• No results found

Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 14, 2017

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Assessment: Very good Defence date: June 14, 2017"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Aravind Prasad Srikanthan Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S15000615

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good

Course of the defence:

prof. Ing. Přemysl Pokorný, CSc.:

Could you explain the term Principle of Triangulation used in your work.

What does Deviation Ranges stand for and what is it’s unit?

If your solution is the Best, where are mentioned the others and did you compare your method with conventional ones?

Answered partially.

prof. Ing. Stanislav Hosnedl, CSc.:

Other concepts of Reverse Engineering.

Compare vector data with parametric.

The influence of the material to the result of presented technology.

Is it possible to combine various direction of views to a model?

The main benefit of the presented work.

Answered.

Assessment: Very good

Defence date: June 14, 2017 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Related documents

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of