Tryckta källor

Banister D. (2008) The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport

Policy, 15 (2008) 73-80. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005

Bornemark, J. (2018). Det omätbaras renässans: en uppgörelse med

pedanternas världsherravälde. (Första upplagan). Stockholm: Volante. Boverkets byggregler. (SFS 2011:6). Karlskrona: Näringsdepartemen-

tet.

Boverkets föreskrifter och allmänna råd om tillgänglighet och an- vändbarhet för personer med nedsatt rörelse- eller orienteringsförmåga på allmänna platser och inom områden för andra anläggningar än byggnader.

(SFS 2004:15). Karlskrona: Näringsdepartementet.

Church, A., Frost, M. & Sullivan, K. (2000) Transport and social exclusion in London, Transport Policy, 7. 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0967-070X(00)00024-X

Cloke, P.J. (red.) (2004). Practising human geography. London: SAGE.

Çolak, T., Bamaç, B., Aydin, M., Meriç, B.,& Özbek, A. (2004). Physical fitness levels of blind and visually impaired goalball team players.

Isokinetics and Exercise Science 12, 247–252

Crampton, J. (1994). “Cartography defining moment: The Peters projection controversy, 1974–1990.”; Cartographica: The International

Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 31(4), 16-32. doi:

10.3138/1821-6811-L372-345P

Cresswell, J. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.) Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Cresswell, T. (2010). Towards a politics of mobility. Environment

and Planning D: Society and Space, volume 28, pages 17 - 31. doi: https://

doi.org/10.1068/d11407

Denscombe, M. (2014). The good research guide: for small-scale

social research projects. (5th ed.) Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill/Open

University Press.

De Vos, J. (2018). Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satis- faction. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117, 261-274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.034

Dijst, M. Rietveld, P. & Steg, L. (2013). Individual needs, opportuni- ties and travel behaviour: a multidisciplinary perspective based on psycho- logi, economics and geography, i Wee, B.V., Annema, J.A. & Banister, D. (red.), The transport system and transport policy: an introduction. 19.-50. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Diskrimineringslag. (2008:567). Stockholm: Arbetsmarknadsdeparte-

mentet

Eisenhardt. K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. The Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532-550. doi: 10.2307/258557

Eriksson, D., & Svensson, G. (2015). Elements affecting social responsibility in supply chains. Supply Chain Management, 20(5), 561–566. https://doi-org.proxy.mau.se/10.1108/SCM-06-2015-0203

Farrington, J. (2007). The new narrative of accessibility: Its potential contribution to discourses in (transport) geography. Journal of Transport

Geography, 15(5), 319-330. doi: 10.1016/j.trangeo.2006.11.007

Jackson, A. J. (2011). Mobility and access to transport issues as experienced by people with vision impairment living in urban and rural Ireland. Disabili-

ty & Rehabilitation, 33(12), 979–988. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2010.516786

Geurs, K., & Ritsema van Eck, J. (2001). Accessibility measures:

Review and applications. Evaluation of accessibility impacts of land-use transportation scenarios, and related social and economic impact. Utrecht,

the Netherlands, RIVM.

Gregory, D., Johnston, R., Pratt, G., Watts, M.J., Whatmore, S. (2009). The dictionary of human geography. (5th ed.) Malden, MA: Wi- ley-Blackwell.

HAKO-utredningen (1976). Handikappanpassad kollektivtrafik: sam-

mandrag av SOU 1975:76 = Adapting public transport for the handicapped : a summary of the report in Swedish SOU 1975:76 = Den Behinderten angepasster öffentlicher Verkehr : Zusammenfassung des Staatlichen Erhe- bungsberichts SOU 1975:76. Stockholm: LiberFörlag/Allmänna förlag

Hakobyan, L., Lumsden, J., O’Sullivan, D., & Bartlett, H. (2013). ”

Mobile assistive technologies for the visually impaired”. Elsevier Volume

58(6), 513-528. doi: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2012.10.004

Hannam, K., Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2006) Editorial: Mo- bilities, Immobilities and Moorings, Mobilities, 1(1), 1-22, doi: 10.1080/17450100500489189

Hine, J., & Mitchell, F. (2016). Transport disadvantage and social

exclusion : exclusionary mechanisms in transport in urban Scotland. Lon-

don : Routledge, 2016.

Holloway, L., & Hubbard, P. (2001). People and place : the extraordi- nary geographies of everyday life. Harlow : Prentice Hall, 2001

K2, Nationellt kunskapscentrum för kollektivtrafik (2018). Vilken

framtid har bussen?: omvärldsanalys inom ramen för projektet Buss 2030.

[Lund]: K2, Nationellt kunskapscentrum för kollektivtrafik.

Kvale, S.,& Brinkmann, S. (2009). Den kvalitativa forskningsinter-

vjun (andra upplagan). Lund: Studentlitteratur.

Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research

interviewing. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

Kenyon, K., (2003). Understanding social exclusion and social inclusion. Municipal Engineer 156 (Issue ME2), 97–104. doi: 10.1680/ muen.2003.156.2.97

Krizek, J.K., Hornig, J. & El-Geneidy, A. (2012). Perceptions of ac- cessibility to retail and other public services, I Geurs, K (red,), Accessibility

Analysis and Transport Planning Challenges for Europe and North America.

(s. 96-117). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar

Lag om handikappanpassad kollektivtrafik (1979:558). Stockholm:

Näringsdepartementet

Levitas, R., Pantazis, C., Fahmy, E., Gordon, D., Lloyd, E.,& Patsios, D. (2007). The multidimensional analysis of social exclusion. Department of Sociology and School for Social Policy, Townsend Centre for the Internatio- nal Study of Poverty and Bristol Institute for Public Affairs. Bristol, Univer- sity of Bristol.

Levy, C. (2013). Travel choice reframed: “deep distribution” and gender in urban transport, Environment & Urbanization. 25(1): 47–63. doi: 10.1177/0956247813477810

Lindqvist, R., & Lundälv, J. (2012). Participation in Work Life and Access to Public Transport – Lived Experiences of People with Disabilities in Sweden. Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 18(2), 148- 155. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jrc.2012.15

Longley, P., Goodchild, M.F., Maguire, D.J. & Rhind, D. (2011).

John Wiley & sons

Lucas, K. (2012). Transport and social exclusion: where are we know? Transport Policy, 20, 105-113

Lättman, K., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. (2016). Perceived Accessibi-

lity of Public Transport as a Potential Indicator of Social Inclusion. Social

Inclusion (ISSN: 2183-2803) 4 (3), 36-45 doi: 10.17645/si.v4i3.481 Lättman, K. (2018). Perceived accessibility, living a satisfactory

life with help of the transport system. (Doktorsavhandling, Karlstad uni-

versitet). Hämtad från http://kau.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1258116/ FULLTEXT01.pdf

Lättman, K., Friman, M., & Olsson, L. (2018). A new approach to accessibility – Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel. Research in Transportation Econo-

mics, Volume 69, 501-511. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.002

Malterud, K. (2009). Kvalitativ metod i medicinsk forskning. Lund: Studentlitteratur

Mc Cracken G. (1988). The long interview. Qualitative Research

Methods. London: Sage Publications

Morris, J.M., Dumble, P.L., & Wigan, M.R. (1979). Accessibility in- dicators for transport planning. Transportation research, 13(2), 91- 109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-2607(79)90012-8

Nikolaeva, A. Adey, P. Cresswell, T. Lee, J. Y. Nóvoa, A. & Teme- nos, C. (2019). Commoning mobility: Towards a new politics of mobility transitions. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi. org/10.1111/tran.12287

Parkhurst, G., & Meek, S. (2014). The effectiveness of park-and-ride as a policy measure for more sustainable mobility. Transport and sustainabi-

lity, 5(5), 185- 211. doi: 10.1108/S2044-994120140000005020

Patel, R & Davidson, B. (2011). Forskningsmetodikens grunder: Att

planera, genomföra och rapportera en undersökning. Lund: Studentlittera-

tur.

Pelli, D. G. (1987). The Visual Requirements of Mobility. Berlin: Springer Verlag

Plan- och bygglag. (2010:900) Stockholm: Näringsdepartementet

Pooley, C. (2016). Mobility, Transport and Social Inclusion: Les- sons from History. Social Inclusion, 4 (3), 100-109. doi: http://dx.doi. org/10.17645/si.v4i3.461

Pred, A., (1977). The choreography of existence: comments on Häg- gerstrand´s time-geography and its usefulness. Economic Geography, 53, 207-221

Redman, L., Friman, M., Gärling, T., & Hartig, T. (2013). Quality att- ributes of public transport that attract car users: A research review. Transport

Policy, 25, 119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.11.005

Salive, M. E., Guralnik, J. , Glynn, R. J., Christen, W. , Wallace, R. B. and Ostfeld, A. M. (1994). Association of Visual Impairment with Mobi- lity and Physical Function. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42, 287-292. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1994.tb01753.x

Scheepers, C., Wendel-Vos, G., van Kempen, E., de Hollander, E., van Wijnen, H., Maas, J., & Schuit, A. (2016). Perceived accessibility is an important factor in transport choice — Results from the AVENUE project.

Journal Of Transport & Health, 396-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2016.01.003

Schiller, P.L., Bruun, E.C. & Kenworthy, J.R. (2010). An introduction

to sustainable transportation: policy, planning and implementation. London:

Earthscan.

port Policy, 15, 127-137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.002

Svensson, E. (2012). Bygg ikapp: för ökad tillgänglighet och använd-

barhet för personer med funktionsnedsättning. Stockholm: Svensk bygg-

tjänst

Swenor, K., Simonsick, E., Ferrucci, L., Newman, A., Rubin, S., & Wilson, V. (2015). Visual Impairment and Incident Mobility Limitations: The Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. The American Geriatrics

Society, 63 (1) 46-54. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13183

Thackara, J. (2015). How to thrive in the next economy: designing

tomorrow’s world today. London: Thames and Hudson.

Thurén, T. (2007). Vetenskapsteori för nybörjare. (2., uppl.) Stock- holm: Liber.

Tuan, Y. (1974). Space and Place: Humanistic Perspective. Progress

in Human Geography, 6:233–46

Ureta, S. (2008). To move or not to move? Social exclusion, acces- sibility and daily mobility among the low-income population in Santiago, Chile. Mobilities, 3(2), 269-289. doi: 10.1080/17450100802095338

Wong, S. (2018). The limitations of using activity space measure- ments for representing the mobilities of individuals with visual impairment: A mixed methods case study in the San Francisco Bay Area. Journal of

Transport Geography, 66, 300–308. doi: https://doi-org.ludwig.lub.lu.

se/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.12.004