• No results found

Limitations of the research & further recommendations

7. Conclusion

7.1. Limitations of the research & further recommendations

This research, like all studies, has several limitations. Firstly, it has been carried out in a relatively small sample of students in Czech Republic. Thus the corresponding value can have predicting value. However it does not include the older generations of customers, which could have change the results and prove, that CSR and corporate reputation might not be as important aspects in their purchase decision process. Based on the first limitation, this research should be carried out in a bigger sample, either of student or wider context as all customers or different industry or countries. As already mentioned in the limitations of this research, this research was hold only in the context of the Czech Republic focusing on students, in order to higher levels of awareness of CSR. However, based on other researches, with a wider sample of customers, those results could differ.

Secondly, further research needs to be done to investigate the reasons of this relations.

Although a brief explanation was given in the literature review, a consensus about corporate

49

reputation and CSR need to be made in order to offer complex understanding of this topic.

50 8. References

AJZEN, I., (1991). The Theory of Planned Behaviour. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, pp. 179-211.

AKASAKA, E. O., FERGUSONB, M. A., & DUMANC, S. A; (2016);. Corporate social responsibility and CSR fit as predictors of corporate reputation: A global perspective. Public Relations Review, pp. 79-81.

AMSTRONG, G., KOTLER, P; (2015). Marketing: An Introduction. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.

Argenti, P., & Druckenmiller, B. (2004). Reputation and the Corporate Brand. Corporate Reputation Review , pp. 368-374.

Arifeen, M. 2012. Need of awareness about CSR . Pakistan and Gulf Economist, pp. 20-22.

Bae, J., & Kim, S. 2013. The influence of cultural aspects on public perception of the importance of CSR activity and purchase intention in Korea . Asian Journal of Communication , pp. 68-85.

Baines, P., & Fill, C. 2014. Marketing 3.. vyd.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bhattacharya, C., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why and How Consumers Respond To Corporate Social Initiatives. CAlifornia Management Review , pp. 9-24.

Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2001). Consumer Behaviour. Orlando, FLO, USA: Harcourt College Publishers .

Bock, M. (2015). Možný dopad aféry Dieselgate na Společnost Škoda Auto a.s. Konference doktorandů na Vysoké škole finanční a správní, pp. 1-8.

Brown, & Dacin. (1997). ‘The company and the product: corporate associations. Journal of Marketing , pp.

68-84.

Bruke, R., Graeme, M., & Cary, C.(2011). Corporate Reputation: Managing Opportunities and Threats . Surrey, GB: Tylor and Francis .

Bryman, A.; Bell, E. (2011) Business Research Methods, Oxford, Oxford University Press

businessinfo.cz. (2016). Business Info . Retrieved from Czech Republic - International TRade : http://www.businessinfo.cz/cs/clanky/vysledky-souteze-exporter-roku-2015-72982.html

Cabral, L. (2016). Media Exposure and Corporate Reputation . Research in Economics, pp. 735-740.

Carroll, A. B. (1997). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, pp. 39-48.

Caruana, A., Cohen, C., & Krentler, K. A. (2006). Corporate Reputation and shareholder's intentions: An attitudinal perspective. Journal of Brand Management, pp. 429-440.

Castaldo, S., Perrini, F., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (07. 02 2008). The Missing Link Between Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Trust: The Case of Fair Trade Products. Journal Business of Ethics, pp. 1-15.

Cavallone, M., Freidank, J., Bowen, M., & Ubiali, E. (2016). An Italian perspective of “Dieselgate” related to Volkswagen’s brand image. Toulon-Verona Conference "Excellence in Services", (pp. 111-120). Huelva.

Centrum for Corporate Citizenship . (26. Jan 2010). How to read a CSR report. Retrieved from Bosten College:

https://ccc.bc.edu/index.cfm?fuseaction=document.showDocumentByID&DocumentID=1353

Coombs, T., & Holladay, S. (2015). CSR as crisis risk: expanding how conceptualize the relationship. Corporate Communicationa: An International Journal, pp. 144-162.

Cooper, D.; Schindler, P. S. (2006) Business Research Methods. New Yor, NY, USA. McGraw Hill Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (2014). Corporate Social Responsibility . London: Routledge .

Creyer, E., & Ross, W. (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: do consumers really care about business ethics? . Journal of consumer marketing, pp. 421-432.

Currás-Pérez, Bigné-Alcañiz, E., & Alvarado-Herrera, A. (2009). The Role of Self-Definitional Principles in Consumer Identification with a Socially Responsible Company. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 547-564.

Czech Invest. (2016). Automotive Industry. Retrieved from Czech Invest:

http://www.czechinvest.org/en/1automotive-industry

Davies, M., & Huges, N. (2014). Doing a successful research project - using qualitative or quantitative methids.

Hampshire: Palgarve Macmillian.

DJSI. (2017). About us . Retrieved from Sustainability Indices: http://www.sustainability-indices.com/

51

Dodd, Supa. (2011). Understanding the Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility in Consumer Purchase Intention. Public Relations Journal , pp. 1-19.

Dowling, G. (2016). Defining and Measuring Corporate Reputation. European Academy of Management, pp.

207-223.

Dvorakova, Z., & Bright, E. (2013). CSR in the Czech Republic: A local experience. WEI International Academic Conference Proceedings (pp. 83-84). Antalya, Turkey : The West East Institute.

Elster, J. (1986). Rational Choice . New York, USA : NYU Press.

EnviroMedia Social Marketing . (2016). About greenwashing. Retrieved from Greenwashing index:

http://greenwashingindex.com/about-greenwashing/

European Commision . (2017). Economic performance by country . Retrieved from European Commision : https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/file_import/03_cz_scp_en_4.pdf

European Union. (2016). Directive 2006/114/EC concerning misleading and comparative advertising.

Retrieved from European Commision: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=URISERV:l32010

Evans, T., & Beesley, M. (1978). Corporate Social Reponsibility - A Reassesement . Guildford, Surrey: Croom Helm Ltd.

Fombrun, C. (2005b). Building Corporate Reputation Through CSR Initiatives: Evolving Standards. Corporate Reputation Review, pp. 7-11.

Fombrun, C. (1996). Reputation: Realizing value from the corporate image. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

Fombrun, C. & Foss, C. (2005). The Reputation Quotient, Part 1: Developing a Reputation Quotient. The Gauge.

Fombrun, C., Ponzi, L., & Newburry, W. (2015). Stakeholder Tracking and Analysis: The RepTrack System for Measuring Corporate Reputation. Corporate Reputation Review, pp. 3-24.

Freeman, E. (2009). Managing For Stakeholders. In T. Beauchamp, Bowie & Arnold, Ethical Theory and Business (p. 56). New Jersey : Pearson.

Freeman, I., & Hasnaoui, A. (Springer 2010). The Meaning of Cosporate Social Responsibility: The Vision of Four Nations. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 419 - 443.

Gatti, L., Caruana, A., & Snehota, I. (2012). The role of corporate social responsibility, perceived quality and corporate reputation on purchase intention: Implications for brand management . Journal of Brand Management , pp. 65-76.

Gaudencio, P., Coelho, A., & Ribeiro, N. (2014). ORGANISATIONAL CSR PRACTICES: EMPLOYEES’ PERCEPTIONS AND IMPACT ON INDIVIDUAL PERFORMANCE. International Journal of Innovational Management , pg.

26.

GRI. (2017). About us . Retrieved from GRI : https://www.globalreporting.org/information/about-gri/Pages/default.aspx

Henderson, D. (2001). Misguided virtue - False notion of Corporate Social Reponsibility. London : Hobart paper 142 .

Hopkins, M. (2003). The Planetary Bargain - CSR Matters. London: Earthscan.

Hopkins, M. (2007). Corporate Social Reposnsibility and International Development. London: Earthscan.

Hyundai. (2017). About Hyundai - finnacial information. Retrieved from Hyundai:

https://www.hyundai.com/worldwide/en/about-hyundai/ir/financial-information/financial-highlights/annual

Ind, N. (1992). Corporate Image: Strategies for effective identity programess. London: Kogan Page.

Jamali, D. (2006). Insights into triple bottom line integration from a learning organization perspective.

Business Process Management Journal , pp. 809-821.

Jindrichovska, I., & Purcarea, I. (2011). CSR and environmental reporting in the Czech Republic and Romania:

Country Comparison of Rules and Practices . Accounting and Management Information Systems, pp. 202-227.

52

JING, & Wang. (2007). A study on the signaling mechanism of corporate reputation . IEEE Xlore, pp. 3277-3280.

Jonikas, D. (2014). Value created through CSR measurement possibilities. 19th International Scientific Conference; Economics and Management 2014, ICEM 2014, 23-25, (pp.189-193). Riga.

Kapoor, S., & Sandhu, S. (2010). Does it Pay to be Socially Responsible? An Empirical Examination of Corporate Social Responsibility on Financial Performance. Global Business Review, pp. 185-208.

Karaosman, H. (2015, 07 13). Consumers' response to CSR in a cros-cultural setting. Cogent business and management , pp. 1-18.

Khojastehpour, M., & Johns, R. (2014). The effect of environmental CSR issues in corporate/brans reputation and corporate profitability. European Business Review, pp. 330-339.

Ki-Hoon, L., & Dongyoung, S. (2010). Consumers’ responses to CSR activities: The linkage between increased awareness and purchase intention. Public Relations Review, pp. 193-195.

Kim, H., Hur & Yeo, J. (2015). Corporate Brand Trust as a mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception if CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy and Corporate Reputation. Sustainability - Open Access, pp. 3683-3694.

Kim, Y. (2014). Strategic communication of corporate social responsibility (CSR): Effects of stated motives and corporate reputationon shareholder responses. Public Relation Rewiev, pp. 838-840.

Klub Zaměstnavatelů . (2016). Ocenění. Retrieved from Klub zaměstnavatelů:

http://www.klubzamestnavatelu.cz/cenu-sodexo-za-diverzitu-ma-ceska-televize-za-peci-o-zdravi-byla-ocenena-skoda-auto/know-how/

Kolodinsky, R. W., Madden, T. M., Zisk, D. S., & Henkel, E. T. (2010). Attitudes About Corporate Social Responsibility: Business Student Predictors. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 167-181.

Kotler, P. (1997). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planningm Implementation and Control. Prentice Hall . Kotler, P., & Lee, N. (2004). Corporate Social Responsbility. New Jersey : Wiley .

Lewis, S. (2003, 01 17). Reputation and corporate responsibility. Journal of Communication Management, pp.

356-365.

Lin, Chen, Chiu, C.-K., & Lee (2011). Understanding Purchase Intention During Product-Harm Crises. Journal Business of Ethics, pp. 455-471.

Maylor, H.; Blackmon, K. (2005). Researching Business and Management. Hampshire, New York. Palgarve McMillian

McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective.

Academy of Management Review, pp. 117-127.

Melé, D. (2008). Integrating ethics into management. Journal of Business Ethics, pp. 291-297.

Moor, L. (2007). The Rise of Brands. New York, NY, USA: Berg Publisher.

Morwitza, V. G., Steckela, J., & Guptab, A. (2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, pp. 347-364.

Mutch, N., & Aitken, R. (2009). Being Fair and being seen to be fair: Corporate Reputation and CSR partnership . Australasian Marketing Journal, pp. 92-98.

Odriozola, M., & Baraibar-Diez, E. (2017). Is Corporate Reputation Associates with Quality of CSR Reporting?

Evidence from Spain. Corporate Social Reponsibility and Environmental Management, pp. 121-132.

Oppenheim, A. (1992) Questionnaire Design, interviewing and attitude measurement. London. Continuum.

OECD. (2017). Czech Republic. Retrieved from OECD Data: https://data.oecd.org/czech-republic.htm Page, G., & Fearn, H. (2005). Corporate Reputation: What do consumers really care about? . Journal of

Advertising Research, pp. 305-315.

Pava, M., & Krausz, J. (1996). Corporate Social Responsibility and financial performance: The paradox of social cost . Westport: CR: Quorum Books.

Peréz, A. (2015). Corporate reputation and CSR reporting to stakeholders: Gaps in literature and future lines of research . Corporate Communications, pp. 11-29.

Poolthong, Y., & Mandhachitara, R. (2009). Customer expectations of CSR, perceived service quality and brand effect in Thai retail banking. International Journal of Bank Marketing, pp. 408-427.

53

Porter, M., & Kremer, M. (2006). Strategy and Society: The Link Between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility. Harvard Business Review .

Pragulic. (2017). Pragulic. Retrieved from City tours with homeless people: http://pragulic.cz/

Quinlan, C. (2011). Business Research Methods. United Kingdom: South-Western CENGAGE Learning . Riches, C., & Stalker, P. (2016). The Czech Republic . V A Guide to Countries of the World (4th. vyd.). Oxford,

UK : Oxford University Press. Retrieved from

http://www.oxfordreference.com.libaccess.hud.ac.uk/view/10.1093/acref/9780191803000.001.0001/

acref-9780191803000-e-0057

Roberts, R. (1992). DETERMINANTS OF CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DISCLOSURE: AN APPLICATION OF STAKEHOLDER THEORY. Accounting, Organizations and Society, pp. 595-612.

Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2016). Research Methods For Business Students (7. ed.). Harlow, England: Pearson Education Limited.

Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. & Korschun, D. (2006). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Strenghtening Multiplne Stakeholder Relationship: A Field Experiment. Journal of the Marketing Academy Science, pp.

158-166.

Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for High Quality products as Returns to Reputations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, pp. 659-679.

Schlosser, A. E. (2003). Experiencing Products in the Virtual World: The Role of Goal and Imagery in Influencing Attitudes versus Purchase Intentions. Journal of Consumer Research, pp. 184-198.

Schweiger, M. (2004). Components and Parameters of Corporate Reputation . Schmalenbach Business Review, pp. 46-71.

Siano, A., Vollero, A., Conte, F., & Amabile, S. (2016, 10 31). 'More than words': Expanding the taxonomy of greenwashing after tge Volkswagen scandal. Journal of Business Research , pp. 27-37.

Skoda Auto a.s. (2015). Sustanability Report . Mladá Boleslav: Skoda Auto a.s.

Skoda Auto a.s. (2017). About us: Skoda Auto a.s. Viewed: 28. 03 2017, from Skoda Auto a.s.:

http://www.skoda.co.uk/about-us

Skoda Auto a.s. (2017). Skoda aunnual Report. Viewed 28. 03 2017, z Skoda Auto a.s.: http://www.skoda- auto.com/SiteCollectionDocuments/company/investors/annual-reports/en/skoda-annual-report-2016.pdf

Smith, N. C., Read, D., & Lopez-Rodriguez, S. (2010). Consumer perceptions of corporate social responsibility:

the CSR halo effect . INSEAD Working Paper Series .

Sobczak, A., Debucquet, G., & Havard, C. (2006). The impact of higher education on studets' and young managers' perception of companies and CSR: an exaploratory analysis. Corporate Governance, pp. 463-474.

Teng, L. (2007). A comparison of two types of price discounts in shifting consumers' attitudes. Journal of Business Research, pp. 14-21.

Union, E. (2016). Europa. Retrieved from The Czech Republic - overview: http://europa.eu/european-union/about-eu/countries/member-countries/czechrepublic_en

WEBHOUSE . (2017). Official web page of Mladá Bolselav. Retrieved from Mladá Boleslav: http://www.mb-net.cz/

Wolkswagen Group . (2017). Volkswagen Group. Retrieved from About us:

http://www.volkswagen.co.uk/about-us

Wongpitch, S., Minakan, N., Powpaka, S., & Laohavichien, T. (2016). Effect of corporate social responsibility motives on purchase intention model: An extension. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, pp. 30-37.

Zdrahalova, H. (3. 3 2015). Forum . Retrieved from The magazine of the Charles' Univerzity:

http://iforum.cuni.cz/IFORUM-15573.html

Zyglidopoulos, S. C. (2001). The impacts of Accidents on Firm's Reputation for Social Performance. Business and Society, pp. 416-441.

54 9. APPENDIXES

9.1. Appendix 1: Table of Research Research

Question:

Hypothesis: Variable Reference Objective:

How does the

Main RQ: How does the perceived Corporate Social Responsibility affect the perceived Corporate Reputation and how does it influence customers purchase intention?

Main objective: Examine how perceived corporate social responsibility and perceived corporate reputation affect purchase intention.

Aim of this paper is to examine how are the purchase intentions of customers affected by the perceived corporate social responsibility and perceived corporate reputation.

55 9.2. Appendix 2: The Ethical Form

University of Huddersfield The Business School

STUDENT PROJECT / DISSERTATION ETHICAL REVIEW

APPLICABLE TO ALL UNDERGRADUATE AND POSTGRADUATE TAUGHT PROGRAMMES

Please complete and return via email to your Project / Dissertation Supervisor along with the required documents (shown below)

Before completing this section please consult the ‘Ethics Policy and Procedures’ section on Blackboard. Students should consult the appropriate ethical guidelines. The student’s supervisor is responsible for advising the student on appropriate professional judgement in this review.

SECTION A: TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STUDENT

Project Title: An Investigative study of the role of Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Reputation in Purchase Intention in the Czech Republic

Student name: Jana Dumkova

Student number: U1672023

Course: BHS0001-1617 ‘Business Dissertation: Methods and Implementations’

Supervisor: Maha Alshaghroud

Proposed start date of data collection

12/04/2017

56

SECTION B: PROJECT OUTLINE (TO BE COMPLETED IN FULL BY THE STUDENT)

Issue Please provide sufficient detail for your supervisor to assess strategies used to address ethical issues in the research proposal.

Aim / objectives of the study These need to be clearly stated and in accord with the title of the study.

(Sensitive subject areas which might involve distress to the participants will be referred to the Ethics Committee Representative).

Aim of this paper is to examine how perceived corporate social responsibility and perceived corporate reputation affect purchase intention of customers.

Research methodology

The methodology needs to be explained in sufficient detail to show the approach used (e.g. survey) and explain the research methods to be used during the study.

Data for this research are collected through an online survey. Further the data will be analysed in SPSS program, using correlation, precisely Pearson’s coefficient in order to evaluate the relationship of CSR and Corporate reputation, corporate reputation and purchase intention and lastly the CSR and purchase

Please outline who will participate in your research. You should comment explicitly about whether your participants are able to offer informed consent. If your research involves vulnerable groups (e.g.

children, adults with learning disabilities), it must be referred to an Ethics Committee member.

Present students of universities in the Czech Republic are the target group of this research, including all kinds of focus of studies e.g. Business, technological, pedagogy, etc.

Measures researched are based on respondents’

perception and thus no further knowledge is required.

57 Access to participants

Please give details about how participants will be identified and contacted.

The survey will be distributed through internet, using Facebook pages of the Universities. Also the method of snowballing is used, when friends distribute this questionnaire to their friends and University pages.

How will your data be recorded and stored?

Data will be collected and stored electronically.

Distribution channels used will be Facebook. However, data will be collected through electronic online questionnaires, created on google.forms.com. The data will be then stored also electronically, by the google.forms.com and a password is required, when a person needs to access them.

Confidentiality

Please outline the level of confidentiality you will offer respondents and how this will be respected. You should also outline who will have access to the data and how it will be stored. (This information should be included on

‘Information Sheet’.)

Access to the data will have the person data collecting, Jana Dumkova, who will ensure that no information will be published about identifiable respondents. Thus this questionnaire is absolutely confidential. Further, there are no information that would be requested, which would lead to respondents’ identification and it is also anonymous.

Anonymity

If you offer your participants anonymity, please indicate how this will be achieved.

No need of identification is needed when answering.

Therefore no questions asking name, birth date, email address or IP address are used. Thus nobody can identify data provided.

Could the research induce psychological stress or anxiety, cause harm or negative consequences for the participants (beyond the risks encountered in normal life)? If yes, you should outline what support there will be for participants.

No, it could not.

Retrospective applications. If your application for Ethics approval is retrospective, please explain why this has arisen.

58

SECTION C – SUMMARY OF ETHICAL ISSUES (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STUDENT)

Please give a summary of the ethical issue and any action that will be taken to address the issue(s).

SECTION D – ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE STUDENT)

Please supply to your supervisor copies of all relevant supporting documentation electronically. If this is not available electronically, please provide an explanation and supply hard copy

I have included the following documents

Information sheet Yes Not applicable

Consent form Yes Not applicable

Letters Yes Not applicable

Final version of questionnaire Yes Not applicable

Interview schedule / questions Yes Not applicable

SECTION E: STUDENT STATMENT

I confirm that the information I have given in this form on ethical issues is correct. Please tick the box to confirm.

Student Name Date

59

SECTION F: STATEMENT BY SUPERVISOR AND RECOMMENDATION ON THE PROJECT’S ETHICAL STATUS

I have read the information above and I can confirm that, to the best of my understanding, the information presented by the student is correct and appropriate to allow an informed judgement on whether further ethical approval is required. Please tick the box to confirm x

Supervisor Name Date 19 /04/2017

Having satisfied myself of the accuracy of the project’s ethical statement, I believe that the appropriate action is:

The project proceeds in its present form x

The project proposal needs further assessment with the Ethics Committee representatives

The project needs to be returned to the student for reworking

This form should be submitted to the nominated course team.

60 9.3. Appendix 3: Questionnaire

61

62

63

64

65

66

Related documents