https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-18-2769-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Epistemic uncertainties and natural hazard risk assessment – Part 2: What should constitute good practice?
Keith J. Beven
1,2, Willy P. Aspinall
3, Paul D. Bates
4, Edoardo Borgomeo
5, Katsuichiro Goda
7, Jim W. Hall
5, Trevor Page
1, Jeremy C. Phillips
3, Michael Simpson
5, Paul J. Smith
1,6, Thorsten Wagener
7,8, and Matt Watson
31
Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
2
Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
3
School of Earth Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
4
School of Geographical Sciences, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
5
Environmental Change Institute, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
6
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasting, Reading, UK
7
Department of Civil Engineering, Bristol University, Bristol, UK
8