• No results found

All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Pavel Vedel Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: M18000203

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus

Course of the defence:

The student responded using slides. All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion.

Questions from the Jury Ing. Jan Koprnický, Ph.D.

What are the megagrids?

Question was answered fully and without any objections.

prof. Ing. Jaroslav Nosek, CSc.

Which are main energy storage possibilities both for microgrids and for large grids sysem in EU?

Question was answered.

Examination Board:

Chairman: doc. Dr. Ing. Mgr. Jaroslav Hlava Vicechairman: prof. Ing. Jaroslav Nosek, CSc.

Members: prof. Dr. rer. nat. Stefan Bischoff doc. Ing. Osvald Modrlak, CSc.

Ing. Martin Pustka, Ph.D.

Ing. Lukáš Hubka, Ph.D.

Ing. Jan Koprnický, Ph.D.

Secretary: Ing. Leoš Kukačka, Ph.D.

Assessment: Very good

Defence date: May 30, 2019 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Related documents

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent?. Course of