Denna studie genomfördes som svar på tidigare forskares uppmaningar om mer forskning om praktisk hantering av institutionell komplexitet. Denna studie har bidragit med ytterligare empirisk forskning inom fältet för fondförvaltning men bristen på empiriska studier kvarstår. Vidare forskning bör således fokusera på att kartlägga den praktiska hanteringen inom andra kontexter. Förslag på inriktningar som skulle kunna vara intressanta att utforska mer än vad som gjorts i denna studie är huruvida de åtgärder som kan observeras är medvetna strategiska val eller en emergent effekt. Ett annat intressant spår som inte fick lika mycket utrymme i studien men som vi i efterhand hade velat följa upp ytterligare är huruvida de praktiska lösningar som kunnat identifierats är av en permanent eller situationsspecifik karaktär, som en fortsättning av resultaten i Carlsson-Wall, Kraus och Messner (2016).
Även en bättre historisk kartläggning av avkastningslogiken och hållbarhetslogiken på fondmarknaden, likt Lounsburys (2007) kartläggning av trustee-logiken och en affärslogik, skulle vara en intressant studie för att kunna utveckla vår analys kring huruvida logikerna är på väg att smälta samman till en gemensam logik och i dagsläget befinner sig i en så kallad övergångsperiod.
57
Referenser
Almandoz, J. (2014). Founding Teams as Carriers of Competing Logics: When Institutional Forces Predict Banks’ Risk Exposure. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), ss. 442– 473.
Amans, P., Mazars-Chapelon, A. & Villesèque-Dubus, F. (2015). Budgeting in institutional complexity: The case of performing arts organizations. Management Accounting
Research, 27, ss. 47–66.
Aslaksen, I. & Synnestvedt, T. (2003). Ethical investment and the incentives for corporate environmental protection and social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and
Environmental Management, 10(4), ss. 212–223.
Azevedo, V., Santos, A. & Campos, L. (2016). Corporate sustainability and asset pricing models: empirical evidence for the Brazilian stock market. Production, 26(3), ss. 516– 526.
Battilana, J. & Dorado, S. (2010). Building Sustainable Hybrid Organizations: The Case of Commercial Microfinance Organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), ss. 1419–1440.
Bauer, R., Derwall, J., Guenster, N. & Koedijk, K. (2005). The eco-efficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), ss. 51–64.
Bento, R. F., Mertins, L. & White, L. F. (2017). Ideology and the Balanced Scorecard: An Empirical Exploration of the Tension Between Shareholder Value Maximization and Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 142(4), ss. 769–789. Berk, J. B. & van Binsbergen, J. H. (2015). Measuring skill in the mutual fund industry.
Journal of Financial Economics, 118(1), ss. 1–20.
Berry, A.J., Capps, T., Cooper, D., Ferguson, P., Hopper, T. & Lowe, E.A. (1985). Management control in an area of the NCB Rationales of accounting practices in a public enterprise.
Accounting Organizations and Society, 10(1), ss. 3–28.
Bryman, A. & Bell, E. (2011). Företagsekonomiska forskningsmetoder. (2. uppl.) Stockholm: Liber.
Carlsson-wall, M., Kraus, K. & Messner, M. (2015). Performance measurement systems and the dynamic relationship between different logics: Insights from a football organization.
Management Accounting Research, 32, ss. 1–17.
Christensen, L., Engdahl, N., Grääs, C. & Haglund, L. (2010). Marknadsundersökning en
58 Climent, F. & Soriano, P. (2011). Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US
Environmental Mutual Funds. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(2), ss. 275–287. CNN (2015). 5 years after the Gulf oil spill: What we do (and don´t) know.
https://edition.cnn.com/2015/04/14/us/gulf-oil-spill-unknowns/index.html [2018-01-27] Corazza, L., Scagnelli, S. D. & Mio, C. (2017). Simulacra and Sustainability Disclosure: Analysis of the Interpretative Models of Creating Shared Value. Corporate Social
Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(5), ss. 414–434.
Deegan, C. (2002). Introduction: The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures – a theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal,
15(3), ss. 282–311.
Denscombe, M. (2009). Forskningshandboken: För småskaliga forskningsprojekt inom
samhällsvetenskaperna. (2. uppl.) Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Derwall, J., Koedijk, K. & Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(8), ss. 2137–2147.
DiMaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 48(2), ss. 147–160.
Eriksson-Zetterquist, U. (2009). Institutionell teori: Idéer, moden, förändring. Malmö: Liber. Ezzamel, M., Robson, K. & Stapleton, P. (2012). The logics of budgeting: Theorization and
practice variation in the educational field. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(5), ss. 281–303.
Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Fondbolagens förening (2011). Fondbolagens förening – en samlad röst för fondbranschen. http://www.fondbolagen.se/sv/Om-oss/ [2018-02-02]
Fondbolagens förening (2014). Fondspecial: Fördjupning om fonder från Fondbolagens
förening. http://www.fondbolagen.se/Documents/Fondbolagen/Studier%20-
%20dokument/Fondspecial/FONDSPECIAL_Aktiv-_och_indexforvaltning.pdf [2018-02-02] Fondbolagens förening (2018). Helårsrapport: Fondåret 2017 i siffror.
http://www.fondbolagen.se/PageFiles/835/Fondsparandet%202017.pdf [2018-02-05] Friedman, M. (1970). The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase its Profits. New
59 Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S. & Williams, K. (2000). Shareholder value and
financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves. Economy and Society,
29(1), ss. 80–110.
Graneheim, U. H. & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness, Nurse education today,
24, ss. 105–112.
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R. & Lounsbury, M. (2011).
‘Institutional complexity and organizational responses’. Academy of Management Annals, 5,
ss. 317–71.
Guba, E.G. & Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. I Denzin, N.K. & Lincoln, Y.S. (red) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: SAGE, ss. 105– 117.
Holmström, B. & Kaplan, S. N. (2001). Corporate Governance and Merger Activity in the United States: Making Sense of the 1980s and 1990s. Journal of Economic Perspectives,
15(2), ss. 121–144.
Hsieh, H.-F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis,
qualitative health research, 15(9), ss. 1277–1288.
Jensen, M. (2010). Value Maximization, Stakeholder Theory, and the Corporate Objective Function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 22(1), ss. 32–42.
Kraatz, M. & Block, E. (2008). Organizational implications of institutional pluralism. I Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Sahlin, K. & Suddaby, R. (red), The SAGE Handbook of
Organizational Institutionalism. California, Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc., ss.
78-98.
Lander, M. W., Koene, B. A. S. & Linssen, S. N. (2013). Committed to professionalism: Organizational responses of mid-tier accounting firms to conflicting institutional logics.
Accounting, Organizations and Society, 38(2), ss. 130–148.
Larsson von Garaguly, J. (2016). Vasaloppet - Resan från skidtävling och skidlöpare till
produkter och kunder. En studie om kommersialisering och professionalisering. Diss.
Stockholm: Stockholm School of Economics. http://du.diva- portal.org/smash/get/diva2:937270/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Lindberg, K. (2014). Performing multiple logics in practice. Scandinavian Journal of
Management, 30(4), ss. 485–497.
Lounsbury, M. (2007). A Tale of Two Cities: in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds.
Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), ss. 289–307.
Marquis, C. & Lounsbury, M. (2007). Vive la Résistence: Competing Logics and the Consolidation of U. S. Community Banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), ss. 799–820.
60 Merriam, S. B. (1994). Fallstudien som forskningsmetod. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), ss. pache340–363.
Ocasio, W. & Radoynovska, N. (2016). Strategy and commitments to institutional logics: Organizational heterogeneity in business models and governance. Strategic
Organization, 14(4), ss. 287–309.
Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses To Institutional Processes. Academy of Management
Review, 16(1), ss. 145–179.
Pache, A.-C. & Santos, F. (2010). When Worlds Collide : The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands. Academy of
Management Review, 35(3), ss. 455–476.
Pache, A.-C. & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the Hybrid Organization: Selective Coupling as a Response to Competing Institutional Logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), ss. 972–1001.
PRI (2017). The PRI 2017/18 work programme.
https://www.unpri.org/Uploads/l/n/c/PRIWorkProgramme2017.pdf [2018-03-13] PRI (2017). What are the Principles for Responsible Investment?
https://www.unpri.org/pri/what-are-the-principles-for-responsible-investment [2018-03- 13]
PRI (2017). What is responsible investment? https://www.unpri.org/pri/what-is-responsible- investment [2018-03-13]
Reay, T. & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics.
Organization Studies, 30(6), ss. 629–652.
Reay, T. & Jones, C. (2016). Qualitatively capturing institutional logics. Strategic
Organization, 14(4), ss. 441–454.
Schäffer, U., Strauss, E. & Zecher, C. (2015). The role of management control systems in situations of institutional complexity. Qualitative Research in Accounting &
Management, 12(4), ss. 395–424.
SFS 2013:588. Lag om värdepappersfonder. Stockholm: Finansdepartementet V.
Sjöström, E. (2017). Hållbar konsumtion, marknadsföring och konsumenter. I Borglund, T., De Geer, H., Sweet, S., Frostenson, M., Lerpold, L., Nordbrand, S., Sjöström, E. & Windell, K. CSR och hållbart företagande. Stockholm: Sanoma utbildning.
61 Smets, M. & Jarzabkowski, P. (2013). Reconstructing institutional complexity in practice: A
relational model of institutional work and complexity. Human Relations, 66(10), ss. 1279–1309.
Sundin, H., Granlund, M. & Brown, D. A. (2010). Balancing multiple competing objectives with a balanced scorecard. European Accounting Review 19(2), ss. 203-246.
Syed, A. M. (2017). Environment , social , and governance (ESG) criteria and preference of managers. Cogent Business & Management, 69(1), ss. 1–13.
Thornton, P. H. & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), ss. 801–843.
Thornton, PH., Ocasio, W. & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The Institutional Logics Perspective: A
New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. New York: Oxford University Press.
van Duuren, E., Plantinga, A. & Scholtens, B. (2016). ESG Integration and the Investment Management Process: Fundamental Investing Reinvented. Journal of Business Ethics,
138(3), ss. 525–533.
Wagemans, F. A. J., van Koppen, C. S. A. & Mol, A. P. J. (2013). The effectiveness of socially responsible investment: a review. Journal of Integrative Environmental
Sciences, 10(3–4), ss. 235–252.
Wójcik, P. (2016). How Creating Shared Value Differs From Corporate Social Responsibility.
Journal of Management and Business Administration, 24(2), ss. 32–55.
Yin, R. K. (2007). Fallstudier: Design och genomförande. Malmö: Liber.
Yoo, H. & Kim, J. W. (2017). Creating and sharing a bigger value: A dual process model of inter-firm CSV relative to firm performance. Journal of Business Research, (oktober 2017), ss. 1-9.
Zabarankin, M., Pavlikov, K. & Uryasev, S. (2014). Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) with drawdown measure. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(2), ss. 508– 517.