Final report of DISA Seed project:
An Exploration of the Challenges and Possibilities of Multidimensional Visualization in the Context of Visual Learning Analytics
Rafael M. Martins
1, Marcelo Milrad
1, and Italo Masiello
21
Dept. of Computer Science and Media Technology /
2Dept. of Pedagogy and Learning Linnaeus University
1. Summary of Activities and Results of the Seed Project
We report on 8 main groups of activities (A1-8) and 7 main results (R1-6) performed and obtained during the period of the Seed project, as described next. After a couple of initial planning meetings at LNU (A1), we proceeded to travel to Gothenburg and meet with key members of the managing and data team of Hypocampus (A2), where we discussed the contents of their data and the possibilities of collaboration. Some time was spent for loading, studying, cleaning, and understanding their data, resulting in an exploratory data analysis report (R1).
With the new knowledge, more concrete goals for the collaboration were defined and discussed online, both asynchronously in a Slack room created for the specific purpose of discussing learning analytics between the members of the project and in a Zoom meeting with the Hypocampus data team. After an initial non-systematic analysis of recent and relevant papers, a systematic literature review of the use of t-SNE in the context of learning analytics has been planned and partially performed during the project (A3, R2), and is still ongoing. This, coupled with the data and the cooperation of the company, was enough to inform the development of a prototype of a visual analysis system for investigating multidimensional student behavior extracted from the company’s data (A4, R3). The first stable version of the prototype was discussed both internally and with Hypocampus, again in person in their Gothenburg office. The results obtained with the improved prototype were described in a short paper published in the proceedings of EC-TEL 2019, the 14th European Conference on Technology-Enhanced Learning (A5, R4), as a LNCS Springer volume
1. This publication also included the presentation of the prototype at the conference in Delft, NL (A6). In parallel, the work of a summer intern was also funded and supervised (A7), which resulted in the development of a second prototype (R5) with a different focus. Finally, using all the experience gathered during the project, the team members collaborated on writing and submitting a proposal for external research funding (A8, R6) from VINNOVA (Ansökan till Utmaningsdriven innovation - Steg 1) including partners such as RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, Studi AB, Kungsbacka kommun, Skellefteå kommun, NTI-gymnasierna, Eskilstuna kommun, Lidingö Stad and Västerviks kommun.
2. To what extent have the objectives of the project been achieved / challenges were met?
Explain the outcome and indicate the reasons for possible deviations.
The submitted proposal had three main objectives, which are discussed in details below. Two main deviations are worth mentioning: first, the practical perspective (O2) was prioritized over the theoretical one (O1) during the project, mainly due to the fact that the collaboration with the company proceeded in a much smoother and more productive way than predicted in the proposal. Since we got a very active cooperation from the data team of Hypocampus in understanding the data and its possible uses, we decided to move on to building, validating (and eventually publishing) a much more interesting and complex prototype than initially planned. This re-allocation of resources meant we did not fully reach the objective of having a complete draft of a systematic literature review by the end of the project, but we believe that the final balance was positive and the available human resources were better used this way. Second, due to strategic reasons, we changed the plan from submitting a KK proposal
1