• No results found

EIJS Seminar “Three Historical Analyses on Japan’s Fiscal Issues”

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "EIJS Seminar “Three Historical Analyses on Japan’s Fiscal Issues”"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

EIJS Seminar

“Three Historical Analyses on Japan’s Fiscal Issues”

 Date and Time: 14 September 2016, 14: 30 – 17: 00

 Venue: Library, 3rd floor, European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics, Saltmätargatan 19C

 Language: English

Researches on Japan’s tax policy, intergovernmental fiscal relation and elderly care system will be presented by three Japanese scholars.

Program

14:30–14:55 Coffee / Tea

14:55–15:00 Welcome Remarks

Marie Söderberg, Director and Professor, European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics

15:00-15:40 Presentation I

Moderator: Ivar Padrón Hernández, European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics

“A Comparative Historical Analysis of the Tax Revolt in Denmark and Japan”

Shintaro Kurachi, Research Associate, Faculty of Economics, Keio University

Discussant: Mikael Stenkula, Research Institute of Industrial Economics

15:40-16:20 Presentation II

Moderator: Yoshihiro Sato, European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics

(2)

“An Analysis of the National Subsidy to Compulsory Education in Taisho Period”

Ryutaro Yamaguchi, Research Associate, College of Economics, Rikkyo University

Discussant: Vanesa Pesqué-Cela, Visiting Researcher, Stockholm China Economic Research Institute, Stockholm School of Economics

16:20-17:00 Presentation III

Moderator: Ji-Won Song, European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics

“Relation between Long-term Care Insurance System and Decentralization Reform in Japan”

Tatsuki Ichikawa, PhD student, Department of Economics, Yokohama National University

Discussant: Els-Marie Anbäcken, Senior Lecturer, School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University 17:00-17:10 Closing Remarks

References

Related documents

The more efficient Blundell and Bond (1998) “system” estimator, which exploits the moment conditions from a system of the differenced equation plus the original level

Session III Chair: Professor Marie Söderberg, Director of the European Institute of Japanese Studies, Stockholm School of Economics 13:00-13:40 H. Cecilia Malmström, the

Venue: Stockholm School of Economics, Room Ragnar, Bertil Ohlins Gata 5, Stockholm..

second, the darker bars indicate the average cumulative loss of output during the crisis episode (computed for the countries in a country group that actually lost output in the

So where does this impatience with institution building come from? The typical explanation is that it comes from a political need to show immediate results. This causes a bias

This shape of SDI curve illustrates the trade-off discussed above: With low usage of South Stream, the EU buyer power effect combined with an improved gas route

In this paper we attempt to empirically identify the effects of shifting from in-house production to outside procurement on non- contractible quality dimensions –

The Entrant firm has a cost advantage in producing low quality: it can produce low quality at cost c L e =c L -k, where c L is the Incumbent firms’ (common) cost of producing low