• No results found

Counting the cost of heroic surgical intervention

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Counting the cost of heroic surgical intervention"

Copied!
3
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Editors Author Guidelines Home

About Us Contact

R E V I E W S F E A T U R E S

C O M M E N T

Image: Hospital, operating theatre, table and lights, Wellcome Trust

The practice of medicine involves interesting contradictions. In the name of treatment, clinicians regularly inflict pain on people who are already suffering. Medicine promises to alleviate pain in the long-term through an intervention that exacerbates it. Such is the strength of humanity’s hope (collective and individual) for life without pain and suffering that we undergo experimental interventions with little or no documented success.

Gavin Francis Gavin Francis describes an operation aimed at alleviating severe and intractable epilepsy, where a woman’s skull was opened and an area of her brain cut out. The decision of where to perform the excision was made by the patient speaking, while the neurosurgeon stimulated local areas of the brain surface. If the woman’s speech faltered with a stimulation, the surgeon labels this bit as not to be removed. The surgeon admits that removing the ‘epileptogenic’ part of the brain is a hit-and-miss operation, with no guarantee of reducing the frequency or severity of the woman’s seizures and a significant risk of worsening her situation.

The surgeon compares his work to ‘gardening’, emphasising the lack of precision or certainty involved. By contrast, the account of surgery for epilepsy that appears on Epilepsy Today’s website offers more reassurance that ‘epilepsy specialists’ can and will make precise and secure diagnosis of best treatment options best treatment options.

A friend was offered surgery to control his seizures 20 years ago, when, presumably the techniques were even more experimental. At the consultation he mentioned that he was about to start studying for a doctorate. My friend remembers his physician saying ‘Oh well, best not opt for surgery then. If you were working on a check-out, it might be worth the risk.’ The outcome of this encounter was that the friend avoided the medical professional for the next decade and phased out his own anti-epileptic drugs. Only when his seizures became visible to colleagues and friends was he persuaded to return and re-start the process of finding a suitable drug combination.

Gavin Francis’s account of watching a semi-conscious woman’s brain being manipulated ends with her rueful regret at the resulting raggedy scalp scars. The implication is that this is a small price to pay for the reduction in seizure frequency. But in the ledger of costs and benefits for heroic surgical interventions, how should we account for the decade that my friend spent with uncontrolled seizures, resulting from his horror at the gung-ho attitude of his doctor?

Tweet 0

SHARE THIS

SEEN ELSEWHERE

RT @JaneElliott66@JaneElliott66: Our nine-point guide to spotting a dodgy statistic

https://t.co/bMP1UIsCc5https://t.co/bMP1UIsCc5 1 day ago

RT @clarkmike@clarkmike: 'Hunt's Houdini act: What next?' - https://t.co/nqaeKa40kZhttps://t.co/nqaeKa40kZ via

@BBCNews@BBCNews 1 day ago

RT @TheLancet@TheLancet: Editorial & front cover:

#Brexit#Brexit and #juniordoctors#juniordoctors contracts:

the real threats to the #NHS#NHS https://t.co/KrgT5MAlXbhttps://t.co/KrgT5MAlXb https://…

3 days ago

RT @profsaulbecker@profsaulbecker: Please read this all the way through if you only read one thing today: https://t.co/FsjsLxzQ4Uhttps://t.co/FsjsLxzQ4U 3 days ago

RT @Prof DavidNutt@Prof DavidNutt: Why isn't cycling illegal? https://t.co/2o34zmmjCchttps://t.co/2o34zmmjCc via

@wordpressdotcom@wordpressdotcom 3 days ago

RT @peterjukes@peterjukes: Fantastic, fun and informative summary of Theresa May's Brexit nightmare by @IanDunt@IanDunt

https://t.co/ghcUGVVJcXhttps://t.co/ghcUGVVJcX 4 days ago

RT @NHSConfed_EU@NHSConfed_EU: How will #Brexit#Brexit affect NHS patients; our latest blog explains https://t.co/0IO3zcsSchhttps://t.co/0IO3zcsSch

https://t.co/wC2SmZnb9Dhttps://t.co/wC2SmZnb9D 4 days ago

Everything you need to know about #Brexit#Brexit trade deals (including some small print about NHS) @IanDunt@IanDunt -

https://t.co/CudHiOjHJUhttps://t.co/CudHiOjHJU 4 days ago

RECENT POSTS

Brexit and its discontentsBrexit and its discontents Jul 13, 2016Jul 13, 2016

On bulls, men and riskOn bulls, men and risk Jul 6, 2016Jul 6, 2016

‘Corporate Wellness’: blurring the‘Corporate Wellness’: blurring the lineslines

Jun 29, 2016Jun 29, 2016

How many Zikas will it take?How many Zikas will it take?

S E A R C H

Counting the cost of heroic surgical intervention

by HANNAH BRADBYHANNAH BRADBY Feb 22, 2013 LikeLike 2

(2)

Submit

1 C O M M E N T 1 C O M M E N T

I find it most repugnant that persons who suffer epilepsy are sucked into risky lobotomy, when the historical research of healthy good brain tissue removal upon psychiatric patients demonstrate adverse effects of “seizures and cerebral hemmorrahaging”. As a victim of Dr. [name removed]

unauthorized lobotomy Dec. 9,1969 & Jan. 27,1972, at 14 & 16 years of age) life has been a bitch with further seizure disorder, status epilepticus, continual episodes of cerebral hemmorrahaging in the operative field, and post traumatic stress disorder, when screaming verbal profanities during a local cranium incision. No parent should be deprived informed consent, when the risks outweigh any benefit as to address seizure disorder. There should be government intervention as to ban epilepsy brain surgery and recognize other more humane treatment for those suffer seizure disorder.

Straight up, epilepsy brain surgery is criminal negligence causing death when every year across Canada, 2400-4600 people die as a result of status epilepticus. The number one adverse effect of healthy good brain tissue removal. if not for alternative herbal remedies, I too, would have died from status epilepticus decades ago. Anyone considering brain surgery should abandon this procedure, when it’s not worth the risks.

Y O U R C O M M E N T S Y O U R C O M M E N T S

Name Name required required

Email Email required required

Website Website

Jun 22, 2016Jun 22, 2016

Caring for CarersCaring for Carers Jun 15, 2016Jun 15, 2016

Partners Partners Stay up to date Stay up to date

Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook MedSocNews Subscribe in a reader Subscribe to our newsletter Who we follow

Sites we like Sites we like

BSA MedSoc Study Group Centre for Medical Humanities Blog Charisma

Critical Public Health Discover Society Guerilla Policy Medical Sociology Online No way to make a living ourNHS openDemocracy Pop Theory

Social Science Space Sociological Images Sociology of Health and Illness

TERRY PARKER JR.TERRY PARKER JR. on Apr 9, 2013 Reply

(3)

All content © 2015 Cost Of Living. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy and Cookie Policy | Site by Rainbird Studio

References

Related documents

‘nadir’ of the disease course, and that regression to the mean will account for some of the improvement seen over time. 149 Bearing this in mind, controlled studies are still

Study III was a controlled prospective, cross-sectional, national long-term follow-up study 14 years after epilepsy surgery evaluation where HRQOL was investigated

Keywords: Epilepsy surgery, invasive electrode procedures, intracranial EEG, complications, adverse events, risk, seizure worsening, multicenter study, register

The aim of this thesis was to study surgical and neurological complications of pre- operative invasive investigations and epilepsy surgery procedures (Papers I-II) and

A neuropsychiatric examination and assessments of psychosocial functioning and IQ were performed at baseline and at 2-year follow-up to assess individual outcome in (i) 25

Studies II-IV: Autism and other neuropsychiatric disorders in children and adolescents with medically intractable epilepsy in the epilepsy surgery programme

Suppose, for example, that Karen and Lisa both have had a high, full quality of life before the transplantation, but that for some medical reason, Karen’s life expectancy after

The focus group interviews with young adults with epilepsy and subjective cognitive decline revealed some problematic domains with four themes regarding their condition: ‘Affecting