Full text
i
Figure D: These are photographies of the different samples
spectrophotometrically measured from the full-size experiment. The
samples refer to table 8.2 in the following maner; a) Top plate one, b) Top plate two, c) Top plate three, d) Bottom plate one, e) Bottom plate two and f) Bottom plate three.
Related documents
Summing all the errors we may thus expect the standard error in the drop height estimate to be of an order around 1 % or less, and a major variation coming from the method of
For the analytical study of the South American plate, the wind data were investigated at twenty-one locations, all around South America, as shown in figure 6. Ji-Parana
Distribution of the track impact point for the RB1 in layer in a local reference frame, for events with cluster size of 1, 2 and 3, in units of strip pitch.. The local frame,
A plate tensegrity structure obtained with triangular elements will, as already noted, form a different overall geometry than with rectangular elements, if only
As illustrated in Figure 1b, rays are mirrored using the x‐axis as the symmetry axis (red line) in a half‐Luneburg lens, thus reducing the size of the beamformer while maintaining
The parallel plate resonator is excited by a central patch in MCM-D’s second metallization, as can be seen in Fig. The measurements, shown in Fig. 1b are higher in frequency
Even after clearing the flash from the outer surface of the weight plate by using a cutting tool, there will be a stick out of flash along the part line, by using different
Top left: Sensor readings during zero test in air, top right: Calculated electric field in the ˆ x-, ˆ y- and ˆ z-directions of a zero test in air, bottom left: Sensor readings
