• No results found

Possible issues with Cold Dark Matter

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Possible issues with Cold Dark Matter"

Copied!
21
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Can we better constrain the nature of Dark Matter

with new observations?

1

(2)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Possible issues with Cold Dark Matter

2

• Cusps in galaxy centers

• Numerous subhalos

• Prolate halos

(3)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Gaia

3

(4)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier 4

Astrometric satellite with 100x Gaia’s accuracy

PI: Céline Bohm (Durham)

Co-PI: Alberto Krone-Martins (Lisbon)

(5)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 Juillet 2016, Journée CNES de propositions de mission ESA M5

Astrometric mission: 30x Gaia’s accuracy

5

Gaia post-launch Theia improvement Telescope Aperture 1.45 x 0.5 = 0.73 m 2 0.8 m → 0.40 m 2 0.55

Field of view 0.6 deg

Coverage Survey Pointed

Astrometry Global Differential

Exposure time per field 76 x 9 (CCD) x 4.4 sec 20 x 50 hr = 1000 hr 1200

Additional factors 2D vs 1D astrometry: 1.4, Gaia Stray light: 1.9, non-uniform sampling: 1.6

Proper motion accuracy

G=10 star 3.5 μas/yr 0.03 μas/yr 119

Proper motion accuracy

G=15 star 14 μas/yr 0.23 μas/yr 60

Proper motion accuracy

G=20 star 330 μas/yr 2.8 μas/yr 118

naïve global gain = (0.55 x 1200) 1/2 = 26 ➜ 110 after additional factors

(6)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 Juillet 2016, Journée CNES de propositions de mission ESA M5

Astrometric mission: 30x Gaia’s accuracy

6

Gaia post-launch Theia improvement Telescope Aperture 1.45 x 0.5 = 0.73 m 2 0.8 m → 0.40 m 2 0.55

Field of view 0.6 deg

Coverage Survey Pointed

Astrometry Global Differential

Exposure time per field 76 x 9 (CCD) x 4.4 sec 20 x 50 hr = 1000 hr 1200

Additional factors 2D vs 1D astrometry: 1.4, Gaia Stray light: 1.9, non-uniform sampling: 1.6

Proper motion accuracy

G=10 star 3.5 μas/yr 0.03 μas/yr 119

Proper motion accuracy

G=15 star 14 μas/yr 0.23 μas/yr 60

Proper motion accuracy

G=20 star 330 μas/yr 2.8 μas/yr 118

naïve global gain = (0.55 x 1200) 1/2 = 26 ➜ 110 after additional factors

(7)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Precision vs. magnitude

7

(8)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier 8

what

science?

(9)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

dwarf spheroidal galaxies:

numbers of stars for Draco

9

M. Fairbairn

(10)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

numbers of stars per dSph

10

(11)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Dark Matter (DM) in mock dwarf Spheroidal galaxies without & with proper motions

11

dSph = DM-dominated velocity dispersion:

σ v ≈ 10 km/s

Theia proper motions

→ ∆v = 3 km/s

Mass-orbit modeling (Jeans equation) of mock dSph galaxies → DM density profiles

Gaia Challenge: mocks from M. Walker; with J. Read & L. Watkins

10 2 10 1

r [kpc]

10 2 10 1 100 101 102

[Msunpc3 ]

PM+LOS fit LOS only fit true

10 1 100

r [kpc]

10 2 10 1 100 101

[Msunpc3 ]

PM+LOS fit LOS only fit true

10 1 100

r [kpc]

10 3 10 2 10 1 100

[Msunpc3 ]

PM+LOS fit LOS only fit true

radius (kpc) D M ma ss de nsi ty (M

⦿

pc

–3

)

radius (kpc) radius (kpc)

D M ma ss de nsi ty (M

⦿

pc

–3

) D M ma ss de nsi ty (M

⦿

pc

–3

)

cuspy DM mocks

LOS only fit LOS+PM fit true

LOS only fit LOS+PM fit true

isotropic velocities

10 1 100

r [kpc]

10 2 10 1 100 101

[Msunpc3 ]

PM+LOS fit LOS only fit true

D M ma ss de nsi ty (M

⦿

pc

–3

)

cored DM mocks

isotropic velocities

LOS only fit LOS+PM fit true

LOS only fit LOS+PM fit true

radius (kpc)

radial outer velocities

radial outer velocities

L. Watkins

L. Watkins

L. Watkins

L. Watkins If cores found in ~all dSphs:

case for interacting DM

calibration of DM annihilation x-section from γ-ray obs of dSph galaxies

Theia proper motions dramatically reduce bias & uncertainty on inner DM slope!

(12)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Detecting subhalos in Milky Way

12

Largest effect when subhalo passes through disk

in disk

Feldmann & Spolyar 15

still visible after 1st passage

(13)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Detecting subhalos in Milky Way

13

Gaia can detect log M = 8 subhalos (rare: closest at 3 kpc)

Theia (20 LOS in 2 yr) can unambiguously detect log M = 6.7 subhalos

→ avoid confusion with other perturbers

If no subhalos found: case for Warm Dark Matter

Gaia Gaia

time (Myr)

after disk crossing

before disk crossing

Theia

400h, 1σ

Theia

400h, 1σ

G a ia l imi t

A. Siebert & D. Spolyar

(14)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

tomography of halo substructure

14

A. Siebert & D. Spolyar

(15)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Detecting Ultra-Compact Minihalos in Milky Way

15

by micro-lensing

fra ct io n o f D M in U C MH s

P. Scott, H. Clark & A. Erickcek

(16)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Shape of outer Dark Matter halo of Milky Way using Hypervelocity stars

16

10 µas/yr accuracy required Gnedin+05

standard DM halo

model oblate

spherical

prolate

> 20 Hyper-Velocity Stars known (v LOS > 500 km/s)

Brown+05,…,15

(17)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Shape of outer Dark Matter halo of Milky Way using Hypervelocity stars

O. Gnedin & W. Brown

17

(18)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Habitable exo-Earths

18

(19)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 Juillet 2016, Journée CNES de propositions de mission ESA M5

Strategy

19

(20)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 October 2016, 4th Gaia Challenge, Stockholm, Theia: the new Astrometry Frontier

Targets

20

(21)

Gary Mamon (IAP), 11 Juillet 2016, Journée CNES de propositions de mission ESA M5

Theia = unique microarcsec telescope

• 1st to probe Dark Matter on small scales

➡ Nature of Dark Matter, discriminate among models

• 1st to directly probe shape of Milky Way Dark Matter halo

➡ should see transition from oblate to prolate

• 1st to detect habitable exo-Earths with high mass accuracy

➡ input for biosphere search followups

• open time (15%) & serendipitous discoveries

21

References

Related documents

The mass-to-light ratio indicates how dark matter-dominated a certain object is Higher M/L  More dark-matter dominated Typically: (M/L) stars < 10 (from models). (M/L) tot

A direct detection signal, from either or both SI and SD interactions, needs to be validated with more than one target and concept: current zoo of experiments vital for

Thermal neutrons can be efficiently shielded using some additional elements in the shielding material e.g. boron, lithium,

● A different perspective on DM clustering (in phase space) using the Particle Phase Space Average Density (P 2 SAD)?. ● DM annihilation can be computed directly from the P 2 SAD

Direct and indirect detection rates have been computed implementing two dark matter halos, with fully consistent density profiles and velocity distribution functions, and

The capture rates of DM and anti-DM can be different due to different scattering cross sections on regular matter or there can be an asymmetry in the background density of DM

Chapter 7 presents analysis details and results for a search for muon neutrinos from dark matter annihilation in the center of the Sun using the 79-string configuration of the

Most notably the density and various element abundances are of great importance as they enter the equations as a dierential contribution to the capture rate and need to be