Editors Author Guidelines Home
About Us Contact
R E V I E W S F E A T U R E S
C O M M E N T
David Hamilton 2012 A History of Organ David Hamilton 2012 A History of Organ Transplantation. Ancient Legends to Modern Transplantation. Ancient Legends to Modern Practice. University of Pittsburgh Press Practice. University of Pittsburgh Press.
Transplant surgery holds a certain fascination, both for its potential to restore a broken human body and for the prospect of Frankenstein-horrors that it conjures. David Hamilton’s detailed history starts, as the title suggests, with legends of limb replacement, but does not linger with the ancients, as it is the modern application of science to clinical problems that interests him.
The book’s first major medical figure is Gaspare
Tagliacozzi, appointed to the Bologna chair of anatomy in 1570, author of an illustrated text ‘On the surgery of mutilation by grafting’, describing early techniques of
plastic surgery. Tagliacozzi’s patients came to him with a lost ear, lip or nose as a result of warfare, duelling or syphilis, which would be replaced with a flap of skin lifted from their own upper arm. The arm was held in place near the face, while the flap grew into its new site over a number of days. The success of Tagliacozzi’s surgery was partly due to the support system binding the patient’s forearm in front of his nose while the skin flap developed a new blood supply. Although Tagliacozzi was honoured in his own lifetime and his book remained in print, crucial details of his successful technique got lost or misinterpreted and had to be
rediscovered more than 200 years later. Specifically Tagliacozzi’s successful use of skin (not muscle) and the use of a person’s own tissue in autografts (rather than using donated tissue) to rebuild their missing features came to be obscured through neglectful and malevolent reporting.
One of Hamilton’s themes is the way that science progresses in fits and starts and as a result of circumstances and chance as well as scientific endeavour. Laboratory mistakes sometimes result in a breakthrough, overturning previous orthodoxies, while disastrous accidents can contribute to clinical developments. In 1958 six Yugoslavian physicists involved in a nuclear reactor accident, were treated in Paris. One physicist who had received a lower dose of radiation recovered spontaneously, whereas the other five men were treated with bone marrow. Of the four men who survived, their own marrow production recovered, giving encouragement for the use of radiation as a technique of immunosuppression in the developing practice of kidney transplantation. The following year 12 year old Nils Alwall was flown from Sweden to Boston, after his only kidney was lost in an accident, in the hopes that he could receive a kidney from his mother. He died from complications of the initial radiation dose and that treatment protocol was abandoned forthwith. This book’s human body count, often noted briefly as ‘overall results were poor’, is second only to the number of laboratory animals that died in the course of the developing science of immunology. The mounting number of deaths over the 500 plus pages of the book are balanced by the success stories, such as the 23-year old who successfully donated a kidney to his twin in 1959. These Boston twins showed that it was ethically possible to remove an organ from a healthy, living person and that complications to the recipient after transplantation were treatable.
Although Hamilton’s tone is cool and he favours a calm approach to medicine, the human drama of the egos and competitiveness that drove the development of transplant medicine are nonetheless part of the story. The bulk of this book covers the twentieth century and the long, painstaking efforts to understand immunity and graft-rejection which was so crucial for transplant surgery to become beneficial. Hamilton is interested in the collaboration between surgeon and lab scientist necessitated by the early experimental work, as well as public reaction to the successes and failures. The development of transplant medicine has been dependent on public opinion, both for ethical permission and for the donation of organs. After
Tweet 0
SHARE THIS
SEEN ELSEWHERE
RT @JaneElliott66@JaneElliott66: Our nine-point guide to spotting a dodgy statistic
https://t.co/bMP1UIsCc5https://t.co/bMP1UIsCc5 1 day ago
RT @clarkmike@clarkmike: 'Hunt's Houdini act: What next?' - https://t.co/nqaeKa40kZhttps://t.co/nqaeKa40kZ via
@BBCNews@BBCNews 1 day ago
RT @TheLancet@TheLancet: Editorial & front cover:
#Brexit#Brexit and #juniordoctors#juniordoctors contracts:
the real threats to the #NHS#NHS https://t.co/KrgT5MAlXbhttps://t.co/KrgT5MAlXb https://…
3 days ago
RT @profsaulbecker@profsaulbecker: Please read this all the way through if you only read one thing today: https://t.co/FsjsLxzQ4Uhttps://t.co/FsjsLxzQ4U 3 days ago
RT @Prof DavidNutt@Prof DavidNutt: Why isn't cycling illegal? https://t.co/2o34zmmjCchttps://t.co/2o34zmmjCc via
@wordpressdotcom@wordpressdotcom 3 days ago
RT @peterjukes@peterjukes: Fantastic, fun and informative summary of Theresa May's Brexit nightmare by @IanDunt@IanDunt
https://t.co/ghcUGVVJcXhttps://t.co/ghcUGVVJcX 4 days ago
RT @NHSConfed_EU@NHSConfed_EU: How will #Brexit#Brexit affect NHS patients; our latest blog explains https://t.co/0IO3zcsSchhttps://t.co/0IO3zcsSch
https://t.co/wC2SmZnb9Dhttps://t.co/wC2SmZnb9D 4 days ago
Everything you need to know about #Brexit#Brexit trade deals (including some small print about NHS) @IanDunt@IanDunt -
https://t.co/CudHiOjHJUhttps://t.co/CudHiOjHJU 4 days ago
RECENT POSTS
Brexit and its discontentsBrexit and its discontents Jul 13, 2016Jul 13, 2016
On bulls, men and riskOn bulls, men and risk Jul 6, 2016Jul 6, 2016
‘Corporate Wellness’: blurring the‘Corporate Wellness’: blurring the lineslines
Jun 29, 2016Jun 29, 2016
How many Zikas will it take?How many Zikas will it take?
S E A R C H
Waiting for the Xenografts…
by HANNAH BRADBYHANNAH BRADBY Oct 15, 2012
2 Like Like
Submit
a series of experimental and unsuccessful heart transplants in 1968, prompted by Christian Barnard’s widely publicised world-first in 1967, donation rates fell, including those for kidney and corneal transplantation, where the surgical techniques were well established, successful and safe.
The final chapter is titled ‘Waiting for the Xenografts’ and offers optimism for the possibility of the techniques of genetic engineering, cloning and stem cell manipulation making the techniques of transplant medicine available to more people currently on waiting lists. Hamilton professes faith in human ingenuity and endeavour and communicates the sense of prerogative necessitated by the progress of a heroic medicine that requires sacrifice and that does not routinely alleviate suffering.
Further Information Further Information
Review of: Review of: A History of Organ Transplantation: Ancient Legends to Modern Practice by David Hamilton
Hardback: Hardback: 640 pages
Publisher: Publisher: University of Pittsburgh Press (2012) ISBN: ISBN: 9780822944133
ISBN10: ISBN10: 0822944138
Y O U R C O M M E N T S Y O U R C O M M E N T S
Name Name required required
Email Email required required
Website Website
Jun 22, 2016Jun 22, 2016
Caring for CarersCaring for Carers Jun 15, 2016Jun 15, 2016
Partners Partners Stay up to date Stay up to date
Follow us on Twitter Like us on Facebook MedSocNews Subscribe in a reader Subscribe to our newsletter Who we follow
Sites we like Sites we like
BSA MedSoc Study Group Centre for Medical Humanities Blog Charisma
Critical Public Health Discover Society Guerilla Policy Medical Sociology Online No way to make a living ourNHS openDemocracy Pop Theory
Social Science Space Sociological Images Sociology of Health and Illness
All content © 2015 Cost Of Living. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy and Cookie Policy | Site by Rainbird Studio