• No results found

All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion

N/A
N/A
Info
Download
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Download now ( 1 Page )

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Pavel Vedel Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: M18000203

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus

Course of the defence:

The student responded using slides. All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion.

Questions from the Jury Ing. Jan Koprnický, Ph.D.

What are the megagrids?

Question was answered fully and without any objections.

prof. Ing. Jaroslav Nosek, CSc.

Which are main energy storage possibilities both for microgrids and for large grids sysem in EU?

Question was answered.

Examination Board:

Chairman: doc. Dr. Ing. Mgr. Jaroslav Hlava Vicechairman: prof. Ing. Jaroslav Nosek, CSc.

Members: prof. Dr. rer. nat. Stefan Bischoff doc. Ing. Osvald Modrlak, CSc.

Ing. Martin Pustka, Ph.D.

Ing. Lukáš Hubka, Ph.D.

Ing. Jan Koprnický, Ph.D.

Secretary: Ing. Leoš Kukačka, Ph.D.

Assessment: Very good

Defence date: May 30, 2019 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Download now ( PDF - 1 Page - 14.80 KB )

Related documents

Calculation of working hours per year for one person

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Could you quantify the contribution of your work? Answered partially Could you assess the expected time savings using the tool that you designed? Answered partially Ing

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent doc.Ing.PavelKopeček,CSc.Whattroublesdidyoufacewithduringpreparationofyourmasterthesis?Whatwerethemainpeaksinyourwork?AnsweredWhatwasthecomputingtimen

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Questions of the supervisor and the opponent were answered

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Šulc informed about the supervisors assessment

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of

What is roughness? Failed to answer

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Otázky vedoucího a oponenta: (Student answered.) Prof

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent?. Course of

Where did you find the cost of moving the machines that you considered in your thesis? Answered Did you respect limitations of the room in your work? Answered doc

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of