• No results found

CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent doc.Ing.PavelKopeček,CSc.Whattroublesdidyoufacewithduringpreparationofyourmasterthesis?Whatwerethemainpeaksinyourwork?AnsweredWhatwasthecomputingtimen

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "CommitteeChairperson’ssignature Defencedate:June25,2020 ...................................... Excellent doc.Ing.PavelKopeček,CSc.Whattroublesdidyoufacewithduringpreparationofyourmasterthesis?Whatwerethemainpeaksinyourwork?AnsweredWhatwasthecomputingtimen"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Jm´eno: Pandiyaraj Gnanasekar Osobn´ı ˇc´ıslo: S18000448

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good

Course of the defence:

doc. Ing. Pavel Kopeček, CSc.

What troubles did you face with during preparation of your master thesis? What were the main peaks in your work?

Answered

What was the computing time necessary for experiment?

Answered

Assessment: Excellent

Defence date: June 25, 2020 . . . .

Committee Chairperson’s signature

References

Related documents

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Very good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Good.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent minus?. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good minus Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Failed.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Very good Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent.. Course of

Assessment proposed by the supervisor of Master ’s thesis: Excellent Assessment proposed by the reviewer of Master ’s thesis: Excellent?. Course of