• No results found

Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer"

Copied!
24
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

FEB 2005

GÖRAN RONQUIST

Identification of

prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer

Master’s degree project

(2)

Molecular Biotechnology Programme

Uppsala University School of Engineering

UPTEC X 05 008 Date of issue 2005-02-01

Author

Göran Ronquist

Title (English)

Identification of prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer

Title (Swedish)

Abstract

Molecular markers in serum are often used to monitor the development of cancer disease.

This project aimed to identify prostasomal autoantigens in prostate cancer. Classical proteomics technologies were used; sample preparation, 2D-electrophoresis separation and mass spectrometry to identify separated proteins. In addition, Western blots were made to visualise the immunogenic antigens.

A total amount of 25 immunogenic proteins were forwarded to mass spectrometric identification.

Keywords

Prostasomes, Prostate cancer, Autoantigens, Proteomics, Western blot

Supervisors

Doctor Lena Carlsson

Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University Scientific reviewer

Professor Anders Larsson

Department of Medical Sciences, Uppsala University

Project name Sponsors

Language

English

Security

ISSN 1401-2138

Classification

Supplementary bibliographical information Pages

21

Biology Education Centre Biomedical Center

Husargatan 3 Uppsala Box 592 S-75124 Uppsala Tel +46 (0)18 4710000 Fax +46 (0)18 555217

(3)

Göran Ronquist

Sammanfattning:

Prostatacancer är vanligt förekommande bland äldre män i västvärlden. En tidigt upptäckt prostatacancer behandlas bäst genom kirurgiska ingrepp och patienten tillfrisknar i många fall. En sent upptäckt, metastaserande tumör leder till utdragen behandling och oftast till en för tidig död för patienten. Det är därför viktigt att förfoga över en bra diagnostisk metod som kan avgöra när en relativt godartad tumör övergår till ett mer elakartat tillstånd. Nuvarande markör, prostataspecifikt antigen (PSA) är inte prostatacancerspecifik och blir därför osäker och det medför en svårighet att avgöra tumörens status. I dagens samhälle med fler invånare som når en högre ålder (hög ålder är en stark riskfaktor för att drabbas av prostatacancer) kommer efterfrågan efter en bättre diagnosmetod att bli allt större.

Prostasomer, små sekretoriska vesiklar som normalt finns i prostatakörtelns epitelceller, syntetiseras och frisätts även av metastaserande celler hos prostatacancerpatienter. Man har även kunnat påvisa att prostasomerna ger upphov till autoantikroppar i blodserum hos dessa patienter redan innan metastaser bildats.

Detta projekt syftar till att identifiera några av de prostasomala antigen som är målproteiner för de prostasomautoantikroppar som bildas av prostatacancerpatienter och som uppträder i serum. Förhoppningen är att något av dessa antigener kan komma att användas som komplement till PSA-markören för en förfinad diagnostik av prostatacancer.

Examensarbete 20p, Molekylär bioteknikprogrammet

Uppsala Universitet februari 2005

(4)

CONTENTS

1.INTRODUCTION... 3

1.1 The prostasome ... 3

1.2 Functional role of prostasomes ... 4

1.3 Prostasomes and prostate cancer ... 4

1.4 Proteomics... 4

2. AIM OF THE STUDY ... 5

3. MATERIAL AND METHODS... 5

3.1 Serum samples... 5

3.2 Isolation of prostasomes... 5

3.3 ELISA... 5

3.4 1D-SDS-PAGE... 6

3.5 1D-Western blotting... 6

3.6 2D-electrophoresis ... 6

3.7 2D-Western blot ... 7

3.8 MALDI-TOF... 8

4. RESULTS... 8

4.1 Purification of prostasomes... 8

4.2 ELISA... 9

4.3 1D-electrophoresis ... 9

4.4 1D-Western blot ... 10

4.5 2D-electrophoresis ... 13

4.6 2D-Western blot ... 15

5. DISCUSSION... 18

6. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES ... 18

7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... 19

8. REFERENCES ... 20

(5)

ABBREVIATIONS

CD Cluster of differentiation. By convention, leukocyte cell surface molecules are named systematically by assigning them a cluster of differentiation (CD) antigen number that includes any antibody having an identical and unique reactivity pattern with different leukocyte populations.

CHAPS 3-[(3-Cholamidopropyl)dimethylamino]-1-

propanesulfonate, a zwitterionic detergent used as a component in 2D buffer.

ELISA Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay.

IgG Immunoglobulin G.

Ip Isoelectric point.

IPG-strip Immobilized pH-gradient strip, used for first dimension- separation in 2D-gel separation of proteins.

kDa kiloDalton.

MALDI-TOF Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-of- flight, a mass spectrometric metod to determine peptide sequences.

MW Molecular weight.

PSA Prostate-specific antigen. A protein (enzyme) produced by the prostate epithelial cells that may be found in an increased amount in serum of men who have prostate cancer, benign prostatic hyperplasia, or infection or inflammation of the prostate.

PSMA Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen, a PSA-like protein in the membrane of the prostate epithelial cells.

PAP Prostatic acid phosphatase, an enzyme hydrolysing phosphate esters produced by the prostate epithelial cells.

It may be found in increased amounts in serum in men who have prostate cancer.

SDS-PAGE Sodium dodecyl sulphate-PolyAcrylamide Gel Electrophoresis.

Swim up media Differently designed media to select the most viable sperm cells.

(6)

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 The prostasome

Prostasomes were discovered in Uppsala during the late 1970´s [1]. They are small, membrane-surrounded vesicles produced and secreted by the epithelial cells of the human prostate gland and are present in high amounts in normal semen (Fig 1). The vesicles are usually surrounded by a lipid bilayered membrane and they have a mean diameter of 150 nm, but with large variation of size [2]. Small spherical particles of approximately 15 nm in diameter can be seen in the cytosol. In the prostate gland, prostasomes are mostly encased in bigger storage vesicles together with electron dense material [3]. The prostasomes may thereby be released as small intact vesicles in the prostatic fluid (and semen) by an ordinary exocytosis between the membrane surrounding the storage vesicle and the plasma membrane of the prostatic secretory cells [3]. This release is thought to be hormone-dependent [4].

The membranes of these vesicles are complex and they have an unusually high cholesterol/phospholipid ratio [5].

Fig 1. Transmission electron microscopy of seminal prostasomes that vary in size (range 40-500nm). The bilayered membrane and the small spherical particles (15 nm) are seen within the prostasome (arrow). Mag x 80 000. (Published

with courtesy by Lena Carlsson).

1cm = 125nm

(7)

1.2 Functional role of prostasomes

Prostasomes have many different biologic activities, but their physiologic role is still unclear. They seem to have an important role in the fertilization process and studies have shown that they can adhere to and, at least to some extent, fuse with sperm cells. Further, immunostaining demonstrated that washed spermatozoa incubated with prostasomes in vitro are coated with prostasomes [6]. Several studies have shown that they promote forward motility of washed sperm cells [7]. By inclusion in swim-up media, a medium designed to select the viable sperms, they enhance the recruitment of motile spermatozoa [8]. Recently, prostasomes have been shown also to possess an antibacterial effect on certain bacteria [9]. The prostasomes have an immunosuppressive and complement- inhibitory activity in seminal fluid and may thereby protect spermatozoa from damaging effects from phagocytosing cells [10].

1.3 Prostasomes and prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common form of cancer among men in the Nordic countries [11]. More than 25% of the diagnosed cancer cases are prostate cancer [12]. The number of men with prostate cancer has increased during the last decade, due to an increasing age of the population. Currently, PSA (prostate specific antigen) is the most sensitive and clinically useful tumour marker for prostate cancer, both in diagnosing and monitoring the prostate cancer patient. However, the deficient specificity for prostate cancer is inherent in the PSA assay, since PSA is rather organ-specific but not cancer-specific.

This tends to limit the clinical utility of PSA testing [13]. Accordingly, there is a need for supplementation of the PSA test to differentiate prostate cancer from benign diseases of the prostate and to predict which cancers will become aggressive [14]. Prostate cancer cells express tissue-specific antigens, including PSA, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Several epitopic peptides of these antigens have been identified [15]. In addition, prostate cancer cells are capable of synthesizing and releasing prostasomes [16]. A previous pilot study proved the presence of serum autoantibodies against prostasomes in patients having prostate cancer and a serum PSA value of 50µg/L or more [17]. Furthermore, an inverse relationship was established between antiprostasome autoantibody titre in serum and outcome of prostate cancer in terms of metastases to lymph nodes and the skeleton [18].

1.4 Proteomics

The term ”Proteome” was introduced and first used in 1995 (PROTEin complement to a genOME). A cellular proteome is an assembly of proteins found in a particular cell type under specified environmental conditions.

Proteomics is used as a tool in the study of the proteome. Classical proteomics technologies involve sample preparation, 2D-electrophoresis and mass spectrometry, to separate and identify particular proteins.

In October 2004, researchers of the human genome project estimated the number of genes in the human genome to 20.000-25.000. Researchers of the human proteome project estimate the number of proteins to be more than 200.000. The large protein diversity is thought to be brought about by post-translational modifications of the proteins. A

(8)

proteomic analysis of human prostasomes was carried out 2003 revealing 139 of the proteins subdivided in 6 different categories: 1. enzymes (34 % of total); 2.

transport/structural (19 %); 3. GTP proteins (14%); 4. chaperone proteins (6 %); 5. signal transduction proteins (17 %) and 6. unannotated proteins (10%) [19].

2. AIM OF THE STUDY

The aim of this study was to isolate prostasomal proteins and to identify prostasomal autoantigens recognized by autoantibodies in serum from patients with prostate cancer by using classical protein techniques.

3. MATERIAL AND METHODS

3.1 Serum samples

Eighthundred and seventyeight (878) blood sera from patients with prostate cancer diagnosis (unknown aggressiveness of the tumour), were investigated regarding titre of prostasome antibodies. These serum samples were obtained from Karolinska institute, Stockholm and were stored at -75°C for not more than 2 and half years before use.

3.2 Isolation of prostasomes

Prostasomes were isolated and purified from seminal plasma obtained from the Fertility centre at Uppsala University Hospital. Semen samples were centrifuged for 20 min at 1000 g to remove spermatozoa and other cells from the seminal plasma and then ultracentrifuged at 10 000 g for 15 min +4°C to remove possible cell debris. The supernatant was subsequently subjected to another ultracentrifugation for 2 h at 100 000 g to pellet the prostasomes. The prostasomes were resuspended in 30 mmol/L Tris-HCl, containing 130 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.6 (isotonic Tris-HCl buffer). This suspension was further purified on a Sephadex G 200 column, equilibrated with the isotonic Tris-HCl buffer (flow rate 6mL/h), to separate the prostasomes from an amorphous substance [20].

Isotonic Tris-HCl buffer was used as eluent, and the eluate was monitored at 260 (due to nucleic acid content of prostasomes) and 280 nm. Fractions with elevated UV absorbances were collected and analysed for aminopeptidase N activity, a marker enzyme for prostasomes [21]. Ultraviolet-absorbing fractions with high aminopeptidase N activity (6- 11) were pooled and ultracentrifuged at 100 000 g for 2 h. The pellet representing the

“purified prostasomes” was resuspended in the isotonic Tris-HCl buffer and adjusted to a protein concentration of 2 mg/mL using a Protein Assay ESL method (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany).

3.3 ELISA

A first selection, out of the 878 blood sera with a high titre of antiprostasome antibodies, was done by Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), developed by Carlsson and coworkers [22]. Wells in the ELISA microtitre plates were coated with 4 µg of purified prostasomes over night. After that the following measures were taken: 1) 100 µL primary antibodies (patient’s blood sera samples, diluted 1:50), 2) Bovine serum albumin (3%

BSA, blocking unspecific bindings), 3) Secondary antibodies (purchased IgG anti-

(9)

antibodies, diluted 1:1000) with the enzyme horseradish peroxidase conjugated, 4) Substrate (tetramethyl benzidine), was added, with additional washing steps in-between.

The substrate reaction was stopped by adding 1.8 mol/L sulphuric acid and the amount of primary antibodies bound was monitored by measuring the absorbance at 450 nm in an ELISA reader system (SPECTRA Max 250). For each one of the blood sera samples a factor value was calculated relative a positive and negative control obtained from Immunsystem AB (Uppsala, Sweden).

The factor value was defined as the quota:

Factor= (A450 patients serum sample - A450 negative control)/ (A450 positive control - A450

negative control)

Fortyfour patient sera with factor values between 1.141 and 4.047 were chosen for 1D and 2D investigation.

3.4 1D-SDS-PAGE

Purified prostasome proteins (0.25mg/mL) were denatured by SDS sample buffer (70°C, 10 min) and electrophoretically separated by weight on a 4-12% gradient polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were visualized by colloidal blue staining.

3.5 1D-Western blotting

After SDS-PAGE, the proteins were electrotransferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was washed and incubated over night with patient sera (primary antibodies, diluted 1:30). Next day, the membrane was blocked with 1% BSA, incubated first with biotinylated anti-human IgG (diluted 1:500) and thereafter with streptavidin alkaline phosphatase (diluted 1:1000), and visualized by NBT (Nitro-Blue Tetrazolium Chloride) - BCIP (5-Bromo-4-Chloro-3'-Indolyphosphate p-Toluidine Salt) substrate. Between every step additional washings were performed. The 13 best sera, with the most distinct and clear bands were chosen for 2D-electrophoresis.

3.6 2D-electrophoresis

The purified prostasomes were precipitated and solubilized in a solution containing 8 mol/L urea, 4% CHAPS (a zwitterionic detergent), 40 mmol/L Tris, 0.2% (w/v) IPG (immobilized pH-gradient) buffer 3-10 for 1 h at 4°C and ultrasonicated on ice for 1.5 min, 40 KHz. The extraction was then ultracentrifuged (4°C for 2 h) at 100 000 x g.

Extracted proteins in the supernatant were collected and analyzed for their protein concentration.

First dimension separation was performed on ReadyStrip™ IPG-strip. Prostasome proteins (2mg/mL) soluted in equilibration buffer were passively rehydrated to a ReadyStrip™ IPG-strip over night. Next day, first dimensional separation was performed;

the IPG-strips from previous day were installed into the focusing machine and a current was applied to the IPG-strip, with a prefabricated solid phase pH-gradient. The current forced the proteins to migrate in the immobilized pH-gradient towards the electrode with charge opposite to their own net charge. The migration, in the IPG strip continued until

(10)

the net charge of the protein equalled zero (iso-electric point). Isoelectric focused IPG- strips (Fig 2) were stored at -70°C until further analysis.

Fig 2. Purified prostasomal proteins focused at their respective iso-electric points on an IPG-strip

First dimensional separation with IPG-strips was performed on small (11cm) strips (200 µL protein/buffer solution (1:10)) and on large (17cm) strips (300 µL protein/buffer solution (1:10)).

Second dimension separation was common SDS-PAGE separation by molecular weight (kDa).

Prostasome proteins were visualized on small and large gels by colloidal blue and silver staining. The silver-stained large gel was used to detect the exact coordinate position of the correlating immunogenic proteins from the Western blot.

3.7 2D-Western blot

SDS-PAGE gels (11cm, 4-12% gradient) with separated purified prostasome proteins were blotted to a nitrocellulose membrane as previously described. Seven sera with strong and scattered immunospots were also blotted from large gels 17cm, 8-16% gradient. The Western blot was performed as before.

(11)

3.8 MALDI-TOF

Proteins recognized by Western blotting were selected for identification via mass spectrometry. Preparative gels loaded with 200 µg protein from extracted purified prostasomes were stained with Coomassie-staining.

Immunogenic protein spots were determined by the MALDI-TOF (Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight) method. This method uses the mass to charge (MALDI is a soft ionization method and will result in predominantly single charged peptide fragments) ratio of laser fragmented ionized peptides accelerated in an electric field. The time of flight through an electric field free region was recorded by an analyzer at the end of the tube. Lighter ions gain more velocity from the electric field acceleration than the heavier ones. All ions entering the TOF tube have a fixed kinetic energy.

The accuracy of mass determination for biomolecules can be measured within an accuracy of 0.01% of the molecular weight of the sample, if the sample has a molecular weight less than 40 kDa [23]. Trypsin fragments of masses 842.50 Da and 2211.10 Da were used as internal standards for spectra calibration. Data generated are going to be screened in databases.

4. RESULTS

4.1 Purification of prostasomes

Sephadex eluate of the solubilized prostasome pellet had 2 separated absorbance peaks at wave lengths 260 nm (nucleic acid) and 280 nm (protein). All fractions were tested for amino peptidase N-activity at 410 nm. The highest UV-peak had activity for amino peptidase N, strongly indicating presence of prostasomes (Fig 3). Eluted fractions from the highest UV- peak (6-11) were pooled together. The second peak (fractions 19-27) did not contain any aminopeptidase N activity and thereby no prostasomes.

(12)

Fig 3. Elution pattern from Sephadex G200 column chromatography of pelleted material obtained after ultracentrifugation at two different velocities of seminal plasma. Five different suspensions were pooled and eluted by 30 mM Tris-HCl buffer containing 130 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.6 at a flow rate of 6 mL/h.

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

0,0 0,5 1,0 1,5 2,0 2,5

ABSORBANCE (A) VALUE

FRACTION NUMBER

410 nm A 260 nm A 280 nm

4.2 ELISA

Fortyfour sera with high factor number in the ELISA assay (in accordance with the inclusion criteria, range 1.141-4.047) were further investigated by 1D-Western blotting.

4.3 1D-electrophoresis

SDS-PAGE separated colloidal-stained, purified prostasome proteins revealed several bands in the molecular weight range of 10-200 kDa. There was also a distinct band with higher molecular weight. Bands corresponding to proteins of the approximate weights 150, 120 and 100 kDa have already been identified from 1D-PAGE and mass spectrometry as aminopeptidase N (CD 13), dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD 26) and enkephalinase (CD 10) (Fig 4).

(13)

MW (kDa) P 188-

62- 49- 38- 28- 18- 14-

6-

Fig 4. Colloidal stained 1D-SDS-PAGE separation of prostasomes.

Molecular weight (MW) marker in first lane. Separated prostasome proteins (P) in second lane. Bands at molecular weight 150, 120 and 100 kDa was previously determined by 1D mass spectrometry as aminopeptidase N, dipeptidylpeptidase IV and enkephalinase.

Aminopeptidase N (CD 13)

Dipeptidylpeptidase IV (CD 26) Enkephalinase (CD 10)

4.4 1D-Western blot

Immunoblotting with 44 patients´ sera generally revealed several immunogenic bands (range 10-170 kDa) for a majority of the sera (Fig 5a-c). Some of the bands were more frequently represented than others, bands at molecular weight 170 kDa occurred in 41%

(18/44) of the blots, bands at molecular weight 55 kDa occurred in 32% (14/44) of the blots, and bands at molecular weight 70 kDa occurred in 32% (14/44) of the blots. Some of the controls generated weak bands while others gave rise to no bands at all (Fig 5d).

(14)

188 - 97 - 62 - 49 - 38 - 28- 17 - 14-

kDa MW a b c d

6-

1 9 19 contr

Fig 5. Western blot of patients´ sera (a-c) as well as of a control (d). Molecular weight (MW) markers in first lane.

Thirty one of the 44 (31/44) patients´ sera (70%) produced either distinct or very distinct bands (Table 1). The total amount of bands was 80 and the distribution of weak and strong bands and their respective sizes is shown in figure 6.

(15)

Serum

Band visibility

Distinct Very distinct 1 10 , 55 , 70 , 170 , 200 - 2 15 , 25 - 3 70 , 90 , 96 170

4 50 -

5 55 , 170 - 6 - 55 , 170 7 25 , 55 , 70 50 , 170

8 15 -

9 100 15 , 70 , 170 10 55 , 170 - 11 25 , 30 55 12 25 , 42 , 170 55

13 - 55

14 25 -

15 25 , 170 70

16 - 10

17 50 , 55 70 , 170

18 - 55

19 90 15 , 55 , 170 20 55 35 , 70 21 - 70 , 170 22 13 , 55 , 100 - 23 100 , 170 96 24 50 , 55 , 100 96 , 170 25 25 , 50 , 170 70

26 170 70

27 70 , 170 - 28 100 70 , 170

29 70 -

30 100 -

31 70 -

TABLE I. Visible bands corresponding to proteins in patient´s sera revealed by

immunoblotting on seminal prostasomes. The bands are labeled with the corresponding approximate size (kDa) of the proteins revealed. Thirteen of the 31 tested sera did not show any distinct bands in immunoblotting. Sera 1, 9 and 19 are visualized in figure 5.

(16)

Fig 6. Size distribution (kDa) of purified prostasomal proteins

recognized by prostate cancer patients´sera (n=31) in Western blot.The bands are seperated into two groups depending on the distinctness (distinct and very distinct) of the band (amount) on the immunoblot.

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

10 13 15 25 30 35 42 50 55 60 70 90 96 100 170 200

Molecular w eight (kDa)

Positive patient sera (n)

very distinct distinct

4.5 2D-electrophoresis

2D-Separation and silver staining of purified prostasome proteins resulted in more than 300 visible protein spots in the IP-range 3-10. IPG-strips (11cm) with pH-range 3-10 and 5-8 were stained, and most of the proteins were inside the 5-8 range; the 5-8 range was used in following experiments. Separation on large gel (17cm) was made for comparison of coordinates for immunogenic protein spots on Western blots (Fig 7).

(17)

MW

pI SDS-PAGE

IEF

5.0 8.0

20 30

15 90

Fig 7. Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis map (immobilized pH gradient 5-8, large gel (17 cm), silver stained). The arrow points out the Clusterin

protein.Clusterin is a protein working as an apoptotic switch and was visible on most of the Western blots over prostasome proteins.

(18)

4.6 2D-Western blot

Out of 14 small-gel Western blotted sera (Fig 8 displays one of them), 9 sera with clear, distinct spots were selected for blotting on large gels (Fig 9 shows one out of totally 9 gels).

Fig 8. Western blot (small gel, 11cm) of antigens in purified prostasome proteins. The arrow points out the Clusterin protein.

Western blot in large gels displayed a recurrent appearance of an immunogenic spot at molecular weight 37kDa, previously determined as the protein Clusterin (Fig 7, 8, 9).

Commonly seen was a band of droplet-shaped immunogenic protein spots at higher molecular weight (Fig 9). These and scattered immunogenic spots (in total 25 spots) were punched and forwarded for MALDI-TOF determination (Fig10).

8

10 90

Ip-range 5

MW (kDa)

(19)

Fig 9. Western blot (large gel 17 cm) of prostasome proteins incubated with serum from a prostate cancer patient. Clusterin (1) and its iso-forms. Droplet-shaped formation of immunogenic proteins (2) characteristically found in serum of prostate cancer patients.

1 2

pH 5 8 Mw

(kDa)

70

40

10

(20)

Ip 5 Ip 8 MW

90

40

20

10

2 1

3 4 5 6

7

8

9 10

11 12 13

14 15 16 1718

19 20

21 22

24 23

25

Fig 10. Silver-stained 2D gel of prostasome proteins. Numbered spots have been punched and sent for identification by mass spectrometry and database search.

(21)

5. DISCUSSION

This work was undertaken as a first step to characterize the molecular targets of autoantibodies directed against prostasomes as a consequence of the development of prostate cancer in man. Normally, prostasomes have a role in protecting and promoting motility of sperms in the fertilization process. Also, prostasomes have antibacterial and antioxidant abilities which favour the normal reproductive process.

It is demonstrated that not only one but a limited number of prostasome proteins is a target for antibody responses in patients with prostate cancer and elevated ELISA-titres of antiprostasome autoantibodies. Thirteen of the tested sera gave bands that were too weak to be included into the test material. This is probably due to the fact that the ELISA selection is much more sensitive, and positive levels of serum antibodies in ELISA may be too weak to appear in the Western blots employed in the present study.

Blood sera from a large selection of patients with prostate cancer diagnosis were used for the Western blots. Since all case-books were available, comparisons between antibody response (for each antigen protein) and the severeness of the tumour will be done.

Prostasomes normally appear in a secluded area, which means that they do not evoke an immune response behind this barrier. On the other hand, once outside the barrier as in pathological conditions, like prostate cancer, they are able to be immunogenic. This makes surface antigens on prostasomes interesting as a diagnostic tool whereas the blood serum antibody level could be a measure with possible information regarding aggressiveness of the tumour. Today prostate specific antigen (PSA) is the most common biochemical marker for prostate cancer. Prostate specific antigen is a prostate specific protein that evokes an immune response outside the prostate. It has the disadvantage of being rather organ-specific but not cancer-specific therefore other diseases like prostatitis and benign tumours elevate the PSA concentration in serum and some few patients do not show elevated PSA values even after the cancer has become aggressive [25]. It could be mentioned in this context that great demands are made upon the concept of a cancer- specific serum marker, and as a matter of fact, there is no such serum marker available in clinical praxis at present. Therefore PSA with its shortcomings has to be supplemented.

The present study on autoantibodies in serum against prostasomes should be understood as complementary to the already existing PSA test in prostate cancer.

A new or complementary biochemical marker (as one or more prostasomal antigen(s)) is urgently needed for correct prognostic evaluation of prostate cancer. Permanent treatment in many cases is available for patients with an early discovered tumour.

6. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES

The biochemical data of the present study with a possible disclosing of new prostasomal antigens recognized by prostate cancer patients´sera should be compared with patient data.

By such a comparison it would be possible to identify and link some of the prostasomal antigens to certain patient characteristics as aggressiveness and liability of the prostate cancer to metastasize.

(22)

7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would first like to thank my supervisor Dr Lena Carlsson for excellent planning and guidance throughout the project. I also thank my scientific reviewer Professor Anders Larsson for encouragement and stimulating discussions.

(23)

8. REFERENCES

1. Ronquist G, Brody I, Gottfries A, Stegmayr B: An Mg2+ and Ca2+-stimulated adenosine triphosphatase in human prostatic fluid. Andrologia 10:261-272, part I and 427-433, part II, 1978.

2. Brody I, Ronquist G, Gottfries A: Ultrastructureal localization of the prostasome- An organelle in human seminal plasma. Upsala J Med Sci 88:63-80, 1983.

3. Ronquist G, Brody I: The prostasome; Its secretion and function in man. Biochim Biophys Acta 822:203-218, 1985

4. Ronquist G, Stegmayr B: Prostatic origin of fucosyl transferase in human seminal plasma-A study on healthy controls and on men with infertility or with prostatic cancer. Urol Res 12:243-247, 1984.

5. Arvidson G, Ronquist G, Wikander G, Öjteg AC: Human prostasome membranes exhibit very high cholesterol/phospholipid ratios yielding high molecular ordering.

Biochim Biophys Acta 984:167-173, 1989.

6. Wang J, Lundqvist M, Carlsson L, Nilsson O, Lundkvist Ö, Ronquist G: Prostasome- like granules from the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line increase the motility of washed human spermatozoa and adhere to the sperm. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 96:88-97, 2001.

7. Stegmayr B, Ronquist G: Promotive effect on human sperm progressive motility by prostasomes. Urol Res 10:253-257, 1982.

8. Fabiani R, Johansson L, Lundkvist Ö, Ronquist G: Enhanced recruitment of motile spermatozoa by prostasome inclusion in swim-up medium. Hum Reprod 9:1485-1489, 1994.

9. Carlsson L, Påhlson C, Bergquist M, Ronquist G, Stridsberg M: Antibacterial activity of human prostasomes. Prostate 44:279-286, 2000.

10. Skibinski G, Kelly RW, Harkiss D, James K: Immunosuppression by human seminal plasma-Extracellular organelles (prostasomes) modulate activity of phagocytic cells.

Am J Reprod Immunol 28:97-103, 1992.

11. Läkemedelsverket. Behandling av prostatacancer,

http://www.mpa.se/workshops/reko/031127_prostata.shtml (27 nov 2004).

12. Socialstyrelsen. Cancer incidence in Sweden 1997. Stockholm 1999

13. Bunting PS. A guide to the interpretation of serum prostate specific antigen levels.

Clin Biochem 28:221-241, 1995.

14. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281:1642-1645, 1999.

15. Correale P, Walmsley K, Nieroda C, Zaremba S, Zhu M, Schlom J, Tsang KY. In vitro generation of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for peptides derived from prostate-specific antigen. J Natl Cancer Inst 89:272-275, 1997.

16. Sahlén GE, Egevad L, Ahlander A, Norlén BJ, Ronquist G, Nilsson BO. Ultrastructure of the secretion of prostasomes from benign and malignant epithelial cells in the prostate. Prostate 53:192-199, 2002.

17. Nilsson BO, Carlsson L, Larsson A, Ronquist G. Autoantibodies to prostasomes as new markers for prostate cancer. Upsala J Med Sci 106:43-50, 2001.

18. Larsson A, Ronquist G, Wulfing C, Eltze E, Bettendorf O, Carlsson L, Nilsson BO, Semjonow A. Prostasome autoantibodies: Possible serum markers for prostate cancer metastasizing liability. Submitted, 2004.

19. Utleg AG, Yi EC, Xie T, Shannon P, White JT, Goodlett DR, Hood L, Lin B.

Proteomic analysis of human prostasomes. Prostate 56:151-161, 2003.

(24)

20. Carlsson L, Nilsson BO, Larsson A, Stridsberg M, Sahlén G, Ronquist G.

Characteristics of human prostasomes isolated from three different sources. Prostate 54:322-330, 2003.

21. Ronquist G, Frithz G, Jansson Å. Prostasome membrane associated enzyme activities and semen parameters in men attending an infertility clinic. Urol Int 43:133-138, 1988.

22. Carlsson L, Nilsson O, Ronquist G, Lundquist M, Larsson A: A new test for immunological infertility: an ELISA based on prostasomes. Int J of Andr 27:130-133, 2004.

23. Astbury Centre for Structural Molecular Biology, http:www.astbury.leeds.ac.uk (17 nov 2004)

24. National Cancer Institute. The Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) Test: Questions and Answers.http://cis.nci.nih.gov/fact/5_29.htm (17 nov 2004).

References

Related documents

In 1990 Schwartz and Hulka presented the vitamin D hypothesis [2] based on the observation that the risk factors for prostate cancer, older age, ethnicity (African American),

To further analyze the de-differentiation process and stem cell properties of long- term steroid-deprived LNCaP cells, LNstarv.2 cells from both the colony-forming phase and from

MDK was associated with a profound biological role in androgen- sensitive PC cells in vitro and was found to promote PC cell survival during the initial phase of steroid

In paper 1, "A Novel Automated Platform for Quantifying the Extent of Skeletal Tumour Involvement in Prostate Cancer Patients Using the Bone Scan Index" , we developed

In the future, it would be interesting to evaluate if the sensitivity of the gene expression detection method used in my study and the detection of TMPRSS2:ERG fusion

For men on secondary GnRH agonists (Table A8, Supplementary Appendix), increased adherence was observed with increased age, longer injection intervals and those who were

Characteristics of 240 patients with incidental prostate cancer (T1a-b, Nx, M0) who received no initial treatment, according to age, nuclear grade, Gleason score, tumor volume

acnes type IA or II for 48 h had a higher secretion of IL-6 compared to cells in- fected for 1 week (Fig. 3a-b), although the opposite was seen for CXCL8, where cells infected for 48