• No results found

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent Dr.Mullerinformedaboutthesupervisorsassessment.JanHujerinformedabouttheopponentsassessment.Studentansweredallquestionsofopponentandsupervisor.Prof.Fra

N/A
N/A
Info
Download
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent Dr.Mullerinformedaboutthesupervisorsassessment.JanHujerinformedabouttheopponentsassessment.Studentansweredallquestionsofopponentandsupervisor.Prof.Fra"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Download now ( 1 Page )

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Rhoda Ayorkor Sai Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S18000382

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent

Course of the defence:

Dr. Muller informed about the supervisors assessment.

Jan Hujer informed about the opponents assessment.

Student answered all questions of opponent and supervisor.

Prof. Fraňa: If I have a look in the results . . . why you used different exposure times for the testing?

Student answered.

Assessment: Excellent

Defence date: June 25, 2020 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Download now ( PDF - 1 Page - 13.11 KB )

Related documents

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent doc.Ing.PavelKopeček,CSc.Whattroublesdidyoufacewithduringpreparationofyourmasterthesis?Whatwerethemainpeaksinyourwork?AnsweredWhatwasthecomputingtimen

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Vít: What was the construction of the heated cylinder? (Student answered.) Doc

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good?. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Questions of the supervisor and the opponent were answered

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Answered partially

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of

What is roughness? Failed to answer

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Šafařík: Have you been informed about thesis assessments? (Student agreed.) Otázky vedoucího a oponenta: (Student answered.) Prof

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent?. Course of

All the questions of the supervisor and the reviewer were addressed with discussion

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus.. Course of

Where did you find the cost of moving the machines that you considered in your thesis? Answered Did you respect limitations of the room in your work? Answered doc

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of