• No results found

Course evaluation template

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Course evaluation template"

Copied!
3
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Sida 1 av 2 Course evaluation template

Course evaluation template

After the course has ended, the course coordinator fills in this template. The head of department/programme decides whether the template should be supplemented with further information/questions.

Course code 7KL004

Course title

Samhälls- och författningskunskap

Credits 4,5 hp

Semester VT 21

Period 22/2 – 12/3

Course coordinator Peter Allebeck

Examiner Peter Allebeck

Other participating teachers Maki Morinaga

Other participating teachers

Number of registered students 22

Number who have not completed the course

Number passed after regular session 22

Conclusions from the previous course evaluation

Quotation from previous evaluation: “Overall they found that the course gave valuable knowledge, was interesting, and was well conducted. Some variation though, so some

persons thought some moments wre on too high level, or difficult to understand, other than it was too low level. Two issues were not optimal and needs to modify: The textbook was difficult to access… The course venue was changing…”

Description of conducted changes since previous course occasion As suggested we had a number of textbooks that could be lent to the students during the course. We had booked a room that could be held throughout the period, but due to the pandemic the course was held on distance.

Method(s) for student influence

Since the course is short, it is difficult to integrate students wishes. We have a session in the beginning where they can state what the find strange or difficult in the Swedish system, and we try to take up during the course

In spite of the distance teaching, there was good possibilities to keep an interactive spirit and students could ask for clarification and additional explanation.

(2)

Sida 1 av 2 Course evaluation template

We have added questions on the standard evaluation, and these inform future planning of courses.

21 out of 22 responded to the evaluation, an improvement since last year Summary of the students’ response to the course valuation

Overall very positive responses to the course. Some students want more of case discussions and less lectures. Regarding specific components, I understand comments given to some teachers who were not very good communicators.

The course coordinator’s reflections on the implementation and results of the course

Considering distance teaching, and my inexperience of this, the results from this course was above expectations. All external teachers were very good in adjusting to the online format, and there was good interaction and many questions. One important aspect was that myself or coleader of the course was present in all moments.

• How have the students’ previous knowledge, experiences and prerequisites been used as a basis during the course?

Comparisons were made with experiences from their countries, and many could also use experiences from work in Sweden.

• In what way the work methods used during the course contribute to the students attaining the learning outcomes?

Lectures and discussions on clinical aspects of relevance to all physicians and important for their work in Sweden.

• How has the course worked with -constructive alignment - from learning outcomes to examination form and examination content?

Case discussions were held interactively that picked up issues from the lectures. Similar types of case descriptions were then used in the examination.

• How do examinations and assessment criteria ensure that students achieve the learning outcomes of the course?

• Case discussions and questions are distributed for home reading, and are followed up in sessions where individual students are asked to give responses. Some tasks are also to be handed in for review.

Description of how the course works with quality, research-basis and collaboration with other professions

We bring in highly qualified teachers in different fields, and monitor performance through our own participation as course leaders, and through the evaluations.

Course coordinator’s conclusions and suggestions for improvement

Since the course basically was highly appreciated, no major changes for next course. We know some external teachers are not optimal, and will be changed. Students want more case discussions, and we will try to incorporate more.

Views on the course and improvement suggestions from others

We have regular contact with the program director, and adjust if there are overlaps or gaps to cover.

(3)

Sida 1 av 2 Course evaluation template

No specific comments from others.

Description of how the course valuation has provided feedback internally and to the students

It is not possible to integrate students’ views during such a short course, and afterwards they continue to other moments. We discuss results internally, and use for future courses.

Reflection of the type and level of student participation

In spite of distance teaching, students were very present and active throughout the course.

They were all motivated, and it seems the quality and type of topics brought up were of high interest for students and their future work in Sweden, thus high participation and very active students.

References

Related documents

På föreläsningarna var det ofta svårt att hänga med då det var svårt att förstå den bakomliggande teorin innan man hade greppat konceptet av metoderna. Eftersom teorin kom

examination instead. Actions need to be taken in order to find a way to motivate the student to engage in the same manner as previous years, although it is no longer a group

A clear majority (~90%) of responding students felt that they had developed valuable expertise/skills and achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course to a large or

The course used pre-recorded lectures, in-person and online lectures, seminars, practical group exercises, short written assignments, a longer individual protocol writing

• response frequency (for example, concluding survey 70 % response frequency, post-it notes – improvement suggestions after the second course week 90 % response.. frequency,

However following the feedback of the students I am going to include a workshop at the end of the course where we summarize all course content and allow the students to reflect on

i) The Research Application assignment was developed in response to comments from students from the previous course. Firstly, the research application assignment was more

The course promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning to some, large or very large extent according to all but one (mean 3.7), and all thought that the teachers had been