• No results found

DOCUMENT D – taxud.c.1(2019)7899573 – 975 (1/1) GUIDELINES 113

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "DOCUMENT D – taxud.c.1(2019)7899573 – 975 (1/1) GUIDELINES 113"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

254

ATTENTION: Please bear in mind that guidelines issued by the VAT Committee are merely views of a consultative committee.

They do not constitute an official interpretation of EU law and do not necessarily have the agreement of the European Commission. They do not bind the European Commission or the Member States who are free not to follow them.

Reproduction of this document is subject to mentioning this Caveat.

GUIDELINES

RESULTING FROM THE

113

th MEETING of 3 June 2019

DOCUMENT D – taxud.c.1(2019)7899573 – 975 (1/1)

3. NEW LEGISLATION – MATTERS CONCERNING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RECENTLY ADOPTED EU VAT PROVISIONS

3.1 Origin: Commission

References: Articles 17a, 36a, 138(1) and (1a), 243(3) and 262(2) of the VAT Directive

Articles 45a and 54a of the VAT Implementing Regulation Subject: Implementation of the Quick Fixes Package:

Council Directive (EU) 2018/1910 and Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/1912

(Document taxud.c.1(2019)3533969 – Working paper No 968)

Chain transactions: Combined with applying the simplification in Article 141 (triangular transactions) (section 3.2.1.)

1. Where the same goods are supplied successively and those goods are dispatched or transported from one Member State to another Member State directly from the first supplier to the last customer in the chain, the VAT Committee unanimously agrees that in the chain of transactions, only the taxable person making the intra-Community acquisition (hereinafter,

“X”) may, subject to meeting all conditions, benefit from the simplification for triangular transactions laid down in Article 141 of the VAT Directive.

2. The VAT Committee almost unanimously agrees that, in the situation such as described under point 1, the condition laid down in Article 141(c) of the VAT Directive shall be seen as fulfilled when the goods are directly dispatched or transported, from a Member State other than that which has issued the VAT identification number used by X for the purposes of the intra-Community acquisition, to the place designated by the person for whom X carries out the subsequent supply (hereinafter, “Y”).

3. The VAT Committee almost unanimously agrees that the fact that Y makes a subsequent supply of the goods to another person within the chain, shall have no impact on the application of the simplification for triangular transactions to the transactions made by X. For that simplification to apply, all the conditions in Article 141 of the VAT Directive must however be fulfilled, which according to the view held almost unanimously by the VAT Committee, shall require that Y is identified for VAT purposes in the Member State where the VAT on that subsequent supply is due and designated, in accordance with Article 197 of the VAT Directive, as liable for the payment of the VAT due on that supply.

References

Related documents

The VAT Committee almost unanimously confirms that in accordance with settled case-law of the CJEU, even if a fund does not qualify as a UCITS within the meaning of the UCITS

The VAT Committee almost unanimously agrees that the exemption laid down in Article 148(a) of the VAT Directive, referring to the supply of goods for the

The VAT Committee by a large majority agrees that in respect of the supplies of goods and services related with activities in the exclusive economic zone on which the coastal Member

ATTENTION: Please bear in mind that guidelines issued by the VAT Committee are merely views of a consultative committee. They do not constitute an official interpretation of EU

The VAT Committee unanimously agrees that this addition means that where the person acquiring the goods does not indicate his VAT identification number to the supplier or where

As to the cases envisaged by Article 138(1a) of the VAT Directive, the VAT Committee almost unanimously agrees that the exemption may only be revoked retroactively, if and when

The VAT Committee, at large majority, agrees that where the warehouse, to which goods are transported from another Member State with a view to those goods being supplied at a

There is a need for a political discussion about the exemptions and the effects of blocked input VAT and cumulative effects have as a result of the Swedish VAT base not being