• No results found

A few non-baryonic* dark matter candidates

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "A few non-baryonic* dark matter candidates "

Copied!
48
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)
(2)

Outline I

(3)

Outline II

(4)

What is Dark Matter?

Dark Matter Luminous Matter

(5)

First detection of dark matter

(6)

How Much Dark Matter is There?

~2%

(Luminous)

~98%

(Dark)

(7)

How do we know that it exists?

(8)

Dynamics of Galaxies I

Galaxy ≈ Stars + Gas + Dust + Supermassive Black Hole + Dark Matter

(9)

Dynamics of Galaxies II

Dark matter halo Visible galaxy

R Vrot

Visible galaxy R

Observed

Expected

(10)

Intermission: What do these rotation curves tell you?

R Vrot

R Vrot

R Vrot

(11)

Dynamics of Galaxy Clusters

Balance between kinetic and potential

energy →

Virial theorem:

G R

M v G

2 vir =

Check out Sect. 6.3.2 in

Schneider’s book for details

(12)

Hot Gas in Galaxy Clusters

X-ray gas, T=107—108 K

High mass required to keep the hot gas from leaving the

cluster!

If gas in hydrostatic equilibrium →

Luminosity and temperature profile → mass profile

(13)

Gravitational Lensing

(14)

Gravitational Lensing II

(15)

Intermission: One of these is not a lensed system – which one?

(16)

Baryonic and non-baryonic matter

Μ ∼ 0.27

baryons ∼ 0.04

Most of the matter (85%) in the Universe shares

no resemblance to the matter we know

from everyday life!

Particles with 3 quarks, like the proton and neutron

(17)

A few non-baryonic* dark matter candidates

Supersymmetric particles

••

••

••

* or evading current constraints on the cosmic baryon density

(18)

What is supersymmetry (SUSY)?

fermion (e.g. quark) ↔ boson (e.g. squark) boson (e.g. photon) ↔ fermion (e.g. photino)

selektrons, sneutrinos, gluinos, Higgsinos, gravitinos, axinos...

(19)

Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs)

The WIMP miracle

often a neutralino

(20)

WIMPs in your morning coffee

Generic assumptions (∼100 GeV WIMPs) →

Handful of WIMPs in an average-sized coffee cup

(21)

Hot and Cold Dark Matter

Ruled out by observations

Successful in explaining the formation of large scale structure (galaxies, galaxy

clusters, voids and filaments)

(22)

Additional Assumed CDM Properties

(23)

The Universe according to CDM

(24)

The dark matter halo

Schematic illustration What it looks like in

actual N-body simulations

(25)

Voids, halos and filaments

Void:

low-density region

Halo:

high-density region

Filament:

connects the halos

(26)

Intermission:

What are you looking at?

These are frames from the Illustris simulation –

showing dark matter density, gas density and gas metallicity within a cube of side ≈100 Mpc – but which frame shows what?

Credit: Illustris Collaboration

(27)

A hierarchy of dark matter halos

: ???

Mhalo < 108 Msolar is a largely untested part of the CDM paradigm… The very first stars are predicted to form in these halos at z>15, but where are these halos now?

(28)

A hierarchy of dark matter halos II

(29)

Time

Small halo falls

into big one Disruption begins - big halo grows more massive Second small halo

falls into the big one

First small halo

completely disrupted

(30)

The formation of a halo

The Aquarius simulation (Springel et al. 2008)

(31)

Subhalos

(32)

The tumultuous life of a subhalo

(33)

Intermission: What does this

picture have to do with subhalos?

(34)

Dark halo density profiles I

Dark halo Visible galaxy

( s)2

s

s

NFW( ) ( / ) 1 / r r r

r r

= ρ+

ρ

Famous dark matter-only, N-body simulations by Navarro, Frenk & White (1996, 1997)→

r

NFW profile now slightly outdated, but still in active use

ρ ∝ r-1 at small r ρ ∝ r-3 at large r

(35)

Favoured by observations of

dark matter- dominated

galaxies (density core)

Predicted by dark matter-only simulations based on

CDM (density cusp)

CDM problem I : The core/cusp issue

Possible solution:

Baryonic processes (supernova explosions, ”feedback” ) may

have altered the CDM density profile (Governato et al. 2010, Nature)

(36)

Density profiles of real galaxies I

Works reasonably well for massive galaxies acting as strong gravitational lenses, probably due to

baryon-domination in the centre

2 0

0

SIS ( / )

) ) (

( r r

r

ρ

r

ρ

=

(37)

Density profiles of real galaxies II

Works reasonably well for dark matter-dominated galaxies (dwarfs and low surface brightness galaxies)

2 c 0

PIS ( ) 1 ( / ) r r r

= + ρ ρ

(38)

CDM problem II: Missing satellites

Naïve expectation Observed

Should not dwarf galaxies form inside the subhalos?

A factor of 10—100 too few satellite galaxies around the Milky Way!

(39)

CDM problem II: Missing satellites

(40)

Intermission: Remember this one?

(41)

Data Model Surface mass density

Gravitational lensing allows the detection of subhalos, even if they are completely dark – and one such object has already been detected (Vegetti et al. 2012, Nature)

Subhalo

Lensing detection of subhalos

(42)

WIMP annihilation

WIMPs predicted to annihilate in

regions where the CDM density is high

→ Subhalos should glow in gamma-rays

(43)

Fermi Gamma-ray Telescope

Launched in 2008, but still no clear-cut signatures of WIMP annihilation in subhalos

(44)

Mass-to-Light Ratios

solar solar

L M L

Mass-to-light: M

Different choices for M:

Mtot = Total mass →

Dynamical mass-to-light ratio

Mstars = Mass of stars & stellar remnants

→ Stellar mass-to-light ratio

Observed luminosity

(45)

Mass-to-Light Ratios II

What are M/L-ratios good for?

The mass-to-light ratio indicates how dark matter-dominated a certain object is

Higher M/L → More dark-matter dominated

Typically: (M/L)stars < 10 (from models) (M/L)tot ~100 for large galaxies

(M/L)tot ~ 300 for galaxy clusters

(M/L)tot ~ 1000 for ultrafaint dwarf galaxies (M/L)tot > (M/L)stars → Dark matter!

(46)

Mass-to-Light Ratios III

Model by Van den Bosch et al. (2005)

Galaxy clusters Galaxy

groups

Milky Way Dwarf

galaxies Perhaps too steep

(47)

Baryon fractions

Baryonic Tully-Fisher McGaugh (2010)

(48)

Tidal dwarf galaxies

Dark baryons?

Evidence of modified gravity?

Kinematics just too disturbed to draw any conclusion?

References

Related documents

A direct detection signal, from either or both SI and SD interactions, needs to be validated with more than one target and concept: current zoo of experiments vital for

● A different perspective on DM clustering (in phase space) using the Particle Phase Space Average Density (P 2 SAD)?. ● DM annihilation can be computed directly from the P 2 SAD

Direct and indirect detection rates have been computed implementing two dark matter halos, with fully consistent density profiles and velocity distribution functions, and

As one of the important features of the VLTC model, after the chiral symmetry breaking in the T-quark sector the left and right components of the original Dirac T-quark fields

• Indirect detection of particles produced in dark matter annihilation: neutrinos, gamma rays &amp; other e.m!. waves, antiprotons, antideuterons, positrons in ground-

South Pole Canfranc.. Patrick Decowski -

These constraints can be compared to dark matter models explaining a number of recent anomalous results from other indirect and direct dark matter searches. Re- cent measurements by

We identify a weak line at E ∼ 3.5 keV in X-ray spectra of the Andromeda galaxy and the Perseus galaxy cluster – two dark matter-dominated objects, for which there exist deep