• No results found

CHAPTER 33 LEAFLET ANGLES AND SEPARATION 33-1

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "CHAPTER 33 LEAFLET ANGLES AND SEPARATION 33-1"

Copied!
2
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

CHAPTER 33 LEAFLET ANGLES AND SEPARATION 33-1

MITRAL VALVE MECHANICS by Neil B. Ingels, Jr. and Matts Karlsson

Figure 33.1 Definition of leaflet edge-edge separation (D3738) and anterior (Φ182238) and posterior (Φ221837) leaflet angles with respect to the mitral annulus.

CHAPTER 33 LEAFLET ANGLES AND SEPARATION

In this chapter we explore the opening and closing behavior of the anterior and posterior leaflets whose hinge regions define the mitral annulus.

Figure 33.1 defines the leaflet edge-edge separation distance (D3738) and anterior (Φ182238) and posterior (Φ221837) leaflet edge angles with respect to the mitral annulus that will be examined in this chapter. Figure 33.2 displays the time history of these variables throughout three cardiac cycles for hearts H1-H6 (data in Appendix A).

During ejection, the anterior leaflet maintains a virtually unchanging angular relationship to the mitral

annulus in all hearts, while the posterior leaflet angle may be relatively constant (in H1, H2, and H4) or decrease (in H3, H5, and H6) as ejection proceeds.

During left ventricular relaxation, the onset of rapid anterior and posterior leaflet opening rotations (onset of increases in Φ182238 and Φ221837) occurs within ±17ms of mitral valve opening as defined by the time of the abrupt increase of leaflet edge-edge separation, i.e. D3738 increase. The most likely candidate triggering leaflet opening is simply the trans-leaflet pressure gradient associated with the reduction in left ventricular pressure below left atrial pressure at the end of isovolumic LV relaxation. During diastole, the effect of early (E-wave) and late (A-wave) flow from the left atrium into the left ventricle in sequentially pulsing the leaflet edges apart is always in evidence, but to various degrees in each heart. The posterior leaflet opens more widely (greater angle with respect to the annulus) than the anterior leaflet in all hearts, suggesting that it offers less resistance to left ventricular inflow than the anterior leaflet.

Valve closure is complex. The interval from the onset of the rapid systolic rise of LVP to mitral valve closure (defined as a stable minimum of D3738) is seen to range from 17-83ms. In these hearts, both the anterior and posterior leaflet edges begin well-defined abrupt rotations towards closure (onset of reductions in Φ182238 and Φ221837) as early as 33ms before or as late as 33ms after the onset of the rapid systolic rise of LVP. Thus, although the rapid rise of LVP would always be expected to force valve closure (a fail-safe mechanism), something other than simply the onset of the rapid systolic rise of LVP is also capable of abruptly triggering the rotation of both leaflet edges towards closure and this

mechanism exhibits variable trigger timing with respect to IVC onset. Further, the time of onset of the abrupt rotations toward closure of both the anterior and posterior leaflets is highly-correlated in these hearts (0.93), suggesting that a common mechanism is acting to initiate the movement of both leaflets towards closure. Local LV regional flow patterns acting in concert on the leaflets with waning A-wave flow in the space between the leaflets is a likely candidate for this mechanism. Some flow-related issues will be explored in the next chapter.

(2)

CHAPTER 33 LEAFLET ANGLES AND SEPARATION 33-2

MITRAL VALVE MECHANICS by Neil B. Ingels, Jr. and Matts Karlsson

Figure 33.2 Anterior and posterior leaflet edge-edge separation and angles with respect to the mitral annulus for hearts H1-H6 (data in Appendix A). LVP=left ventricular pressure; MVO=mitral valve opening; MVC=mitral valve closure; PML=posterior mitral leaflet; AML=anterior mitral leaflet; Φ221837=posterior leaflet angle subtended by markers #22-18-37;

Φ182238=anterior leaflet angle subtended by markers #18-22-38; D3738=separation distance (mm, left ordinate) between central meridional anterior and posterior leaflet edges.

References

Related documents

We know the coordinates of the leaflet markers to within roughly 0.1 mm through the cardiac cycle, and hold the best-fit leaflet plane in a constant position in each frame, yet

In Chapter 10, we found that while the mitral valve was closed, anterior leaflet surface area was constant to within a few percent over a wide range of left ventricular pressures..

Thus, we can now conclude that, not only does the anterior mitral leaflet maintain a rigid shape in the closed mitral valve, but this rigid shape is maintained in a fixed position

Figure 15.2 shows annular trigone perimeters, annular contractile region perimeters, and anterior leaflet edge perimeters for hearts H1-H6.. Once again, note that variations in

Figure 18.2 shows that the complete mitral annulus (trigone region plus contractile annulus) increasingly flattens throughout diastole, reaching its flattest configuration at the

Markers #15, 22, and 21 are trigonal, Marker #16 is at the anterior commissure, Marker #20 at the posterior commissure, Markers #17, 18, and 19 are on the contractile portion of the

These three panels illustrate mitral valve geometry in three orthographic views: the upper right panel viewing the valve from the left atrium to the left ventricle, the upper

As can be seen in the upper right panels of each figure, clearly the posterior leaflet in the closed valve has not only considerably reduced the perimeter of its free edge from