• No results found

To Fix What’s Not Broken

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "To Fix What’s Not Broken"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Charlotta Plejert

To Fix What’s Not Broken

Repair Strategies in

Non-Native and Native English Conversation

ISBN 91-85295-74-4 ISSN 1403-2570 Department of Language and Culture

Linköping University

Studies in Language and Culture

Charlotta Plejert·To Fix What’s Not BrokenSLC 5

Studies in Language and Culture

5

(2)

Charlotta Plejert

To Fix What’s Not Broken

Repair Strategies in

Non-Native and Native English Conversation

ISBN 91-85295-74-4 ISSN 1403-2570 Department of Language and Culture

Linköping University

Studies in Language and Culture

Charlotta Plejert·To Fix What’s Not BrokenSLC 5

Studies in Language and Culture

5

References

Related documents

The only exception is for the oral exam in 2012, where low- ability students scored lower than high-ability students (conditional on camera implementation). However, this difference

By contrast, a naïve observer does not take into account the existence of a norm and so judges esteem relative to whether the agent chooses the action preferred by the ideal type..

This is due to the fact that consumption comparisons over time give rise to an intertemporal chain reaction with welfare effects in the entire future, whereas comparisons with

We study the k-th-to default spreads as function of the average CDS spread in the portfolio and investigate how some of the model parameters affect the kth-to default spreads

Sick individuals choose either the parallel imported or the locally sourced drug, given their prices and the coinsurance rate (the percentage of price paid out-of-pocket)..

On the other hand, the selfish Principal, by providing extrinsic incentive and signaling her low generosity (or toughness), can’t intrinsically motivate the pro-social Agent at a

As a …rst approximation, we hypothesize that the e¤ects of disaster destruction on the likelihood of termination are roughly the reverse of its e¤ects on the likelihood of onset

When we view as informative only variables that are more likely to share covariance properties with unobserved factors, the upper bound increases to 0.056 (the lower bound does