• No results found

What is your relationship to the applicant

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "What is your relationship to the applicant"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CONFIDENTIAL LETTER OF RECOMMENDATION For Applicant to the PhD Program in Business Administration

at the Stockholm School of Economics

This letter of recommendation must be written by a professor or teacher who has taught or supervised the Applicant in the field of Business Administration. The letter can be written in Swedish or English.

Name of Applicant: _____________________________________________________

Name of Referee: _______________________________________________________

Position: ______________________________________________________________

University/College: _____________________________________________________

Address: _______________________________________________________________

Telephone number: _____________________________________________________

How long have you known the applicant? ___________________________________

What is your relationship to the applicant? __________________________________

Please provide a candid evaluation of the applicant’s past performance and ability to pursue and successfully complete Ph.D. studies in Business Administration. If desired, the

evaluation may be written on a separate sheet, to be attached to this form.

(2)

Please rate the applicant in comparison with other students in your department.

Exceptional Top 5%

Outstanding Next 15%

Above Average Next 20%

Average Mid 20%

Below Average Lowest 40%

Intellectual ability Oral expression Written expression Emotional maturity Imagination and probable creativity Potential as teacher Motivation for proposed program of study Background for proposed program of study

How do you rate the applicant in overall ability and promise, in comparison with other students at the same level of training? Please tick one.

Equal to the best in any department

Will perform at a superior level wherever admitted

Performance should be up to average of most graduate students Qualifications marginal, but warrants consideration

Questionable whether admission to further study is warranted

Signature ____________________________________ Date _____________________

Please send this form before February 1, 2015 to:

Stockholm School of Economics, Marie Tsujita Stephenson, Sveavägen 65, Box 6501, SE-113 50 Stockholm, Sweden. Telephone: +46-8-736 9630. E-mail:

marie.tsujita@hhs.se

UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD THE COMPLETED FORM BE GIVEN TO THE APPLICANT!

References

Related documents

In fact, Merleau-Ponty took up Saussure’s distinction between langue and parole, language system and speech, at an early stage 11 and reformulated it into precisely the one

Even though recast, elicitation, and praise were the most common types of feedback given by all three teachers during the observation, it cannot be stated that they were provided

Hence, we suggest a synthesis of these four factors (Purpose, Personality, Continuity, and Transpa- rency) to form a model referred to as Four Factor Authenticity Model for

III The aim of this study was to use RNA-seq to guide analysis of protein expression in a four-step cell model for malignant transformation, called the BJ model..

The groups that may find research of mental models in co-design beneficial are: Researchers (the results of research may inspire them and may support past

A video interpretation technique was used to help patients interpret their own emotional expressions towards other actors and evaluate their perceived pain and self- rated health..

The third research question about how is study motivation linked to various aspects of education according to teachers and students, is highlighted both in the theoretical

The project aims at developing the ability of teacher students to reason mathematically and to understand pupils' reasoning in mathematics.. The problem