ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect
Australasian
Emergency
Care
j ourn a l h o m ep a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / a u e c
Research
paper
Outcome
among
patients
who
call
the
emergency
medical
service
(EMS)
due
to
dizziness
Niclas
Packendorff
a,
Victoria
Gustavsson
a,
Carl
Magnusson
b,
Magnus
Andersson
Hagiwara
c,∗,
Katarina
Jood
d,
Johan
Herlitz
c,
Christer
Axelsson
caTheEmergencyMedicalServiceSysteminGothenburg,Sweden
bInstituteofMedicine,DepartmentofMolecularandClinicalMedicine,TheSahlgrenskaAcademy,GothenburgUniversity,SE-40530Gothenburg,Sweden cCentreforPrehospitalResearchFacultyofCaringScience,WorkLifeandSocialWelfare,UniversityofBorås,SE-50190Borås,Sweden
dDepartmentofClinicalNeuroscienceandPhysiology,TheSahlgrenskaAcademyUniversityofGothenburg,SE-40530Gothenburg,Sweden
a
r
t
i
c
l
e
i
n
f
o
Articlehistory: Received7April2020
Receivedinrevisedform5June2020 Accepted3July2020
Keywords:
EmergencyMedicalService Dizziness
Etiology Outcome
a
b
s
t
r
a
c
t
Background:Patientwithdizzinessarechallenginginprehospitalcare.
TheaimwastodescribefinaldiagnosisamongpatientsassessedbyEMSassufferingfromdizziness withfocusontime-criticalconditions.
Methods:ConsecutivepatientsassessedbyanEMSclinicianduring12monthsinasinglelargeEMSsystem inGothenburg,Sweden(660,000inhabitants),wereassessed.ThestudycomprisedpatientsgivenESS code11dizziness.Themainend-pointwasthefinaldiagnosis(ICDcode).
Results:Therewere58,575primarymissions,ofwhich2,048(3.5%)wereassessedasESScode11 (dizzi-ness).Ofthese,161(8%)wereexcluded.Amongtheremaining1887cases,therewere230differentICD codesand96(5%)hadatime-criticalcondition.Themajority(88%)hadacerebrovasculardisease.The mosttypicalsymptomsamongtime-criticalconditionswereanacuteonset(63%)andnausea,vomiting (61%).Whencomparedwithnon-time-criticalconditions,thosewithtime-criticalconditionswereolder andhadahighermediansystolicbloodpressureatEMSarrival.
Conclusion:AmongprimarymissionsbytheEMS,3.5%haddizziness.Ofthese,5%hadatime-critical conditionandthemajorityhadacerebrovasculardisease.Instrumentstoidentifytime-criticalconditions amongpatientsseenbyEMSduetodizzinessarerequired.
©2020PublishedbyElsevierLtdonbehalfofCollegeofEmergencyNursingAustralasia.
Introduction
Dizziness is a relatively common symptom that may force patientstoseekemergencycare.Manyofthesepatientsdialthe emergencynumberinSweden(112)forambulancetransportto hospital.
Dizzinessisaunifyingconceptforanumberofdifferent expe-rienceswhichthepatientsoftendescribeasfeelingsofbringon acarousel,offbalance,nearsyncopeormotionofthesea.Ithas beenreportedthat aboutthree percentof alladmissions toan emergencydepartment(ED)areduetosymptomsofdizziness[1].
∗ Correspondingauthor.
E-mailaddresses:niclas.packendorff@gmail.com
(N.Packendorff),Victoria.g1981@gmail.com(V.Gustavsson),
cw.magnusson@gmail.com(C.Magnusson),magnus.hagiwara@hb.se
(M.AnderssonHagiwara),Katarina.jood@neuro.gu.se(K.Jood),Johan.herlitz@hb.se
(J.Herlitz),christer.axelsson@hb.se(C.Axelsson).
Anumberofconditionscanbeassociatedwithsymptomsof dizziness.Damagetocentralorperipheralpartsofthevestibular systemwillgenerateanacutevestibularsyndrome.
Whenthedamageislocalisedintheinnerearorinthe vestibu-larnerve,thereisaperipheralaetiology.Examplesofperipheral aetiologies of an acute vestibular syndrome are benign parox-ysmalpositional vestibularneuritis,Ménière’s disease,bacterial labyrinthitisandherpeszosteroticus[2].
In“centraldizziness”,thedamageislocalisedincentralpartsof thevestibularsysteminthebrainstemand/orcerebellumandthe underlyingaetiologiesincludestroke/TIA,migraine,tumourinthe brainstem,encephalitisandmultiplesclerosis[2].
However,ithasbeensuggestedthatthemajorityofpatients withacutevertigohaveotheraetiologies,whicharenotassociated withdamagetothevestibularsystem.Lametal.reportedthat63% ofpatientswithacutedizzinesshadsomethingotherthandamage tothevestibularsystem[3].Themostcommonaetiologieswere anupper airwayinfection(35%) and hypertension(18%).
Time-https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2020.07.001
criticalconditionssuchassepsis,bradycardia,AVblockIIIandacute coronarysyndromeaccountedforaboutthreepercentofallcases. A further categorisation of vertigo was made by Newman-Tokeretal.,who included9000casesofvertigointheirsurvey [1].Morethanhalfthepatientshadanaetiologywhichwasnot relatedtothevestibularsystem.Thestudyconfirmedthatthere is often a medical disease behind symptoms of vertigo which isnot related tothevestibular system.Time-critical conditions whicharenotrelatedtothevestibularsystembutmaystillcause dizzinessand includewater-electrolyteimbalance, arrhythmias, cerebrovasculardiseases,carbonmonoxidepoisoningandaortic dissection/aneurysm.
Thevarietyofconditionsthatmayexistbehindsymptomsof dizzinesshighlight thedifficultieshealth-careproviders experi-enceindifferentiatingthesesymptomsintobenignandmalignant conditionsatthefirstencounterwithpatientswhopresentwith thesesymptoms.
The burden on the emergency medical service (EMS) has increasedmarkedlyduringthelastfewdecades.Thisphenomenon isexplainedbyanumberoffactors,includingthedevelopmentof anelderlypopulationandthefactthatmorepeoplenowadaystend tocallforanambulanceduetolesstime-criticalconditions.Ithas thusbeenshownthatnotallpatientswhodial112needtobe trans-portedtoanEDbutcanpreferablybehandledatanotherlevelof care[4].Thishasincreasedthedemandonhealth-careproviders intheEMSwho,alreadyatanearlystage,needtobeableto dis-tinguishpatientswithatime-criticalconditionfromthosewithout anddonotrequireemergencycare.
Onesymptomthatmaycreatedifficultiesintheearly assess-mentonEMS arrivalisdizziness.Thisisexplained bythelarge numberofpossibleunderlyingaetiologiesofwhichsomearetime criticalbutthemajorityarenot.Arecentstudyofpatientswith TIA/strokedescribingpatientswhowerenotdirectlytransported tohospitalaftertheassessmentbyEMS,duetofailureintheearly identificationindicatedthatmanyofthesepatientshaddizziness asthedominantsymptom[5].
Theaimofthepresentstudyisthereforetodescribeconsecutive patientswhocallfortheEMSduetosymptomsofdizzinesswiththe emphasisontheinitialpresentationtotheEMSclinicianandthe finaldiagnosis,i.e.underlyingcondition.Particularattentionwill bepaidtowhetherthepatientswereorwerenotsufferingfroma time-criticalconditionaccordingtothefinaldiagnosis.
Methodsandmethods
Design
Thiswasaretrospective,consecutive,observational,pilotstudy witha quantitativeapproach which wasperformedthroughan evaluationoftheEMSandhospitalmedicalrecords.
Studysettingandpopulation
ThestudywasperformedinGothenburg,whichisthesecond largestcity inSweden,locatedonthewest coast,with660,000 inhabitantsandanareaof900km[2].IntheEMSsystem,there are20advancedlifesupport(ALS)ambulancesmannedbyatleast oneregisterednurse(oftenwithaspecificeducationin prehospi-talemergencycare).Thiseducationinvolveseitherpostgraduate educationoraprogrammeinprehospitalemergencycare.There arealsotwoso-calledsingle-responderunitsmannedby experi-encedregisterednursesalwayswithaneducationinprehospital emergencycare.Thereisalsoonephysician-mannedunitwithan anaesthesiologistandaregisterednurse.
In2016,therewere58,575primarymissionswithinthe organ-isationofwhich 2048(3.5%)receivedtheEmergencySignsand Symptoms (ESS) code11 (dizziness)fromthe nurse. Thiscode includedalltypesofdizziness.
“Primarymission”meansthattheEMSnursemakesthepatient assessmentonscene.
Patientrecruitment
In2016,alltheprimarymissionsinthecatchmentareawithESS code11(dizziness;n=2048)wereincludedinthestudy.
Theinclusioncriteriawerethus:
1)PrimarymissionassessedbytheEMSnurse 2)ESScode11(dizziness)
Theexclusioncriteriawere: 1)Age<16years.
2)Patientbeingassessedbyanothercaregiver,i.e.aphysicianat anoutpatientclinic.
3)ThelackofanassessmentbyaphysicianattheED. 4)Thelackofacompleteidentificationnumber.
5)Thepatientwassenttoanotherhospitaloutsidethecatchment area.
Datacollection
Datawerecollectedfromthehealth-careprovider’snotification intheEMSrecordsintheEMSdatasystem,Ambulink.A simulta-neousanalysisofthehospitaldatabase,Melior,towhichAmbulink islinked,wasperformedwiththeemphasisonthefinaldiagnosis accordingtotheInternationalStatisticalClassificationofDiseases andRelatedHealthProblems-TenthRevision(ICD-10)code.
Patientswerethusdividedintotwogroups,i.e.thosewitha time-criticalconditionaccordingtofinaldiagnosisandthose with-out.
Atime-critical conditionwas definedaccordingtoHagiwara et al. [6] and comprised the following diagnoses: myocardial infarction,unstable angina pectoris,transitory ischaemicattack (TIA)/stroke, unconsciousness, sepsis, aortic dissection/rupture, anyformofshock,pulmonaryembolism,heartfailureincluding pulmonaryoedema,bundlebranchblock,cardiacarrest, intoxica-tion,water-electrolyteimbalanceandhigh-energytrauma.
Allcasesthathadanyoftheaboveasthefinaldiagnosiswere morecarefullyreviewed,addressingsomevariablesthatwerenot addressedintheremainingpatients.
Prioritisation
Patientswereprioritisedatthedispatchcentreatthreepriority levels.
Level1)Lifethreateningandanambulancedispatchedwithblue lightsandsirens
Level2)Notlifethreatening;canaccept30-minutewaitingtime fortheEMS
Level3)NormalwaitingtimefortheEMS
Patientswereassessed and triagedatthescene bytheEMS clinicianbasedonpatientseverityaccordingtotheRapid Emer-gencyTriageandTreatmentSystem(RETTS).Thissystemisbased onthevitalsignsofdegreeofconsciousness,oxygensaturation, res-piratoryrate,heartrate,bloodpressureandbodytemperaturein combinationwithanESScode.Thelatterdefinesthemodeof com-plaint,i.e.chestpain,dizzinessandsoon.Eachpatientiscategorised intooneoffivecolours(red,orange,yellow,greenandblue)and oneESScodethatdefinethemainsymptom.Redislifethreatening andorangeispotentiallylifethreatening.Bothcolorsindicatethat
thepatientshouldbemonitoredandseenbyaphysicianattheED assoonaspossible.Yellowandgreenindicatenon-life-threatening conditions,butpatientsneedtobeseenbyaphysicianwithina reasonabletime.
Bluemeansthatalowerlevelofcaremaybemoreappropriate thanEDadmission.Atthetimeofthestudy,thebluelevelwasnot inuseintheEMS.
Dataanalysis
Theresultispresentedasnumbers,percentagesorthemedian with25thand75thpercentiles.Whencontinuousvariablesaswell asordereddata(prioritylevel)werecompared,theMann-Whitney UtestwasusedandFisher’sexacttestfordichotomous/categorical variables.Alltestsaretwo-sidedand p-valuesbelow0.05were regarded asstatistically significant.SPSSversion 22 (IBMCorp, Armonk,NY)wasusedfordataprocessingandstatisticalanalysis. Ethicalconsiderations
Thisstudyhasbeenconductedwithintheframeworkofa mas-ter’sdegreeattheUniversityofBorås.AccordingtotheSwedish law,SFS2003:460Thelawofethicalconsiderationsinhuman tri-als,studiesconductedbystudentsarenotjudgedbytheSwedish ethicalreviewboards.However,BoråsUniversityjudgesallits stu-dents’workaccordingtotheHelsinkiDeclaration.Inallanalyses, patientsremainedanonymousand,asaresult,patientintegritywas respected.
Results
Inall,2048patientsfulfilledtheinclusioncriteria(primary mis-sionandassessedasdizziness),but161(8%)ofthemwereexcluded forthefollowingreasons:thepatientlefttheEDbeforebeingseen byaphysician(n=71);thepatientwasassessedbyanother care-giver(n=33),thelackofacompleteidentificationnumber(n=26), thepatientwassenttoanotherhospitaloutsidethecatchmentarea (n=24)andthepatientwasundertheageof16(n=7).
Fromnowon,theresultswillonlydealwiththeremaining1887 patients.Ofthesepatients, 96(5%)hadatime-criticalcondition accordingtothefinaldiagnosis(ICDcode).
Characteristicsofpatientswithdizzinessinrelationtothe ambulancepopulation
Patientswithdizzinesswerealmost10yearsoldercomparedto theoverallambulancepopulation,andhadahigherpercentageof women(58%),wereassessedatthedispatchcentrewithalower prioritylevelandtriagedon-scenetolowerlevelsmorefrequently (Table1).
Characteristicsofallpatientsinrelationtogender
Ofallpatientswithdizziness,58%werewomen.Womenwere somewhatolderthanmenandtheyweregivenalowerpriority thanmenatthedispatchcentre.
The three most frequent dispatch codes were: 1) headache/dizziness (59%), 2) chest pain/heart disease (10%) and3)uncertaininformation/severelysickpatient(10%).
Womenwerealsoassessedtoalowertriagecolour(level)bythe EMSnurse.Amongbothwomenandmen,about80%weretaken tohospitalandabout20%stayedatthescene.Amongthosewho stayedatthescene,44(11%)attendedtheEDwithin72h.Among thosewhoweretransportedtohospital,slightlymorethan70% weretransporteddirectlybyambulance.Intermsoffinaldiagnosis
Table1
CharacteristicsofallESS11casesinrelationtoallprimarymissions.
ESS11Dizziness(n= 1887) Primarymissions(n= 58,575) Age-yearsa Median(25th,75th percentile) 72(55−83) 63(35−80) Gender-n(%)b Women 1087(58.1) 30084(53.4) Men 783(41.9) 26217(46.6) Priorityatdispatch centre-n(%)c Prio1 644(34.2) 30128(51.5) Prio2 1154(61.2) 25861(44.2) Prio3 87(4.6) 2487(4.3)
TriagecolourRETTS -n(%)d Red 24(1.3) 5431(10.5) Orange 422(22.4) 16246(31.4) Yellow 1019(54.0) 21256(41.1) Green 422(22.4) 8826(17.1) Levelofcare-n(%) Tohospital 1493(79.1) 45212(77.2) Stayatthescene 394(20.9) 13363(22.8) Modeoftransport -n(%)e Ambulance 1361(91.2) 42564(94.1) PTS,immobilef 50(3.3) 1076(2.4) PTS,seated 49(3.3) 854(1.9) Single-responder unit 17(1.1) 303(0.7) Transportbyown means 16(1.1) 415(0.9)
a17missinginESS11;1776inprimarymissions. b17missinginESS11;2274inprimarymissions.
c Twoprio4casesexcluded(assessedastransportonlybydispatch)inESS11;
99inprimarymissions.
d6816missinginprimarymissions. eOfpatientstransportedtohospital.
f PTS:non-emergencypatienttransportservices.
(ICDcode),4%ofwomenand6%ofmenhadatime-criticalcondition (p=0.06)(Table2).
Characteristicsamongwomenandmenwithatime-critical condition
Womenwere10 yearsolderthanmen.Noneofthepatients wasgiventhehighestprioritycolour(red).Fourpercentofwomen andeightpercentofmenwerenotconveyed.Allthesepatients attendedtheEDwithin72h.Amongthosewhoweretakento hospi-tal,96%ofwomenand92%ofmenweretransportedbyambulance (Table3).
Previoushistoryamongpatientswithatime-criticalcondition Themostfrequentpreviouslyknowndiseasesamongpatients withatime-criticalconditionwerehypertension(52%),stroke/TIA (31%),heartdiseaseincludingmyocardialinfarction,angina pec-torisandheartfailure(22%),diabetes(18%),atrialfibrillation(18%), cancer(10%)andperipheralarterydisease(1%).
Findingsassociatedwithonsetofsymptomsinthecritical conditions
Themostfrequentfindingsassociatedwithonsetofsymptoms intimecriticalconditionswere1)anacuteonset(63%),2)nausea, vomiting(61%),3)thepatienthadatendencytobleedorwason treatmentwithanticoagulants(25%),4)ahistoryofheadtrauma (16%),5)suddenonsetofheadache(11%)and6)lossof conscious-ness(10%).
Table2
CharacteristicsofallESS11casesinrelationtogender.
Gender Women(n=1087) Men(n=783) P Age-years Median(25th,75th percentile) 73(56−84) 71(55−81) 0.025 Priorityatdispatch centre-n(%)a 0.001 Prio1 334(30.8) 302(38.6) Prio2 698(64.3) 448(57.2) Prio3 53(4.9) 33(4.2)
TriagecolourRETTS -n(%) 0.002 Red 11(1.0) 13(1.7) Orange 224(20.6) 195(24.9) Yellow 587(54.0) 423(54.0) Green 265(24.4) 152(19.4) Levelofcare-n(%) 0.170 Tohospital 849(78.1) 632(80.7) Stayatthescene 238(21.9) 151(19.3) Seekmedicaladvice
within72h.-n(%)b 29(12.2) 15(9.9) 0.517 Modeoftransport -n(%)c 0.605 Ambulance 764(90.0) 584(92.4) PTS,immobiled 33(3.9) 17(2.7) PTS,seated 32(3.8) 18(2.8) Single-responder unit 8(0.9) 9(1.4) Transportbyown means 12(1.4) 4(0.6) Typeofcondition-n(%) Non-timecritical 1040(95.7) 734(93.7) 0.062 Timecritical 47(4.3) 49(6.3)
aTwoprio4casesexcluded(assessedastransportonlybydispatch). b Ofpatientsinitiallyassessedtostayatthescene.
c Ofpatientstransportedtohospital.
d PTS:non-emergencypatienttransportservices.
Table3
Characteristicsofpatientswithatime-criticalconditioninrelationtogender.
Gender Women(n=47) Men(n=49) P Age-years Median(25th,75th percentile) 81(70−86) 71(63−83) 0.010 Priorityatdispatch centre-n(%) 0.058 Prio1 16(34.0) 26(53.1) Prio2 29(61.7) 22(44.9) Prio3 2(4.3) 1(2.0) TriagecolourRETTS
-n(%) 0.074 Red 0(0) 0(0) Orange 16(34.0) 24(49.0) Yellow 22(46.8) 21(42.9) Green 9(19.1) 4(8.2) Levelofcare-n(%) 0.432 Tohospital 45(95.7) 45(91.8) Stayatthescene 2(4.3) 4(8.2) Seekmedicaladvice
within72h.-n(%)a 2(100) 4(100) Modeoftransport -n(%)b 0.409 Ambulance 41(91.1) 42(93.3) PTS,immobilec 1(2.2) 1(2.2) PTS,seated 2(4.4) 0(0) Single-responder unit 0(0) 2(4.4) Transportbyown means 1(2.2) 0(0)
aOfpatientsinitiallyassessedtostayatthescene. b Ofpatientstransportedtohospital.
c PTS:non-emergencypatienttransportservices.
Fig.1. MostfrequentICD10diagnosisforESS11patientswithatimecritical diag-nosis.
Fig.2.MostfrequentICD10diagnosisforESS11patientswithoutatimecritical diagnosis.
Comparisonbetweentime-criticalandnon-time-critical conditionsintermsofageandvitalparameters
Patientswithatime-criticalconditionwereolder,hadslightly lower oxygen saturation and had higher blood pressure than patientswithoutatime-criticalcondition(Table4).
Finaldiagnosis
Inall,therewere230differentICDcodes.Amongthepatients witha time-criticalcondition,a cerebrovasculardiseasewasby far the most frequent final diagnosis (Fig. 1), whereas, among thepatientswithanon-time-criticalcondition,dizziness/giddiness wasthemostfrequentfinaldiagnosis(Fig.2).
Discussion
Overallresults
Inthispilotstudy,wefoundthat3.5%ofprimaryEMSmissions wereassessedbythearrivingEMScrewasbeingcausedby symp-tomsofdizziness.Amongthesepatients,fivepercenthadafinal diagnosisequivalenttoatime-criticalcondition.Themajorityof thesepatientshadacerebrovasculardisease.Comparedtothe aver-agepatientwhocallsforEMS,thepatientwithdizzinessappears tobeolderandisgivenalowerprioritybytheEMScrew.
Thefindingthat3.5%ofprimaryEMSmissionsareassessedby theEMScrewasdizzinessisinagreementwithareportbyHjälte
Table4
Acomparisonbetweenpatients(ESS11)withandwithoutatime-criticalconditionwithregardtoageandvitalparameters.
Typeofcondition Time-criticalcondition(n=96) Withouttime-criticalcondition(n=1774) P Age-yeara
Median(25th,75thpercentile) 78(66−85) 72(54−82) 0.001
Vitalsigns-Median(25th,75thpercentile)
Respiratoryrate/minb 16(16−18) 16(16−18) 0.863
Oxygensaturation-%c 98(96−98) 98(97−99) 0.026
Systolicbloodpressure-mm/Hgd 160(140−174) 140(125−160) <0.001
Diastolicbloodpressure-mm/Hge 90(75−100) 80(75−90) 0.008
Heartrate/minf 78(70−90) 80(70−90) 0.603 Temperature◦Cg 36.6(36.1−36.9) 36.7(36.3−37.0) 0.093 a17missing. b96missing. c 68missing. d 70missing. e195missing. f 66missing. g117missing.
etal.[7],whofoundthat,amongallcallstothedispatchcentre, threepercentwereduetodizziness.Furthermore,thisfindingis ingoodagreementwithapreviousreportbyNewman-Tokeretal. [8],whoreportedthat,amongconsecutiveEDadmissions,about 3%arecausedbydizziness.
Wefoundthatfivepercentofpatientswithdizzinesshada time-criticalconditionwherethevastmajorityhadacerebrovascular disease.Thisisnewinformation.However,itisingoodagreement witha studyintheEDbyKerberetal.[9],where itwasfound thatthreepercentofpatientswithdizzinesshadanunderlying stroke.Doijirietal.[10]foundthat,amongpatientswhowere hos-pitaliseddue toisolated dizziness,11%had astrokewhichwas mainlylocatedinthecerebellum.Similarfindingsweremadeby Navietal.[11]andLjunggrenetal.[12],whobothreportedthat fivepercentofadmissionstotheEDduetodizzinesswerecaused byacerebrovasculardisease.
The next time-critical condition in order of frequency was electrolyteimbalance.However,onlyfiveof1887patients(0.3%) fulfilledthiscriterion.InthestudybyNavietal.[11],twopercent hadanelectrolyteimbalance.
Amongthepatientswithanon-time-criticalcondition,alarge proportionhadanICDcodeequivalenttoafinaldiagnosisof dizzi-ness/giddiness.Thishighlightsthefactthatmanypatientsdidnot receiveanadequateexplanationoftheaetiologybehindtheir com-plaints.
Welookedforcharacteristicsamongthepatientswitha time-criticalcondition.Averylargeproportionofthesepatientseither hadanacuteonsetofthedizzinessorsimultaneouslysufferedfrom nausea,vomiting.Unfortunately,wedonotknowthe correspond-ingfigureforpatientswithoutatime-criticalcondition.Tarnutzer etal.[13]reportedthatpatientswithsymptomsofdizzinesswhich wascaused bya strokemore frequentlyhad an acuteonset of symptomsthanpatientswithdizzinessduetovestibular neuroni-tis.Simultaneoussymptomsofnauseaandvomitinghavealsobeen reportedbyothersasfrequentlyoccurringamongpatientswith dizzinesscausedbyastroke[9,11].However,innoneofthese stud-ieswastheriskofthesesymptomsmorefrequentamongpatients withstrokeascomparedwithnon-time-criticalconditions.
Thehypothesisthatnauseavomitingmaybeawarningsignfor atime-criticalconditionamongpatientswithvertigogets some supportfromthesituationinothertimecriticalconditions.Thus, amongpatientswithacutechestpainassessedbyEMS,wasthe presence of nausea, vomiting shown to be associated with an increasedriskofanunderlyingacutemyocardialinfarction[14].
Patientswithatime-criticalconditionwereolderthanpatients withoutone.Thisisinagreementwiththefindingsreportedby Navietal.[11].Wealsofoundthatpatientswithatime-critical
conditionmorefrequentlyhadanelevationoftheirsystolicand diastolicbloodpressure,ascomparedwithnon-time-critical con-ditions.ThisisinagreementwiththefindingsreportedbyKerber etal.[9]andmaybeexplainedbythefactthatanelevationofblood pressureiscommonintheacutephaseofastroke[15–18].
Intermsofprevioushistory, ahighrateofhypertensionand TIA/strokewasfoundamongpatientswithatime-criticalcondition. Arelativelyhighproportionofthepatientswithsuchacondition hadaprevioushistoryofvariousheartdiseasesincludingatrial fib-rillationwhichisawell-knownriskfactorforstroke[20].Ahistory ofdiabetes,whichisanotherriskfactorforstroke[21]wasalso rel-ativelycommonamongthesepatients.Thus,informationfromthe patient’scomorbiditymaygiveimportantinformationregarding theriskofatimecriticalcondition.Such ahypothesisgets sup-portfromNavietal.[11],whoreportedahigherrateofsomeof thesepreviousdiseasesamongpatientswhohaddizzinesscaused byastrokethanamongpatientswhohaddizzinesscausedbyother diseases.
Theremaythereforebesomedifferencesintermsoftheinitial clinicalpicturewhen patientswithdizziness causedbya time-critical conditionare compared withthose withoutone. In the future,thesedifferencescouldbeusedinamoresystematic man-nertocreateadecisionsupporttoolfortheassessmentofpatients withdizzinessbytheEMScrewintheprehospitalsetting.
Thus,onemayspeculatethat adecisionsupporttoolfor the EMScrewtriagingpatientswithvertigomaybebasedonspecific informationregardingthepatient’sage,previoushistorywithfocus oncardiovasculardisease,thetypeofacuteonsetofsymptomsand clinicalfindingsonadmissionoftheEMScrew.Theaimofsuch atoolshouldprimarilybetoidentifypatientswithatimecritical etiology.Asecondaryaimmaybetoidentifypatientswhodonot needtobetransportedbyEMStoahospitalbutcouldinsteadbe handledatalowerlevelofcare.
Noneofthepatientswithatime-criticalconditionreceivedthe highestpriority(red)whenassessedbytheEMScrewaccordingto RETTS.Thisisbestexplainedbythefactthatthereisnoredlevel basedontheESScodefordizziness.So,inordertobetriagedto levelred,vitalsignsmustbelifethreateningandadeviationofthis kindobviouslydidnotoccur.
Strengthsandlimitations
Thisisacohort,whichrepresentsconsecutivepatientsfroma singleEMSsystemfromanurbanarea.Forthisreason,ourdata cannotbeextrapolatedtoruralareaswithanydegreeofcertainty. Furthermore,thisisaretrospective,observationalstudywithall itsweaknesses,includingalargeproportionofcaseswith miss-inginformation.Finally,questionsrelatingtodifferentaspectsof
symptomsandprevioushistorywereonlyaddressedincaseswith atime-criticalcondition.
Conclusion
Amongprimary missionsby theEMS, 3.5%of patientswere assessedassufferingfromdizziness.Ofthem,5%hadatime-critical conditionandthemajorityofthesepatientshadacerebrovascular disease.Furtherstudiesarerequiredtodevelopinstrumentsthat canhelptoidentifytime-criticalconditionsatanearlystageamong patientswhocallfortheEMSduetodizziness.
Authorship
NP,VG,JHandCAplannedthestudyanddevelopedtheresearch design.NP,VGandCMplannedandcarriedoutthedatacollection. JHwrotethefirstdraftandJH,MA,KJ,CMandCAwas responsi-bleforrevisions.Allauthorsdiscussedand commentedondraft versionsandapprovedthefinalversion.
Thestudywasacceptedbytheresearchethicscounseloratthe UniversityofBorås,Sweden,andconductedinagreementwiththe ethicalreferencesoftheSwedishResearchCouncil.
Funding
Thisresearchdidnotreceiveanyspecificgrantfromfunding agenciesinthepublic,commercial,ornot-for-profitsectors.
Conflictofinterest
Allthesigningauthorsmeettherequirementsforauthorship andtheyhavenoconflictsofinterest.
References
[1]Newman-TokerDE,HsiehYH,CamargoCA,PelletierAJ,ButchyGT,EdlowAJ.
SpectrumofdizzinessvisitstoUSemergencydepartments:cross-sectional
analysisfromanationallyrepresentativesample.MayoClinProc
2008;83:765–75.
[2]MochalinaN,KhoshnoodA,KarlbergM,DryverE.ABComYrselpåakuten.
Läkartidningen2015;112:1–7.
[3]LamJ,SiuW,LamT,CheungN,GrahamC,RainerTH.Theepidemiologyof
patientswithdizzinessinanemergencydepartment.HongKongJEmergMed
2006;13:133–9.
[4]BeillonL-M,SuserudB-O,KarlbergI,HerlitzJ.Doesambulanceusediffer
betweengeographicareas?Asurveyofambulanceuseinsparselyand
denselypopulatedareas.AmJEmergMed2009;27:202–11.
[5]AlsholmL,AxelssonC,AnderssonHagiwaraM,NivaM,ClaessonL,HerlitzJ, etal.Interruptedtransportbytheemergencymedicalserviceinstroke/ transitoryischemicattack:aconsequenceofchangedtreatmentroutinesin prehospitalemergencycare.BrainBehav2019,http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/
brb3.1266.
[6]HagiwaraAm,NilssonL,StrömsöeA,AxelssonC,KängströmA,HerlitzJ.
Patientsafetyandpatientassessmentinpre-hospitalcare:astudyprotocol.
ScandJTraumaResuscEmergMed2016;24:14.
[7]HjälteL,SuserudBO,HerlitzJ,KarlbergI.Initialemergencymedical
dispatchingandprehospitalneedsassessment:aprospectivestudyofthe
Swedishambulanceservice.EurJEmergMed2007;14:134–41.
[8]Newman-TokerDE,StantonVA,HsiehYH,TothmanRE.Frontlineproviders
harbormisconceptionsaboutthebedsideevaluationofdizzypatients.Acta
Otolaryngol2008;128:601–4.
[9]KerberKA,BrownDL,LisabethLD,SmithMA,MorgensternLB.Strokeamong
patientswithdizziness,vertigo,andimbalanceintheemergency
department:apopulation-basedstudy.Stroke2006;37:2484–7.
[10]DoijiriR,UnoH,MiyashitaK,IharaM,NagatsukaK.Howcommonlyisstroke
foundinpatientswithisolatedvertigoordizzinessattack?JStroke
CerebrovascDis2006;25:2549–52.
[11]NaviBB,KamelH,ShahMP,GrossmanAW,WongC,PoissonSN,etal.Rate
andpredictorsofseriesneurologiccausesofdizzinessintheemergency
department.MayoClinProc2012;87:1080–8.
[12]LjunggrenM,PerssonJ,SalzerJ.Dizzinessandtheacutevestibularsyndrome
attheemergencydepartment:apopulation-baseddescriptivestudy.Eur
Neurol2018;79:5–12.
[13]TarnutzerAA,BerkowitzAl,RobinsonKa,HsiehYh,Newman-TokerDe.Does
mydizzypatienthaveastroke?Asystematicreviewofbedsidediagnosisin
acutevestibularsyndrome.CMAJ2011;183:571–92.
[14]AnderssonH,UllgrenA,HolmbergM,KarlssonT,HerlitzJ,Wireklint
SundströmB.Acutecoronarysyndromeinrelationtotheoccurrenceof
associatedsymptoms.Aquantitativestudyinprehospitalemergencycare.Int
EmergNurse2017;33:43–7.
[15]BritonM,CarlssonA,deFaireU.Bloodpressurecourseinpatientswithacute
strokeandmatchedcontrols.Stroke1986;17:861–4.
[16]Leonardi-BeeJ,BathPW,PhillipsSJ,SandercockPG.Bloodpressureand
clinicaloutcomesintheInternationalStrokeTrial.Stroke2002;33:1315–20.
[17]QureshiAI,EzzeddineMA,NasarA,SuriMK,KirmaniJF,HusseinHM,etal.
Prevalenceofelevatedbloodpressurein563704adultpatientswithstroke
presentingtotheEDintheUnitedStates.AmJEmergMed2007;25:32–8.
[18]BangaloreS,SchwammL,SmithEE,HellkampAS,SuterRE,XianY,etal.Blood
pressureandin-hospitaloutcomesinpatientspresentingwithischaemic
stroke.EurHeartJ2017;38:2827–35.
[20]FribergL,RosenqvistM,LindgrenA,TerentA,NorrvingB,AsplundK.High
prevalenceofatrialfibrillationamongpatientswithischemicstroke.Stroke
2014;45:2599–605.
[21]LeeCC,SuYC,HoHC,HungSK,LeeMS,ChauP,etal.Riskofstrokeinpatients
hospitalizedforisolatedvertigo:afouryearfollowupstudy.Stroke