a street-level response to policy pluralism"

Copied!
9
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

1

Street-Level Bureaucracy Research Conference

The interplay between policy reforms, governance and street-level practices and the implications for the assistance-seeking citizens

Copenhagen 11st – 13th of June 2019

SAB - Department of Sociology and Social Work

(2)

2

Program Tuesday 11

th

Time Activity

13:00 - 14.00 Registration Room: Hall

Coffee/tea and refreshments will be served

Address: A.C. Meyers Vænge 15

14:00-14.15 Welcome Room: Auditorium 14:15 – 15:00

15:00-15.30

Key note: Bernardo Zacka, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room: Auditorium

Based on his recent work “When the State Meets the Street” Q & A

(3)

3

Program Wednesday 12

th

Time Activity

09:00 -10:30 Paper Session 1 - parallel sessions

Stream 1: Conference hall 1.001 Stream 2: Room 2.0.028

Chair: Sharon Wright

Pedersen, Eirin, Eric Breit & Cathrine Egeland (Oslo Metropolitan University): Between

production and innovation - The role of front-line professionals in local innovation in NAV.

Brauer, John (Örebro universitet): Social

representations of unemployment and activation work among street-level bureaucrats.

Kongsgaard, Leif Tøfting (Væksthuset Research Center): Critical reflections at the frontline.

Chair: Gitte Sommer Harrits

Olesen, Søren Peter (Aalborg University):

Negotiation and Persuasive Devices in Street-Level Practice - Two Contrasting Talks at a Danish Job-center.

Osiander, Christopher & Martin Dietz (The Institute for Employment Research):

Labour Market Integration of Refugees: What Affects Caseworkers’ Strategies?

Piippo, Sisko, Marianne Notko & Marita Husso (University of Eastern Finland):

Working with domestic violence:

interprofessional cooperation among social and health care professionals and police.

10:30 -11:00 Short Break Room: outside Conference hall 1.001

Coffee/tea and refreshment will be served

(4)

4 11:00 -12:30 Paper Session 2 - parallel sessions

Stream 1: Conference hall 1.001 Stream 2: Room 2.0.028 Stream 3: Room 2.1.042

Chair: Dorte Caswell

McGann, Michael, Siobhan O’Sullivan & Mark Considine (University of Melbourne): The

category game and its impacts on street-level workers and job seekers: An Australian casestudy.

Matarese, Maureen (City University of New York): Constructing policy on the clock: How

benchmarks shape social interaction in social welfare.

Stray, Karianne Nyheim & Thomassen, O.J (USN School of Business): Frontline workers

coping with performance management.

Chair: Flemming Larsen

Alecu, Andrea (Oslo Metropolitan University):

The role of street-level bureaucrats’ attitudes in sanctioning practice in the Norwegian Labor and Welfare administration.

Sadeghi, Talieh (Oslo Metropolitan University):.

Social workers dedication in an activation work context.

Kaufman, James (University of Sheffield):

Intensity, Moderation, and the Pressures of Expectation: Calculation and Coercion in the Street-level Practice of Behavioral Conditionality.

Chair: Michael Lipsky

Paraciani, Rebecca & Kim Loyens (The University of Bologna): Deciding whether

labour exploitation is severe. An

international comparative vignette study in Italy, the Netherlands, and Belgium.

Leibetseder, Bettina (Landshut University of Applied Sciences): They do what they

must: Caseworker at the Public Employment Service in Vienna.

Breidahl, Karen, Flemming Larsen(Aalborg University), Eric Breit & Knut Fossetøl (Oslo Metropolitan University) : How to

make integrated and co-produced social- and employment services possible in public street-level organisations? Lessons from Norway and Denmark.

12:30 –13:30 Lunch Break Room: outside Conference hall 1.001

Lunch will be served

(5)

5 13:30-15:00 Paper Session 3 - parallel sessions

Stream 1: Conference hall 1.001 Stream 2: Room 2.0.028 Chair: Rik van Berkel

Hollertz, Katarina & Kerstin Jacobsson (University of Gothenburg): The Role of

Teamwork in a Welfare State Bureaucracy: Performativity, Commitment and Control in the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.

Bennet, Hayley (University of Edinburgh):

“We have to do something!” Street-level

collaborations to mitigate benefit

sanctioning in Scotland.

Considine, Mark (The University of Melbourne): The Choice Factor in Policy

Designs: Street-level Issues, Dilemmas and Ways Forward.

Chair: Sharon Wright

Lundemark, Maja (Aalborg University): Empowering collaboration within a Danish workfare paradigm: a challenge in social work research.

Magnussen, Siv & Rolf Rønning (Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences): Co-creation of

value in public services: The need for an integration of ressources.

Wollter, Filip & Lars Oscarsson (Ersta Sköndal Bräcke University College): Treatment planning

in public social casework – a street-level response to policy pluralism.

15:00-15.30

15.30-17.00

Break

Coffee/tea and refreshments will be served Room: outside Conference hall 1.001

Address: A.C. Meyers Vænge 15

Open session: Room: Auditorium Presentation of findings in the Danish LISES project (by Flemming Larsen & Dorte Caswell) and dialogue with the international advisory board: Michael Lipsky, Evelyn Brodkin, Rik van Berkel, Sharon Wright & Mark Considine

(https://lisessite.files.wordpress.com/2016/08/lises-project-description.pdf)

17.25 Option: Joint departure with a harbor boat to the conference dinner Meeting place: Hall

(6)

6

18:30- Conference Dinner

At restaurant “Søren K”, The Black Diamond (The Royal Library) Address: Søren Kierkegaards Plads 1, 1016 Copenhagen

Preliminary program Thursday 13

th

Time Activity

10:00 – 12.00 Paper Sessions 4 - parallel sessions

Stream 1: Conference hall 1.001 Stream 2: Room 2.0.028 Stream 3: Room 2.1.042

Chair: Maja Lundemark

Madsen, Mikkel Bo, Anette Skals, Jonas K. Ørnbøll & Susanne T. Hvistendal

(Metropolitan University College): Professional

competency processes among street-Level bureaucrats going through Radical Governance Regime Transformations: A longitudinal case study among employment professionals in Denmark.

Leonardi, Daniela (University of Milano Bicocca): In the relationship we put the skills,

but we also put our way of being’. Professional discretion in the homeless services.

van der Aa, Paul & Rik van Berkel (Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences): The contested

meaning of ‘professional activation’ in the Netherlands.

Chair: Maureen Matarese

Bakkeli, Vidar (Oslo Metropolitan University):

Integrating activation and mental health services. Implementation and professional practices in an evidence-based model.

Szücs, Stefan, Staffan Höjer (University of Gothenburg), Andreas Liljegren & Johan Berlin (University West): Coping with Citizens and

Stress: Interaction Strategies during Public Service Delivery within Health Care, the Police, and Social Work.

Stray, Karianne & Thomassen O.J. (USN School of Business). Exploring the contemporary

discourse of health within the Norwegian activation policies.

Kjeldsen, Lena & Finn Amby (VIA University College): Furthering employment for people with

Chair: Evelyn Brodkin

Lotta, Gabriela (Sao Paulo School of Business Administration), Marie

Østergaard (Aalborg University) & Roberto Pires (Institute for Applied Economic Research): The double role of street-level

bureaucrats in categorizing needs of service provision.

Gångare, Emma-Lisa (Gothenburg

University): Street-level organizations and

wicked problems.

Eiro, Flávio (Radboud University): The

vicious cycle in the Bolsa Família Program’s implementation: discretionality and the challenge of social rights consolidation in Brazil.

(7)

7 Andreassen, Tone, Eric Breit & Therese

Saltkjel(Oslo Metropolitan University):

Meta-narratives in research on service integration for workforce inclusion: A systematic review.

mobility impairments through integrated services.

Adamu, Nenadi (University of Bedfordshire): Young People in the

Informal Economy

12: - 13:00 Lunch Break Room: outside Conference hall 1.001Lunch will be served

Address: A.C. Meyers Vænge 15

13:00 - 14:30 Paper Sessions 5 - parallel sessions Stream 1: Conference hall 1.001 Stream 2: Room 2.0.028

Chair: Mark Considine

Gjersøe, Heidi & Anne Strand (VID Specialised University and Fafo Research Institute):

Between employment needs and client needs – Tackling a new role for the street-level

organization.

Saruis, Tatiana (University of Modena) & Dario Raspanti and Reggio Emilia (University of Florence): The reversed asymmetry. The

relationship between public employment services' frontline workers and employers as voluntary clients.

Braun, Thorsten & Edda Luth (VIA University College): Municipal implementation of

unemployment policy – cooperation with employers and businesses.

Chair: Søren Peter Olesen

Hansen, Helle Cathrine (VID Specialized University): A pendulum swing in Norwegian

activation policy - what does it look like from the street level?

Girardi, Silvia (Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research): Social workers’ practices in

response to the tensions arising in shaping the activation of social assistance beneficiaries: The case of Luxembourg.

Løberg, Ida Bring (Oslo Metropolitan University): Digital Decision-Making:

Experiences with Semi-Automation in the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration (NAV).

14.30-15.00 Break

(8)

8 Address: A.C. Meyers Vænge 15

15:00-16.00 Panel Session chaired by Professor Michael Lipsky, Georgetown University Room: Auditorium Panel participants: Mark Considine, Evelyn Brodkin, Sharon Wright

Theme for the panel: reflexions on the field of street level bureaucracy research – where are we going?

(9)

9

How to get there AAU-CPH

Main building – A

A.C. Meyers Vænge 15

2450 Copenhagen SW

Reception/Hall

Guest canteen room 1.001

Auditorium room 1.008

(near the entrance)

Room 2.1.042

(second floor)

Room 2.1.043

(second floor)

References

Related documents

Although a recent meta-analysis found that the two main types of family-based programs, general parent education (i.e., home visiting programs aimed at improving health and

However, studies of higher methodological quality found little evidence that mentoring reduced reoffending, suggesting that inadequate control of pre-existing differences

The main selection criteria were that the evaluation should be based on voluntary treatment programmes that aimed to reduce drug use (e.g. methadone maintenance, detoxi- fication,

The anti-bullying initiative in the Netherlands was inspired by the Olweus programme (Fekkes et al., 2006, p. The programme was specifically designed to tackle bullying behaviour

The treatment group (n=62; only those who completed the programme) and the comparison group were matched on a number of features including age at first violent offence, total

After identifying 34 studies that met a series of highly stringent in- clusion criteria, the analyses indicated that: (1) self-control improve- ment programs improve

At 18 month follow up period, the treatment group had a lower percentage of general recidivism than the control group with not significant differences between the two groups

Studies were included in these systematic reviews if the surveillance measure in question (i.e., security guards, place managers, and defen- sible space) was the main focus of