• No results found

Attitude to Speech and Communication in Individuals Born with Cleft Lip and Palate

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Attitude to Speech and Communication in Individuals Born with Cleft Lip and Palate"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

C h ris tin a H a vs ta m A tt itu de to S p e e c h a n d C o m m u n ic a tio n in In di v idu a ls B o rn w ith C le ft L ip a n d Pa la te

Attitude to Speech and

Communication in Individuals

Born with Cleft Lip and Palate

20

1

0

ISBN 978-91-628-8168-9

Printed by Intellecta Infolog AB, Gothenburg

Christina Havstam

Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology

at Sahlgrenska Academy

University of Gothenburg

References

Related documents

It is even more imperative to closely follow these individuals with CP±L, as they present with a higher prevalence of abnormal middle ear status, elevated hearing thresholds when

audiological and otological data from children with CP±L and children without CP±L at 1, 1.5, 3 and 5 years of age, analysed audiological and otological data from adolescents with

Retracted ar- ticulation: no significant difference between groups VPC: VPI: rate of occurrence higher among the IA children Secondary surgery for VPI: IA 28%, NA 4% Language: -

The main aim of this thesis was to investigate speech production (i.e. consonant proficiency, consonant errors and velopharyngeal competence) and language ability at

The group of orthodontists and the group of young adults focused on different features in the facial and dental appearance of the persons with BCLP (Fig.. For both groups,

The present study compared the height of the palatal vault in dental casts from 320 10-year-old children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) operated on with the

Digit recognition and person-identification and verification experiments are conducted on the publicly available XM2VTS database showing favorable results (speaker verification is

Purpose: The main purpose in this thesis is to investigate whether there are any differences in how the companies communicate accountability and positive attitude in the risk