2LK111 Part Reproduction Solna, Spring 2022
Respondents: 8 Answer Count: 6 Answer Frequency: 75,00 %
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise /skills during the course.
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise
/skills during the course. Number of
responses
to a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 1 (16,7%)
to a large extent 3 (50,0%)
to a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
In my view, I have developed valuable expertise…
to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during
the course. 4,2 0,8 18,1 % 3,0 4,0 4,0 4,5 5,0
In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.
In my view, I have achieved all the intended
learning outcomes of the course. Number of responses
to a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 1 (16,7%)
to some extent 1 (16,7%)
to a large extent 3 (50,0%)
to a very large extent 1 (16,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
In my view, I have achieved all the intended lear…
to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning
outcomes of the course. 3,7 1,0 28,2 % 2,0 3,5 4,0 4,0 5,0
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.
In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes
to examinations. Number of
responses
to a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 2 (33,3%)
to a large extent 2 (33,3%)
to a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
In my view, there was a common theme runnin…
to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small
extent
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course –
from learning outcomes to examinations. 4,0 0,9 22,4 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and
evaluation of information).
In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and
evaluation of information). Number of
responses
to a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 3 (50,0%)
to a large extent 1 (16,7%)
to a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
In my view, the course has promoted a scientifi…
to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
MeanStandard
Deviation Coefficient
of Variation MinLower
Quartile MedianUpper Quartile Max In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning
(e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of
information). 3,8 1,0 25,6 % 3,0 3,0 3,5 4,5 5,0
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the
course’s structure and content.
In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the
course’s structure and content. Number of responses
to a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 0 (0,0%)
to a large extent 3 (50,0%)
to a very large extent 3 (50,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
In my view, during the course, the teachers hav…
to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and
opinions about the course’s structure and content. 4,5 0,5 12,2 % 4,0 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,0
My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the teaching of the course.
My previous knowledge was sufficient to
understand the teaching of the course. Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 2 (33,3%)
To a large extent 3 (50,0%)
To a very large extent 1 (16,7%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
My previous knowledge was sufficient to under…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max My previous knowledge was sufficient to understand the
teaching of the course. 3,8 0,8 19,6 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,0 5,0
I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn during the course.
I have had a clear picture of what I was expected
to learn during the course. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 2 (33,3%)
To a large extent 2 (33,3%)
To a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
I have had a clear picture of what I was expecte…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max I have had a clear picture of what I was expected to learn
during the course. 4,0 0,9 22,4 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
The requirements of being responsible for
organizing my own learning were reasonable.
The requirements of being responsible for
organizing my own learning were reasonable. Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 2 (33,3%)
To a large extent 4 (66,7%)
To a very large extent 0 (0,0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
The requirements of being responsible for orga…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max The requirements of being responsible for organizing my own
learning were reasonable. 3,7 0,5 14,1 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,0 4,0
The requirements to search for information on my own were reasonable.
The requirements to search for information on my
own were reasonable. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 2 (33,3%)
To a large extent 3 (50,0%)
To a very large extent 1 (16,7%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
The requirements to search for information on … Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max The requirements to search for information on my own were
reasonable. 3,8 0,8 19,6 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,0 5,0
I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for in Canvas.
I could easily find the information I needed/were
looking for in Canvas. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 1 (16,7%)
To some extent 0 (0,0%)
To a large extent 3 (50,0%)
To a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
I could easily find the information I needed/wer…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max I could easily find the information I needed/were looking for
in Canvas. 4,0 1,1 27,4 % 2,0 4,0 4,0 4,5 5,0
The requirements to work together with other students were reasonable.
The requirements to work together with other
students were reasonable. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 1 (16,7%)
To a large extent 2 (33,3%)
To a very large extent 3 (50,0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
The requirements to work together with other s…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max The requirements to work together with other students were
reasonable. 4,3 0,8 18,8 % 3,0 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,0
I received useful feedback on my performance during the course.
I received useful feedback on my performance
during the course. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 1 (16,7%)
To a large extent 2 (33,3%)
To a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 1 (16,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
I received useful feedback on my performance … Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max I received useful feedback on my performance during the
course. 4,5 1,0 23,3 % 3,0 4,0 4,5 5,0 6,0
The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's number of credits.
The work effort was reasonable in relation to the
course's number of credits. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 2 (40,0%)
To a large extent 2 (40,0%)
To a very large extent 1 (20,0%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
The work effort was reasonable in relation to th…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max The work effort was reasonable in relation to the course's
number of credits. 3,8 0,8 22,0 % 3,0 3,0 4,0 4,0 5,0
The examinations of the course were relevant to the learning outcomes.
The examinations of the course were relevant to
the learning outcomes. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 2 (33,3%)
To a large extent 1 (16,7%)
To a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Don’t know/Not applicable 1 (16,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
The examinations of the course were relevant t…
Don’t know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max The examinations of the course were relevant to the
learning outcomes. 4,3 1,2 27,9 % 3,0 3,5 4,5 5,0 6,0
Questions on Clinical Rotation (VFU)
The on-site training was relevant to the courses outcomes.
The on-site training was relevant to the courses
outcomes. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 1 (16,7%)
To some extent 1 (16,7%)
To a large extent 4 (66,7%)
To a very large extent 0 (0,0%)
Don't know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
The on-site training was relevant to the course…
Don't know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max The on-site training was relevant to the courses
outcomes. 3,5 0,8 23,9 % 2,0 3,5 4,0 4,0 4,0
I took part in relevant activities during my placements.
I took part in relevant activities during my
placements. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 1 (16,7%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 1 (16,7%)
To a large extent 2 (33,3%)
To a very large extent 2 (33,3%)
Don't know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
I took part in relevant activities during my place…
Don't know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max I took part in relevant activities during my
placements. 3,7 1,5 41,1 % 1,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
I was appointed a supervisor during my placement.
I was appointed a supervisor during my
placement. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 1 (16,7%)
To a large extent 1 (16,7%)
To a very large extent 3 (50,0%)
Don't know/Not applicable 1 (16,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
I was appointed a supervisor during my placem…
Don't know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max I was appointed a supervisor during my
placement. 4,4 0,9 20,3 % 3,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the placement.
My supervisors seemed informed about the
purpose of the placement. Number of
responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
To a small extent 0 (0,0%)
To some extent 4 (66,7%)
To a large extent 1 (16,7%)
To a very large extent 1 (16,7%)
Don't know/Not applicable 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
My supervisors seemed informed about the pur…
Don't know/Not
applicable To a very large
extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max My supervisors seemed informed about the purpose of the
placement. 3,5 0,8 23,9 % 3,0 3,0 3,0 3,5 5,0
How do you value the clinical rotation during Part Reproduction?
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Huddinge Hospital
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Huddinge
Hospital Number of
responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 1 (50,0%)
very good 1 (50,0%)
Total 2 (100,0%)
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Huddinge Hos…
very good good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Huddinge
Hospital 4,5 0,7 15,7 % 4,0 4,5 4,5 4,5 5,0
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Liljeholmen
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Liljeholmen Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 0 (0,0%)
very good 5 (100,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Liljeholmen very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) Liljeholmen 5,0 0,0 0,0 % 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Gyn Emergency Danderyd Hospital
Gyn Emergency Danderyd Hospital Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 4 (66,7%)
very good 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Gyn Emergency Danderyd Hospital very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Gyn Emergency Danderyd Hospital 4,3 0,5 11,9 % 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,5 5,0
GynStockholm
GynStockholm Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 2 (33,3%)
very good 4 (66,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
GynStockholm very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
GynStockholm 4,7 0,5 11,1 % 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,0 5,0
Södertälje Hospital
Södertälje Hospital Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 1 (33,3%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 1 (33,3%)
very good 1 (33,3%)
Total 3 (100,0%)
Södertälje Hospital very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 1.25
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Södertälje Hospital 3,7 1,5 41,7 % 2,0 3,0 4,0 4,5 5,0
Gynecologic oncology (Theme cancer)
Gynecologic oncology (Theme cancer) Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 1 (16,7%)
very good 5 (83,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Gynecologic oncology (Theme cancer) very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Gynecologic oncology (Theme cancer) 4,8 0,4 8,4 % 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
ALB Endocrinology
ALB Endocrinology Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 2 (33,3%)
good 3 (50,0%)
very good 1 (16,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
ALB Endocrinology very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
ALB Endocrinology 3,8 0,8 19,6 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,0 5,0
ALB Hereditary cancer
ALB Hereditary cancer Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 1 (25,0%)
good 2 (50,0%)
very good 1 (25,0%)
Total 4 (100,0%)
ALB Hereditary cancer very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
ALB Hereditary cancer 4,0 0,8 20,4 % 3,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital
Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 0 (0,0%)
very good 0 (0,0%)
Total 0 (0,0%)
Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Abortion clinic Huddinge Hospital 0,0 0,0 NaN % ∞ 0,0 0,0 0,0 -∞
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) at Karolinska University Hospital
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) at Karolinska
University Hospital Number of
responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 0 (0,0%)
very good 3 (100,0%)
Total 3 (100,0%)
Student outpatient clinic (KUM) at Karolinska U…
very good good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max Student outpatient clinic (KUM) at Karolinska University
Hospital 5,0 0,0 0,0 % 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Delivery ward with Midwife
Delivery ward with Midwife Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 1 (16,7%)
good 1 (16,7%)
very good 4 (66,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Delivery ward with Midwife very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Delivery ward with Midwife 4,5 0,8 18,6 % 3,0 4,5 5,0 5,0 5,0
Delivery ward with Doctor
Delivery ward with Doctor Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 1 (16,7%)
neither bad nor good 1 (16,7%)
good 0 (0,0%)
very good 4 (66,7%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Delivery ward with Doctor very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Delivery ward with Doctor 4,2 1,3 31,9 % 2,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Emergency obstetric care unit (AKUT-Spec)
Emergency obstetric care unit (AKUT-Spec) Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 1 (20,0%)
good 2 (40,0%)
very good 2 (40,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Emergency obstetric care unit (AKUT-Spec) very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Emergency obstetric care unit (AKUT-Spec) 4,2 0,8 19,9 % 3,0 4,0 4,0 5,0 5,0
Ultrasound
Ultrasound Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 3 (60,0%)
very good 2 (40,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Ultrasound very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Ultrasound 4,4 0,5 12,4 % 4,0 4,0 4,0 5,0 5,0
Antenatal with Doctor
Antenatal with Doctor Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 1 (16,7%)
neither bad nor good 1 (16,7%)
good 2 (33,3%)
very good 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Antenatal with Doctor very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Antenatal with Doctor 3,8 1,2 30,5 % 2,0 3,5 4,0 4,5 5,0
Maternity clinic Sundbyberg (MVC)
Maternity clinic Sundbyberg (MVC) Number of responses
Very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 1 (25,0%)
very good 3 (75,0%)
Total 4 (100,0%)
Maternity clinic Sundbyberg (MVC) very good
good neither bad nor
good bad Very bad
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Maternity clinic Sundbyberg (MVC) 4,8 0,5 10,5 % 4,0 4,5 5,0 5,0 5,0
The seminars were a support in my learning process during Part Reproduction?
The little fetus
The little fetus Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 1 (20,0%)
to a large extent 1 (20,0%)
to a very large extent 3 (60,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
The little fetus to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
The little fetus 4,4 0,9 20,3 % 3,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Mixed cases
Mixed cases Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 0 (0,0%)
to a large extent 2 (40,0%)
to a very large extent 3 (60,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Mixed cases to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Mixed cases 4,6 0,5 11,9 % 4,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Bleeding during pregnancy
Bleeding during pregnancy Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 1 (20,0%)
to a large extent 1 (20,0%)
to a very large extent 3 (60,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Bleeding during pregnancy to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Bleeding during pregnancy 4,4 0,9 20,3 % 3,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Bleeding disturbances
Bleeding disturbances Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 1 (20,0%)
to a large extent 1 (20,0%)
to a very large extent 3 (60,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Bleeding disturbances to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Bleeding disturbances 4,4 0,9 20,3 % 3,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Pelvis resistances
Pelvis resistances Number of responses
To a very small extent 0 (0,0%)
to a small extent 0 (0,0%)
to some extent 1 (20,0%)
to a large extent 1 (20,0%)
to a very large extent 3 (60,0%)
Total 5 (100,0%)
Pelvis resistances to a very large
extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent To a very small
extent
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max
Pelvis resistances 4,4 0,9 20,3 % 3,0 4,0 5,0 5,0 5,0
Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological examination independently?
Have you had the opportunity to perform a
gynecological examination independently? Number of responses
No 0 (0,0%)
Yes, at one to three occasions 3 (50,0%) Yes, at four to six occasions 1 (16,7%) Yes, at seven to ten occasions 0 (0,0%) Yes, at more than ten occasions 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Have you had the opportunity to perform a gyn…
Yes, at more than
ten occasions Yes, at seven to ten
occasions Yes, at four to six
occasions Yes, at one to three
occasions No
0 1 2 3 4
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max Have you had the opportunity to perform a gynecological
examination independently? 3,2 1,5 46,5 % 2,0 2,0 2,5 4,0 5,0
Have you had the opportunity to participate in a childbirth?
Have you had the opportunity to participate in a
childbirth? Number of
responses
No 2 (33,3%)
Yes, at one to three occasions 2 (33,3%) Yes, at four to six occasions 1 (16,7%) Yes, at seven to ten occasions 1 (16,7%) Yes, at more than ten occasions 0 (0,0%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
Have you had the opportunity to participate in … Yes, at more than
ten occasions Yes, at seven to ten
occasions Yes, at four to six
occasions Yes, at one to three
occasions No
0 1 2 3
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max Have you had the opportunity to participate in a
childbirth? 2,2 1,2 54,0 % 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5 4,0
What is your overall assessment of Part Reproduction?
What is your overall assessment of Part
Reproduction? Number of
responses
very bad 0 (0,0%)
bad 0 (0,0%)
neither bad nor good 0 (0,0%)
good 4 (66,7%)
very good 2 (33,3%)
Total 6 (100,0%)
What is your overall assessment of Part Repro…
very good good neither bad nor
good bad very bad
0 1 2 3 4 5
Mean Standard
Deviation Coefficient of
Variation Min Lower
Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max What is your overall assessment of Part
Reproduction? 4,3 0,5 11,9 % 4,0 4,0 4,0 4,5 5,0
Thank you for your feedback!
