• No results found

Feasibility of a multi-sensor data fusion method for assessment of Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Feasibility of a multi-sensor data fusion method for assessment of Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

Feasibility of a multi-sensor data fusion method for assessment of

Parkinson’s disease motor symptoms

Email: Saa@du.se; Tel: +46 23 778592 +46 720316706;

Somayeh Aghanavesi

1,*

, Filip Bergquist

2

, Dag Nyholm

3

, Marina Senek

3

, Mevludin Memedi

4

Conclusions:

Temporal irregularity score (TIS) was able to differenciate spiral drawings drawn by patients in different stages of disease from healthy controls.

TIS was somewhat responsive to single-dose levodopa treatment.

TIS had good test-retest reliability.

TIS is an upper limb high-frequency based measure that can not be detected during clinincal assessment.

Three machine learning methods of support vector machines, decision trees, and linear regression (LR) were employed.

Validity of the scores from machine learning methods to TRS were examined by Pearson correlation coef�icients (R) and root mean squared error (RMSE).

Test-retest reliability of the methods during baseline measurements were examined by intra-class correlation coef�icient (ICCs) and their 95% con�idence intervals (CI). Responsiveness of the scores from machine learning methods to levodopa effects was assessed by calculating the effect sizes [2]. Background: Methods:

Results:

Conclusions:

1 Computer Engineering, School of Technology and Business Studies, Dalarna University, 2 Dept. of Pharmacology, University of Gothenburg, 3 Dept. of Neuroscience, Neurology, Uppsala University, 4 Informatics, Business School, O�rebro University, References: [1] M. Senek, S. M. Aquilonius, H. Askmark, F. Bergquist, R. Constantinescu, A. Ericsson, et al., "Levodopa/carbidopa microtablets in Parkinson's disease: a study of pharmacokinetics and blinded motor assessment," Eur J Clin Pharmacol, vol. 73, pp. 563-571, May 2017. [2] C. G. Goetz, G. T. Stebbins, K. A. Chung, R. A. Hauser, J. M. Miyasaki, A. P. Nicholas, et al., "Which dyskinesia scale best detects treatment response?," Mov Disord, vol. 28, pp. 341-6, Mar 2013. Objective:

To assess the feasibility of measuring Parkinson’s disease (PD) motor symptoms with a multi-sensor data fusion method.

More speci�ically, the aim is to assess validity, reliability and responsiveness of the methods to treatment.

Data from 19 advanced PD patients (mean age: 71.4, mean years with PD: 9.7, mean years with levodopa: 9.5) were collected

in a single center, open label, single dose clinical trial [1].

PD patients performed three tests of leg agility, hand rotation, and walking. Data from hands while walking were also collected.

The tasks were performed starting from baseline, at the time of morning dose (150% of the normal levodopa equivalent dose), and at

follow-up time points until the medication wore off.

Movement disorder experts rated the videos of PD patients on six items of UPDRS-III motor section, treatment response scale (TRS),

and dyskinesia.

Scores from multi-modal motion sensors: • Are useful for automatic quanti�ication of Parkinson's disease (PD) motor symptoms severity. • Can be used to measure the changes in motor symptoms related to Treatment Response Scale.

Validity: LR was the best performing method when using the fusion of the feature sets (R = 0.95; RMSE = 0.34).

Time- and wavelet- domain based features were calculated for each dataset. The feature sets were then combined resulting

in a fusion set. Using stepwise method, most important features were selected and used in machine learning methods.

Test-retest reliability:

Responsiveness: The effect sizes from LR-based scores were

responsive to Levodopa treatment changes.

TRS LR-based scores ICC 0.82 0.82 CI 0.53-0.94 0.52-0.94

Validity of LR-based method to other clinical ratings was

further examined.

UPDRS #23 UPDRS #25 UPDRS #26 UPDRS #27 UPDRS #29 UPDRS #31 Dyskinesia LR-based

scores

(R,RMSE) (0.71; 0.42) (0.70; 0.46) (0.73; 0.46) (0.64; 0.29) (0.85; 0.29) (0.89; 0.32) (0.86; 0.31)

Classi�ication accuracy of LR method to seperate patients and healthy controls was 84%.

References

Related documents

Om det exempelvis finns ett familjebolag, och företagsägaren vill att bolaget ska behållas inom familjen men inte hinner upprätta ett testamente till förmån för bröstarvingarna,

Vid tidigare insamling av data för egentillverkade artiklar från fallföretaget fick författarna fram artiklarnas grad av kundanpassning samt vart de var placerade utifrån

Då revisorns identifikation med revisionsbyrån, klientföretaget eller professionen har betydelse för i vilken grad revisorn utvecklar relationer och nätverk inom dessa grupper

Kiwimaterial. Det funkar, men bilderna i Kiwiböckerna är mycket detaljrika och inspirerande för att bjuda in till diskussion, något som kan vara svårt att hitta i andra

Comparison of (a) mean (SD) absolute muscle masses and (b) mean (SD) muscle masses relative to lean body mass between two groups (small (S), large (L)) of 12 weeks old broiler

Bullerdämpning av externt industribuller från livsmedelsindustri och hamnar 51 Om bullret från fläkten innehåller stor andel lågfrekvent buller, så ökar problemen vid

växelargument. This process is clearly dependent on the judgement of the individual doing the data reduction. This means that, starting with the same raw data, two different

Under beaktande av ovan sammanställda virkeskostnader, urläggs- och avkapsandelar och intäkter från försäljning av urläggsvirke och flis uppgår således virkeskostnadema