• No results found

Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 14, 2017

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 14, 2017"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Jitendra Reddy Kondapally Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S15000592

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good

Course of the defence:

prof. Ing. Přemysl Pokorný, CSc.:

Comparison with common tool steel.

Specification of the heat treatment used at the presented work.

Explain the Hysteresis Loop graph shown in the presentation.

Answered partially.

Ing. Miloš Šikola, MBA:

Side effects - the way of avoiding oxidation.

Answered.

prof. Ing. Stanislav Hosnedl, CSc.:

How many samples were used in the experiment?

Fatique properties of printed materials compared with commonly used materials.

Answered.

Assessment: Very good

Defence date: June 14, 2017 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Related documents

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of