• No results found

The results of motor tests of DME by Volvo

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "The results of motor tests of DME by Volvo"

Copied!
34
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

The results of motor tests of DME by Volvo

H. Salsing

Volvo Power Train Sweden

Thursday, 30 August 2007, 16:40 – 17:25

Handout of presentation slides

(2)

DME as Alternative Fuel in the Diesel DME as Alternative Fuel in the Diesel

Engine Engine

Henrik Salsing

Henrik Salsing

(3)

Outline of Presentation

The Volvo Group

Driving forces for alternative fuels

DME Background

DME in a diesel engine

(4)

Volvo Aero

Buses

Construction

Equipment Volvo Penta Financial Services

BA Asia Incl. Nissan Diesel Mack Trucks Renault Trucks Volvo Trucks

(5)

Organisation

Mack Trucks

Renault Trucks

Volvo Trucks

Volvo Aero

Financial Services AB Volvo

Business Areas

Business Units

Volvo 3P

Volvo Powertrain Volvo Parts

Volvo Information Technology, Volvo Technology Corporation & Others Volvo Logistics

BA Asia Including

Nissan Diesel

Volvo Penta Construction

Equipment Buses

(6)

Sales and Employees Worldwide 2006

ASIA

OTHERS SOUTH

AMERICA

EUROPE

NORTH AMERICA

3 890 5%

2 160 3%

57 900 69%

14 820 18%

4 420 5%

Sales 52%

Sales 8%

Sales 30%

Sales 5%

Sales 5%

(7)

Engines*

* Engine Production 2006, 9-18 liter displacement

(excluding licensees / minority JV’s)

KamAZ MAN Scania Cummins Weichai Power Caterpillar Daimler

Volvo Powertrain

Sweden 106000, France 44000, N. America 36000, Japan 14000Tot 200000 Mercedes 105000, DDC 63000, Fuso 15000 Tot 183000

72000

67000

52000

14400 Sourced

CAT 167000, Perkins 3000 Tot 170000

Cummins 123000, CDC 11000Tot 134000 146000

Grey bars = Year 2005 Production Volume

Mack MP8

(8)

Some Driving Forces for Engine Development

Lower fuel consumption and higher power

Higher reliability

Reduced environmental impact

(9)

Emission Regulations Europe

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

NOx [g/kWh]

Particulate Matter [g/kWh] Euro2 (1996)

Euro3 (2000)

Euro4 (2005) Euro5 (2009)

Euro6 (2012)

Emission Legislation

Combustion

Exhaust gas aftertreatment

Alternative Fuels

Emission Regulations the US

0 0.02 0.04 0.06 0.08 0.1 0.12 0.14 0.16

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

NOx [g/kWh]

Particulate Matter [g/kWh] US94US98US04

US07 US10

(10)

CO 2 and the Global Warming

Source: Global Warming Art

http://www.globalwarmingart.com/wiki/Image:Carbon_Dioxide_400kyr_Rev_png

Ca rb on d io xi de n eu tra l fu el s

Ca rb on d io xi de n eu tra l fu el s

(11)

Alternative Fuels Examples

Fischer-Tropsch

Methanol

Ethanol

FAME

DME

(12)

DME Background

What is DME?

Why should DME be used in diesel engines?

DME in diesel engines

(13)

Historical Perspective

Used as propellant in spray cans

Industrial solver

In 1995

Affordable production technique

Research indicated excellent diesel fuel

Growing areas, such as domestic gas

(14)

What is DME?

Condensed gas at 5bar

Colour of water

Ether-like smell

No health effects

(15)

DME Background

Why DME in Diesel Engines?

Potentially renewable

High life cycle efficiency

Low exhaust emissions

(16)

Natural Gas Biomass Coal Feedstock

Production Process

End User

(17)

DME Background

Why DME in a Diesel Engine?

Potentially renewable

High life cycle efficiency

Low exhaust emissions

(18)

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 Farmed wood

Diesel DICI with DPF CNG bi-fuel Remote natural gas Coal Farmed wood Waste wood via BL Remote natural gas Coal Farmed wood Waste wood via BL

Feed Stock

Energy input [MJ/100km]

Ethanol Synthetic

diesel DME

Energy Input to Drive 100km

Conventional fuels

Adapted from: WELL-TO-WHEELS ANALYSIS OF FUTURE AUTOMOTIVE FUELS AND POWERTRAINS IN THE EUROPEAN CONTEXT, Version 2b May 2006, EUCAR concawe

(19)

Comparison of DME and Diesel Fuel

Property DME Diesel

Phase atmospheric conditions Gas Liquid Heating value [MJ/kg] 28.8 42.9 Density, 15°C [kg/m 3 ] 671 836 Viscosity, 40°C [m 2 /s]x10 -6 0.18 2.92

Cetane number >55 53

Stoichiometric A/F ratio 9.0 14.6

(20)

Base Line Engine

Volvo D9A 300 Euro3

Six cylinder, 9.4L in-line Heavy Duty Engine

(21)

Volvo D9A 300 DME prototype

DME Fuel Injection Equipment

Long root EGR system

(22)

DME Fuel Injection Equipment

DME High Pressure Pump DME Common Rail

(23)

Diesel – DME

Specific Carbon Monoxide Emission

0 2 4 6 8 10

A25 A50 A75 A100

S p eci fi c C O [ g /kW h ]

DMEDME w Cat

Diesel

(24)

Diesel – DME

Specific Hydrocarbon Emissions

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

A25 A50 A75 A100

S p ec if ic H C [ g /k Wh]

DME DME w Cat Diesel

(25)

0 200 400 600 800 1000

A25 A50 A75 A100

C onc e n tr at ion N O x [ ppm ]

DME

DME w Cat Diesel

Diesel – DME

NO X Concentration

(26)

Fuel Consumption and NO X – A50

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5

340 350 360 370 380 390 400 410 420 430

Brake Specific Fuel Consumption [g_DME/kWh]

Specific NOx [g/kWh] SOI=17 CAD BTDC

SOI=19 CAD BTDC SOI=24 CAD BTDC

Increasing

amount of

EGR

(27)

Objectives of Engine Tests within Renew

DME fuel grade specification

Why?

Substitute chemical grade with “fuel” grade to reduce cost

Investigate Engine Performance

Regulated emissions

Unregulated emissions

Fuel consumption

Suggest fuel grade

Long term effects on engine not included

(28)

Layout – Blending Apparatus

6.6 wt% Methanol

3.3 wt% Water

DME Water – Methanol

On-line blending

Engine

10wt%

Only

Only

Dum

p & Purge Valve

(29)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

0 5 10 15 20

EGR [%]

Specific NOx [g/kWh]

- Neat DME - 3.3wt% Water - 6.6wt% Methanol

- 3.3 Water + 6.6wt%

Methanol

No significant effect of impurities on

emissions

Combustion is however slightly affected

The Influence of Water and Methanol

Impurities on Emissions

(30)

Particulate Matter

Diesel Engine

Chart will be added that shows particle size versus number of particles

DME Engine

Various load points

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5

1 10 100

Millions

Particle Diameter [nm]

Particle Concentration [Number/cm³]

(31)

Chemical Energy to Work in the Engine

Several chemical and physical steps must take place before the fuel’s chemical energy can be released

Varies during the combustion process

Ignition delay

Premixed combustion

Diffusion combustion

Late combustion

In-cylinder pressure evaluated => possible to

analyse the heat release from the fuel

(32)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140

340 360 380 400 420 440

Crank Axel Position [CAD]

RoHR [J/CAD]

Typical Rate of Heat Release for DME

Results

Start of injection End of injection

(33)

-10 10 30 50 70 90 110

-5 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40

Crank Axle Position [CAD]

Rate of Heat Release [J/CAD]]

The Influence of Water and Methanol Impurities on Combustion

M:0wt%

W:0wt%

M:0wt%

W:3.3wt%

M:6.6wt%

W:0wt%

M:6.6wt%

W:3.3wt%

(34)

Summary

Renewable fuel

High life cycle efficiency

Low exhaust emissions can be achieved

Different fuel injection system

Adapted combustion system to reach optimum performance

No effect of water and methanol impurities

References

Related documents

The conclusion for optimization with two-dimensional analysis is the same as for the one-dimensional: If a minimized drying time is wanted, dry as hard as possible, but dry with

DME: GTL DME: Farmed wood DME: Waste wood, Black liqour EtOH: Wheat, Straw CHP, DDGS as AF EtOH: Sugar cane (Brazil). EtOH: Wheat, Straw CHP, DDGS as fuel EtOH:

The thawing process was then simulated in a two-dimensional section by FEM using the software FEMLAB [9] version 3.1, where the dry weight moisture distribution and the

• Tuodaan kiertotalouden hyviä käytäntöjä ja toimintamalleja alueen puurakennus- ja puutuotealan yrityksille mm.. uutiskirjeet

In this study, two options for the production of combined heat and power (CHP) at a wood- based ethanol plant are being considered: 1) All solid residue is used for combined heat and

Significant environmental improvements are potentially possible if construction and demolition wood waste (C&D wood waste) is material recycled. An initial screening of

This thesis examines the variations in the composition of MSW and WW streams used as a fuel supply in WtE facilities after undergoing waste pre-treatment technologies, and the

In summary, the study described in Paper III found that the variation of the food waste content in the fuel blends seemed not to be a determining factor for the formation of PAH,