Framtida forskning

Utifrån denna studie har det uppkommit tre områden där begränsad forskning verkar finnas. De tre områdena är:

1. I uppsatsen presenteras de fyra faktorerna mötesplats, intern arbetsmarknad, mentorskap och rutiner som faktorer för att bevara kunskap inom organisationen. Tidigare forskning har inte undersökt om det finns fler faktorer som har betydelse, där även andra organisationsstrukturer behöver undersökas för att ge en mer komplett bild av hur bevarandet av kunskap sker inom olika organisationsstrukturer.

2. De fyra faktorerna verkar också variera över tid, där verkar också begränsad forskning finnas. Framtida forskning bör därför fokusera på hur dessa faktorer förändras över tid. En kortare diskussion genomfördes för att öka förståelsen kring fenomenet, dock behövs mer forskning för att undersöka variationen över tid.

3. Denna uppsats undersökte en matvarubutik där personalomsättningen vid tidpunkten för undersökningen inte var hög inom avdelningar med mer implicit kunskap och därför inte uppfattades som ett problem. Framtida forskning behöver kontrollera inom andra organisationer där personalomsättningen är hög inom avdelningar med implicit kunskap, och som upplevs som ett problem, för att se om andra faktorer och variationen bland faktorerna uppkommer.

7. REFERENSER

Alvesson, M. (1995). Management of Knowledge-Intensive Companies. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter

Andersson. K.B, Björk. T, Frykhammar. K, Karlsson. E, Lundqvist. H.P, Gurthie. A.R, (2015),

Fakta om löner och arbetstider 2015, Svenskt Näringsliv, Hämtad (2019-03-27)

Argote. L, (1999), Organisational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge, Springer Science & Business Media

Argote. L, Ingram. P, (2000), Knowledge Transfer: A Basis for Competitive Advantage in

Firms, Organizational Behvaior and Human Decision Processes, Volume 82; Issue 1

Armstrong, M. Taylor, S. (2014). Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management

Practice, Kogan Page Limited

Ashforth. B, Mael. F, (1989). Social Identity Theory and Organization. The Academy of Management Review. 14. pp. 20-39

Beazley. H, Boenisch. J, Harden. D, (2002), Continuity Management: Preserving Corporate

Knowledge and Productivity When Employees Leave

Becker. M.C, (2004), Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Ind. Corp. Change 13:643–78

Branham. L, (2005), The 7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave, New York

Bratton, J. Gold, J. (2017). Human resource management. Theory and practice. London: Palgrave.

Bryman. A, Bell. E, (2015), “Business Research Methods”, 4 uppl., Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Burnell L.J, Priest J.W, Durrett J.R, (2007), Developing and Maintaining Knowledge

Management Systems for Dynamic, Complex Domains, Knowledge Management

Chen. C-J, Huang. J-W, (2007), How organizational climate and structure affect knowledge

management—The social interaction perspective. International Journal of Information

Management. 27. 104-118.

Cortés. E.C, Zaragoza. P.S, Ortega E.P, (2007) "Organizational structure features supporting

knowledge management processes", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 11 Issue: 4,

pp.45-57

Cyert. R, March.J, (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice- Hall.

Dahmström. K, (2015), Från datainsamling till rapport – att göra en statistisk undersökning, Lund: Studentlitteratur upplaga 5

Dalkir. K, (2005), Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice, Elsevier Science

Danilov. K, Hellgren. J, (2010), Rekryteringsstrategier inom detaljhandeln, Handelns Utvecklingsråd, Hämtad (2019-03-27)

DeLong. DW, (2004). Lost Knowledge: Confronting the Threat of an Aging Workforce. Oxford University Press

Dess G.G, Shaw J.D, (2001), Voluntary Turnover, Social Capital, And Organizational

Performance, Academy of Management Review, Vol 26. No.3, s. 446-456

DiMattia. S, Oder. N, (1997), “Knowledge management: Hope, Hyper or harbinger?” Library Journal; New York Vol. 122, Iss. 15, s. 33-35.

Droege. S.B, Hoobler. J.M, (2003), Employee Turnover And Tacit Knowledge Diffusion: A

Network Perspective, Journal of Managerial Issues, 15(1):50 s.50-64

Eraut. M, (2004), Informal learning in the workplace. Studies in continuing education, 26, 2, 247-273.

Feldman S.M, Pentland T.B, (2003), Reconceptualizing Organizational Routines as a source

of Flexibility and change. SAGE

Goh, S.C. (2003). Improving organisational learning capability: lesson from two case studies. The Learning Organization 2003, 10 (4): 216-227.

Gold, A.H., Malhotra, A. and Segars, A.H. (2001), “Knowledge management: an

organizational capabilities perspective”, Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol.

18 No. 1, pp. 185-214.

Gruenfeld, D. H., Martorana, P. V., Fan, E. T. (2000). What do groups learn from their

worldliest members? Direct and indirest influence in dynamic teams. Organizational Behavior

and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 45-59.

Hislop. D, Bosua. R, Helms. R, (2018), Knowledge Management in Organizations: A Critical

Introduction, Oxford University Press

Jonsson. A, (2012), Kunskapsöverföring och Knowledge Management, Liber

Knott. A.M, (2003), The organizational routines factor market paradox. Strategic Management J. 24(10):929–943.

Landon. A, Walker. B, (u.å.), ‘‘Knowledge retention: preventing knowledge from walking out

the door. An overview of processes and tools at the Tennessee Valley Authority’’, Tillgänglig

på: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/72e6/0d0d43781f7ced3186e6729994d3f6a47293.pdf (Hämtad 2019-04-28)

Langley. A, Tsoukas. H, (2016), The SAGE Handbook of process organization studies 55 City Road, London: SAGE Publications Ltd

Leonard-Barton, D. (1992). Core Capabilities and Core Rigidities: A Paradox in Managing

New Product Development. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 13, Special Issue: Strategy

Process: Managing Corporate Self-Renewal pp. 111-125.

Levy. M, (2011), "Knowledge retention: minimizing organizational business loss", Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 15 Issue: 4, pp.582-600,

March, J. G., Simon H.A, (1958), Organizations. New York: Wiley.

March. J.S, Stock. G.N, (2006), Creating Dynamic Capability: The Role of Intertemporal

Integration, Knowledge Retention, and Interpretation, The Journal of Product Innovation

Management, 23; 422-436

McCracken. G, (1988), Qualitative Research Methods: The long interview, Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications

Mintzberg, H. (1979), The Structuring of Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

Mobley. W.H, (1982), Employee Turnover: Causes, Consequences and Control, Reading MA, Addison Wesley

Nilsson. P, Wallo. A, Rönnqvist. D, Davidson. B, (2018), Human Resource Development - att

utveckla individer, grupper och organisationer, Studentlitteratur, 2: a uppl

Nonaka. I, (1994), A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization science, 5, 1, 14-37.

Nonaka. I, Takeuchi. H, (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese

Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press

North. K, Kumta. G, (2018), Knowledge Management, Value Creation Through Organizational

Learning, Springer International Publishing

O’Reilly III.C.A, Tushman. M. L, (2004), ‘The Ambidextrous Organization’, Harvard Business Review, 82(4), pp. 74–81.

Riege. A, (2005), Three-dozen knowledge-sharing barriers managers must consider, Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 9 No. 3, 18-35

Shams S.M.R , Demetris V, Yaakov W, Evangelos T, Alberto F, (2019), Cross-Functional

Knowledge Management: The International Landscape, The Annals of Business Research

Siebert. S, Zubanov. N, (2009). Searching for The Optimal Level of Employee Turnover: A

Study of a Large U.K. Retail Organization. Academy of Management Journal. 52. 294-313

Stasser. G., Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information

on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality

and Social Psychology, 53(1), 81-93.

Szulanski. G, (2000). Appropriability and the challenge of scope. Dosi G, Nelson RR, Winter SG, eds. The Nature and Dynamics of Organizational Capabilities, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 69–98.

Vaiman. V, Vance. C, (2008). Smart Talent Management: On the Powerful Amalgamation of Talent Management and Knowledge Management.

Bilaga 1 - Information till respondenter