• No results found

Progressive constructions in Swedish

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Progressive constructions in Swedish"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Göteborgsstudier i nordisk språkvetenskap 25

Progressive constructions in Swedish

(Swedish Summary)

av Kristian Blensenius

Akademisk avhandling för filosofie doktorsexamen i nordiska språk, som enligt beslut av humanistiska fakultetsnämnden vid Göteborgs universitet

kommer att försvaras offentligt lördagen den 10 oktober 2015 kl. 10.15

i Lilla hörsalen, Humanisten.

(2)

title: Progressive constructions in Swedish

swedish title: Progressiva konstruktioner i svenskan language: English and Swedish (Swedish summary) author: Kristian Blensenius

Abstract

This thesis aims to provide new insights into the semantic properties of some progressive constructions in Swedish and to provide better understanding of aspect in Swedish. The five included studies present analyses of previously understudied as well as more familiar progressive constructions, based on authentic language data.

Constructions with a verb followed by a verbal present participle, e.g. försvinna skrikande ‘dis- appear screaming’, are analyzed in the first study, and they are labeled progressive participial. It is shown that the verb and the participle, taken together as a construction in a construction-grammar sense, yield progressive reading.

More familiar constructions, standardly considered progressive in the litera-ture, are studied in the remaining papers, primarily from a two-componential theory of aspect. The second study analyzes the constructions hålla på att ‘hold on to’ + infinitive verb and hålla på och ‘hold on and’ + finite verb. While the difference between them is usually taken to be primarily stylistic, it is shown that only hålla på att is a progressive marker in a canonical sense.

Posture-verb pseudocoordinations, e.g. sitta ‘sit’/stå ‘stand’/ligga ‘lie’ + och ‘and’ + finite verb, are analyzed in the third study. It is shown that posture-verb pseudocoordinations are not progressive like e.g. hålla på att but instead locative and, in some cases, episodic.

The fourth study returns to the hålla på construction, primarily assessing the pseudocoordin- ative hålla på och variant in detail, noting its restrictions in terms of compatibility with certain types of VP. It is shown that hålla på och does not combine with VPs with homogeneous internal structure, and a pluractional analysis is proposed instead. Finally, as a way to find out the nature of hålla på att constructions, the fifth study investigates constructions of the type <verb + linking element + VP> from the perspectives of e.g. finiteness and aspect.

keywords: Swedish, aspect, imperfective, progressive, pseudocoordination, finiteness, se- mantics, pluractionality, implicative verbs

© Kristian Blensenius

distribution: Institutionen för svenska språket Box 200

405 30 Göteborg

omslagsbild: Thomas Leuthard, CC BY 2.0, beskuren, www.flickr.com foto porträtt: Rudolf Rydstedt

issn: 1652-3105 isbn: 978-91-87850-60-8

länk till e-publicering: http://hdl.handle.net/2077/40179 sättning: Sven Lindström

tryckning: Ineko AB

References

Related documents

Questions about implications of overnight work travel in terms of the travellers’ ability to keep in touch with locally based as well as long-distance friends, and the

The thesis brings together and discusses several theories that might explain the access and use of public spaces from a gender perspective; planning theory, theories about

Ratcheting is accumulated plastic strains which may occur when a structure is subjected to a constant load in combination with cyclic loading. In the assessment of nuclear class

Overt agents (63% of the instances of the passive progressive in the subset and 62% of the instances of the passive progressive in the main database are agented) are considerably

In summary, the ITT-PMS study was a multicentre, prospective, open-label, phase 1b Intrathecal Treatment Trial in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (ITT-PMS) where patients

Two types of multiverbal construction in Swedish are well-known and typi- cally claimed to be progressive (see studies II–IV): the posture-verb pseudoco- ordinations, in which

Redaktörer för serien: Inga-Lill Grahn, Hans Landqvist, Benjamin Lyngfelt, Andreas Nord, Lena Rogström, Barbro Wallgren Hemlin.. GS GS GS GS GS GS GS GS

In everyday written English many ing-forms seem to be found in constructions such as: He is always complaining or He is successfully working, where the progressive form together with