• No results found

101003666Start date: 01/04/20End Date: 31/03/22Project Title

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "101003666Start date: 01/04/20End Date: 31/03/22Project Title"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

GA 101003666 Start date: 01/04/20 End Date: 31/03/22

Project Title OPENCORONA

WP number,

deliverable number, and Title

WP8 D8.2

Project risk management plan

Responsible partner

name and contact Partner number: 1

Organisation: Karolinska Institutet Name: Hanna Gador

Email: hanna.gador@ki.se Nature

R-Report P-Prototype D-Demonstrator O=-Other

R, Document report

Dissemination level PU-public

PP-restricted to otherprogramme participants RE-restricted to a group of partners CO-only for

consortium members

PU

Delivery Month

Planned M6 – 30 September 2020

Actual delivery date

(dd/mm/yy) 11 November 2020

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101003666

Ref. Ares(2020)6696741 - 13/11/2020

(2)

Description of deliverable

• COMPLETED

• We have created a Project Risk Management Plan togheter with a

monitoring tool for the OPENCORONA consortium in order to monitor the risk manamgent activities and associated communication between partners and the project managment team regarding follow up of both already

foreseen and new risks. They are both available for the consortium at our intra net file sharing tool. The risks will be regularly updated as changes arises, by both the Management team and the participants.

• ANNEXES

Risk Management Plan for the OPENCORONA project

(3)

1 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101003666

Project Acronym: OPENCORONA

Grant Agreement No: 101003666

Project Duration: 1 April 2020 – 31 March 2022

Responsible Partner: Karolinska Institutet

Name: Hanna Gador E-mail: hanna.gador@ki.se Document version

Version 1 M6

Document History

Version Date Author Description

1.0 October 2020 Hanna Gador Established Plan v1.0

Contents

Executive summary ... 2

Acronyms ... 2

Introduction ... 2

Risk management plan ... 2

Risk assessment: risk identification, categorization and mitigation. ... 2

Continuous risk monitoring ... 2

Overview of times and tasks for risk monitoring ... 3

OPENCORONA overview of risks ... 3

Risk Management Plan

(4)

Executive summary

The performance of a project can be impacted by risks and opportunities that is presented at the start of the project as well as throughout the project’s life. To identify, monitor and mitigate risks as well as opportunities through the project is therefor of importance.

The risk and management plan is established according to the OPENCORONA project Grant Agreement no 101003666 WP8 in order to provide a plan for the threats and opportunities that might impact the project performance.

The performance of a project can be impacted by risks and opportunities that is presented at the start of the project as well as throughout the project’s life. To identify, monitor and mitigate risks as well as opportunities through the project is therefor of importance.

Acronyms

OPENCORONA Rapid therapy development through Open nCoronavirus Vaccine Platform

GA Grant Agreement No 101003666

WP Work Package according to Grant agreement Annex 1

PSM Project Steering Committee

PC Project Coordinator

PMO Project Management Office, the coordinators management team

Introduction

The aim of this plan is to encourage project participants to openly communicate risks within the consortium and to find a mitigation strategy to decrease negative impact of the project. The aim of the plan is to encourage all participants to report any risks so that they can be identified, categorized, monitored, and develop appropriate responses together with the WP leaders and PMO.

Annex 1 provides a detailed risk register including information on risk likelihood and impact.

Risk management plan

Risk assessment: risk identification, categorization and mitigation.

The regular risk assessment will be led by the WP leader in communication and encouragement by PC and PMO. The PMO will collect and compile all input received from WP leaders. The risk

assessment will be performed throughout the project and risks will be escalated to the PSC meetings for a broader discussion and assessment.

Continuous risk monitoring

WP leaders will be encouraged by PC and the PMO to update the risk register. The participants has access through the internal tool OPENCORONA Box our monitoring document “OPENCORONA Critical Implementation risks and mitigation actions”. The PMO will continue to discuss the risk monitoring as a recurring agenda item during their meetings as well as during the PSM:s.

(5)

3 This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 101003666

The PMO will report, follow up and correspond mitigation strategies to the consortium at regular timepoints or as they arise.

Overview of times and tasks for risk monitoring

Continuous risk monitoring Request from Request to Timeline

Request each WP leader to update the risk register in view of

logged risks and identify new risks PMO WP Leader Prior to meetings,

and/or as the issues arise

Finalize updated risk register PMO n.a. As they arise

Reporting to PSC n.a. PMO, WP

Leaders At every PSC meeting

Report to EC n.a. PMO

At reporting periods, project meetings and as

required

Discuss risk monitoring PMO n.a. As recurring PMO

discussion point.

OPENCORONA overview of risks

OPENCORONA Critical Implementation risks and mitigation actions

Risk

number Description of

risk Level of risk WP

Number

Proposed risk- mitigation

measures Updated

risk level Impact Reason for update

Updated by and when

1 Vaccine candidate not immunogenic Low

WP1, WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7, WP8

Several vaccine candidates generated and tested, delivery optimisation

2

Vaccine candidate causes cytokine storm

Medium WP2, WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7, WP8

Several vaccine candidates generated and tested

3

The vaccine candidate does not protect the challange mice

Low

WP3, WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7, WP8

Several parallel vaccine concept will be

developed by WP1

4 In vivo EP not tolerable Low

WP4, WP5, WP6, WP7, WP8

Cliniporator has been used extensively in clinical practice, extensive experience,

(6)

adjust pulse patterns

5 Plasmid can not

grow Low

WP5, WP6, WP7, WP8

Several vaccine candidates generated and tested

6 Plasmid toxic Low WP6, WP7, WP8

Several vaccine candidates generated and tested

7

Study not approved by ethics committee or MPA/EMA

Low WP7

Earlry contacts and Scientific advice with MPA/

EMA

8 Clinical trial fails to show

safety Low WP7

All vaccine candidates are analysed for toxicological effects in vitro and in vivo in animal models.

Toxicologial studies are performed according to GLP and all data is analyzed by the Swedish MPA/EMA before approval of the

clinical trial.

9 Clinical trial fails to show

immunogenicity Medium WP7

The selection of the vaccine candidate is done in the best animal models. The immunogenicity is thoroughly evaluated in larger animals such as rabbits. Only highly immunogenic candidates are evaluated further.

References

Related documents

46 Konkreta exempel skulle kunna vara främjandeinsatser för affärsänglar/affärsängelnätverk, skapa arenor där aktörer från utbuds- och efterfrågesidan kan mötas eller

In the latter case, these are firms that exhibit relatively low productivity before the acquisition, but where restructuring and organizational changes are assumed to lead

The increasing availability of data and attention to services has increased the understanding of the contribution of services to innovation and productivity in

Närmare 90 procent av de statliga medlen (intäkter och utgifter) för näringslivets klimatomställning går till generella styrmedel, det vill säga styrmedel som påverkar

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No

The established model has thereafter been used to evaluate protection of infection after vaccination with the selected SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidate/s. Infection Protocols

Transfection mixes comprised the indicated firefly and Renilla luciferase reporter constructs (40 ng each; firefly luciferase under the control of IFNB-, ISG56-, MX1-,

WP6 D6.2 D24 Completion of the GLP toxicity study, month Completed toxicological evaluation according to GLP of the vaccine candidate Adlego Report Public 31 Mar 2021 Pending. WP6