• No results found

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent Dr.Mullerinformedaboutthesupervisorsassessment.JanHujerinformedabouttheopponentsassessment.Studentansweredallquestionsofopponentandsupervisor.Prof.Šaf

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent Dr.Mullerinformedaboutthesupervisorsassessment.JanHujerinformedabouttheopponentsassessment.Studentansweredallquestionsofopponentandsupervisor.Prof.Šaf"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Feben Tereffe Huluka Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S18000190

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent

Course of the defence:

Dr. Muller informed about the supervisors assessment.

Jan Hujer informed about the opponents assessment.

Student answered all questions of opponent and supervisor.

Prof. Šafařík: What is more dangerous, rising or collapsing bubble?

Student answered.

Assessment: Excellent

Defence date: June 25, 2020 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Related documents

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus.. Course of