• No results found

Grand Valley Unit Negative Determination

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

Share "Grand Valley Unit Negative Determination"

Copied!
1
0
0

Loading.... (view fulltext now)

Full text

(1)

UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT

of

the

INTERIOR

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *news

release

BUREAU OF RECLAMATIOll

Grand Junction, Colorado

(Rinckel (303) 243-4992)

FOR IMMEDJ ATE RELEASE

GRAND VALLEY tmiT NEGATIVE DETER}UNATION

AVAILA!ILE TO THE PUBLIC

July 27, 1978

A Nec::d~ 1\r~c~. ar"l!

•*

s ,.1JiP'b -:.;U. I~a-c~ S-tage On& of th.: Grand

Valley U.tit of the Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Project has been released by the Bure~tu of Reclamation. The negative detenaination, which ia available for public review at the Western Colorado Projects Office, 764 Horizon Drive, Grand J etion 81501, addresses only the impacts of Stage One which includes lining of 6. 7 ml!CS

or

canal and construction of 29.7 :Iiles of piped laterals in the Grand \'lllley._ColDn.dD. The unit is part of the Colorado River Water Quality Improve-:qenc--Trograll!. A "Final Envirowoental Statement, FES 77-15, on the entire program --~was filt:d with the Council on Environmental Quality on May 19, 1977.

The determination satisfies requirements of the National Environmental Policy

~t and clears the way for construction activities. Any further development of the Grand Valley Unit, which tentative:iy includes an additional 178 miles of canal and 420 uiles of laterals, -~11 be dependent upon data received from the monitoring programs to be undertaken in the Stage One area. If monitoring results are favor

-able, impacts of the remainder of the unit will be addressed in draft and final environmental statements which ""ill be prepared b~::for~decision is ude on any

further construction.

The 3rand Valley Unit has been planned to reduce and control salinity levels

in the COlorado River by implementation of a three part program: improvement of

uaior irziant.'n, system~ r~ rndnce sa:epa~d ;>rcvent t.~tc:- lo:::ccs thrc~gh

improved management control, scientific scheduling of irrigation events to

minimize sali nity contributions, and improvement of on- farm irrigation facilities

to reduce &ePpage and provide controlled water m~nagement.

Stage One, which covers approximately 10 percent of the project area, is designed to pro·.ride information to fully analyze the effectiveness o! the proposed plan. Stage One will be constructed and monitored to determine whether the

reminder of the unit would be an effective and appropriate aetbod of salinity control.

References

Related documents

The traditional approach to testing for structural change in, for example, the mean or variance of time series employs retrospective tests, where a historical data

p. The problem was then how to utilize the efficient estimators of the linear model when p is unknown. Since uncertain hypothetical information about p might

An approach not often used in a financial setting is statistical surveillance, which deals with the theory and methodology of online detection of an

An overview of statistical optimality issues and statistical measures for evaluation of prospective surveillance will be given.. Timeliness and the control of false alarms

The non-informative prior results in a constant alarm limit, whereas the empirical prior has an extremely high alarm limit at early time points, resulting in few

The smaller the size of the shift (111), the larger the delay and the larger the impact of ED on E[U(tA, 't)] as compared to the impact ofEFA. Thus for very small shifts, the

However, for severe cases of IUGR, the ability to save a foetus is small for early time points.z 5 Therefore, it could be argued that the false alarm distribution

Therefore, in the present simulation study, the evaluation period (t=I) starts 4 time points after the last turning point of the estimation period. Knowledge of whether