• No results found

Mar 2011011Feb 20n 2011JanDec 2010

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Mar 2011011Feb 20n 2011JanDec 2010"

Copied!
8
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Natural Radiation Background Radiation Natural Radiation Background Radiation

at Linero, Lund, Sweden

Bertil RR Persson

Bertil RR Persson

(2)

1 6 0 1 6 5

B a k g r u n d s s t r å l n i n g p å L i n e r o n S v p e r t i m m e

1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0

H R = 1 5 6 + 0 . 1 3 * X ( n S v / h )

M a r 2011

1 5 5 1 6 0 1 6 5

0 11

1 4 0

H R = 1 5 5 + 0 . 0 6 * X ( n S v / h )

1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5

Fe b 2 0

1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0 1 6 5

n 2011

1 6 5

H R = 1 5 1 + 0 . 1 7 * X ( n S v / h )

1 4 0 1 4 5

Ja n

1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0

H R = 1 5 7 - 0 . 1 3 * X ( n S v / h )

Dec 2010

2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6 2 8 3 0

1 4 0

3 1

( )

D a g i r e s p e k t i v e m å n a d

1

(3)

1 6 5

B a k g r u n d s s t r å l n i n g i L U N D ( L i n e r o ) n S v p e r t i m m e

1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0

H R = 1 5 8 + 0 . 0 6 * X ( n S v / h )

Apri l-11

1 5 5 1 6 0 1 6 5

1

1 4 0

1 4 0 1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5

H R = 1 5 6 + 0 . 1 3 * X ( n S v / h )

Mar -1

1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0 1 6 5

e b- 1 1

1 6 5 1 4 0

1 4 5

H R = 1 5 5 + 0 . 0 6 * X ( n S v / h )

F e

1 4 5 1 5 0 1 5 5 1 6 0

H R = 1 5 1 + 0 . 1 7 * X ( n S v / h )

Jan -11

2 4 6 8 1 0 1 2 1 4 1 6 1 8 2 0 2 2 2 4 2 6 2 8 3 0

1 4 0

( )

D a y o f m o n t h

1 3 1

(4)

160 165

Bakgrundsstrålning på Linero nSv per timme

165

Bakgrundsstrålning i LUND (Linero) nSv per timme

140 145 150 155 160

HR = 156 + 0.13 * X (nSv/h)

Mar 2011

140 145 150 155 160

HR = 158 + 0.06 * X (nSv/h)

Apr il-1 1

155 160 165

0 11

140

155 160 165

1 1

140

HR = 155 + 0.06 * X (nSv/h)

140 145 150 155

Fe b 2 0

140 145 150 155

HR = 156 + 0.13 * X (nSv/h)

Ma r- 1

150 155 160 165

n 2011

150

155 160 165

e b-1 1

160 165

HR = 151 + 0.17 * X (nSv/h)

140

Ja n

145

160 165 140

145

HR = 155 + 0.06 * X (nSv/h)

F e

140 145 150 155 160

HR = 157 - 0.13 * X (nSv/h)

Dec 2010

140 145 150 155 160

HR = 151 + 0.17 * X (nSv/h)

Jan -11

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 140

31

Dag i respektive månad

1

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

140

Day of month

1 31

(5)

170

165 170

Y 155 4+ 0 0317 * X Mean 156,0 0,5 (SE) Oktober 2011

160

165 Y = 155,4+ 0.0317 * X

v / h 155

150

nS v

145

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

140 1 31

Dag i Oktober 2011

(6)

166 164 166

Mean 157,4 0,4 (SE) November 2011

160 162

156 158

v / h

154 156

nS v

150 152

Y 157 7 0 018 * X 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

148 Y = 157,7 - 0.018 * X

1 31

Dag i November 2011

(7)

168 166 168

Y ( S /h) 1 9 3 0 1* d

162

164 Y (nSv/h) = 159.3 - 0.1* day

160

v / h

156

nS v 158

152 154

December 2011

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 150

152

31 1

Average 157.8  2,8 (SE 0.4) nSv/h

December / day

(8)

166 168

1

Annual average 156,3  3,8 nSv.h

-1

SE = 0,2

160 162 164

d / nSv .h

-

156 158 160

k g roun d

technical problems

150 152 154

tion ba c

146 148 150

Rad ia

Y(nSv/h) = 155.4 + 0.005day

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350

144 R = 0.18

Day of 2011

References

Related documents

techniques including proton therapy for breast

In this thesis, the effects of bulk damage due to gamma, neutron, proton and pion irradiation on the properties of GaAs detectors in terms of current as a function of voltage

The results presented in this paper highlight the need for an improved understanding of backgrounds at modern spallation neutron source facilities. Future studies could for

The average irradiation dose is expected to be low compared to the doses used to perform the irradiation tests, therefore it is possible a natural annealing process on

The first model estimates the source auto-spectrum from the mea- sured sound pressure cross-spectra of different microphone pairs, the second model determines the source

Keywords: Cone beam computed tomography, anatomic landmarks, dose-area product, image quality, implant planning, periapical diagnosis, radiation dosimetry. Swedish Dental

A set of scripts to access the simulated SREM response function, evaluate the AP-8 flux model, obtain the Badhwar-Konradi pitch angle distribution and determine the SREM attitude

Indirect effects (via the water radiolysis process) on the bentonite buffer have thus not been mentioned and discussed by SKB, possibly owing to, according to the report, very