1
Linköping University Medical Dissertations No. 1350
ERRATADemand for Rapid and Accurate Regional
Medical Response at Major Incidents
Heléne Nilsson, IKE, Katastrofmedicin
Page Text Correction
3, IV-line 20 Submitted December 2012 Accepted January 18 2013 8, line 7 Emergency Management
and Disaster medicine
European Masters in Disaster Medicine 25, line 19 Reference 118 Same as reference 80
26, line 26 Add reference 121 and 142
39, line 1 Reference 153 Same as reference 11
44, line 6 northeast mid portion
46, Table 2 Burn injury on
face/pulmonary injury 5
10
50 Table 5 Add; Developed from ref#121
54, line 21 indicators 7 and 8 indicator 8 64 Table 10 Total number Sim II 59 61
71, line 18 causality casualty
94, line 1 Reference 108 (SOSFS 2005:12)
SOSFS 2011:9.
Socialstyrelsens föreskrifter och allmänna råd om ledningssystem för systematiskt kvalitetsarbete. Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm Paper II, page 40 Reference 16, 2006 2008
Paper III (Results)
2005-2009 2006-2009
Paper III page 6,line 2 and 4
Table 3 Table 4
Figure 3 Figure 4 Paper III page
6,line 3
(75%) (77%)
Paper III, page 9 Indicator 11 Indicator 10 Paper IV
(Abstract-line 4
northwest mid portion of Sweden
Paper IV (Abstract – line 6) ETS© ETS® Paper IV (2.2)
Emergo Train System© Emergo Train System® Paper IV
(2.2) line 1
2
Page Text Correction
Paper IV (2.4) line 2
northeast mid portion of Sweden
Paper I -Table 1 Indicator 6 missing Deciding on preliminary referrals 2 points Paper I -Table 2 Content of staff briefing-
1,75
Content of staff briefing-1,25
Paper I- Table 3 Se backside
Table 3: Number of casualties referred to other regions, reason for preventable deaths and score for performance indicators for initial strategic management and staff procedure skills in a pilot exercise in a scenario with 100 casualties Number of casualties referred to other regions 3 Preventable deaths (total number) 11 Inadequate management of airway and/or breathing at the scene 5 Failure to operate within time frame 2 Late admission to ICU 4 Score for staff procedure skills 19.25 points (max 22) Score for initial strategic management 16 points (max 22)
