• No results found

Black-Hole Universe

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Black-Hole Universe"

Copied!
6
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Black-Hole Universe

Irina Galstyan

Abstract

In this contribution, we have constructed new analytical solutions for initial data of the Einstein equations. Such solutions are valuable for gaining a better understanding of prob- lems involving strong gravitational and/or electromagnetic interactions in general relativity.

In this process we have examined an inhomogeneous cosmological model consisting a lattice of regularly arranged, charged black holes with initial data corresponding to the maximum expansion of a cosmological solution. We have also refined the method in such a way that the values of the mass and charge of the sources can be prescribed beforehand subject to certain constraints dictated by the field equations.

Akademisk avhandling f¨ or avl¨ aggande av licentiatexamen vid Stockholms Universitet, Fysikum

December, 2017

(2)

Discussion

We studied a physically interesting case of the initial data for a vacuum 3–sphere with black holes. This family of time–symmetric initial data is a counterpart of a closed FLRW model at the moment of its largest expansion in which the homogeneous matter distribution has been re- placed with an arbitrary number of Reissner–Nordstr¨om-like black holes located on a 3–sphere.

This type of initial data for a Schwarszchild–like black holes has been studied extensively in the special case of regular black hole lattices, i.e., arrangements of a fixed number of black holes of equal mass placed in such a way that the resulting initial data has the biggest possible dis- crete group of isometries [48], [67], [6], [25]. We applied this initial data to an exact, analytic inhomogeneous cosmological models containing three, four and eight discrete masses regularly arranged in topological 3–sphere, focusing our attention to the masses, charges and interaction energies by employing exact methods and considering instantaneously static hypersurfaces at the moment of maximum expansion. First, we found that the total net charge is zero for existing solutions. Then we analyzed example models and employed that black holes exist in antipodal pairs. This gives a simple way of obtaining the uncharged lattices discussed in [25].

We have studied time–symmetric initial data for discrete and continuous models and con- structed geometries with cosmological regions connected by Einstein–Rosen bridges. The next step would be to study full evolution of these models. Although, we considered masses that are regularly arranged on the 3–sphere, we believe the formalism we applied allows more compli- cated distributions. In the next, we have discussed and defined different concepts of mass in our models, the “proper mass” and the “bare mass” for each of the black holes. Then we have employed a definition of interaction energy between group of masses in a cosmological model and investigated gravitational consequences of interaction energy. We found that if the group is small compared to the cosmological region scale, the total gravitational mass of the group encodes information about the sum total of the proper mass of each source plus the sum of the pairwise interaction energies between sources.

Finally, the results we obtained are close to the solutions of Lindquist and Wheeler that use a gravitational analogue of the Wigner–Seitz construction [48]. Generally, we believe the frame- work of our constructed models provides a new laboratory for testing ideas about inhomogenety, averaging and backreaction in cosmology. In the presence of electric charges, which is the core of this thesis, the formalism employed here has very recently been considered by [12].

Our work can be regarded as the first step of the study of the evolution of an inhomogeneous model for the Universe, where reflection symmetries play a fundamental role. Less symmetric configurations should then be studied with application to the structure formation problem in cosmology.

(3)

References

[1] Alcubierre M., 2008, “Introduction to 3+1 Numerical Relativity”, Oxford University Press UK

[2] Alcubierre M., Degollado J.C. and Salgado M., 2009, “The Einstein-Maxwell system in 3+1 form and initial data for multiple charged black holes”, Phys. Rev. D 80 104022

[3] Aminneborg S., Bengtsson I., Brill D., Holst S. and Peld´an P., 1997, “Black holes and wormholes in (2+1)-dimensions”, Class. Quant. Grav. 15 627

[4] Banados M., Henneaux M., Teitelboim C. and Zanelli J., 1993, “Geometry of the (2+1) black hole”, Phys. Rev. D 48 506, [gr-qc/9707036]

[5] Baumgarte, T.W. and Shapiro S.L., 2010, “Numerical Relativity: Solving Einstein’s Equa- tions on the Computer”, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

[6] Bentivegna E., Korzinsky M., 2012, “Evolution of a periodic eight-black-hole lattice in numerical relativity”, Class. Quant. Grav. 29, 165007

[7] Bengtsson I., Holst S., 1999, “De Sitter space and spatial topology”, Class. Quant. Grav.

16 3735

[8] Bengtsson I., “Some examples of trapped surfaces”, Black Holes: New Horizons, edited by S.A. Hayward (World Scientific, Singapore, 2013)

[9] Bengtsson I., 2012, “Spherical Symmetry and Black Holes”, retrieved from http://www.

fysik.su.se/~ingemar/

[10] Beig R., 2000, “Generalized Bowen-York initial data”, Lect. Notes Phys. 537 55

[11] Bertotti B., 1959, Phys. Rev., 116, 1331; Robinson I., 1959, Bull. Acad. Pol. Sci., 7, 351 [12] Bibi R., Clifton T., Durk J., 2017, “Cosmological solutions with charged black holes”, Gen.

Rel. Grav. 49 98

[13] Bowen J.M., 1985, “Inversion Symmetric Initial Data for N Charged Black Holes”, Annals of Physics 165 17

[14] Bowen J.M. and York Jr., J.W., 1980, “Time-asymmetric initial data for black holes and black-hole collisions”, Phys. Rev. D, 21(8), 20472056

[15] Brill D.R. and Lindquist R.W., 1963, “Interaction Energy in Geometrostatics”, Phys. Rev.

131 471

[16] Brill D.R., 2004, “Lattice universes in (2+1)-dimensional gravity”, Class. Quant. Grav. 21 S97

[17] Brill D.R., 1996, “Multi-black hole geometries in (2+1)-dimensional gravity”, Phys. Rev.

D 53 4133

(4)

[18] Brown J.D., Ph. D. thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1985; published as a book, “Lower Dimensional Gravity”, World Scientific, Singapore, 1988

[19] Brandt S., Br¨ugmann B., 1997, “A simple construction of initial data for multiple black holes”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 78(19), 36063609

[20] Buchert, T., 2005, “On globally static and stationary cosmologies with or without a cos- mological constant and the dark energy problem”, Class. Quantum Grav. 22, L113

[21] Chandrasekhar S., 1983, “The Mathematical Theory of Black Holes”, Oxford University Press, USA

[22] Choquet-Bruhat Y., York Jr. J.W., Plenum, New York, 1980, “The Cauchy problem”, in Held, A., ed., General Relativity and Gravitation: One Hundred Years After the Birth of Albert Einstein, vol. 1, 99172

[23] Christodoulou D., 1984, “Violation of cosmic censorship in the gravitational collapse of a dust cloud”, Commun. Math. Phys. 93 171

[24] Christodoulou D, 1999, “On the global initial value problem and the issue of singularities”, Class. Quantum Grav. 16 A, 23 - 35

[25] Clifton T., Rosquist K., Tavakol R., 2012, “An Exact quantification of backreaction in relativistic cosmology”, Phys. Rev. D 86, 043506

[26] Clifton T., 2014, “The method of images in cosmology”, Class. Quant. Grav. 31, 175010 [27] Cook G.B., 2000, “Initial data for numerical relativity”, Living Rev. Rel.3 5

[28] Coxeter H.M.S., 1948, “Regular Polytopes”, Book (Methuen and Company Ltd.), London [29] Dafermos M., 2003, “Stability and instability of the Cauchy horizon for the spherically

symmetric Einstein-Maxwell-scalar field equations”, Ann. of Math. 158, no. 3, 875928 [30] Dafermos M., 2005, “The Interior of Charged Black Holes and the Problem of Uniqueness

in General Relativity”, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 58 445

[31] Dafermos M., “Price’s law, mass inflation, and strong cosmic censorship”, in Racz, I., ed.

Relativity today: Proceedings of the Seventh Hungarian Relativity Workshop, Budapest, 2004, pp. 79–90, E-print: arXiv:gr-qc/0401121 [gr-qc]

[32] Einstein, A. and Rosen, N., 1935, “The Particle Problem in the General Theory of Rela- tivity”, Phys. Rev. 48, 73-77

[33] ´Eric Gourgoulhon, 2007, “3+1 Formalism in General Relativity, Bases of Numerical Rela- tivity”, gr-qc/0703035 [GR-QC]

[34] Flanagan E.E., 2005, “Can superhorizon perturbations drive the acceleration of the Uni- verse?”, Phys. Rev. D 71, 103521

[35] Geroch, R., 1969, “Limits of Spacetimes”, Commun. Math. Phys. 13 180

(5)

[36] Gibbons G.W., 1972, “The Time Symmetric Initial Value Problem for Black Holes”, Comm.

Math. Phys. 27 87

[37] Gibbons G.W., Hawking S.W., 1977, “Cosmological event horizons, thermodynamics, and particle creation”, Phys. Rev. D 15, 2738

[38] Hartle J.B., Hawking S.W., 1972, “Solutions of the Einstein-Maxwell equations with many black holes”, Commun. math. Phys., 26, 87 - 101

[39] Hawking S.W. and Ellis G.F.R., 1973, “The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time”, Cam- bridge Monographs on Math. Phys.

[40] Ishibashi A., Wald R.M., 2006, “Can the acceleration of our universe be explained by the effects of inhomogeneities?”, Class. Quantum Grav. 23, 235

[41] Kolb E.W. et al, 2005, “Effect of inhomogeneities on the expansion rate of the Universe”, Phys. Rev. D, 71, 023524

[42] Korzy´nski, M., 2014, “Backreaction and continuum limit in a closed universe filled with black holes”, Class. Quantum Grav. 31 085002

[43] Kulkarni A.D., 1984, “Time-asymmetric initial data for the N black hole problem in general relativity”, J. Math. Phys., 25(4), 10281034

[44] Kulkarni A.D., Shepley L.C. and York Jr. J.W., 1983, “Initial data for N black holes”, Phys. Lett. A, 96(5), 228230

[45] Landau L.D., Lifshitz E.M., 1971, “The Classical Theory of Fields”, (Volume 2 of A Course of Theoretical Physics) Pergamon Press

[46] Lindquist R.W., 1963, “Initial-Value Problem on Einstein-Rosen Manifolds”, Journal of Math. Phys. 4 938

[47] Lichnerowicz A., 1944, “L’integration des ´equations de la gravitation relativiste et le probl`eme des n corps”, J. Math. Pures et Appl., 23, 3763

[48] Lindquist R.W. and Wheeler J.A., 1957, “Dynamics of a Lattice Universe by the Schwarzschild-Cell Method”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 43243

[49] L¨ubbe C., Kroon J.A.V., 2013, “On the conformal structure of the extremal Reissner- Nordstr¨om spacetime”, arXiv:1308.1325 [gr-qc]

[50] Majumdar S.D., 1947, Phys. Rev., 72, 930; Papepetrou A., 1947, Proc. Roy. Irish Acad., A51, 191

[51] Misner C.W., 1963, “The Method of Images in Geometrostatics”, Annals of Phys. 24 102 [52] Misner C.W., Thorne K.S. and Wheeler J.A., 1973, “Gravitation”, W. H. Freeman and

Company, New York

[53] Peebles P.J.E., 1993, “Principles of Physical Cosmology”, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

(6)

[54] Penrose R., 1969, “Gravitational collapse: The Role of General Relativity”, Riv. Nuovo Cimento 1 252

[55] Penrose R., 1965, “Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities”, Phys. Rev. Lett.

14, 57 - 59

[56] Penrose R., 1973, “Naked Singularities”, Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 224 125

[57] Perlmutter S., 2003, “Supernovae, Dark Energy, and the Accelerating Universe”, Physics Today

[58] Rosquist K., Samuelsson L., 2012, “Constraints of initial data for a discrete universe”, Int.

J. Mod. Phys. Conf. Ser. 12 213

[59] R¨as¨anen S., 2006, “Constraints on backreaction in dust universes”, Class. Quantum Grav, 23, 1823

[60] Smarr, L., ˘Cade˘z, A., DeWitt B. and Eppley K., 1976, “Collision of two black holes:

Theoretical framework”, Phys. Rev. D 14, 2443

[61] Spradlin M., Strominger A., 1999, “Vacuum states for AdS2 black holes”, JHEP 11, 021 [62] Stephani H., Kramer D., MacCallum M., Hoensealers C., Herlt E., 2002, “Exact solutions

of Einstein’s field equations”, Cambridge University Press

[63] Walker M., 1970, “Block diagrams and the extension of timelike two-surfaces”, J. Math.

Phys. 11 2280

[64] Wald R.M., 1984, “General Relativity”, The University of Chicago press, Chicago

[65] Weyl H., 1916, “ ¨Uber die Gleichverteilung von Zahlen mod. Eins”, Mathematische Annalen 77 313352 ISSN 0025-583, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01475864

[66] Weinberg S., 1972, “Gravitation and Cosmology: Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity”, pp. 688

[67] Wheeler, J.A., 1983, “The Geometrostatic Lattice Cell”, Found. Phys. 13, 161173

[68] Yoo C., Abe H., Nakao K., Takamori Y., 2012, “Black hole universe: Construction and analysis of initial data”, Phys. Rev.D 86, 044027

[69] York Jr. J.W., 1984, “Initial data for N black holes”, Physica (Utrecht) 124A(13), 629637 [70] York Jr. J.W., 1974, “Covariant decompositions of symmetric tensors in the theory of

gravitation”, Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´e Phys.Theor. 21 319-332

References

Related documents

Let us now assume, for simplicity, that the collapsing star is in the form of a thin shell of matter with Schwarzschild geometry on the outside, and Minkowski space on the inside..

In this pa- per we extend the analysis to slowly rotating black holes, solving the Israel-Lanczos-Sen junction conditions for a rotating shell composed of stringy matter to

In the case of strongly coupled large field theory black holes, the corresponding bulk duals of the Hartle-Hawking states will be described by a spacetime with a single

In this exercise, you will be using the Universe Sandbox 2 software, along with a Oculus Rift headset, to explore what happens to stars as they venture close to the

Där Sterne gör en (om än måhända ironisk) ansats att hävda ett verklighetsanspråk, 99 är Winterbottom och Rowson från början tydliga med att berättelsen är en berättelse,

Aspects of the TMT process that have been studied are communication, debate, decision making, problem solving, conflicts, social integration, behavioural integration,

Hawking radiation occurs when so called virtual particles are created in the close vicinity of the event horizon of a black hole.. [12] and [13] both have good descriptions of

In this article, we have shown that in order to correctly reproduce bulk perturbation theory in presence of charged operators in the background of an eternal black hole, a new