• No results found

Course evaluation Degree project in Public heath sciences (4FH100) Spring 2022

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Course evaluation Degree project in Public heath sciences (4FH100) Spring 2022"

Copied!
32
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Course evaluation Degree project in Public heath sciences (4FH100) Spring 2022

Respondents: 43 Answer Count: 28 Answer Frequency: 65.12%

In which specialization are you registered?

In which specialization are you registered? Number of responses

Public Health Epidemiology 13 (46.4%)

Health Promotion and Prevention 15 (53.6%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

In which specialization are you registered?

Health Promotion

​and Prevention Public Health

​Epidemiology

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

In which specialization are you registered? 1.5 0.5 33.1 % 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during the course.

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise

/skills during the course. Number of

responses

to a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

to a small extent 0 (0.0%)

to some extent 3 (10.7%)

to a large extent 7 (25.0%)

to a very large extent 18 (64.3%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

In my view, I have developed valuable expertise…

to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20

(2)

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, I have developed valuable expertise/skills during

the course. 4.5 0.7 15.3 % 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course.

In my view, I have achieved all the intended

learning outcomes of the course. Number of responses

to a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

to a small extent 1 (3.6%)

to some extent 2 (7.1%)

to a large extent 10 (35.7%)

to a very large extent 15 (53.6%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

In my view, I have achieved all the intended lear…

to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, I have achieved all the intended learning

outcomes of the course. 4.4 0.8 17.9 % 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes to examinations.

In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course – from learning outcomes

to examinations. Number of

responses

to a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

to a small extent 0 (0.0%)

to some extent 4 (14.3%)

to a large extent 12 (42.9%)

to a very large extent 12 (42.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

In my view, there was a common theme runnin…

to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

(3)

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, there was a common theme running throughout the course –

from learning outcomes to examinations. 4.3 0.7 16.6 % 3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of information).

In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning (e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and

evaluation of information). Number of

responses

to a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

to a small extent 0 (0.0%)

to some extent 2 (7.1%)

to a large extent 6 (21.4%)

to a very large extent 20 (71.4%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

In my view, the course has promoted a scientifi…

to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20 25

MeanStandard

Deviation Coefficient

of Variation MinLower

Quartile MedianUpper Quartile Max In my view, the course has promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning

(e.g. analytical and critical thinking, independent search for and evaluation of

information). 4.6 0.6 13.4 % 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the course’s structure and content.

In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and opinions about the

course’s structure and content. Number of responses

to a very small extent 2 (7.1%)

to a small extent 2 (7.1%)

to some extent 9 (32.1%)

to a large extent 3 (10.7%)

to a very large extent 12 (42.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

In my view, during the course, the teachers hav…

to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

(4)

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max In my view, during the course, the teachers have been open to ideas and

opinions about the course’s structure and content. 3.8 1.3 34.5 % 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

1 In my view, all students were provided with the same learning opportunities during the course.

1 In my view, all students were provided with the

same learning opportunities during the course. Number of responses

to a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

to a small extent 5 (17.9%)

to some extent 8 (28.6%)

to a large extent 9 (32.1%)

to a very large extent 4 (14.3%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 2 (7.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

1 In my view, all students were provided with th…

6. Do not know/Non

​applicable to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max 1 In my view, all students were provided with the same learning

opportunities during the course. 3.6 1.2 31.9 % 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 6.0

2 The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the learning outcomes.

2 The demands of the course were reasonable in

relation to the learning outcomes. Number of responses

to a very small extent 1 (3.6%)

to a small extent 0 (0.0%)

to some extent 2 (7.1%)

to a large extent 16 (57.1%)

to a very large extent 8 (28.6%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 1 (3.6%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

2 The demands of the course were reasonable i…

6. Do not know/Non

​applicable to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20

(5)

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max 2 The demands of the course were reasonable in relation to the

learning outcomes. 4.2 0.9 21.7 % 1.0 4.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

3 The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act in diverse situations.

3 The course made me reflect on ethical issues

and how to act in diverse situations. Number of responses

to a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

to a small extent 1 (3.6%)

to some extent 6 (21.4%)

to a large extent 12 (42.9%)

to a very large extent 8 (28.6%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 1 (3.6%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

3 The course made me reflect on ethical issues … 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable to a very large

​extent to a large extent to some extent to a small extent to a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max 3 The course made me reflect on ethical issues and how to act

in diverse situations. 4.1 0.9 22.1 % 2.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 6.0

4 I completed the following workshops offered during this course:

a. Caption and presentation of results and tables/figures (Lucie)

a. Caption and presentation of results and tables

/figures (Lucie) Number of

responses

YES 18 (66.7%)

NO 9 (33.3%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

a. Caption and presentation of results and table…

NO YES

0 5 10 15 20

(6)

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max a. Caption and presentation of results and tables/figures 

(Lucie) 1.3 0.5 36.0 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

b. Qualitative corner (Helle)

b. Qualitative corner (Helle) Number of responses

YES 5 (17.9%)

NO 23 (82.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

b. Qualitative corner (Helle) NO

YES

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

b. Qualitative corner (Helle) 1.8 0.4 21.4 % 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

c. Peer review (Anna – KIB) 

c. Peer review (Anna – KIB)  Number of responses

YES 10 (37.0%)

NO 17 (63.0%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

c. Peer review (Anna – KIB) NO

YES

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Peer review (Anna – KIB)  1.6 0.5 30.2 % 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

(7)

d. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB)

d. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB) Number of responses

YES 21 (75.0%)

NO 7 (25.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

d. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB) NO

YES

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

d. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB) 1.2 0.4 35.3 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0

e. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB)

e. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB) Number of responses

YES 20 (71.4%)

NO 8 (28.6%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

e. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB) NO

YES

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB) 1.3 0.5 35.8 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

(8)

f. Abstract & PH relevance in thesis (Mathilde)

f. Abstract & PH relevance in thesis

(Mathilde) Number of

responses

YES 15 (53.6%)

NO 13 (46.4%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

f. Abstract & PH relevance in thesis (Mathilde) NO

YES

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max f. Abstract & PH relevance in thesis (Mathilde) 1.5 0.5 34.7 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

g. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI only)

g. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI 

only) Number of

responses

YES 7 (25.9%)

NO 20 (74.1%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

g. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI … NO

YES

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max g. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI 

only) 1.7 0.4 25.7 % 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0 2.0

(9)

5. The workshops offered during this course helped me develop practical skills to  achieve the course’s intended learning outcomes: 

a. Statistical corner (Nicola)

a. Statistical corner (Nicola) Number of responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 1 (3.8%)

3. To some extent 2 (7.7%)

4. To a large extent 1 (3.8%)

5. To a very large extent 4 (15.4%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 18 (69.2%)

Total 26 (100.0%)

a. Statistical corner (Nicola) 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

a. Statistical corner (Nicola) 5.4 1.1 21.1 % 2.0 5.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

b. Caption and presentation of results and tables/figures (Lucie)

b. Caption and presentation of results and tables

/figures (Lucie) Number of

responses

To a very small extent 1 (3.8%)

To a small extent 1 (3.8%)

3. To some extent 7 (26.9%)

4. To a large extent 5 (19.2%)

5. To a very large extent 5 (19.2%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 7 (26.9%)

Total 26 (100.0%)

b. Caption and presentation of results and tabl…

6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max b. Caption and presentation of results and tables/figures 

(Lucie) 4.3 1.4 33.5 % 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.5 6.0

(10)

c. Qualitative corner (Helle)

c. Qualitative corner (Helle) Number of responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 0 (0.0%)

3. To some extent 3 (11.1%)

4. To a large extent 2 (7.4%)

5. To a very large extent 0 (0.0%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 22 (81.5%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

c. Qualitative corner (Helle) 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Qualitative corner (Helle) 5.5 1.1 19.1 % 3.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

d. Peer review (Anna – KIB) 

d. Peer review (Anna – KIB)  Number of responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 0 (0.0%)

3. To some extent 5 (19.2%)

4. To a large extent 2 (7.7%)

5. To a very large extent 4 (15.4%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 15 (57.7%)

Total 26 (100.0%)

d. Peer review (Anna – KIB) 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

d. Peer review (Anna – KIB)  5.1 1.2 23.7 % 3.0 4.5 6.0 6.0 6.0

(11)

e. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB)

e. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB) Number of responses

To a very small extent 1 (3.7%)

To a small extent 1 (3.7%)

3. To some extent 4 (14.8%)

4. To a large extent 6 (22.2%)

5. To a very large extent 9 (33.3%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 6 (22.2%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

e. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB) 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Writing the introduction (Anna – KIB) 4.4 1.3 29.5 % 1.0 4.0 5.0 5.0 6.0

f. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB)

f. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB) Number of responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 0 (0.0%)

3. To some extent 2 (7.7%)

4. To a large extent 5 (19.2%)

5. To a very large extent 12 (46.2%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 7 (26.9%)

Total 26 (100.0%)

f. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB) 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

f. Writing the discussion (Anna – KIB) 4.9 0.9 18.1 % 3.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

(12)

g. Absract & PH relevance in thesis (Mathilde)

g. Absract & PH relevance in thesis

(Mathilde) Number of

responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 1 (3.7%)

3. To some extent 3 (11.1%)

4. To a large extent 5 (18.5%)

5. To a very large extent 7 (25.9%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 11 (40.7%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

g. Absract & PH relevance in thesis (Mathilde) 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

g. Absract & PH relevance in thesis (Mathilde) 4.9 1.2 24.3 % 2.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 6.0

h. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI only)

h. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI 

only) Number of

responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 0 (0.0%)

3. To some extent 0 (0.0%)

4. To a large extent 2 (7.4%)

5. To a very large extent 5 (18.5%)

6. Do not know/Non applicable 20 (74.1%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

h. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI … 6. Do not know/Non

​applicable 5. To a very large

​extent 4. To a large extent 3. To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max h. Assessment criteria (Marie and Jette, PHEPI 

only) 5.7 0.6 10.9 % 4.0 5.5 6.0 6.0 6.0

(13)

6. I completed the following self-learning modules: 

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure 

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and 

structure  Number of

responses

YES 23 (82.1%)

NO 5 (17.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and stru…

NO YES

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and 

structure  1.2 0.4 33.1 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research 

question Number of

responses

YES 23 (82.1%)

NO 5 (17.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research qu…

NO YES

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research 

question 1.2 0.4 33.1 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0

(14)

c. Module 3: Scientific writing

c. Module 3: Scientific writing Number of responses

YES 17 (60.7%)

NO 11 (39.3%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

c. Module 3: Scientific writing NO

YES

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Module 3: Scientific writing 1.4 0.5 35.7 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the 

master thesis background Number of

responses

YES 14 (50.0%)

NO 14 (50.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the … NO

YES

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis 

background 1.5 0.5 33.9 % 1.0 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.0

(15)

e. Module 5: Presenting results

e. Module 5: Presenting results Number of responses

YES 12 (46.2%)

NO 14 (53.8%)

Total 26 (100.0%)

e. Module 5: Presenting results NO

YES

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Module 5: Presenting results 1.5 0.5 33.0 % 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 2.0

7. The content of the self-learning modules was relevant and helped me develop  skills to achieve the course’s intended learning outcomes 

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and structure 

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and 

structure  Number of

responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 2 (7.7%)

To some extent 10 (38.5%)

To a large extent 3 (11.5%)

To a very large extent 6 (23.1%)

Do not know/Non applicable 5 (19.2%)

Total 26 (100.0%)

a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and stru…

Do not know/Non

​applicable To a very large

​extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max a. Module 1: Research protocol – Role and 

structure  4.1 1.3 32.5 % 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

(16)

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research question

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research 

question Number of

responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 1 (4.0%)

To some extent 8 (32.0%)

To a large extent 7 (28.0%)

To a very large extent 5 (20.0%)

Do not know/Non applicable 4 (16.0%)

Total 25 (100.0%)

b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research qu…

Do not know/Non

​applicable To a very large

​extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max b. Module 2: Formulating a strong research 

question 4.1 1.2 28.3 % 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

c. Module 3: Scientific writing

c. Module 3: Scientific writing Number of responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 1 (4.2%)

To some extent 7 (29.2%)

To a large extent 4 (16.7%)

To a very large extent 2 (8.3%)

Do not know/Non applicable 10 (41.7%)

Total 24 (100.0%)

c. Module 3: Scientific writing Do not know/Non

​applicable To a very large

​extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Module 3: Scientific writing 4.5 1.4 31.1 % 2.0 3.0 4.5 6.0 6.0

(17)

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis background

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the 

master thesis background Number of

responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 0 (0.0%)

To some extent 6 (24.0%)

To a large extent 3 (12.0%)

To a very large extent 3 (12.0%)

Do not know/Non applicable 13 (52.0%)

Total 25 (100.0%)

d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the … Do not know/Non

​applicable To a very large

​extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max d. Module 4: Polishing the key elements of the master thesis 

background 4.9 1.3 26.2 % 3.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

e. Module 5: Presenting results

e. Module 5: Presenting results Number of responses

To a very small extent 0 (0.0%)

To a small extent 0 (0.0%)

To some extent 5 (20.0%)

To a large extent 2 (8.0%)

To a very large extent 4 (16.0%)

Do not know/Non applicable 14 (56.0%)

Total 25 (100.0%)

e. Module 5: Presenting results Do not know/Non

​applicable To a very large

​extent To a large extent To some extent To a small extent To a very small

​extent

0 5 10 15

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Module 5: Presenting results 5.1 1.2 24.1 % 3.0 4.0 6.0 6.0 6.0

Supervision questions:

(18)

2. I am overall satisfied with the support received from my main supervisor  throughout the Degree project course. 

Number of responses

Very little 0 (0.0%)

Little 1 (3.6%)

Some 1 (3.6%)

Considerable 5 (17.9%)

A great deal 21 (75.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

A great deal Considerable Some Little Very little

0 5 10 15 20 25

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

4.6 0.7 15.7 % 2.0 4.5 5.0 5.0 5.0

3. How much supervision did you need/expect from your main supervisor regarding  the following?  

a. Ethical approval

a. Ethical approval Number of responses

Very little 6 (21.4%)

Little 7 (25.0%)

Some 4 (14.3%)

Considerable 5 (17.9%)

A great deal 6 (21.4%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

a. Ethical approval A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

a. Ethical approval 2.9 1.5 50.8 % 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

(19)

b. Time planning and management

b. Time planning and management Number of responses

Very little 4 (14.3%)

Little 9 (32.1%)

Some 9 (32.1%)

Considerable 3 (10.7%)

A great deal 3 (10.7%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

b. Time planning and management A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

b. Time planning and management 2.7 1.2 43.5 % 1.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 5.0

c. Formulating aim and research question

c. Formulating aim and research question Number of responses

Very little 0 (0.0%)

Little 2 (7.1%)

Some 10 (35.7%)

Considerable 11 (39.3%)

A great deal 5 (17.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

c. Formulating aim and research question A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Formulating aim and research question 3.7 0.9 23.5 % 2.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 5.0

(20)

d. Data management

d. Data management Number of responses

Very little 1 (3.6%)

Little 4 (14.3%)

Some 9 (32.1%)

Considerable 6 (21.4%)

A great deal 8 (28.6%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

d. Data management A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

d. Data management 3.6 1.2 32.7 % 1.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysis Number of responses

Very little 1 (3.6%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 3 (10.7%)

Considerable 12 (42.9%)

A great deal 9 (32.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

e. Statistical analysis A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Statistical analysis 3.9 1.1 28.3 % 1.0 3.5 4.0 5.0 5.0

(21)

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of results Number of responses

Very little 0 (0.0%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 9 (32.1%)

Considerable 6 (21.4%)

A great deal 10 (35.7%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

f. Interpretation of results A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

f. Interpretation of results 3.8 1.1 27.6 % 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

g. Presentation of results 

g. Presentation of results  Number of responses

Very little 0 (0.0%)

Little 2 (7.1%)

Some 13 (46.4%)

Considerable 7 (25.0%)

A great deal 6 (21.4%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

g. Presentation of results A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

g. Presentation of results  3.6 0.9 25.4 % 2.0 3.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

(22)

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesis Number of responses

Very little 1 (3.6%)

Little 7 (25.0%)

Some 6 (21.4%)

Considerable 7 (25.0%)

A great deal 7 (25.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

h. Writing up the thesis A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

h. Writing up the thesis 3.4 1.2 35.9 % 1.0 2.0 3.5 4.5 5.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editing Number of responses

Very little 5 (17.9%)

Little 6 (21.4%)

Some 9 (32.1%)

Considerable 2 (7.1%)

A great deal 6 (21.4%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

i. Language editing A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

i. Language editing 2.9 1.4 47.3 % 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

(23)

4. How much supervision did you receive from your main supervisor regarding the  following?

a. Literature review

a. Literature review Number of responses

Very little 7 (25.0%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 8 (28.6%)

Considerable 5 (17.9%)

A great deal 5 (17.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

a. Literature review A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

a. Literature review 2.9 1.4 49.1 % 1.0 1.5 3.0 4.0 5.0

b. Ethical approval

b. Ethical approval Number of responses

Very little 9 (32.1%)

Little 1 (3.6%)

Some 3 (10.7%)

Considerable 8 (28.6%)

A great deal 7 (25.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

b. Ethical approval A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

b. Ethical approval 3.1 1.6 52.8 % 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.5 5.0

(24)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s) Number of responses

Very little 0 (0.0%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 7 (25.0%)

Considerable 9 (32.1%)

A great deal 9 (32.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s) A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Formulating aim and research question(s) 3.9 1.0 26.1 % 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

d. Data management

d. Data management Number of responses

Very little 3 (10.7%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 4 (14.3%)

Considerable 11 (39.3%)

A great deal 7 (25.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

d. Data management A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

d. Data management 3.6 1.3 36.1 % 1.0 3.0 4.0 4.5 5.0

(25)

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysis Number of responses

Very little 4 (14.3%)

Little 2 (7.1%)

Some 7 (25.0%)

Considerable 6 (21.4%)

A great deal 9 (32.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

e. Statistical analysis A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Statistical analysis 3.5 1.4 40.0 % 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of results Number of responses

Very little 1 (3.6%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 10 (35.7%)

Considerable 3 (10.7%)

A great deal 11 (39.3%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

f. Interpretation of results A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

f. Interpretation of results 3.7 1.2 32.7 % 1.0 3.0 3.5 5.0 5.0

(26)

g. Presentation of results 

g. Presentation of results  Number of responses

Very little 1 (3.6%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 11 (39.3%)

Considerable 6 (21.4%)

A great deal 7 (25.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

g. Presentation of results A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

g. Presentation of results  3.5 1.1 31.3 % 1.0 3.0 3.0 4.5 5.0

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesis Number of responses

Very little 2 (7.1%)

Little 4 (14.3%)

Some 7 (25.0%)

Considerable 6 (21.4%)

A great deal 9 (32.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

h. Writing up the thesis A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

h. Writing up the thesis 3.6 1.3 36.1 % 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

(27)

i. Language editing

i. Language editing Number of responses

Very little 5 (18.5%)

Little 4 (14.8%)

Some 5 (18.5%)

Considerable 5 (18.5%)

A great deal 8 (29.6%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

i. Language editing A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

i. Language editing 3.3 1.5 46.3 % 1.0 2.0 3.0 5.0 5.0

5. How much supervision did you receive from others (i.e., co-supervisor, other  members of the research team) regarding the following?

a. Ethical approval

a. Ethical approval Number of responses

Very little 12 (42.9%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 6 (21.4%)

Considerable 5 (17.9%)

A great deal 2 (7.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

a. Ethical approval A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

a. Ethical approval 2.4 1.4 59.1 % 1.0 1.0 2.0 3.5 5.0

(28)

b. Time planning and management

b. Time planning and management Number of responses

Very little 10 (35.7%)

Little 7 (25.0%)

Some 3 (10.7%)

Considerable 6 (21.4%)

A great deal 2 (7.1%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

b. Time planning and management A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10 12

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

b. Time planning and management 2.4 1.4 57.3 % 1.0 1.0 2.0 4.0 5.0

c. Formulating aim and research question(s)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s) Number of responses

Very little 9 (32.1%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 6 (21.4%)

Considerable 7 (25.0%)

A great deal 3 (10.7%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

c. Formulating aim and research question(s) A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

c. Formulating aim and research question(s) 2.7 1.4 52.9 % 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

(29)

d. Data management

d. Data management Number of responses

Very little 5 (17.9%)

Little 3 (10.7%)

Some 8 (28.6%)

Considerable 7 (25.0%)

A great deal 5 (17.9%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

d. Data management A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

d. Data management 3.1 1.4 43.1 % 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

e. Statistical analysis

e. Statistical analysis Number of responses

Very little 4 (14.8%)

Little 4 (14.8%)

Some 4 (14.8%)

Considerable 7 (25.9%)

A great deal 8 (29.6%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

e. Statistical analysis A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

e. Statistical analysis 3.4 1.4 42.5 % 1.0 2.0 4.0 5.0 5.0

(30)

f. Interpretation of results

f. Interpretation of results Number of responses

Very little 4 (14.8%)

Little 3 (11.1%)

Some 6 (22.2%)

Considerable 9 (33.3%)

A great deal 5 (18.5%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

f. Interpretation of results A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

f. Interpretation of results 3.3 1.3 40.2 % 1.0 2.5 4.0 4.0 5.0

g. Presentation of results 

g. Presentation of results  Number of responses

Very little 6 (21.4%)

Little 4 (14.3%)

Some 5 (17.9%)

Considerable 9 (32.1%)

A great deal 4 (14.3%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

g. Presentation of results A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

g. Presentation of results  3.0 1.4 46.1 % 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0

(31)

h. Writing up the thesis

h. Writing up the thesis Number of responses

Very little 8 (29.6%)

Little 4 (14.8%)

Some 4 (14.8%)

Considerable 3 (11.1%)

A great deal 8 (29.6%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

h. Writing up the thesis A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

h. Writing up the thesis 3.0 1.7 55.8 % 1.0 1.0 3.0 5.0 5.0

i. Language editing

i. Language editing Number of responses

Very little 8 (28.6%)

Little 5 (17.9%)

Some 5 (17.9%)

Considerable 3 (10.7%)

A great deal 7 (25.0%)

Total 28 (100.0%)

i. Language editing A great deal

Considerable Some Little Very little

0 2 4 6 8 10

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max

i. Language editing 2.9 1.6 55.3 % 1.0 1.0 3.0 4.5 5.0

(32)

6. Did you attend research group meetings during the degree project? 

6. Did you attend research group meetings during 

the degree project?  Number of

responses

Yes 18 (66.7%)

No 9 (33.3%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

6. Did you attend research group meetings duri…

No Yes

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max 6. Did you attend research group meetings during the 

degree project?  1.3 0.5 36.0 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

7. Did you present your project and results to the research group?  

7. Did you present your project and results to the 

research group?   Number of

responses

Yes 18 (66.7%)

No 9 (33.3%)

Total 27 (100.0%)

7. Did you present your project and results to t…

No Yes

0 5 10 15 20

Mean Standard

Deviation Coefficient of

Variation Min Lower

Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max 7. Did you present your project and results to the research

group?   1.3 0.5 36.0 % 1.0 1.0 1.0 2.0 2.0

Final questions:

TO REGISTER YOUR ANSWERS, PLEASE PRESS SEND

References

Related documents

It is very common to compare mean values of driving performance indicators (PI) like mean speed, the standard deviation of lateral position, time headway, mean glance

The course promoted a scientific way of thinking and reasoning to some, large or very large extent according to all but one (mean 3.7), and all thought that the teachers had been

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max. What is your overall experience of the course?  4.3 0.7 17.4 % 2.0 4.0 4.0

A clear majority (~90%) of responding students felt that they had developed valuable expertise/skills and achieved all the intended learning outcomes of the course to a large or

Mean Standard Deviation As a result this course, I feel more confident working on mathematical problems as part of a group 2.6 1.0.. The course has increased my ability to read

Mean Standard Deviation Coefficient of Variation Min Lower Quartile Median Upper Quartile Max. Labsters simulations 4.3 1.0 22.3 % 2.0 4.0 5.0

Number of responses to a very small extent 2 5.6% to a small extent 6 16.7% to some extent 11 30.6% to a large extent 14 38.9% to a very large extent 3 8.3% Total 36 100.0%

Number of responses Yes 0 0.0% No 22 100.0% Total 22 100.0% Have you during the course been subjected to … No Yes 0 5 10 15 20 25 MeanStandard Deviation Coefficient of