Förslag till vidare forskning

Betydelsen av kommunikation tycks genomsyra alla W. K. Smith och Lewis (2011) former av lärande samtidigt som delaktighet verkar utgöra en nyckelfaktor för att skapa organisationens dynamiska förmåga.

Om kommunikation kan visa sig alstra delaktighet, eller vice versa, kan det därför i vår mening existera potentiella synergieffekter. Att undersöka detta samband närmare ser vi därmed som ett intressant förslag till vidare forskning.

70

7 Källförteckning

Andriopoulos, C. (2003). Six paradoxes in managing creativity: An embracing act. Long range planning, 36(4), 375-388. [PDF] andriopoulos.org

Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and

organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696–717. [PDF] researchgate.net

Arbnor, I., & Bjerke, B. (1994). Företagsekonomisk metodlära. Studentlitteratur.

Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., & Smith, K. G. (2000). The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change.

Academy of Management journal, 43(5), 837-853. [PDF] berkeley.edu

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2017). Företagsekonomiska forskningsmetoder. Upplaga, 3.

Cameron, K., & Lavine, M. (2006). Making the impossible possible: Leading extraordinary performance: The Rocky Flats story. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

Denis, J. L., Langley, A., & Rouleau, L. (2007). Strategizing in pluralistic contexts:

Rethinking theoretical frames. Human Relations, 60(1), 179–215. [PDF]

semanticscholar.org

Di Digital. (2016). Storbanker skapar egen kryptovaluta. Hämtad från https://digital.di.se/artikel/storbanker-skapar-egen-kryptovaluta

Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation:

Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of management Review, 20(1), 65-91.

[PDF] wwu.edu

Dutton, J. E., & Dukerich, J. M. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of management journal, 34(3), 517-554.

[PDF] helsinki.fi

71 Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House

Incorporated. [PDF] childstudysystem.com

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of management review, 14(4), 532-550. [PDF] ffri.hr

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases:

Opportunities and challenges. Academy of management journal, 50(1), 25-32. [PDF]

aom.org

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: what are they?

Strategic management journal, 1105-1121. [PDF] tku.edu.tw

Eriksson, L. T., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (2006). Att utreda, forska och rapportera.

Liber.

Fiol, C. M. (2001). Revisiting an identity-based view of sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 27(6), 691-699.[PDF] psu.edu

Fiol, C. M. (2002). Capitalizing on paradox: The role of language in transforming organizational identities. Organization Science, 13(6), 653-666.

http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/3086086

Flynn, D., & Du, Y. (2012). A case study of the legitimation process undertaken to gain support for an information system in a Chinese university. European Journal of

Information Systems, 21(3), 212-228. [PDF] semanticscholar.org

Flynn, F. J., & Chatman, J. A. (2001). Strong cultures and innovation: Oxymoron or opportunity. International handbook of organizational culture and climate, 263-87.

Ford, C. M., & Gioia, D. A. (Eds.). (1995). Creative action in organizations: Ivory tower visions and real-world voices. Sage Publications.

72 Ford, J. D., & Backoff, R. W. (1988). Organizational change in and out of dualities and paradox. Ballinger Publishing Co/Harper & Row Publishers.

Framtidens Bank & Försäkring. (2015). Trender inom it, affärsutveckling och säkerhet.

Hämtad från

http://framtidensbank.se/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Framtidens_Bank_SE_24s_lores.pdf

Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of management Journal, 47(2), 209-226.

[PDF] london.edu

Gittell, J. H. (2000). Paradox of coordination and control. California Management Review, 42(3), 101-117.

http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/41166044

Göteborgs Universitetsbibliotek (2017). Källkritiska frågor. Hämtad 2017-11-18 från http://www.ub.gu.se/skriva/kallkritik/fragor/

Grint, K. (2000). The arts of leadership. OUP Oxford.

Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D. Strategic management journal, 339-360. [PDF]

semanticscholar.org

Holme, I. M., Solvang, B. K., & Nilsson, B. (1997). Forskningsmetodik: om kvalitativa och kvantitativa metoder. Studentlitteratur.

Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation. Administrative science quarterly, 44(4), 764-791. [PDF]

mit.edu

Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management science, 52(11), 1661-1674. [PDF] eur.nl

73 Kreiner, G. E., Hollensbe, E. C., & Sheep, M. L. (2006). Where is the “me” among the

“we”? Identity work and the search for optimal balance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 1031-1057. [PDF] academia.edu

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews. An introduction to qualitative research writing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. J., Dalton, M., Ernst, C., & Dea global context. Greensboro, NC:

Center for Creative Leadership., MK, & Whitney, DJ (2001). Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 114-121.

Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., & Batra, B. (1992). The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration.

Strategic Management Journal, 13(8), 585-608.

http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/2486652

Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide.

Academy of Management review, 25(4), 760-776. [PDF] researchgate.net

Lewis, M. W., Andriopoulos, C., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Paradoxical Leadership to Enable Strategic Agility. California Management Review, 56(3), 58-77. [PDF]

city.ac.uk

Mantere, S., & Ketokivi, M. (2013). Reasoning in organization science. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 70-89.

March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning.

Organization science, 2(1), 71-87. [PDF] pbworks.com

Miller, D., & Chen, M. J. (1994). Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the US airline industry. Administrative science quarterly, 1-23. [PDF]

recantodasletras.com.br

74 Mynewsdesk. (2017). Stärkt fokus på konsumenterna när FI kontrollerar bankerna.

Hämtad från https://www.mynewsdesk.com/se/deloitte/pressreleases/staerkt-fokus-paa-konsumenterna-naer-fi-kontrollerar-bankerna-2048722

O’Reilly, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability:

Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in organizational behavior, 28, 185-206.

[PDF] brainmass.com

O'Mahony, S., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). Stretchwork: Managing the career progression paradox in external labor markets. Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 918-941.

[PDF] researchgate.net

Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic management journal, 7(6), 485-501. [PDF]

umich.edu

Quinn, R. E., & Cameron, K. S. (1988). Paradox and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management. Ballinger Publishing Co/Harper & Row Publishers. http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/2393523

Smith, K. G., Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2005). Existing knowledge, knowledge creation capability, and the rate of new product introduction in high-technology firms.

Academy of management journal, 48(2), 346-357. [PDF] psu.edu

Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life: Understanding conflict, paralysis, and movement in group dynamics. Jossey-Bass.

http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/2393328

Smith, W. K. (2014). Dynamic decision making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592-1623. [PDF]

researchgate.net

75 Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic

equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of management Review, 36(2), 381-403.[PDF] researchgate.net

Sohlberg, P., & Sohlberg, B. M. (2001). Kunskapens former. Vetenskapsteori och forskningsmetod. Stockholm: Liber.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Sundaramurthy, C., & Lewis, M. (2003). Control and collaboration: Paradoxes of governance. Academy of management review, 28(3), 397-415.

http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/30040729

Svenska Dagbladet. (2017). Studie: Storbanker tappar inom digitalisering. Hämtad från https://www.svd.se/studie-storbanker-tappar-inom-digitalisering

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic management journal, 509-533. [PDF] academia.edu

Teece, D., & Pisano, G. (1994). The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction.

Industrial and corporate change, 3(3), 537-556. [PDF] iiasa.ac.at

Thomas, R., & Linstead, A. (2002). Losing the plot? Middle managers and identity.

Organization, 9(1), 71-93.

Thurén, T. (2007). Vetenskapsteori för nybörjare. (2., [omarb.] uppl.) Stockholm: Liber.

Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California management review, 38(4), 8-29.

[PDF] prescientstrategists.com

Van Der Vegt, G. S., & Bunderson, J. S. (2005). Learning and performance in

multidisciplinary teams: The importance of collective team identification. Academy of management Journal, 48(3), 532-547.

http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/20159674

76 Volberda, H. W. (1996). Toward the flexible form: How to remain vital in

hypercompetitive environments. Organization science, 7(4), 359-374.[PDF] eur.nl

Voorhees, B. (1986). Toward duality theory. General Systems Bulletin, 16(2), 58-61.

Webb, J. R. (2002). Understanding and designing market research. Cengage Learning EMEA.

Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage publications.

Zilber, T. B. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of management journal, 45(1), 234-254. http://www.jstor.org.webproxy.student.hig.se:2048/stable/3069294

77

8 Bilagor

Appendix 1 - Intervjuguide semistrukturerad

Inledande fråga:

 Vänligen berätta om dina tidigare chefserfarenheter.

Frågor relaterade till organisatoriska lärandeparadoxer:

Paradoxer inom den organisatoriska kärnaktiviteten lärande:

 Att anpassa, förnya och förändra en verksamhet samt skapa innovativitet är ibland förknippat med motstridiga krav mellan att bygga vidare på- och samtidigt förkasta tidigare kunskap för att kunna skapa ny kunskap.

Har du som ledare upplevt några sådana motstridigheter?

Paradoxer i skärningspunkten mellan de organisatoriska kärnaktiviteterna lärande och tillhörighet:

 Hur genomför du anpassningar och förändringar utan att äventyra medarbetarnas självbilder och värderingar?

Paradoxer i skärningspunkten mellan de organisatoriska kärnaktiviteterna lärande och organisering:

 Hur arbetar du med att skapa stabila, tydliga rutiner samtidigt som du möjliggör flexibilitet och agilitet?

Paradoxer i skärningspunkten mellan de organisatoriska kärnaktiviteterna lärande och prestation:

 Hur bygger du kort- och långsiktig framgång samtidigt?

Fråga relaterad till organisationens dynamiska förmåga:

 Hur bidrar ditt ledarskap till organisationens dynamiska förmåga?

78