• No results found

Network Strategic Environmental Assessment for Capacity Development and Dialogue

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Network Strategic Environmental Assessment for Capacity Development and Dialogue"

Copied!
23
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Network SEA for capacity

development and dialogue

Juan Azcárate and Berit Balfors Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

(2)

Deliberat ive democra cy theory Collaborative, communicative planning theory SEA processes

Introduction

(3)

Main challenges

-Difficult to engage stakeholders in deep and

meaningful dialogue (debate, argumentation) especially when dealing with strategic issues

-Time consuming and requires large efforts

-Powerful groups constrain and set agendas for dialogue

(4)

Research objective

Is to study how SEA can enable and foster strategic dialogue to enhance strategic planning and decision making

Specific aim of:

-examining the conceptualisation and development of SEAs to generate adequate conditions for a linked, active and meaningful participation of stakeholders in strategic

(5)

Research strategy and methodologies

Case study design

Literature review

Data needs Data collection Data analysis

Participant observation

(6)

Case study: Samp intercontinental

museum network

Source: Samp -Network-based NGO connecting cultures

-Purpose: is to facilitate museum development

(7)

Samp’s network SEA approach

Operationalising network strategic elements

Sharing Cross border

Respect Dialouge Visio n Purpose M issio n Source: UNDP (2009) Mobilising network capacities

(8)

Network context analysis step 2 Participative screening Key issues & assessment Sharing in Sweden Respect in Tanzania Cross-border in Azerbaijan Dialouge in Philippines step 1 step 3

(9)

Sharing in Sweden

(10)

Cross-border in Azerbaijan

(11)

Dialouge in Philippines

(12)

Respect in Tanzania

(13)

Operationalising Samp’s core values

Strategic themes

(abstract strategic elements)

Key issue identification (processing strategic elements)

Strategy formulation

(giving meaning to strategic elements)

Level of operationalisation of network strategic elements

(14)

Source: UNDP (2009)

(15)

Conclusions

Network SEA approaches

Operationalise the strategic elements of organisations

Need for more case studies

Foster strategic dialogues

Assess network capacities and set

the base for network capacity programmes

Facilitate early

(16)

Thanks for your attention!

Juan Azcárate (azcarate@kth.se) Berit Balfors (balfors@kth.se)

(17)
(18)

Deliberative democracy theory

Lead to well argued alternatives Consensus (common good)

Create public opinion

Influence policy agenda setting and decision-making

Better policies

Positive transformations Discourse approach to strengthen

democracy

Discourses focus on important issues, set the public sphere, diverse, open and in conflict (chaos)

(19)

Collaborative, communicative

planning theory

Discourse appraoch used to

understand the issues (relations) that are linked to a place or space

Consensus/agreements focusing on mutual gains

Influence policy making

Creative, balanced, quality policies

Fair and accepted Learning and change

(20)

Data mapping and key issue

identification

(21)
(22)

Multi-level inputs Multi actors and place factors Mutual benefit Empowering, engaging, including and encompassing for active participation Challenge preconceptions and process attitudes Sharing in Sweden Respect in Tanzania Cross-border in Azerbaijan Dialouge in Philippines

(23)

-Challenging to conceptualise and develop a network SEA based on abstract network core values

-Enabling and maintaining dialogue on strategic issues was difficult

-Workshop programmes had to be changed -Time and effort

References

Related documents

Given a densified network with 35km distances the vertical error budget changes as seen in figure 8, where the contribution from three major error sources are plotted for

• How are the asylum processes related to the LGBTIQ+ community (and therefore considering sexual orientation and gender identity prosecution claims) applied in

Through analyzing the SEA reports of the two case studies they found that current SEA practice in PLEI network planning has a number of problems including: late start

(2008) to identify key challenges to the SEA institutionalization in the Vietnamese policy making context. The most critical challenges come from the planning

Some of the issues that were addressed in the checklist concerned the understanding of the biodiversity concept, the type of impacts identified, the methods and tools used, the

A number of GIS-based habitat models were selected and used in the three model testing studies presented in Papers IV, V and VI. The selection of models was done in two

DD/h together with total hours needed to develop the software is a better measurement and is not dependent on programming language and complexity as DD/KLOC is to describe quality

Det som också framgår i direktivtexten, men som rapporten inte tydligt lyfter fram, är dels att det står medlemsstaterna fritt att införa den modell för oberoende aggregering som